USPTO Examiner HUDSON AMY ROSE - Art Unit 1636

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18909918MODIFIED DOUBLE-STRANDED RNA AGENTSOctober 2024April 2025Allow610NoNo
18885005Compositions and Methods Using CPG OligonucleotidesSeptember 2024April 2025Allow711NoNo
18814067MODIFIED DOUBLE-STRANDED RNA AGENTSAugust 2024January 2025Allow510NoNo
18744370LIPID NANOPARTICLE COMPOSITIONS FOR DELIVERY OF MRNA AND LONG NUCLEIC ACIDSJune 2024March 2025Allow910YesNo
18428353TREATMENT OF AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS (ALS)January 2024April 2025Allow1501NoNo
18390233LIPID FORMULATED COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITING EXPRESSION OF SERUM AMYLOID A GENEDecember 2023June 2025Abandon1801NoNo
18534974COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ORGAN SPECIFIC DELIVERY OF NUCLEIC ACIDSDecember 2023June 2024Allow610NoNo
18523558COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITING EXPRESSION OF MUTANT EGFR GENENovember 2023May 2025Abandon1801NoNo
18515531MicroRNA (miRNA) and Downstream Targets for Diagnostic and Therapeutic PurposesNovember 2023May 2025Abandon1801NoNo
18504548GENETICALLY-MODIFIED IMMUNE CELLS COMPRISING A MICRORNA-ADAPTED SHRNA (SHRNAMIR)November 2023June 2025Abandon1910NoNo
18491658Method for Identification of Sensitivity of a Patient to Telomerase Inhibition TherapyOctober 2023March 2025Abandon1710NoNo
18487338SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY (SMA) TREATMENT VIA TARGETING OF SMN2 SPLICE SITE INHIBITORY SEQUENCESOctober 2023March 2025Abandon1710NoNo
18463079PANCREATIC CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODSeptember 2023August 2024Allow1200NoNo
18449230GENOME EDITING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF CHRONIC GRANULOMATOUS DISEASEAugust 2023July 2024Allow1111YesNo
18446743Methods for Treatment of Alport SyndromeAugust 2023March 2025Abandon1901NoNo
18365787Novel Structurally Designed shRNAsAugust 2023February 2025Allow1910NoNo
18361772PLATELETS AS DELIVERY AGENTSJuly 2023May 2025Allow2110NoNo
18346099ANTISENSE OLIGOMERS TARGETING PCSK9June 2023May 2025Allow2311NoNo
18340192Conjugated Antisense Compounds for Use in TherapyJune 2023February 2025Abandon2010NoNo
18204383STAUFEN1 AGENTS AND ASSOCIATED METHODSMay 2023April 2025Allow2321NoNo
18320132SCARLESS GENOME EDITING THROUGH TWO-STEP HOMOLOGY DIRECTED REPAIRMay 2023July 2025Allow2510NoNo
18319977COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING ORNITHINE TRANSCARBAMYLASE DEFICIENCYMay 2023April 2025Allow2311NoNo
18316693IN VITRO AND IN VIVO INTRACELLULAR DELIVERY OF SIRNA VIA SELF-ASSEMBLED NANOPIECESMay 2023June 2025Abandon2511NoNo
18316981COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION AND GEOGRAPHIC ATROPHYMay 2023November 2024Abandon1811NoNo
18302841COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF SEPSIS-RELATED DISORDERSApril 2023December 2024Allow2011NoNo
18299531Stabilized saRNA Compositions and Methods of UseApril 2023April 2025Abandon2410NoNo
18168004COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR REDUCING ATXN3 EXPRESSIONFebruary 2023March 2025Allow2520NoNo
18167984METHODS FOR THERAPEUTIC ADMINISTRATION OF MESSENGER RIBONUCLEIC ACID DRUGSFebruary 2023October 2024Allow2010NoNo
18166204COMPOUNDS AND COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING PHOSPHOROTHIOATED OLIGODEOXYNUCLEOTIDE, AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFFebruary 2023October 2024Allow2011YesNo
181592335-HALOURACIL-MODIFIED MICRORNAS AND THEIR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCERJanuary 2023January 2025Allow2420NoNo
18153428Oligonucleotides Comprising Modified NucleosidesJanuary 2023August 2024Allow2011NoNo
18147156ARTIFICIAL GENOME MANIPULATION FOR GENE EXPRESSION REGULATIONDecember 2022August 2024Allow1910NoNo
18145238Modified Double-Stranded RNA AgentsDecember 2022August 2024Allow1911NoNo
18063511GENOMIC SAFE HARBORS FOR GENETIC THERAPIES IN HUMAN STEM CELLS AND ENGINEERED NANOPARTICLES TO PROVIDE TARGETED GENETIC THERAPIESDecember 2022June 2025Allow3011NoNo
18072202COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING HYPERTRIGLYCERIDEMIANovember 2022March 2025Abandon2710NoNo
18058212Nucleoporins as Drug Targets for Anti-Proliferative TherapeuticsNovember 2022October 2024Allow2311NoNo
17990402COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING BACTERIALLY DERIVED MINICELLS AND METHODS OF USING THE SAMENovember 2022May 2025Allow3021NoNo
18046020CLICK-MODIFIED MRNAOctober 2022November 2024Allow2511NoNo
17963901GENE THERAPY FOR HAPLOINSUFFICIENCYOctober 2022December 2024Allow2710NoNo
17933500MODIFIED MESSENGER RNA COMPRISING FUNCTIONAL RNA ELEMENTSSeptember 2022October 2024Allow2511NoNo
17931493DOMINANT ACTIVE YAP, A HIPPO EFFECTOR, INDUCES CHROMATIN ACCESSIBILITY AND CARDIOMYOCYTE RENEWALSeptember 2022July 2024Allow2210NoNo
17942698RNAS FOR COMPLEMENT INHIBITIONSeptember 2022July 2024Allow2211NoNo
17941436MODIFIED DOUBLE-STRANDED RNA AGENTSSeptember 2022February 2025Allow2911NoNo
17930345RNA CONTAINING COMPOSITION FOR TREATMENT OF TUMOR DISEASESSeptember 2022June 2025Abandon3411NoNo
17930062RNA FOR TREATMENT OR PROPHYLAXIS OF A LIVER DISEASESeptember 2022October 2024Abandon2602NoNo
17900960Modified Guide RNAsSeptember 2022August 2024Allow2320YesNo
17814407RAPID AND SPECIFIC EX-VIVO DIAGNOSIS OF CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM LYMPHOMAJuly 2022January 2025Abandon3021NoNo
17746360Promotion of Cardiomyocyte Proliferation and Regenerative Treatment of the Heart by Inhibition of microRNA-128May 2022March 2025Abandon3431NoNo
17721704COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITING EXPRESSION OF TRANSTHYRETINApril 2022October 2024Allow3021YesNo
17694224METHODS OF CANCER TREATMENT BY DELIVERY OF siRNAs AGAINST BCLXL AND MCL1 USING A POLYPEPTIDE NANOPARTICLEMarch 2022June 2025Abandon3921NoYes
17688276INHIBITION OF DNA POLYMERASES BY URACIL-DNA GLYCOSYLASE-CLEAVABLE OLIGONUCLEOTIDE LIGANDSMarch 2022August 2024Allow3010NoNo
17586175SELECTIVE ANTISENSE COMPOUNDS AND USES THEREOFJanuary 2022July 2024Allow3011NoNo
17574282METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE SECONDARY TO MULTIPLE SCLEROSISJanuary 2022February 2025Abandon3811NoNo
17597533EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES CONTAINING MIR-142-3P TO TREAT FIBROSING DISEASESJanuary 2022June 2025Abandon4101NoNo
17597281OLIGOMERIC NUCLEIC ACID MOLECULE ACTIVATING ATOH1 GENE AND USE THEREOFDecember 2021June 2025Abandon4101NoNo
175345205-HALOURACIL-MODIFIED MICRORNAS AND THEIR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCERNovember 2021January 2025Allow3840NoNo
17512270METHODS OF MODULATING RNA TRANSLATIONOctober 2021July 2024Allow3321YesNo
17441596Regenerative Therapy Based on miRNA-302 Mimics for Enhancing Host Recovery from Pneumonia Caused by Streptococcus pneumoniaeSeptember 2021May 2025Abandon4310NoNo
17359902RNA ENCODING A THERAPEUTIC PROTEINJune 2021July 2024Allow3611NoNo
17343447ANTISENSE OLIGOMERS AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME FOR TREATING DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH THE ACID ALPHA-GLUCOSIDASE GENEJune 2021July 2024Allow3721NoNo
17291449CODON-OPTIMIZED ABCB11 TRANSGENE FOR THE TREATMENT OF PROGRESSIVE FAMILIAL INTRAHEPATIC CHOLESTASIS TYPE 2 (PFIC2)May 2021April 2025Allow4810YesNo
17234164LONG NON-CODING RNA GENE EXPRESSION SIGNATURES IN DISEASE MONITORING AND TREATMENTApril 2021December 2024Allow4421NoNo
17191247COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF ORNITHINE TRANSCARBAMYLASE DEFICIENCYMarch 2021July 2024Allow4011NoNo
17269714BIOMARKER FOR DIAGNOSING OR PREDICTING REACTIVITY OF OVARY TO FSH AND USE THEREOFFebruary 2021January 2025Allow4720NoNo
17171288METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS RELATED TO RNA-TARGETED RHO SMALL GTPase RND3/RhoE THERAPYFebruary 2021June 2024Allow4031NoNo
17171943BIOACTIVE RENAL CELLSFebruary 2021March 2024Allow3721YesNo
17162226Antisense Compositions and Methods of Making and Using SameJanuary 2021January 2025Abandon4831NoNo
17163015METHODS OF IN VIVO EVALUATION OF GENE FUNCTIONJanuary 2021November 2024Allow4611NoNo
17156002GDF-15 AS A HAEMATOLOGICAL TOXICITY BIOMARKERJanuary 2021January 2025Abandon4710NoNo
17046514P16 POSITIVE TUMOR STRATIFICATION ASSAYS AND METHODSOctober 2020October 2024Allow4811NoNo
17065409THERAPEUTIC OLIGONUCLEOTIDESOctober 2020October 2024Allow4831YesNo
17062422OLIGONUCLEOTIDE-LIGAND CONJUGATES AND PROCESS FOR THEIR PREPARATIONOctober 2020October 2023Allow3711NoNo
17043891MIR-17~92 AS THERAPEUTIC OR DIAGNOSTIC TARGET OF MOTOR NEURON (MN) DEGENERATION DISEASESSeptember 2020July 2024Allow4511NoNo
16962552ADENO-ASSOCIATED VIRUS GENE THERAPY FOR 21-HYDROXYLASE DEFICIENCYJuly 2020August 2024Allow4911NoNo
16906619Deoxynucleic Guanidines (DNG)- Modified Oligonucleotides and Methods of Synthesizing Deoxynucleic Guanidine StrandsJune 2020April 2025Allow5841YesYes
16881919GENE KNOCKOUT OF NRF2 FOR TREATMENT OF CANCERMay 2020May 2024Allow4841YesNo
16848679TREATMENT TARGETING ONCOLOGY AND NEURODEGENERATIONApril 2020November 2024Allow5521NoNo
16618251VIRAL VECTOR COMBINING GENE THERAPY AND GENOME EDITING APPROACHES FOR GENE THERAPY OF GENETIC DISORDERSNovember 2019October 2024Allow5942NoNo
16357765RSPONDINS AS MODULATORS OF ANGIOGENESIS AND VASCULOGENESISMarch 2019September 2019Allow600NoNo
16358013OLIGONUCLEOTIDE DECOYS FOR THE TREATMENT OF PAINMarch 2019January 2020Allow1020NoNo
16299692MICRORNA-200 BASED APPROACHES FOR MODULATING BONE FORMATION INHIBITION AND BONE REGENERATIONMarch 2019March 2020Allow1211NoNo
16071949PREDICTIVE METHODS OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND STENOSISJuly 2018October 2019Allow1501NoNo
16039672METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING AND TREATING OVARIAN CANCERJuly 2018September 2019Allow1400NoNo
15779753DNA APTAMERS BINDING TO MOLECULAR TARGETED AGENTS AND DETECTION METHOD OF MOLECULAR TARGETED MEDICINE USING THE SAMEMay 2018February 2020Allow2010NoNo
15723966SPLICE-REGION ANTISENSE COMPOSITION AND METHODOctober 2017May 2019Allow1910NoNo
15559362METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS INVOLVING TRANSMEMBRANE AND COILED-COIL DOMAINS 3 (TM-CO3) IN CANCERSeptember 2017October 2019Allow2511NoNo
15643556METHODS AND MEANS FOR OBTAINING MODIFIED PHENOTYPESJuly 2017September 2018Allow1400NoNo
15525926COMBINATION LONG ACTING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR HEPATITIS CMay 2017January 2019Allow2010NoNo
15583564MICRORNA-200 BASED APPROACHES FOR MODULATING BONE FORMATION INHIBITION AND BONE REGENERATIONMay 2017December 2018Allow1912NoNo
15515927ENHANCING DERMAL WOUND HEALING BY DOWNREGULATING MICRORNA-26AMarch 2017November 2018Allow2030NoNo
15504191OLIGONUCLEOTIDE DECOYS FOR THE TREATMENT OF PAINFebruary 2017December 2018Allow2211NoNo
15424758MEDICAL DEVICESFebruary 2017October 2018Allow2011NoNo
15388681RNA INTERFERENCE MEDIATING SMALL RNA MOLECULESDecember 2016November 2019Allow3521NoYes
15124916METHODS OF MODULATING WARS2September 2016August 2018Allow2311NoNo
14885288RNA SEQUENCE-SPECIFIC MEDIATORS OF RNA INTERFERENCEOctober 2015June 2019Allow4431NoNo
14870846RSPONDINS AS MODULATORS OF ANGIOGENESIS AND VASCULOGENESISSeptember 2015December 2018Allow3812NoNo
14740079ANTI-TUMOR COMPOSITIONS AND METHODSJune 2015October 2017Allow2821NoYes
13633199NOVEL RNAi THERAPEUTIC FOR TREATMENT OF HEPATITIS C INFECTIONOctober 2012April 2013Allow701NoNo
13568898LIPID FORMULATED DSRNA TARGETING THE PCSK9 GENEAugust 2012July 2013Allow1101NoNo
13501267METHODS FOR DIAGNOSING AND TREATING A PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATED WITH A SYNONYMOUS MUTATION OCCURING WITHIN A GENE OF INTERESTJuly 2012March 2014Allow2311NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner HUDSON, AMY ROSE.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
0
(0.0%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(100.0%)
Reversal Percentile
91.3%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
18
Allowed After Appeal Filing
8
(44.4%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
10
(55.6%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
70.5%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 44.4% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner HUDSON, AMY ROSE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner HUDSON, AMY ROSE works in Art Unit 1636 and has examined 266 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 91.4%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 25 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner HUDSON, AMY ROSE's allowance rate of 91.4% places them in the 75% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by HUDSON, AMY ROSE receive 1.55 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 39% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HUDSON, AMY ROSE is 25 months. This places the examiner in the 64% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +11.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by HUDSON, AMY ROSE. This interview benefit is in the 50% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 37.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 81% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 53.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 75% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 68% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 89.5% of appeals filed. This is in the 80% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 58.8% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 69.1% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 86% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 21.4% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 2.5% of allowed cases (in the 68% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.