USPTO Examiner ALSOMAIRY SARAH ABDOALATIF - Art Unit 1642

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17053328Role of PVT1 in the Diagnosis and Treatment of MYC-Driven CancerNovember 2020August 2023Allow3321YesNo
17066711HER2-TARGETING ANTIGEN BINDING MOLECULES COMPRISING 4-1BBLOctober 2020December 2023Allow3921NoNo
16982330COMBINATION OF ANTI-HGFR ANTIBODY AND HEGFR FOR THE TREATMENT OF A TUMOR AND/OR METASTASISSeptember 2020July 2023Allow3411NoNo
16979469COMBINATION TREATMENT OF CHEMORESISTANT CANCERSSeptember 2020September 2023Allow3630NoNo
17010622BISPECIFIC EGFR/CD16 ANTIGEN-BINDING PROTEINSeptember 2020July 2022Allow2201NoNo
17005734Combination Therapies Comprising Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone and Their UsesAugust 2020July 2022Abandon2201NoNo
17004555METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF AN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASEAugust 2020May 2023Allow3331YesNo
16975625DIAGNOSTIC METHODS USING ANTI-MUC1* ANTIBODIESAugust 2020December 2023Allow4001NoNo
16997581B7-H4 ANTIBODY DOSING REGIMENSAugust 2020December 2022Abandon2810NoNo
16968677ANTI-PD-1/ANTI-VEGF NATURAL ANTIBODY STRUCTURE LIKE HETERODIMERIC FORM BISPECIFIC ANTIBODY AND PREPARATION THEREOFAugust 2020July 2023Allow3611NoNo
16967288FIBROBLAST BINDING AGENTS AND USE THEREOFAugust 2020September 2023Allow3821NoNo
16944292ANTIBODIES BINDING TO GPRC5DJuly 2020November 2022Abandon2801NoNo
16964900L2A5 ANTIBODY OR FUNCTIONAL FRAGMENT THEREOF AGAINST TUMOUR ANTIGENSJuly 2020February 2022Allow1800NoNo
16928571HIV VACCINES AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USINGJuly 2020August 2023Allow3711YesNo
16960297PD-L1 ANTIBODY, ANTIGEN-BINDING FRAGMENT THEREOF, AND PHARMACEUTICAL USE THEREOFJuly 2020March 2022Allow2001NoNo
16958536TARGETING THE CBM SIGNALOSOME COMPLEX INDUCES REGULATORY T CELLS TO INFLAME THE TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENTJune 2020September 2022Allow2711NoNo
16954002CD19 VARIANTSJune 2020September 2023Allow3931YesNo
16899512MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX (MHC) COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFJune 2020February 2024Abandon4412NoNo
16898248USE OF A CEA CD3 BISPECIFIC ANTIBODY AND A PD-1 AXIS BINDING ANTAGONIST IN A DOSAGE REGIMEN TO TREAT CANCERJune 2020May 2024Abandon4712NoNo
16769544ROBUST PANELS OF COLORECTAL CANCER BIOMARKERSJune 2020October 2022Abandon2901NoNo
16882362CANCER THERAPEUTIC METHODS UTILIZING OPCML FRAGMENTMay 2020August 2023Allow3802NoNo
16881650ANTI-HER2 ANTIBODY OR ANTIGEN-BINDING FRAGMENT THEREOF, AND CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR COMPRISING SAMEMay 2020January 2023Allow3211NoNo
16878308Precision Medicine Method for Cancer ImmunotherapyMay 2020March 2023Abandon3411NoNo
15931726Combination Therapies With Bispecific Anti-EGFR/c-Met Antibodies and Third Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase InhibitorsMay 2020August 2023Allow3941NoNo
16762088METHODS AND MATERIALS FOR IDENTIFYING AND TREATING CANCERS HAVING ELEVATED LEVELS OF PHOSPHORYLATED UBIQUITINMay 2020May 2023Allow3611NoNo
16761404MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY NEO-201 FOR THE TREATMENT OF HUMAN CARCINOMASMay 2020May 2023Allow3630NoNo
16855637COMBINATION THERAPY USING AN IL-20 ANTAGONIST AND AN IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORApril 2020January 2023Allow3311NoNo
16757178COMBINATION PRODUCT FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCERApril 2020October 2023Abandon4221NoNo
16850360Combination Therapies Comprising Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone and Their UsesApril 2020June 2022Abandon2601NoNo
16755686METHODS OF TREATING CANCERSApril 2020April 2022Allow2401NoNo
16754068METHODS FOR TREATING LYMPHOMASApril 2020May 2023Abandon3722YesNo
16648792NOVEL BISPECIFIC CD3/CD19 POLYPEPTIDE COMPLEXESMarch 2020April 2022Allow2510NoNo
16648995NOVEL BISPECIFIC POLYPEPTIDE COMPLEXESMarch 2020August 2023Allow4131YesNo
16646875COMBINATION TREATMENT FOR CANCERMarch 2020October 2023Abandon4340NoNo
16811125USE OF MEGF11 AS DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC BIOMARKER AND THERAPEUTIC TARGET FOR TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCERMarch 2020March 2023Abandon3610NoNo
16640617METHODS FOR DETECTING Na/K-ATPASE-MEDIATED SRC SIGNALING FOR DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS OF CANCERFebruary 2020June 2023Allow3921NoNo
16792115ANTIBODIES THAT BIND TUMOR TISSUE FOR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPYFebruary 2020April 2022Allow2601NoNo
16751144CD38-BINDING PROTEINS COMPRISING DE-IMMUNIZED SHIGA TOXIN A SUBUNIT EFFECTORSJanuary 2020November 2022Allow3311NoNo
16633389METHOD FOR PREDICTING THE RESPONSE OF NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CARCINOMA PATIENTS TO A MEDICAMENTJanuary 2020July 2023Allow4221NoNo
16737950PROSTATE NEOANTIGENS AND THEIR USESJanuary 2020May 2023Allow4011NoNo
16732369ANTIHUMAN PCSK9 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY AND APPLICATION THEREOFJanuary 2020December 2021Allow2401NoNo
16626768METHODS OF TREATING CISPLATIN-RESISTANT CANCER WITH COMBINED CISPLATIN AND LCK INHIBITORDecember 2019May 2023Allow4131NoNo
16625239PERSONALIZED VACCINEDecember 2019January 2024Allow4930YesNo
16721108COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR PROSTATE CANCER ANALYSISDecember 2019June 2024Abandon5441NoNo
16624408Recombinant Bispecific Antibodies to PD-L1 and CTLA-4December 2019April 2022Allow2811NoNo
16719154USE OF IL-1BETA BINDING ANTIBODIESDecember 2019June 2022Abandon2910NoNo
16719273BISPECIFIC ANTI-MUC16 X ANTI-CD28 ANTIBODIES AND USES THEREOFDecember 2019May 2022Allow2911NoNo
16719015BISPECIFIC ANTI-CD28 X ANTI-CD22 ANTIBODIES AND USES THEREOFDecember 2019March 2022Allow2711NoNo
16719220CD70 COMBINATION THERAPYDecember 2019March 2023Allow3931NoNo
16715621TWIN IMMUNE CELL ENGAGERDecember 2019March 2023Allow3921NoNo
16710938BLOOD-BASED TUMOR MUTATION BURDEN PREDICTS OVERALL SURVIVAL IN NSCLCDecember 2019March 2023Abandon3921NoNo
16704679METHODS AND IMMUNOGENIC COMPOSITIONS RELATING TO HER2 WITH SELECTIVE SEQUENCE MODIFICATIONSDecember 2019February 2024Abandon5021NoNo
16698203METHOD FOR DETECTION OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURYNovember 2019September 2023Allow4621NoNo
16616146ANTI-ANGIOGENIC ADENOVIRUSNovember 2019August 2024Abandon5741NoNo
16693060TYPE II ANTI-CD20 ANTIBODY AND ANTI-CD20/CD3 BISPECIFIC ANTIBODY FOR TREATMENT OF CANCERNovember 2019October 2023Abandon4641NoNo
16693056METHODS OF TREATING CANCER WITH COMBINATIONS OF ANTI-CD3 ANTIBODY AND GLUCOCORTICOIDNovember 2019May 2024Abandon5351YesNo
16615231PROTEINS BINDING NKG2D, CD16 AND A TUMOR-ASSOCIATED ANTIGENNovember 2019March 2024Abandon5251NoNo
16605748THERAPEUTIC GENOME EDITING IN WISKOTT-ALDRICH SYNDROME AND X-LINKED THROMBOCYTOPENIAOctober 2019January 2023Allow3911NoNo
16604341ANTI-EGFR/HIGH AFFINITY NK-CELLS COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR CHORDOMA TREATMENTOctober 2019July 2022Abandon3411YesNo
16587405EFFICIENT CRISPR/HDR-MEDIATED KNOCK-IN SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USESeptember 2019November 2022Allow3711NoNo
16491647Compositions and Methods For Treating Cancer with Anti-Renalase antibodies and Anti-PD1 antibodiesSeptember 2019January 2023Abandon4121NoNo
16348696IMMUNOMODULATORY COMPOSITIONS, PROCESSES FOR MAKING THE SAME, AND METHODS FOR INHIBITING CYTOKINE STORMSMay 2019November 2022Abandon4211NoNo
16345210COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCERApril 2019June 2022Abandon3711NoNo
16098817BIOMARKERS SIGNATURE DISCOVERY AND SELECTIONNovember 2018November 2022Abandon4801NoNo
16174769ALGORITHMS FOR DISEASE DIAGNOSTICSOctober 2018May 2024Abandon6020NoNo
15768235ANTI-ROR1 ANTIBODIESApril 2018July 2023Allow6061NoNo
15764870BINDING MOLECULES WITH MODIFIED J-CHAINMarch 2018January 2023Allow5851NoNo
14489182COMPOSITIONS OF A CARBOHYDRATE VACCINE FOR INDUCING IMMUNE RESPONSES AND USES THEREOF IN CANCER TREATMENTSeptember 2014January 2024Allow60120YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner ALSOMAIRY, SARAH ABDOALATIF - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner ALSOMAIRY, SARAH ABDOALATIF works in Art Unit 1642 and has examined 68 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 61.8%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 38 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner ALSOMAIRY, SARAH ABDOALATIF's allowance rate of 61.8% places them in the 23% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by ALSOMAIRY, SARAH ABDOALATIF receive 1.87 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 41% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ALSOMAIRY, SARAH ABDOALATIF is 38 months. This places the examiner in the 28% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +9.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ALSOMAIRY, SARAH ABDOALATIF. This interview benefit is in the 42% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 44% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 42.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 66% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 14.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 8% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 2% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 9.5% of allowed cases (in the 89% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.