USPTO Examiner MUMMERT STEPHANIE KANE - Art Unit 1637

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17256266INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE DIAGNOSTIC METHOD BY MEANS OF BACTERIAL METAGENOMIC ANALYSISDecember 2020April 2024Allow4010NoNo
15733965METHOD OF DETECTING TARGET NUCLEIC ACID USING ROLLING CIRCLE AMPLIFICATION AND COMPOSITION FOR DETECTING TARGET NUCLEIC ACIDDecember 2020January 2023Allow2610NoNo
17057936DENATURATION-ENHANCED DNA MUTATION TESTING FOR LIMITED BIOLOGICAL SPECIMENSNovember 2020September 2023Allow3420YesNo
17056017Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR detection method and kit based on metal ruthenium complexNovember 2020January 2023Allow2620NoNo
17053771A KIT FOR THE SPECIFIC DETECTION OF TRICHOMONAS TENAX, A SET OF PRIMERS FOR THE SPECIFIC DETECTION OF TRICHOMONAS TENAX AND A METHOD FOR THE SPECIFIC DETECTION OF TRICHOMONAS TENAXNovember 2020July 2024Abandon4501NoNo
17053624TISSUE SAMPLINGNovember 2020May 2024Abandon4210NoNo
17083815HYBRID MULTI-STEP NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATIONOctober 2020October 2023Abandon3610NoNo
17045825METHOD FOR DETECTING VARIATION OF REFERENCE SEQUENCE IN TARGET NUCLEIC ACID REGIONOctober 2020July 2021Allow910NoNo
17061877METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATION OF TARGET LOCIOctober 2020February 2021Allow410NoNo
17040306EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS FOR BIOCHIPSeptember 2020March 2024Allow4210NoNo
17018845Methods For Identifying Androgen Receptor Splice Variants In Subjects Having Castration Resistant Prostate CancerSeptember 2020August 2023Allow3520NoNo
17018966METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATION OF TARGET LOCISeptember 2020January 2024Allow4020NoNo
17008395METHODS OF LOWERING THE ERROR RATE OF MASSIVELY PARALLEL DNA SEQUENCING USING DUPLEX CONSENSUS SEQUENCINGAugust 2020April 2021Allow710NoNo
16987283METHOD FOR PROCESSING ROLLING CIRCLE AMPLIFICATION PRODUCTSAugust 2020May 2022Allow2110NoNo
16940517CELL ANALYSIS DEVICE, APPARATUS, AND CELL ANALYSIS METHOD USING SAMEJuly 2020March 2024Allow4410NoNo
16934407METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATION OF TARGET LOCIJuly 2020March 2021Allow820NoNo
16933341COMPOSITIONS, KITS AND METHODS FOR DETECTION OF CAMPYLOBACTER NUCLEIC ACIDJuly 2020July 2024Allow4831YesNo
16872855METHOD FOR DETECTING TARGET MOLECULEMay 2020September 2023Allow4030YesNo
16856924METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATION OF TARGET LOCIApril 2020January 2022Allow2160NoNo
16831756DETECTION OF COLORECTAL CANCERMarch 2020January 2021Allow911NoNo
16829133METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATION OF TARGET LOCIMarch 2020January 2021Allow920NoNo
16649894Biomarker Detection From Fluid SamplesMarch 2020March 2023Allow3610NoNo
16823127SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CLEANING NOISY GENETIC DATA AND DETERMINING CHROMOSOME COPY NUMBERMarch 2020February 2021Allow1110NoNo
16777700METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATION OF TARGET LOCIJanuary 2020March 2021Allow1330NoNo
16752018NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION AND TESTINGJanuary 2020May 2022Allow2710NoNo
16752339METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATION OF TARGET LOCIJanuary 2020May 2021Allow1630NoNo
16747833METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATION OF TARGET LOCIJanuary 2020November 2020Allow1020NoNo
16743724METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATION OF TARGET LOCIJanuary 2020March 2020Allow210NoNo
16738577POLYMERASES ENGINEERED TO REDUCE NUCLEOTIDE-INDEPENDENT DNA BINDINGJanuary 2020March 2024Allow5011NoNo
16736071METHOD OF NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCE DETERMINATIONJanuary 2020January 2024Allow4811NoNo
16736323METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROCESSING POLYNUCLEOTIDESJanuary 2020March 2024Allow5130YesNo
16627212MAGNETIC NANOPARTICLEDecember 2019May 2024Abandon5331NoNo
16622445METHODS AND PLATFORM FOR SCREENING AND SELECTING METABOLITES AND THEIR RECEPTORSDecember 2019March 2023Allow3911YesNo
16704743Device for the Thermal Treatment of Test SamplesDecember 2019March 2023Allow4010NoNo
16619761METHODS FOR CHARACTERIZING LOSS OF ANTIGEN PRESENTATIONDecember 2019October 2023Allow4631NoNo
16685792POLYNUCLEOTIDE PRIMERS AND PROBESNovember 2019March 2023Abandon4011NoNo
16607314METHOD OF DETECTING MINOR BCR-ABL1 GENEOctober 2019March 2024Allow5341YesNo
16601540Identification of Traits Associated with DNA Samples Using Epigenetic-Based Patterns Detected Via Massively Parallel SequencingOctober 2019August 2023Allow4631NoNo
16592707Nucleic Acid AmplificationOctober 2019April 2023Allow4311NoNo
16500549METHOD FOR DETERMINING NUCLEIC ACID QUALITY OF BIOLOGICAL SAMPLEOctober 2019December 2023Allow5040YesNo
16585729PROCESS FOR PREPARING A BIOLOGICAL SAMPLESeptember 2019October 2023Allow4820YesNo
16490184BIOMARKER OF AGINGAugust 2019September 2022Allow3711NoNo
16514814MULTIPLEX NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATIONJuly 2019May 2023Allow4640NoNo
16504065Methods and Devices for Performing Real Time Digital PCRJuly 2019May 2023Allow4630NoNo
16503382METHODS OF LOWERING THE ERROR RATE OF MASSIVELY PARALLEL DNA SEQUENCING USING DUPLEX CONSENSUS SEQUENCINGJuly 2019July 2020Allow1211YesNo
16459689FABRICATION OF PATTERNED ARRAYSJuly 2019June 2022Abandon3520NoNo
16459222METHODS FOR PCR AND HLA TYPING USING UNPURIFIED SAMPLESJuly 2019June 2021Allow2410NoNo
16449075SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRE-ANALYTICAL SUBSTRATE PROCESSINGJune 2019June 2023Allow4841YesNo
16436357MEASURES OF SHORT TELOMERE ABUNDANCEJune 2019September 2021Abandon2801NoNo
16428865DETECTION OF COLORECTAL CANCERMay 2019June 2022Allow3631NoNo
16501730Method for capturing long polynucleotides for sequencing specific gnomic regions.May 2019January 2023Allow4320YesNo
16463517DEVICE FOR NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION REACTIONMay 2019December 2022Allow4320NoNo
16416337DIGITAL MICROFLUIDICS FOR POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTIONMay 2019September 2022Allow4011NoNo
16415846DYNAMIC FLUX NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCE AMPLIFICATIONMay 2019June 2023Abandon4930YesYes
16412301METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATION OF TARGET LOCIMay 2019November 2019Allow610NoNo
16412331METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATION OF TARGET LOCIMay 2019October 2019Allow510NoNo
16399103METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATION OF TARGET LOCIApril 2019September 2019Allow510NoNo
16399268METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATION OF TARGET LOCIApril 2019September 2019Allow510NoNo
16399947METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATION OF TARGET LOCIApril 2019May 2020Allow1320NoNo
16400023METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATIONS OF TARGET LOCIApril 2019November 2019Allow710NoNo
16342572SEQUENCING AND ANALYSIS OF EXOSOME ASSOCIATED NUCLEIC ACIDSApril 2019March 2022Allow3510YesNo
16380693INTEGRATED MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS SYSTEM (IMDX) AND METHOD FOR DENGUE FEVERApril 2019May 2022Allow3721YesNo
16377749OSCILLATING AMPLIFICATION REACTION FOR NUCLEIC ACIDSApril 2019November 2021Allow3220NoNo
16372027REAGENTS FOR IMPROVING PCR ACCURACYApril 2019June 2021Allow2611NoNo
16356958PRESERVING GENOMIC CONNECTIVITY INFORMATION IN FRAGMENTED GENOMIC DNA SAMPLESMarch 2019June 2021Allow2711NoNo
16353636METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATION OF TARGET LOCIMarch 2019February 2020Allow1120NoNo
16352600DETECTION OF GENOME EDITINGMarch 2019September 2021Allow3030NoNo
16288022METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATION OF TARGET LOCIFebruary 2019December 2019Allow1010NoNo
16255659METHODS FOR DNA AND RNA EXTRACTION FROM FIXED PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED TISSUE SAMPLESJanuary 2019July 2021Allow3011NoNo
16246322METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SAMPLE PROCESSING POLYNUCLEOTIDESJanuary 2019October 2019Allow910YesNo
16246155USE OF A POROUS CAPILLARY MEMBRANE FOR DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF ROLLING CIRCLE AMPLIFICATION PRODUCTSJanuary 2019January 2021Allow2410YesNo
16245737Enhanced Adaptor LigationJanuary 2019November 2021Allow3421NoNo
16245537SYSTEM FOR THERMAL CYCLING OF MICROFLUIDIC SAMPLESJanuary 2019January 2021Abandon2510NoNo
16241778MULTIPHASE NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATIONJanuary 2019March 2021Allow2720NoNo
16238753PROBABILITY-DIRECTED ISOLATION OF NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCES (PINS)January 2019April 2021Allow2710NoNo
16222052METHODS OF MONITORING CONDITIONS BY SEQUENCE ANALYSISDecember 2018January 2021Allow2510NoNo
16192695METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING TARGET BIOLOGICAL MOLECULE, BEAD FOR IDENTIFYING TARGET BIOLOGICAL MOLECULE, SET OF BEADS, AND TARGET BIOLOGICAL MOLECULE IDENTIFICATION DEVICENovember 2018June 2021Abandon3101NoNo
16301202METHODS OF DETECTING A MUTATED GENE BY MULTIPLEX DIGITAL PCRNovember 2018November 2021Abandon3611NoNo
16099229ANALYTICAL STANDARDS AND METHODS OF USING SAMENovember 2018August 2021Allow3311NoNo
16173610Reagent and method for rapid detection of porcine adenovirusOctober 2018May 2021Allow3011NoNo
16168349Processes for Point of Care Detection of DNA and RNAOctober 2018January 2021Abandon2710NoNo
16164417SIMULTANEOUS BACKGROUND REDUCTION AND COMPLEX STABILIZATION IN BINDING ASSAY WORKFLOWSOctober 2018September 2021Allow3511NoNo
16150815ASSAY FOR DETECTING HEPATITIS C VIRUS (HCV)October 2018December 2020Allow2701NoNo
16150001ASSAY FOR DETECTING HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS (HIV)October 2018June 2021Allow3211YesNo
16140298METHODS FOR SIMULTANEOUS AMPLIFICATION OF TARGET LOCISeptember 2018August 2021Abandon3511NoNo
16131524SPENT ENRICHMENT MEDIA FOR GROWTH OF GENE-MATCHED MICROORGANISMSSeptember 2018July 2021Allow3421YesNo
16120072METHODS OF LOWERING THE ERROR RATE OF MASSIVELY PARALLEL DNA SEQUENCING USING DUPLEX CONSENSUS SEQUENCINGAugust 2018June 2019Allow1010YesNo
16046707NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCING METHODS AND SYSTEMSJuly 2018July 2022Allow4830NoNo
16041711Methods for the Detection of Enterovirus D68 in Complex SamplesJuly 2018January 2022Allow4220NoNo
16068560MULTIPLE STAGE ISOTHERMAL ENZYMATIC AMPLIFICATIONJuly 2018May 2021Allow3420NoNo
16013502ASSAY FOR DETECTION OF HUMAN PARVOVIRUS NUCLEIC ACIDJune 2018November 2020Allow2910NoNo
16013845DIGITAL AMPLIFICATION ASSAYS FOR GENETIC INSTABILITYJune 2018April 2021Allow3420YesNo
16012667METHODS FOR NON-INVASIVE PRENATAL PATERNITY TESTINGJune 2018April 2021Allow3410YesNo
16011182TREATMENT AND DIAGNOSIS OF IMMUNE DISORDERSJune 2018September 2021Allow3920NoNo
16062244Detection and Quantification of Target Nucleic Acid Sequence of a MicroorganismJune 2018June 2021Abandon3611NoNo
16007656POLYNUCLEIC ACID MOLECULE ENRICHMENT METHODOLOGIESJune 2018August 2021Abandon3920NoNo
16007514ISOLATION OF TARGET NUCLEIC ACIDSJune 2018June 2021Allow3630NoNo
16004714METHOD FOR SEQUENCING A POLYNUCLEOTIDE TEMPLATEJune 2018August 2020Allow2710NoNo
16004337SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO DETECT RARE MUTATIONS AND COPY NUMBER VARIATIONJune 2018December 2020Abandon3001NoNo
15779108GENDER-SPECIFIC MARKERS FOR DIAGNOSING PROGNOSIS AND DETERMINING TREATMENT STRATEGY FOR RENAL CANCER PATIENTSMay 2018September 2021Allow4021NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MUMMERT, STEPHANIE KANE.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
9
Examiner Affirmed
7
(77.8%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(22.2%)
Reversal Percentile
35.7%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 22.2% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
50
Allowed After Appeal Filing
11
(22.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
39
(78.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
30.1%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 22.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner MUMMERT, STEPHANIE KANE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MUMMERT, STEPHANIE KANE works in Art Unit 1637 and has examined 711 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 47.1%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 40 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MUMMERT, STEPHANIE KANE's allowance rate of 47.1% places them in the 11% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MUMMERT, STEPHANIE KANE receive 2.29 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 60% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MUMMERT, STEPHANIE KANE is 40 months. This places the examiner in the 23% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +26.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MUMMERT, STEPHANIE KANE. This interview benefit is in the 73% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 19.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 23% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 36.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 56% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 133.3% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 85% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 70.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 56% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 76.2% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 54.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 54% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 2.3% of allowed cases (in the 76% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 6.0% of allowed cases (in the 84% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.