USPTO Examiner KAPUSHOC STEPHEN THOMAS - Art Unit 1634

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17169293METHOD OF SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL CANCERFebruary 2021November 2022Abandon6021NoNo
17247534Marker and diagnosis method for noninvasive diagnosis of myocardial infarctionDecember 2020June 2023Allow3021YesNo
17119167COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING ACUTE REJECTION IN RENAL TRANSPLANTATIONDecember 2020April 2024Abandon4021NoNo
16953480CIRCULATING RNA SIGNATURES SPECIFIC TO PREECLAMPSIANovember 2020November 2022Allow2421YesNo
17097705METHOD OF IDENTIFYING DISEASE RISK FACTORSNovember 2020September 2022Abandon2201NoNo
17053572METHOD FOR PREDICTING THE RISK OF LATE-ONSET ALZHEIMER'S DISEASESNovember 2020September 2022Abandon2301NoNo
16971692BIOMARKER FOR DETECTING A POSSIBLE INCOMPATABILITY WITH RESPECT TO METAL IMPLANTSNovember 2020November 2022Allow2721YesNo
17066189Left-Right Gene Expression Signature for Triple Negative Breast CancerOctober 2020October 2023Abandon3621NoNo
17035179DNA Damage Repair Inhibitors for Treatment of CancerSeptember 2020December 2023Abandon3821NoNo
16980121METHOD FOR PREDICTING PROGRESSION TO ACTIVE TUBERCULOSIS DISEASESeptember 2020November 2022Allow2621YesNo
16995180METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER BY DNA METHYLATION ANALYSISAugust 2020March 2022Allow1911YesNo
16963355USE OF CFDNA FRAGMENTS AS BIOMARKERS IN PATIENTS AFTER ORGAN TRANSPLANTATIONJuly 2020March 2024Allow4331NoNo
16928828BIOMARKER FOR PREDICTING RISK OF RECURRENCE IN PATIENTS WITH PAROXYSMAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATIONJuly 2020March 2023Allow3630YesNo
16923005NON-INVASIVE PRENATAL TESTING AT EARLY STAGE OF PREGNANCYJuly 2020November 2023Allow4131YesNo
16919095SUPPORT BACKING STRIP TECHNOLOGY AND METHOD FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE IDENTIFICATION OF LATENT PRINT AND DNA DEPOSITED ON ADHESIVE MATERIALSJuly 2020April 2024Abandon4601NoNo
16954183ASSESSING GRAFT SUITABILITY FOR TRANSPLANTATIONJune 2020March 2024Allow4541YesNo
16763714BIOMARKER INDICATING RESPONSE TO POZIOTINIB THERAPY FOR CANCERMay 2020February 2023Abandon3301NoNo
16871951DIAGNOSTIC ASSAY FOR TISSUE TRANSPLANTATION STATUSMay 2020May 2023Abandon3611NoNo
16762820Sensitive and Accurate Genome-wide Profiling of RNA Structure In VivoMay 2020May 2023Abandon3601NoNo
16852663NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF FETAL ANEUPLOIDY BY SEQUENCINGApril 2020March 2024Allow4730YesNo
16833587METHOD FOR PREDICTING ORGAN TRANSPLANT REJECTION USING NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCINGMarch 2020January 2023Abandon3411NoNo
16822839BILIARY TRACT CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODMarch 2020June 2022Allow2711YesNo
16817729KIT FOR DIAGNOSIS OF SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS AND PROBE FOR THE DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF THE METHYLATION LEVEL OF AN IFI44L FRAGMENTMarch 2020May 2022Allow2620NoNo
16644313ASSOCIATION OF GENETIC VARIATIONS TO DIAGNOSE AND TREAT ATTENTION-DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER (ADHD)March 2020October 2022Allow3121YesNo
16808095PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODMarch 2020June 2022Allow2711YesNo
16807528MIRNA in Gulf War IllnessMarch 2020May 2022Abandon2610NoNo
16803390ESOPHAGEAL CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODFebruary 2020August 2022Allow3011YesNo
16800755LUNG CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODFebruary 2020August 2022Allow3011YesNo
16797625BREAST CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODFebruary 2020June 2022Allow2811YesNo
16639103Application Of Lung Cancer-Associated MicroRNA Molecular Marker In Serum Exosome And Detection Kit Using SameFebruary 2020October 2023Abandon4421NoNo
16789943STOMACH CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODFebruary 2020June 2022Allow2811NoNo
16789986COLORECTAL CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODFebruary 2020June 2022Allow2811YesNo
16785790APPARATUS, KITS AND METHODS FOR THE PREDICTION OF ONSET OF SEPSISFebruary 2020March 2022Abandon2510NoNo
16785233LIVER CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODFebruary 2020July 2022Allow2921NoNo
16636162BIOMARKERS FOR ASSESSING THE RESPONSE STATUS FOR TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATORY CONDITION OR DISEASE AFFECTING THE DIGESTIVE TRACT SUCH AS INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE IN HUMAN PATIENTSFebruary 2020April 2024Allow5121YesNo
16778490METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR SCREENING AND TREATING DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERSJanuary 2020November 2022Allow3421YesNo
16630127SMALL RNA PREDICTORS FOR HUNTINGTON'S DISEASEJanuary 2020October 2024Abandon5731YesYes
16730949CELL-FREE DNA FOR ASSESSING AND/OR TREATING CANCERDecember 2019November 2020Allow1120YesNo
16730938CELL-FREE DNA FOR ASSESSING AND/OR TREATING CANCERDecember 2019December 2020Allow1211YesNo
16624500BIOMARKERS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF FIBROTIC LUNG DISEASEDecember 2019November 2022Abandon3521NoNo
16721038METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE DETECTION OF CALR MUTATIONS IN MYELOPROLIFERATIVE DISEASESDecember 2019March 2022Abandon2711NoNo
16624779PCR PRIMER PAIR AND APPLICATION THEREOFDecember 2019June 2023Allow4121YesNo
16624061Methods and Compositions For Predicting Chronic Lung Allograft DysfunctionDecember 2019April 2022Allow2821YesNo
16617980GENETIC IDENTIFICATION OF PISCIRICKETTSIA SALMONIS RESISTANT SALMONIDSNovember 2019June 2024Allow5522YesNo
16693117TUMOR ORGANOID CULTURE COMPOSITIONS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODSNovember 2019December 2022Allow3741YesNo
16615659Methods of Diagnosing Intervertebral Disc Disease And Chondrodystrophy In CaninesNovember 2019March 2023Allow4021YesNo
16683588DNA METHYLATION IN COLORECTAL AND BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSTIC METHODSNovember 2019November 2022Abandon3621NoNo
16667932METHODS FOR DETERMINING RESPONSIVENESS TO MEK/ERK INHIBITORSOctober 2019November 2022Abandon3621NoNo
16596481DIAGNOSIS OF SEPSISOctober 2019August 2022Allow6011YesNo
16603613METHODS AND KITS FOR EVALUATING ZINC LEVELS IN MILKOctober 2019August 2022Allow3421YesNo
16590182COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ANALYZING HETEROGENEOUS SAMPLESOctober 2019November 2021Abandon2501NoNo
16499105METHODS FOR ASSESSING RISK OF OR DIAGNOSING GENETIC DEFECTS BY IDENTIFYING DE NOVO MUTATIONS OR SOMATIC MOSAIC VARIANTS IN SPERM OR SOMATIC TISSUESSeptember 2019November 2022Abandon3721NoNo
16496154ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY AND CONCUSSION SYMPTOMSSeptember 2019June 2022Allow3211YesNo
16516663DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF PSORIATIC ARTHRITISJuly 2019October 2021Allow2711YesNo
16419958METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR DETERMINING RESPONSIVENESS TO ANTIBODY THERAPYMay 2019October 2023Abandon5331YesNo
16405812INHIBITING THE ONSET OF GOUTMay 2019April 2021Allow2321YesNo
16373996METHODS FOR PROFILING AND QUANTITATING CELL-FREE RNAApril 2019September 2021Abandon3001NoNo
16371420COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING LIKELIHOOD OF AN INCREASED SUSCEPTIBILITY TO CONTRACTING JOHNE'S DISEASEApril 2019April 2020Allow1201YesNo
16335996DIAGNOSIS, PROGNOSIS AND TREATMENT FOR SCHIZOPHRENIA AND SCHIZOAFFECTIVE PSYCHOSISMarch 2019March 2022Abandon3611NoNo
16351378METHOD TO PERFORM MEDICAL PROCEDURES ON BREAST CANCER PATIENTS GUIDED BY AN SNP DERIVED POLYGENIC RISK SCOREMarch 2019February 2023Abandon4821NoNo
16286975GENETIC MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS AND USE THEREOFFebruary 2019March 2022Abandon3611YesNo
16324467GRAPHENE NANOSENSOR FOR DETECTING TARGET RNAFebruary 2019September 2022Abandon4430NoNo
16321022Application of SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) Loci of Whole Genome of Yak, Primer Group for Detection and KitJanuary 2019December 2020Allow2221YesNo
16317518Method of Identifying a Subject Having a Bacterial InfectionJanuary 2019September 2021Allow3321YesNo
16241565SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING A TREATMENT COURSE OF ACTIONJanuary 2019February 2023Allow5041YesNo
16239129Methods and compositions for screening and treating developmental disordersJanuary 2019January 2022Allow3621YesNo
16235247METHODS FOR PREDICTING ANTI-CANCER RESPONSEDecember 2018November 2021Allow3511YesNo
16218175DNA SEQUENCING BY NANOPORE USING MODIFIED NUCLEOTIDESDecember 2018November 2021Abandon3530YesNo
16308564METHODS AND KITS COMPRISING GENE SIGNATURES FOR STRATIFYING BREAST CANCER PATIENTSDecember 2018April 2022Allow4031YesNo
16308315METHODS FOR DETECTING STRUCTURAL VARIANTS IN NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASEDecember 2018January 2021Allow2521YesNo
16207534GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS ASSOCIATED WITH VENOUS THROMBOSIS, METHODS OF DETECTION AND USES THEREOFDecember 2018March 2021Allow2721NoNo
16197319Methods for Enriching Microbial Cell-Free DNA in PlasmaNovember 2018April 2024Abandon6040NoNo
16098500PROFILING MICROVESICLE NUCLEIC ACIDS AND USES THEREOF AS SIGNATURES IN DIAGNOSIS OF RENAL TRANSPLANT REJECTIONNovember 2018August 2021Allow3411NoNo
16168525METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE DETECTION, CLASSIFICATION, AND DIAGNOSIS OF SCHIZOPHRENIAOctober 2018January 2023Abandon5122YesNo
16159373HENT1 PLUS MATE1/OCT2 POLYMORPHISMS PREDICT EFFICACY AND TOXICITY OF TAS-102 IN METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTSOctober 2018January 2021Abandon2711NoNo
16154023METHODS FOR DETECTING EPIGENETIC MODIFICATIONSOctober 2018June 2021Allow3211YesNo
16091731SF3B1 SUPPRESSION AS A THERAPY FOR TUMORS HARBORING SF3B1 COPY LOSSOctober 2018May 2022Abandon4321YesNo
16149492GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS ASSOCIATED WITH PSORIASIS, METHODS OF DETECTION AND USES THEREOFOctober 2018November 2020Allow2511NoNo
16149653METHOD OF DIAGNOSING NEOPLASMS - IIOctober 2018February 2022Abandon4020NoNo
16141371METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING AND TREATING KAWASAKI DISEASE PATIENTS WITH INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN RESISTANCESeptember 2018December 2020Abandon2701NoNo
16088359IDENTIFICATION OF UNIQUE BLOOD-BASED GENE EXPRESSION PROFILES IN CHILDREN WITH REGRESSIVE AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER (ASD) AND ILEOCOLITISSeptember 2018September 2021Allow3621YesNo
16083055COMPOSITIONS FOR CHARACTERIZING DEVELOPMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA IN PATIENTS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFSeptember 2018September 2021Allow3621YesNo
16076775METHODS FOR ASSESSING THE TREATMENT RESPONSE OF TNBC PATIENTS TO NEO-ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY BY ANALYSING CPG METHYLATIONAugust 2018September 2021Allow3821YesNo
16073564COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR SCREENING PEDIATRIC GLIOMAS AND METHODS OF TREATMENT THEREOFJuly 2018December 2020Abandon2902NoNo
16071999PLANT BREEDING USING NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCINGJuly 2018November 2020Abandon2801NoNo
16031218DISEASE RISK FACTORS AND METHODS OF USEJuly 2018February 2021Allow3111YesNo
16025769METHODS OF DETERMINING RESPONSIVENESS TO ANTI-TNF ALPHA THERAPY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASEJuly 2018September 2021Allow3821YesNo
16067139BIOMARKER FOR BREAST CANCERJune 2018October 2020Abandon2801NoNo
16021261METHOD OF IDENTIFYING DISEASE RISK FACTORSJune 2018August 2020Allow2511YesNo
16019079METHODS OF DIAGNOSING AND TREATING CANCER BY DETECTION OF CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIESJune 2018November 2020Abandon2911NoNo
16065662DISTINGUISHING METASTATIC-LETHAL PROSTATE CANCER FROM INDOLENT PROSTATE CANCER USING METHYLATION STATUS OF EPIGENETIC MARKERSJune 2018March 2021Abandon3311NoNo
16006641MARKERS OF TUMOR CELL RESPONSE TO ANTI-CANCER THERAPYJune 2018July 2020Abandon2510NoNo
16006361DIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR DETERMINING PROGNOSIS OF NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCERJune 2018January 2020Allow1910NoNo
16061046QTLS ASSOCIATED WITH AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING LODGING RESISTANCE IN SOYBEANJune 2018February 2021Allow3221YesNo
16060620BLADDER CANCER DETECTION USING MICROSATELLITE ANALYSIS IN PAIRED BUCCAL SWAB AND URINE SAMPLESJune 2018March 2022Allow4531YesNo
15780762METHODS FOR PREDICTING RESPONSE TO ANTI-TNF THERAPYJune 2018March 2021Abandon3311NoNo
15977443METHODS OF DIAGNOSING OR TREATING PROSTATE CANCER USING THE ERG GENE, ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH OTHER OVER OR UNDER EXPRESSED GENES IN PROSTATE CANCERMay 2018September 2021Allow4021YesNo
15971461METHODS FOR DETECTING EPIGENETIC MODIFICATIONSMay 2018May 2020Allow2511YesNo
15953875HYDROLYSIS PROBESApril 2018August 2020Abandon2930YesYes
15766972METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING HEPATIC FIBROSIS BASED ON BACTERIAL PROFILE AND DIVERSITYApril 2018January 2021Abandon3311NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner KAPUSHOC, STEPHEN THOMAS.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
8
Examiner Affirmed
7
(87.5%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(12.5%)
Reversal Percentile
24.5%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 12.5% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
65
Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(4.6%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
62
(95.4%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
11.8%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 4.6% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner KAPUSHOC, STEPHEN THOMAS - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner KAPUSHOC, STEPHEN THOMAS works in Art Unit 1634 and has examined 739 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 32.6%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 39 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner KAPUSHOC, STEPHEN THOMAS's allowance rate of 32.6% places them in the 5% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by KAPUSHOC, STEPHEN THOMAS receive 2.08 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by KAPUSHOC, STEPHEN THOMAS is 39 months. This places the examiner in the 25% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +57.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by KAPUSHOC, STEPHEN THOMAS. This interview benefit is in the 95% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 16.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 15% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 29.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 68.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 54% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 94.1% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 74.4% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 79% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 3.2% of allowed cases (in the 81% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.8% of allowed cases (in the 61% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.