USPTO Examiner ABBOTT KODYE LEE - Art Unit 1634

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19083713METHOD FOR PREPARING HEMOGENIC ENDOTHELIUM CELL AND METHOD FOR PREPARING HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL OR HEMATOPOIETIC STEM AND PROGENITOR CELLMarch 2025December 2025Allow910NoNo
19050950COMPOSITION FOR REGULATING PRODUCTION OF INTERFERING RIBONUCLEIC ACIDFebruary 2025December 2025Allow1110NoNo
18873580STAGED CULTURE METHOD FOR IN-VITRO EXPANSION OF HUMAN CYTOKINE-INDUCED KILLER (CIK) AND USE THEREOFDecember 2024August 2025Allow810YesNo
18948694RECOMBINANT AAV VECTORS FOR TREATING GLUTARIC ACIDURIA TYPE INovember 2024August 2025Allow911YesNo
18919051ANTIGEN BINDING POLYPEPTIDESOctober 2024May 2025Abandon601YesNo
18849551MODIFIED VECTOR, CONSTRUCTION METHOD, AND APPLICATION OF MODIFIED AAV-8 SEROTYPE FOR GENE TARGETING AND EXPRESSIONSeptember 2024February 2026Allow1721NoNo
18891235COMPOSITION FOR REGULATING PRODUCTION OF INTERFERING RIBONUCLEIC ACIDSeptember 2024January 2026Allow1530NoNo
18827471GENE THERAPY FOR SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHYSeptember 2024July 2025Allow1111NoNo
18841165MODIFIED CPG DINUCLEOTIDES FOR RECOMBINANT VIRAL VECTOR PRODUCTIONAugust 2024August 2025Allow1211NoNo
17635170Chimeric Antigen Receptor, Construction Method Therefor and Application ThereofJuly 2022March 2026Abandon4901NoNo
17811855OPTOGENETIC COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING A CBh PROMOTER SEQUENCE AND METHODS FOR USEJuly 2022September 2025Abandon3901NoNo
17792100ADENO ASSOCIATED VIRUS BASED GENE THERAPY FOR PHENYLKETONURIAJuly 2022January 2026Abandon4211NoNo
17775767METHOD OF ISOLATION OF CULTURE OF VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL CELLS, MEDIUM FOR MAINTAINING CHARACTERISTICS OF VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL CELLS, AND CULTURE METHOD INCLUDING SAMEMay 2022June 2025Allow3810YesNo
15733246ADENO-ASSOCIATED VIRUS (AAV) VECTOR LIPID NANOPARTICLE COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USEMarch 2022December 2025Abandon6020NoNo
17753710Anti CD70 CAR-T Cell, and Preparation Method Therefor and Use ThereofMarch 2022June 2025Abandon3910NoNo
17639565METHOD FOR PRODUCING FROZEN BODY OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL TISSUE AGGREGATE OF RETINAL PIGMENT EPITHELIAL CELLSMarch 2022May 2025Abandon3910NoNo
17683931VIRION-LIKE DELIVERY PARTICLES FOR SELF-REPLICATING RNA MOLECULESMarch 2022December 2025Abandon4501NoNo
17635109METHOD FOR OBTAINING EFFICIENT COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING VIRAL VECTORS FOR VACCINATION OR GENE THERAPYFebruary 2022August 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17633769AAV CAPSID VARIANTS FOR TARGETING HUMAN GLIOBLASTOMA CELLSFebruary 2022January 2026Allow4711NoNo
17629686COMPOSITION OF PHARMACEUTICAL CARRIER SOLUTION FOR MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS AND USE OF THE SAMEJanuary 2022September 2025Abandon4411NoNo
17625587Method for Promoting Cell Proliferation, and Method for Preparing Cell ClusterJanuary 2022February 2026Abandon4921NoNo
17624584METHOD FOR IN-VITRO PRODUCTION OF MAMMALIAN NEURONSJanuary 2022May 2025Abandon4110NoNo
17624200RECOMBINANT AAV VECTORS WITH ALTERED IMMUNOGENCITY AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAMEDecember 2021June 2025Abandon4101NoNo
17620993NONHUMAN ANIMAL AND USE FOR SAMEDecember 2021September 2025Allow4511NoNo
17602170METHOD FOR INDUCING DIRECT REPROGRAMMING OF URINE CELL INTO RENAL PROGENITOR CELL AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION CONTAINING REPROGRAMMED RENAL PROGENITOR CELLOctober 2021April 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17601812THERAPEUTIC PARTICLES THAT ENABLE ANTIGEN PRESENTING CELLS TO ATTACK CANCER CELLSOctober 2021February 2026Abandon5211NoNo
17389169CYCLOPHILIN 40 FOR REDUCTION OF NEUROTOXIC FIBRILS AND TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASESJuly 2021November 2025Allow5120YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner ABBOTT, KODYE LEE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner ABBOTT, KODYE LEE works in Art Unit 1634 and has examined 6 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 33.3%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 51 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner ABBOTT, KODYE LEE's allowance rate of 33.3% places them in the 5% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by ABBOTT, KODYE LEE receive 1.17 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 13% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ABBOTT, KODYE LEE is 51 months. This places the examiner in the 4% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +80.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ABBOTT, KODYE LEE. This interview benefit is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 1% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 1% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.