USPTO Examiner LEITH NANCY J - Art Unit 1636

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19232045TYPE V CAS PROTEINS AND APPLICATIONS THEREOFJune 2025October 2025Allow401YesNo
19092639APTAMER AND RIBOZYME EQUILIBRIUM SHIFTING (ARES) RNA CIRCUITS AND USES THEREOFMarch 2025March 2026Allow1111NoNo
19085903Compositions and Methods for NK-92 Cells Expressing Native CD16March 2025March 2026Allow1221NoNo
19066066EXPRESSION SYSTEM FOR PRODUCT MANUFACTURINGFebruary 2025September 2025Allow611YesNo
19064383NON-IMMUNOGENIC CIRCULAR, NON-VIRAL DNA VECTORSFebruary 2025July 2025Allow510NoNo
19028916METHODS FOR SEQUENCING SAMPLESJanuary 2025July 2025Allow610NoNo
19028930Product, system and method of cell cultivationJanuary 2025December 2025Allow1111YesNo
18959371SUPPLEMENTATION OF LIVER ENZYME EXPRESSIONNovember 2024November 2025Allow1211YesNo
18941863Controllable TranscriptionNovember 2024July 2025Allow811NoNo
18805534TUNING CASCADE ASSAY KINETICS VIA MOLECULAR DESIGNAugust 2024January 2025Allow510YesNo
18805023METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR MODULATING A GENOMEAugust 2024May 2025Allow911NoNo
18799681SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR IN VIVO MANUFACTURING NANOSTRUCTURE-ENDED DOUBLE-STRANDED COVALENTLY-CLOSED LINEAR DNA, THE RESULTING MOLECULES AND THEIR USESAugust 2024September 2025Allow1311YesNo
18834523Recombinant Humanized Collagen Type I Alpha-1 (rhCol1A1), and Expression Vector and Use ThereofJuly 2024April 2025Allow810NoNo
18789158ENGINEERED GUIDE SCAFFOLDSJuly 2024October 2025Allow1421YesNo
18586417TUNING CASCADE ASSAY KINETICS VIA MOLECULAR DESIGNFebruary 2024August 2024Allow511NoNo
18425204SEQUENCE SPECIFIC ANTIMICROBIALSJanuary 2024January 2025Allow1210YesNo
18418774METHODS FOR SEQUENCING SAMPLESJanuary 2024October 2024Allow911YesNo
18418781METHODS FOR SEQUENCING SAMPLESJanuary 2024November 2024Allow1011YesNo
18533538METHODS FOR SEQUENCING SAMPLESDecember 2023October 2024Allow1110YesNo
18527576ELECTROPORATION, DEVELOPMENTALLY-ACTIVATED CELLS, PLURIPOTENT-LIKE CELLS, CELL REPROGRAMMING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINEDecember 2023October 2025Abandon2331NoNo
18518914TUNING CASCADE ASSAY KINETICS VIA MOLECULAR DESIGNNovember 2023February 2024Allow311YesNo
18488261NOVEL CRISPR ENZYMES AND SYSTEMSOctober 2023November 2024Allow1321NoNo
18451315CRISPR ENZYMES AND SYSTEMSAugust 2023June 2024Allow911YesNo
18356900METHODS FOR SEQUENCING SAMPLESJuly 2023March 2024Allow811YesNo
18356906METHODS FOR SEQUENCING SAMPLESJuly 2023September 2024Allow1420YesNo
18355017METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR MODULATING A GENOMEJuly 2023July 2024Allow1211NoNo
18345958FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS USING CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS FOR SATURATING MUTAGENESIS OF NON-CODING ELEMENTS, COMPOSITIONS, METHODS, LIBRARIES AND APPLICATIONS THEREOFJune 2023August 2025Allow2541YesNo
18345935NOVEL CRISPR ENZYMES AND SYSTEMSJune 2023February 2025Allow1931YesNo
18208262TUNING CASCADE ASSAY KINETICS VIA MOLECULAR DESIGNJune 2023November 2023Allow511YesNo
18204329TUNING CASCADE ASSAY KINETICS VIA MOLECULAR DESIGNMay 2023November 2023Allow511YesNo
18316698POLYPEPTIDES USEFUL FOR GENE EDITING AND METHODS OF USEMay 2023August 2024Allow1531YesNo
18189201COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TARGETING, EDITING, OR MODIFYING GENESMarch 2023December 2024Allow2131YesNo
18176197METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING ANGIOPOIETIN-LIKE 3 (ANGPTL3) RELATED CONDITIONSFebruary 2023March 2024Allow1220YesNo
18174013CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY BY DELIVERING CLASS II MHC ANTIGENS USING A VLP-REPLICONFebruary 2023March 2024Allow1320NoNo
18154299TRANSCRIPTIONAL CONTROL IN PROKARYOTIC CELLS USING DNA-BINDING REPRESSORSJanuary 2023December 2023Allow1111NoNo
18088274METHODS FOR SPATIAL ANALYSIS USING TARGETED RNA DEPLETIONDecember 2022August 2023Allow710NoNo
18076262TUNING CASCADE ASSAY KINETICS VIA MOLECULAR DESIGNDecember 2022June 2023Allow611YesNo
18058251GUIDE SCAFFOLDSNovember 2022May 2024Allow1821YesNo
18053269METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR SIMULTANEOUS EDITING OF BOTH STRANDS OF A TARGET DOUBLE-STRANDED NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCENovember 2022November 2023Allow1211YesNo
18050982MODIFIED FACTOR IX, AND COMPOSITIONS, METHODS AND USES FOR GENE TRANSFER TO CELLS, ORGANS, AND TISSUESOctober 2022September 2023Allow1110NoNo
17958973COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TARGETING, EDITING, OR MODIFYING GENESOctober 2022January 2025Allow2841YesNo
17905617NOVEL OMNI-59, 61, 67, 76, 79, 80, 81, AND 82 CRISPR NUCLEASESSeptember 2022November 2023Allow1411YesNo
17820444NOVEL CRISPR DNA TARGETING ENZYMES AND SYSTEMSAugust 2022June 2023Allow1010YesNo
17817877SEQUENTIAL GENE EDITING IN PRIMARY IMMUNE CELLSAugust 2022April 2023Allow801YesNo
17877121METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING A PREGNANCY-RELATED STATE OF A SUBJECTJuly 2022April 2023Allow920YesNo
17877106METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING A PREGNANCY-RELATED STATE OF A SUBJECTJuly 2022April 2023Allow930YesNo
17811391CRISPR-BASED PROGRAMMABLE RNA EDITINGJuly 2022September 2024Allow2631YesYes
17857923CLASS II, TYPE II CRISPR SYSTEMSJuly 2022December 2023Allow1721NoNo
17853753CRISPR ENABLED MULTIPLEXED GENOME ENGINEERINGJune 2022March 2023Allow810NoNo
17848563NOVEL CRISPR ENZYMES AND SYSTEMSJune 2022May 2023Allow1121YesNo
17836222RNA ADENO-ASSOCIATED VIRUS (RAAV) VECTOR AND USES THEREOFJune 2022February 2024Allow2621YesNo
17751999END-TO-END CELL THERAPY AUTOMATIONMay 2022July 2023Allow1430NoNo
17752021END-TO-END CELL THERAPY AUTOMATIONMay 2022May 2023Allow1220NoNo
17774284CRISPR AND AAV STRATEGIES FOR X-LINKED JUVENILE RETINOSCHISIS THERAPYMay 2022September 2025Allow4010NoNo
17735494METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR IDENTIFYING TARGET GENESMay 2022March 2023Allow1011YesNo
17716816SAFE HARBOR LOCIApril 2022July 2023Allow1511NoNo
17707074SEQUENCE SPECIFIC ANTIMICROBIALSMarch 2022September 2022Allow610NoNo
17707049SEQUENCE SPECIFIC ANTIMICROBIALSMarch 2022September 2022Allow610NoNo
17707061SEQUENCE SPECIFIC ANTIMICROBIALSMarch 2022September 2022Allow610NoNo
17683235MULTIPARAMETRIC NUCLEIC ACID OPTIMIZATIONFebruary 2022October 2025Abandon4401NoNo
17679203SIMULTANEOUS MULTIPLEX GENOME EDITING IN YEASTFebruary 2022April 2023Allow1410NoNo
17676210CURING FOR RECURSIVE NUCLEIC ACID-GUIDED CELL EDITINGFebruary 2022December 2022Allow1010YesNo
17584028EXPRESSION CONSTRUCTS AND METHODS OF GENETICALLY ENGINEERING METHYLOTROPHIC YEASTJanuary 2022December 2023Allow2331YesNo
17581467METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING CANCER USING PEPTIDE NUCLEIC ACID-BASED AGENTSJanuary 2022October 2025Abandon4401NoNo
17581614SEQUENCE SPECIFIC ANTIMICROBIALSJanuary 2022August 2022Allow710YesNo
17572208ENGINEERED CLASS 2 TYPE V CRISPR SYSTEMSJanuary 2022February 2024Allow2531YesNo
17555395INSTRUMENTS, MODULES, AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED DETECTION OF EDITED SEQUENCES IN LIVE CELLSDecember 2021January 2023Abandon1310NoNo
17554314NOVEL CRISPR ENZYMES AND SYSTEMSDecember 2021June 2023Allow1811YesNo
17555336INSTRUMENTS, MODULES, AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED DETECTION OF EDITED SEQUENCES IN LIVE CELLSDecember 2021December 2022Allow1210YesNo
17554333NOVEL CRISPR ENZYMES AND SYSTEMSDecember 2021February 2023Allow1411YesNo
17546625METHODS FOR SPATIAL ANALYSIS USING TARGETED RNA DEPLETIONDecember 2021July 2022Allow710YesNo
17533997ENGINEERED PROTEINSNovember 2021September 2022Allow911YesNo
17522425METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING A PREGNANCY-RELATED STATE OF A SUBJECTNovember 2021April 2022Allow511YesNo
17518556SIMULTANEOUS MULTIPLEX GENOME EDITING IN YEASTNovember 2021March 2022Allow410YesNo
17518481NOVEL MAD NUCLEASESNovember 2021March 2026Abandon5201NoNo
17453238Univariant Extrinsic Initiator Control System For Microbes And An In Vitro Assembly Of Large Recombinant DNA Molecules From Multiple ComponentsNovember 2021December 2025Allow5010YesNo
17505578NOVEL CRISPR DNA TARGETING ENZYMES AND SYSTEMSOctober 2021May 2022Allow710YesNo
17450998COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVING HEALTH THROUGH MODULATING CALHM2October 2021November 2025Allow4921YesNo
17475392SIMULTANEOUS MULTIPLEX GENOME EDITING IN YEASTSeptember 2021February 2022Allow510YesNo
17463956SIMULTANEOUS MULTIPLEX GENOME EDITING IN YEASTSeptember 2021February 2022Allow510YesNo
17459053DEVICES AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING NUCLEIC ACIDS AND PROTEINSAugust 2021November 2025Allow5010YesNo
17398951METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR ALTERING FUNCTION AND STRUCTURE OF CHROMATIN LOOPS AND/OR DOMAINSAugust 2021January 2026Abandon5310NoNo
17310205METHOD OF PRODUCING TRANSDUCTION PARTICLESJuly 2021September 2025Allow5021NoNo
17378394HIGH-THROUGHPUT DEEP SEQUENCING OF NUCLEIC ACIDS ACROSS TUMORS AND CLONES WITHIN TUMORSJuly 2021October 2025Allow5140NoNo
17305649MODIFIED FACTOR IX, AND COMPOSITIONS, METHODS AND USES FOR GENE TRANSFER TO CELLS, ORGANS, AND TISSUESJuly 2021August 2022Allow1330YesNo
17368698METHODS OF PRODUCING TWO CHAIN PROTEINS IN BACTERIAJuly 2021January 2026Abandon5510NoNo
17355081INCREASED NUCLEIC-ACID GUIDED CELL EDITING IN YEASTJune 2021January 2026Abandon5510NoNo
17353282CURING FOR RECURSIVE NUCLEIC ACID-GUIDED CELL EDITINGJune 2021December 2021Allow610YesNo
17346020DNA-BINDING PROTEINS AND USES THEREOFJune 2021December 2025Abandon5410NoNo
17339617INTEGRATION OF NUCLEIC ACID CONSTRUCTS INTO EUKARYOTIC CELLS WITH A TRANSPOSASE FROM ORYZIASJune 2021February 2022Allow911NoNo
17334933PRODUCTION OF INSULIN PRODUCING CELLSMay 2021February 2026Abandon5610NoNo
17332503ITERATIVE GENOME EDITING IN MICROBESMay 2021January 2022Allow710NoNo
17330826IMMUNOGENIC COMPOSITIONS AND USES THEREOFMay 2021November 2025Abandon5310NoNo
17329137METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR RNA-GUIDED TREATMENT OF HIV INFECTIONMay 2021May 2023Abandon2411NoNo
17319022SIMULTANEOUS MULTIPLEX GENOME EDITING IN YEASTMay 2021September 2021Allow410NoNo
17313777DNA IMPURITIES IN A COMPOSITION COMPRISING A PARVOVIRAL VIRIONMay 2021March 2026Allow5840NoNo
17290968PROGRAMMABLE NUCLEASES AND BASE EDITORS FOR MODIFYING NUCLEIC ACID DUPLEXESMay 2021December 2025Abandon5601NoNo
17290787MODIFIED CLOSED-ENDED DNA (CEDNA) COMPRISING SYMMETRICAL MODIFIED INVERTED TERMINAL REPEATSMay 2021October 2025Abandon5301NoNo
17245928MANIPULATION OF GENES INVOLVED IN SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION TO CONTROL FUNGAL MORPHOLOGY DURING FERMENTATION AND PRODUCTIONApril 2021December 2021Allow710YesNo
17246460NOVEL CRISPR ENZYMES AND SYSTEMSApril 2021February 2026Allow58101NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner LEITH, NANCY J.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
6
Examiner Affirmed
3
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
3
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
69.9%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
66
Allowed After Appeal Filing
10
(15.2%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
56
(84.8%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
17.9%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 15.2% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner LEITH, NANCY J - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner LEITH, NANCY J works in Art Unit 1636 and has examined 803 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 71.2%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 33 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner LEITH, NANCY J's allowance rate of 71.2% places them in the 34% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by LEITH, NANCY J receive 2.43 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 70% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LEITH, NANCY J is 33 months. This places the examiner in the 46% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +49.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by LEITH, NANCY J. This interview benefit is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 22.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 48.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 72% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 66.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 52% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 84.6% of appeals filed. This is in the 78% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 63.6% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 68.4% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.4% of allowed cases (in the 58% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 5.9% of allowed cases (in the 83% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.