USPTO Examiner SITTON JEHANNE SOUAYA - Art Unit 1634

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17254977CXCL13 Marker For Predicting Immunotherapeutic Responsiveness In Patient With Lung Cancer And Use ThereofDecember 2020July 2024Abandon4311NoNo
17122102METHODS FOR PREDICTING RESPONSE TO TREATMENTDecember 2020October 2023Abandon3401NoNo
17104336METHOD OF DETECTING SMALL RNANovember 2020June 2024Allow4341YesNo
17099195AUTISM ASSOCIATED GENETIC MARKERSNovember 2020July 2024Abandon4411NoNo
17094190USE OF POOLED SAMPLES TO OPTIMISE THE EFFICIENCY AND UTILITY OF A RAPID, LAB-FREE POINT-OF-CARE TESTNovember 2020February 2022Allow1521YesNo
17087277CITRUS GREENING (HUANGLONGBING)-INDUCED SMALL RNAS ARE POTENTIAL EARLY DIAGNOSIS MARKERSNovember 2020May 2024Abandon4211NoNo
17048131ASSESSMENT OF THE RISK OF COMPLICATION IN A PATIENT SUSPECTED OF HAVING AN INFECTION, HAVING A SOFA SCORE LOWER THAN TWOOctober 2020August 2024Abandon4611NoNo
17061749MOLECULAR GENETIC APPROACH TO TREATMENT AND DIAGNOSIS OF ALCOHOL AND DRUG DEPENDENCEOctober 2020May 2021Allow711YesNo
16948526METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR ASSAYING REPETITIVE SEQUENCESSeptember 2020July 2024Allow4621NoNo
16955187METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS BY DETECTING METHANOBREVIBACTER SMITHIISeptember 2020March 2024Abandon4521NoNo
16975651SNP MOLECULAR MARKER TIGHTLY LINKED TO WEEPING TRAIT OF MEI AND DETECTION METHOD AND USE THEREOFAugust 2020January 2024Abandon4021NoNo
16992005METHODS FOR TREATING CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME AND MYALGIC ENCEPHALOMYELITISAugust 2020June 2024Abandon4601NoNo
16935761METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR DETECTION OF ENTEROVIRUS D68July 2020July 2023Allow3620NoNo
16928436METHODS FOR PREDICTING RISK OF INTERSTITIAL PNEUMONIAJuly 2020January 2024Allow4211NoNo
16866137HISTONE DEACETYLASE 6 (HDAC6) BIOMARKERS IN MULTIPLE MYELOMAMay 2020June 2023Abandon3711NoNo
16756702METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR USE OF TREX2 AS DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC MARKER FOR CANCERApril 2020August 2024Abandon5221NoNo
16847334USE OF GLYCANS AND GLYCOSYLTRANSFERASES FOR DIAGNOSING/MONITORING INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASEApril 2020January 2024Abandon4521NoNo
16651492INTERLEUKIN 32 AS A BIOMARKER OF TYPE 1 DIABETESMarch 2020February 2024Abandon4631YesYes
16826030AUTISM ASSOCIATED GENETIC MARKERSMarch 2020December 2022Abandon3301NoNo
16805125TERTIARY AMINE SUBSTITUTED COUMARIN COMPOUNDS AND USES AS FLUORESCENT LABELSFebruary 2020June 2024Allow5122YesNo
16641544NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSTIC OF NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASES, NON-ALCOHOLIC STEATOHEPATITIS AND/OR LIVER FIBROSISFebruary 2020May 2024Abandon5122NoNo
16789383Therapeutic Regimen for HypertensionFebruary 2020January 2023Allow3521YesNo
16784051MOLECULAR GENETIC APPROACH TO TREATMENT AND DIAGNOSIS OF ALCOHOL AND DRUG DEPENDENCEFebruary 2020January 2022Allow2310NoNo
16773040GENETIC MARKERS FOR PREDICTING RESPONSIVENESS TO THERAPY WITH HDL-RAISING OR HDL MIMICKING AGENTJanuary 2020March 2022Allow2610NoNo
16633768METHODS AND TOOLS FOR PURIFYING NUCLEIC ACIDS AND USING POLYMERIZED TUBULINJanuary 2020May 2022Allow2711YesNo
16745998DIAGNOSTIC TEST FOR PREDICTING METASTASIS AND RECURRENCE IN CUTANEOUS MELANOMAJanuary 2020June 2022Allow2920NoNo
16736208DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC TEST FOR STURGE-WEBER SYNDROME, KLIPPEL-TRENAUNAY-WEBER SYNDROME, AND PORT-WINE STAINS (PWSS)January 2020November 2023Abandon4641NoNo
16628259METHOD FOR DETECTING PARASITIC INFECTION AND KITJanuary 2020March 2023Allow3831YesNo
16726546KIT FOR IN VITRO TESTING PANEL OF GENES IN PAP SMEAR SAMPLES FOR ENDOMETRIOSIS AND METHOD OF NON-INVASIVELY AND QUALITATIVELY DETERMINING SEVERITY OF ENDOMETRIOSIS USING THE KITDecember 2019June 2023Abandon4121YesNo
16724970TERT PROMOTER MUTATIONS IN CANCERDecember 2019June 2022Abandon3010NoNo
16481331PROSTATIC CANCER MARKER, PLXNA1, AND APPLICATION THEREOFNovember 2019February 2023Abandon4312NoNo
16610895TRANSMEMBRANE PORE CONSISTING OF TWO CSGG PORESNovember 2019February 2024Allow5131YesNo
16664505Consensus Coding Sequences of Human Breast and Colorectal CancersOctober 2019March 2023Abandon4101NoNo
16662939ERBB2/HER2 MUTATIONS IN THE TRANSMEMBRANE OR JUXTAMEMBRANE DOMAINOctober 2019March 2022Abandon2901NoNo
16606665PEROXISOME BIOMARKERS IN HIV DISEASE PROGRESSION AND PEROXISOME ACTIVATING DRUGS FOR HIV TREATMENTOctober 2019July 2023Allow4521YesNo
16601627DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF VIRAL DISEASESOctober 2019April 2024Allow5442NoNo
16499908METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR DETECTING AND MODULATING AN IMMUNOTHERAPY RESISTANCE GENE SIGNATURE IN CANCEROctober 2019September 2023Allow4841NoNo
16580523DISCOVERY OF A SOMATIC MUTATION IN MYD88 GENE IN LYMPHOPLASMACYTIC LYMPHOMASeptember 2019April 2023Allow4221NoYes
16569119GENE EXPRESSION PROFILES ASSOCIATED WITH SUB-CLINICAL KIDNEY TRANSPLANT REJECTIONSeptember 2019March 2024Allow5421YesNo
16564886PREDICTION AND TREATMENT OF HEART FAILURESeptember 2019May 2021Abandon2010NoNo
16534028NON-INVASIVE TEST TO PREDICT RECURRENCE OF COLORECTAL CANCERAugust 2019September 2023Allow4941YesNo
16530416BIOMARKER DLEC1 FOR CANCERAugust 2019March 2023Allow4431YesNo
16477456METHODS AND KITS FOR TREATING CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASEJuly 2019March 2022Allow3211YesNo
16453195ncRNA AND USES THEREOFJune 2019March 2022Allow3321NoNo
16451942METHOD FOR EVALUATING WHETHER AN INDIVIDUAL WITH CANCER IS SUITABLE FOR TREATMENT WITH A CDK INHIBITORJune 2019June 2023Allow4811NoNo
16471320KIT FOR IDENTIFYING MALIGNANCY, AND USES THEREOFJune 2019January 2023Allow4321YesNo
16445322ADM2 GENE MARKER FOR DIAGNOSIS OR PROGNOSIS PREDICTION OF THYROID CANCER AND USES THEREOFJune 2019April 2023Abandon4631NoNo
16462469METHOD FOR PREDICTING SENSITIVITY OF CANCER TO TREATMENT WITH PD-1 IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORMay 2019April 2024Abandon5931NoNo
16416083PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL-3-KINASE PATHWAY BIOMARKERSMay 2019December 2021Abandon3111YesNo
16409520Compositions and Methods to Detect Kidney FibrosisMay 2019September 2024Abandon6041YesNo
16346659METHOD FOR THE IN VITRO PROGNOSIS OF INDIVIDUALS HAVING MULTIPLE MYELOMA AND METHOD FOR THE TREATMENT THEREOFMay 2019August 2022Allow3921NoNo
16395087METHODS OF USING GENETIC MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH ENDOMETRIOSISApril 2019October 2022Abandon4222NoNo
16369724BIOMARKERS FOR INFLAMMATORY SKIN DISEASEMarch 2019October 2022Allow4221YesNo
16335830ASSAY FOR DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN SEPSIS AND SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROMEMarch 2019August 2023Abandon5322NoNo
16356693METHODS FOR PERSONALIZED DETECTION OF THE RECURRENCE OF CANCER OR METASTASIS AND/OR EVALUATION OF TREATMENT RESPONSEMarch 2019January 2023Abandon4630NoNo
16355796Method and System for Automated Image Analysis in Cancer CellsMarch 2019August 2021Allow2930YesNo
16354799TISSUE-SPECIFIC METHYLATION MARKERMarch 2019September 2023Allow5431YesNo
16333177RNA BIOMARKERS FOR HEREDITARY ANGIOEDEMAMarch 2019September 2023Allow5441NoNo
16331792METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR PREDICTING CHRONIC LUNG ALLOGRAFT DYSFUNCTIONMarch 2019December 2020Allow2121YesNo
16287607METHODS FOR ASSESSING RISK OF INCREASED TIME-TO-FIRST-CONCEPTIONFebruary 2019January 2021Abandon2300NoNo
16281750METHODS FOR TREATING EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITISFebruary 2019April 2023Allow5021YesNo
16327060COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF LYMPHATIC SYSTEM DISORDERSFebruary 2019March 2022Allow3621YesNo
16281315METHODS FOR PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION AND TREATMENTFebruary 2019March 2022Allow3711NoNo
16253697METHODS FOR COLON CANCER DETECTION AND TREATMENTJanuary 2019April 2022Allow3811NoNo
16316662COMPOSITION FOR DIAGNOSING OR PREDICTING RISK OF METABOLIC SYNDROME OR METABOLIC SYNDROME-RELATED DISEASES USING HUMAN ORAL MICROBIOMEJanuary 2019March 2022Allow3831YesNo
16313231SWARM INTELLIGENCE-ENHANCED DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY SELECTION FOR CANCER USING TUMOR- EDUCATED PLATELETSDecember 2018July 2021Abandon3101NoNo
16312958Compositions and Methods for Providing a Prognosis for Influenza InfectionDecember 2018May 2022Allow4121NoNo
16225356METHOD AND KIT FOR GENETIC ANALYSISDecember 2018December 2021Abandon3611NoNo
16309763CHICKEN WHOLE-GENOME SNP CHIP AND USE THEREOFDecember 2018December 2022Allow4810NoNo
16216846BIOMARKERS FOR USE IN PROGNOSIS OF MORTALITY IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTSDecember 2018January 2023Allow5022YesNo
16209698Inhibition of JAK-STAT Signaling Inhibits Formation of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs)December 2018April 2022Allow4022YesNo
16205659ANELLOVIRUS GENOME QUANTIFICATION AS A BIOMARKER OF IMMUNE SUPPRESSIONNovember 2018April 2024Allow6050YesNo
16203803PREDICTING PEPTIDE RECEPTOR RADIOTHERAPY USING A GENE EXPRESSION ASSAYNovember 2018May 2023Allow5411NoNo
16304461DETERMINATION OF GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO AGGRESSIVE PROSTATE CANCERNovember 2018October 2023Abandon5822NoNo
16197593METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR DIAGNOSING, PROGNOSING, AND TREATING ENDOMETRIOSISNovember 2018February 2022Allow3921NoNo
16303033DIAGNOSIS OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE BASED ON GENESNovember 2018September 2022Allow4621NoNo
16192008STROMAL GENE SIGNATURES FOR DIAGNOSIS AND USE IN IMMUNOTHERAPYNovember 2018October 2022Abandon4721YesNo
16302015BTK MUTATION AND IBRUTINIB RESISTANCENovember 2018May 2021Allow3021YesNo
16184748Methods of Subtyping CRC and their association with Treatment of Colon Cancer Patients With OxaliplatinNovember 2018March 2020Abandon1610NoNo
16098019Methods and Compositions for Classifying DLBCLOctober 2018May 2021Allow3111NoNo
16158823METHOD FOR DETECTING CYSTIC FIBROSISOctober 2018November 2020Allow2521NoNo
16153094BCR-ABL TRUNCATION MUTATIONSOctober 2018January 2022Allow4030YesNo
16149560METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR SCD, CRT, CRT-D, OR SCA THERAPY IDENTIFICATION AND/OR SELECTIONOctober 2018December 2021Allow3931YesNo
16138449METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE RISK OF DEVELOPING ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY IN A HUMAN SUBJECT WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION AND INHIBITING SUCH DEVELOPMENTSeptember 2018March 2022Allow4121YesNo
16086144METHOD FOR DETECTING GENE MUTATIONSeptember 2018April 2023Allow5531NoNo
16110964URINE BIOMARKERS FOR DETECTING GRAFT REJECTIONAugust 2018February 2021Allow3021NoNo
16109551COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR DETECTION OF DRUG RESISTANT MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSISAugust 2018January 2021Allow2911NoNo
16101078METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR DETECTING AND DIAGNOSING DISEASES AND CONDITIONSAugust 2018December 2021Allow4022NoNo
16076239GENE SIGNATURE PREDICTIVE OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA RESPONSE TO TRANSCATHETER ARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION (TACE)August 2018December 2021Allow4021YesNo
16074728COPANLISIB BIOMARKERSAugust 2018November 2022Abandon5232YesNo
16071289COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR SCREENING AND IDENTIFYING CLINICALLY AGGRESSIVE PROSTATE CANCERJuly 2018September 2023Allow6041YesNo
16069332IL-10 AS A PREDICTIVE BIOMARKER OF RESPONSIVENESS TO HOUSE DUST MITE ALLERGEN IMMUNOTHERAPYJuly 2018February 2021Allow3121YesNo
16031384BIOMARKERS FOR ASSESSING IDIOPATHIC PULMONARY FIBROSISJuly 2018November 2020Allow2821NoNo
16028937METHODS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASEJuly 2018April 2021Allow3321YesNo
16067235PREDICTING RESPONSE TO IMMUNOMODULATORY DRUGS (IMIDS) IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTSJune 2018September 2020Abandon2701NoNo
16066876COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR SCREENING AND DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCERJune 2018March 2021Allow3211YesNo
16005207MATERIALS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSMENT OF COLORECTAL ADENOMAJune 2018July 2019Abandon1310NoNo
15991247GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS ASSOCIATED WITH PSORIASIS, METHODS OF DETECTION AND USES THEREOFMay 2018October 2020Allow2811NoNo
15990301C-CBL MUTATIONS AND USES THEREOFMay 2018March 2022Allow4621NoNo
15987235ARID1A AND PPP2R1A MUTATIONS IN CANCERMay 2018March 2019Abandon910NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SITTON, JEHANNE SOUAYA.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
6
Examiner Affirmed
6
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
0.5%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
59
Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(5.1%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
56
(94.9%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
11.9%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 5.1% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner SITTON, JEHANNE SOUAYA - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SITTON, JEHANNE SOUAYA works in Art Unit 1634 and has examined 769 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 33.2%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 39 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SITTON, JEHANNE SOUAYA's allowance rate of 33.2% places them in the 6% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SITTON, JEHANNE SOUAYA receive 1.76 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 35% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SITTON, JEHANNE SOUAYA is 39 months. This places the examiner in the 25% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +60.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SITTON, JEHANNE SOUAYA. This interview benefit is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 17.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 19% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 44.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 69% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 68.4% of appeals filed. This is in the 54% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 76.9% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 78.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 82% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 2.6% of allowed cases (in the 78% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 2.4% of allowed cases (in the 72% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.