USPTO Examiner HUDSON AMY ROSE - Art Unit 1635

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18411750NOVEL LIPID FORMULATIONS FOR DELIVERY OF THERAPEUTIC AGENTSJanuary 2024April 2024Allow310NoNo
18495278RNAi Agents for Inhibiting Expression of Complement Component C3 (C3), Pharmaceutical Compositions Thereof, and Methods of UseOctober 2023February 2024Allow410NoNo
18246845IL-34 ANTISENSE AGENTS AND METHODS OF USING SAMEMarch 2023April 2024Allow1310NoNo
18176174METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR MODULATING APOLIPOPROTEIN (A) EXPRESSIONFebruary 2023August 2024Abandon1810NoNo
18171539Modulators of PCSK9 ExpressionFebruary 2023August 2024Abandon1810NoNo
17990757COMPOSITION FOR PREVENTING OR TREATING KELOIDS OR HYPERTROPHIC SCARSNovember 2022December 2023Allow1200NoNo
18055823GENE EDITING FOR HEMOPHILIA A WITH IMPROVED FACTOR VIII EXPRESSIONNovember 2022January 2024Allow1400NoNo
18053195NUCLEIC ACID OLIGOMERS AND USES THEREFORNovember 2022October 2023Allow1100NoNo
17937617GENETIC ELEMENTS DRIVING CIRCULAR RNA TRANSLATION AND METHODS OF USEOctober 2022February 2023Allow400NoNo
17929704COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ORGAN SPECIFIC DELIVERY OF NUCLEIC ACIDSSeptember 2022December 2022Allow310NoNo
17820425GENETICALLY-MODIFIED IMMUNE CELLS COMPRISING A MICRORNA-ADAPTED SHRNA (SHRNAMIR)August 2022August 2023Allow1200YesNo
17819691COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITION OF HAO1 (HYDROXYACID OXIDASE 1 (GLYCOLATE OXIDASE)) GENE EXPRESSIONAugust 2022February 2024Abandon1801NoNo
17881193TREATMENT OF AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS (ALS)August 2022April 2024Allow2111NoNo
17872504NOVEL LIPID FORMULATIONS FOR DELIVERY OF THERAPEUTIC AGENTSJuly 2022August 2023Allow1310YesNo
17847550MODIFIED DOUBLE-STRANDED RNA AGENTSJune 2022October 2022Allow410NoNo
17808247PIKFYVE ANTISENSE OLIGONUCLEOTIDESJune 2022May 2024Allow2311NoNo
17846518MicroRNA (miRNA) and Downstream Targets for Diagnostic and Therapeutic PurposesJune 2022January 2024Abandon1910NoNo
17846794REDUCING INTRON RETENTIONJune 2022September 2023Allow1500YesNo
17839699COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ORGAN SPECIFIC DELIVERY OF NUCLEIC ACIDSJune 2022January 2023Allow710NoNo
17836458EXTENDED DICER SUBSTRATE AGENTS AND METHODS FOR THE SPECIFIC INHIBITION OF GENE EXPRESSIONJune 2022April 2024Allow2310NoNo
17834611STRATEGY TO INCREASE ANTI-VIRAL, ANTI-MICROBIAL, AND ANTI-FUNGAL DEFENSEJune 2022October 2023Allow1600NoNo
17752106Method for Identification of Sensitivity of a Patient to Telomerase Inhibition TherapyMay 2022January 2024Abandon2010NoNo
17741758EXON SKIPPING COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING MUSCULAR DYSTROPHYMay 2022February 2024Abandon2201NoNo
17733552COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITING EXPRESSION OF MUTANT EGFR GENEApril 2022January 2024Abandon2001NoNo
17715815INHIBITION OF NUCLEIC ACID POLYMERASES BY ENDONUCLEASE V-CLEAVABLE CIRCULAR OLIGONUCLEOTIDE LIGANDSApril 2022January 2024Allow2110YesNo
17711911COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ORGAN SPECIFIC DELIVERY OF NUCLEIC ACIDSApril 2022May 2022Allow200NoNo
17709965HSD17B13 Variants And Uses ThereofMarch 2022April 2023Allow1311NoNo
17705166ANTISENSE OLIGONUCLEOTIDES FOR TREATMENT OF CANCER STEM CELLSMarch 2022January 2024Abandon2201NoNo
17701238TREATMENT OF AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS (ALS)March 2022October 2023Allow1901NoNo
17697405NUCLEIC ACIDS FOR INHIBITING EXPRESSION OF LPA IN A CELLMarch 2022March 2024Allow2411NoNo
17696606GENETIC ELEMENTS DRIVING CIRCULAR RNA TRANSLATION AND METHODS OF USEMarch 2022September 2022Allow601NoNo
17694982THERAPEUTIC PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION FOR CANCER INCLUDING MIRNAMarch 2022April 2024Allow2620NoNo
17695079THERAPEUTIC PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION FOR CANCER INCLUDING MIRNAMarch 2022April 2024Allow2520NoNo
17694210GENETICALLY-MODIFIED IMMUNE CELLS COMPRISING A MICRORNA-ADAPTED SHRNA (SHRNAMIR)March 2022May 2022Allow200NoNo
17678792Treatment Of Inflammation With Glucocorticoids And Angiopoietin-Like 7 (ANGPTL7) InhibitorsFebruary 2022August 2023Allow1811NoNo
17667988NUCLEIC ACID COMPOUND AND OLIGONUCLEOTIDEFebruary 2022October 2023Allow2020NoNo
17667449ANGPTL4 OLIGONUCLEOTIDES INFLUENCING THE REGULATION OF THE FATTY ACID METABOLISMFebruary 2022June 2023Allow1620YesNo
17576130RAAV-BASED COMPOSITIONS AND METHODSJanuary 2022October 2023Allow2110NoNo
17572615COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ORGAN SPECIFIC DELIVERY OF NUCLEIC ACIDSJanuary 2022June 2022Allow511NoNo
17567482PARTICLE-MEDIATED DELIVERY OF BIOLOGICSJanuary 2022March 2024Allow2621YesNo
17561095MODULATION OF GYS1 EXPRESSIONDecember 2021March 2023Allow1400NoNo
17555285NANOPARTICLE TO TARGET CANCERDecember 2021February 2023Allow1400NoNo
17536880PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION FOR PREVENTING OR TREATING LIVER CANCERNovember 2021April 2024Allow2821NoNo
17533825Method for Identification of Sensitivity of a Patient to Telomerase Inhibition TherapyNovember 2021September 2023Abandon2210NoNo
17523240MODIFIED DOUBLE-STRANDED RNA AGENTSNovember 2021March 2022Allow510NoNo
17453995EXTENDED DICER SUBSTRATE AGENTS AND METHODS FOR THE SPECIFIC INHIBITION OF GENE EXPRESSIONNovember 2021November 2022Allow1220YesNo
17515859COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR DELIVERING MESSENGER RNANovember 2021July 2024Abandon3321NoNo
17511022GENETICALLY-MODIFIED IMMUNE CELLS COMPRISING A MICRORNA-ADAPTED SHRNA (SHRNAMIR)October 2021March 2022Allow410YesNo
17510277RNA INTERFERENCE MEDIATED INHIBITION OF GENE EXPRESSION USING SHORT INTERFERING NUCLEIC ACIDS (SINA)October 2021October 2023Allow2410NoNo
17508379INHIBITION OF NUCLEIC ACID POLYMERASES BY ENDONUCLEASE V-CLEAVABLE OLIGONUCLEOTIDE LIGANDSOctober 2021August 2023Allow2110NoNo
17506012PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION FOR TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF CHRONIC DISEASEOctober 2021October 2023Allow2411YesNo
17479617MODIFIED DOUBLE-STRANDED RNA AGENTSSeptember 2021January 2024Abandon2701NoNo
17477456COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING RIBOREGULATORS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFSeptember 2021May 2023Allow2000NoNo
17475305LIPID FORMULATED COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITING EXPRESSION OF SERUM AMYLOID A GENESeptember 2021September 2023Allow2411NoNo
17474264Methods for Treatment of Alport SyndromeSeptember 2021December 2023Abandon2711NoNo
17473863COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ORGAN SPECIFIC DELIVERY OF NUCLEIC ACIDSSeptember 2021January 2022Allow400NoNo
17467390CpG-oligodeoxynucleotide compounds in combination with immune modulators for cancer immunotherapySeptember 2021September 2023Allow2411NoNo
17459213INHIBITION OF EXPANSION AND FUNCTION OF PATHOGENIC AGE-ASSOCIATED B CELLS AND USE FOR THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF AUTOIMMUNE DISEASEAugust 2021August 2023Allow2411NoNo
17410504HELIX 73-DERIVED RNA MOLECULES INTERACTING WITH ERM PROTEIN AND METHODS OF USING THE SAMEAugust 2021February 2024Allow3011NoNo
17407930EXTENDED DICER SUBSTRATE AGENTS AND METHODS FOR THE SPECIFIC INHIBITION OF GENE EXPRESSIONAugust 2021May 2022Allow911NoNo
17407966EXTENDED DICER SUBSTRATE AGENTS AND METHODS FOR THE SPECIFIC INHIBITION OF GENE EXPRESSIONAugust 2021April 2022Allow820YesNo
17406718SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY (SMA) TREATMENT VIA TARGETING OF SMN2 SPLICE SITE INHIBITORY SEQUENCESAugust 2021December 2023Abandon2810NoNo
17395683METHOD OF DELIVERING GENES AND DRUGS TO A POSTERIOR SEGMENT OF AN EYEAugust 2021June 2023Allow2210NoNo
17378528ANTISENSE OLIGOMERS TARGETING PCSK9July 2021March 2023Allow2010NoNo
17341057EXOSOMES AND MIRNA TO TREAT GLAUCOMAJune 2021July 2023Allow2511YesNo
17339142EXTENDED DICER SUBSTRATE AGENTS AND METHODS FOR THE SPECIFIC INHIBITION OF GENE EXPRESSIONJune 2021January 2022Allow701NoNo
17324944MOLECULAR FUSES FOR REAL-TIME, LABEL-FREE, MULTIPLEXED IMAGING OF RNAs IN LIVING CELLSMay 2021June 2023Allow2510NoNo
17293356ANGPTL4 OLIGONUCLEOTIDES INFLUENCING THE REGULATION OF THE FATTY ACID METABOLISMMay 2021February 2024Allow3321NoNo
17315939TREATMENT OF TUMORS WITH MIRNA TARGETING CDK4/CDK6May 2021August 2023Allow2711NoNo
17231409GLP-1 Receptor Ligand Moiety Conjugated Oligonucleotides and Uses ThereofApril 2021January 2024Allow3311YesNo
17231969ANTISENSE-INDUCED EXON EXCLUSION IN MYOSTATINApril 2021June 2023Abandon2610NoNo
17227802NOVEL LIPID FORMULATIONS FOR NUCLEIC ACID DELIVERYApril 2021August 2021Allow410YesNo
17225788GENETICALLY-MODIFIED IMMUNE CELLS COMPRISING A MICRORNA-ADAPTED SHRNA (SHRNAMIR)April 2021July 2021Allow300NoNo
17218682TREATMENTS OF NON-ALCOHOLIC STEATOHEPATITIS (NASH)March 2021July 2023Allow2711YesNo
17217989PHOSPHOROTHIOATE-CONJUGATED miRNAs AND METHODS OF USING THE SAMEMarch 2021August 2023Allow2920NoNo
17193182TRANSPOSON-BASED TRANSFECTION SYSTEM FOR PRIMARY CELLSMarch 2021December 2023Allow3411NoNo
17191895COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ORGAN SPECIFIC DELIVERY OF NUCLEIC ACIDSMarch 2021August 2021Allow601YesNo
17185587PROCESSES OF PREPARING MRNA-LOADED LIPID NANOPARTICLESFebruary 2021December 2023Allow3311NoNo
17182423POLYNUCLEOTIDE AGENTS TARGETING AMINOLEVULINIC ACID SYNTHASE-1 (ALAS1) AND USES THEREOFFebruary 2021September 2023Abandon3111NoNo
17170047Novel Structurally Designed shRNAsFebruary 2021April 2023Allow2610NoNo
17158845METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR MODULATING LNCRNAS AND METHODS OF TREATMENT BASED ON LNCRNA EXPRESSIONJanuary 2021February 2024Allow3721YesNo
17050148SCREENING METHOD FOR THERAPEUTIC SUBSTANCE FOR PREVENTING OR TREATING BRONCHOPULMONARY DYSPLASIA (BPD)January 2021May 2024Allow4310NoNo
17150934RNA INTERFERENCE IN DERMAL AND FIBROTIC INDICATIONSJanuary 2021April 2024Abandon3921NoNo
17146554COMPLEMENT COMPONENT C5 IRNA COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFJanuary 2021May 2023Abandon2801NoNo
17146147VON WILLEBRAND FACTOR (VWF)-TARGETING AGENTS AND METHODS OF USING THE SAMEJanuary 2021December 2023Allow3511NoNo
17141275SERPINA1 iRNA COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFJanuary 2021April 2024Allow3921NoNo
17126330Oligonucleotides Comprising Modified NucleosidesDecember 2020October 2022Allow2200NoNo
17125053SEXUAL MATURATION IN RAINBOW TROUTDecember 2020May 2024Allow4011NoNo
17121885TMPRSS6 iRNA COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFDecember 2020October 2023Abandon3411NoNo
17114210PANCREATIC CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODDecember 2020June 2023Allow3011YesNo
17105174RNA INTERFERENCE MEDIATED INHIBITION OF GENE EXPRESSION USING CHEMICALLY MODIFIED SHORT INTERFERING NUCLEIC ACID (SINA)November 2020September 2023Abandon3411YesNo
17103671MARKERS FOR PRE-CANCER AND CANCER CELLS AND THE METHOD TO INTERFERE WITH CELL PROLIFERATION THEREINNovember 2020March 2023Abandon2701NoNo
17102500POLYNUCLEOTIDE AGENTS TARGETING FACTOR XII (HAGEMAN FACTOR) (F12) AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFNovember 2020February 2023Abandon2701NoNo
16953704Modulators of PCSK9 ExpressionNovember 2020November 2022Allow2410NoNo
17056203tRNA/pre-miRNA Compositions and Use in Treating CancerNovember 2020September 2023Allow3421NoNo
17099503Increasing Specificity for RNA-Guided Genome EditingNovember 2020October 2023Allow3511NoNo
17055812MITOCHONDRIAL OPTOGENETICS-BASED GENE THERAPY FOR TREATING CANCERNovember 2020April 2024Abandon4101NoNo
17095945EXTENDED DICER SUBSTRATE AGENTS AND METHODS FOR THE SPECIFIC INHIBITION OF GENE EXPRESSIONNovember 2020January 2023Allow2601NoNo
17092435POLYNUCLEOTIDE AGENTS TARGETING PATATIN-LIKE PHOSPHOLIPASE DOMAIN CONTAINING 3 (PNPLA3) AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFNovember 2020February 2023Abandon2701NoNo
17093038RNA NANOPARTICLES AND METHOD OF USE THEREOFNovember 2020August 2023Allow3311NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner HUDSON, AMY ROSE.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
2
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
0.4%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
41
Allowed After Appeal Filing
7
(17.1%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
34
(82.9%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
18.3%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 17.1% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner HUDSON, AMY ROSE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner HUDSON, AMY ROSE works in Art Unit 1635 and has examined 938 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 59.4%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 26 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner HUDSON, AMY ROSE's allowance rate of 59.4% places them in the 13% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by HUDSON, AMY ROSE receive 1.49 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 35% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HUDSON, AMY ROSE is 26 months. This places the examiner in the 60% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +21.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by HUDSON, AMY ROSE. This interview benefit is in the 69% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 60.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 82% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 66.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 50% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 88.9% of appeals filed. This is in the 79% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 75.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 60.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 3.3% of allowed cases (in the 84% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.4% of allowed cases (in the 47% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.