USPTO Examiner REGLAS GILLIAN CHELSEA - Art Unit 1632

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18409695KIT FOR BREEDING A TGEV INFECTION RESISTANT PIG AND USE THEREOFJanuary 2024January 2025Allow1221YesNo
18381660VASCULARIZED ISLET AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOFOctober 2023February 2025Abandon1620NoNo
17821754UMBILICAL CORD MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS FOR TREATMENT OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE AND LUNG DEGENERATIONAugust 2022January 2025Abandon2920NoNo
17850770HUMANIZED MOUSE MODELS FOR STUDY OF COVID-19June 2022April 2024Abandon2201NoNo
17748992CDC-DERIVED EXOSOMES FOR TREATMENT OF VENTRICULAR TACHYARRYTHMIASMay 2022May 2025Abandon3601NoNo
17748611KCNV2 Variants and Their UseMay 2022June 2024Allow2520YesNo
17742126METHODS OF CANCER TREATMENT BY INHIBITION OF VASCULOGENESIS AND GLI1May 2022January 2025Abandon3230NoNo
17662627INTRANASALLY ADMINISTERED NEURAL STEM CELLS FOR TREATMENT OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIESMay 2022March 2024Abandon2210NoNo
17427513METHODS FOR USING TRANSCRIPTION-DEPENDENT DIRECTED EVOLUTION OF AAV CAPSIDSJuly 2021March 2025Abandon4401NoNo
17425893METHOD FOR TREATING OR PREVENTING GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDINGJuly 2021May 2025Abandon4511NoNo
17418754SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS DISEASE MODEL AND USE THEREOFJune 2021May 2025Abandon4611NoNo
17416490NUCLEIC ACID APTAMER SPECIFICALLY RECOGNIZING B-LACTOGLOBULIN AND USE THEREOFJune 2021September 2024Allow3911YesNo
17351150METHOD OF SEPARATING HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS FROM UMBILICAL CORD BLOODJune 2021November 2024Abandon4110NoNo
17311011SYSTEMS, DEVICES AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFICATION, SELECTIVE ABLATION, AND SELECTION AND COLLECTION OF SINGLE CELLSJune 2021November 2024Abandon4201NoNo
17293867METHOD OF PRESERVING CELLS FOR THERAPEUTIC USEMay 2021September 2024Abandon4110NoNo
17290032CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF ERYTHROCYTES TO DISPLAY POLYPEPTIDES AND OTHER BIOMACROMOLECULESApril 2021September 2024Abandon4001NoNo
17289132ISOLATED NASOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA CELLS AND DERIVATIVES PREPARED THEREOFApril 2021June 2024Abandon3801NoNo
17288373ER TUNABLE PROTEIN REGULATIONApril 2021June 2025Abandon5021NoNo
17226974SYNERGISTIC TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS TO INDUCE HIGH RESISTANCE TRANSENDOTHELIAL BARRIER DApril 2021December 2024Abandon4411NoNo
17282425COMPARTMENTALIZED CELL CULTURES FOR USAGE IN HIGH CAPACITY APPLICATIONSApril 2021September 2024Abandon4110NoNo
17279437MINERALIZATION OF CELL-LADEN MATRICESMarch 2021January 2025Abandon4611NoNo
17277618METHOD FOR INCREASING LENTIVIRAL VECTOR PRODUCTIONMarch 2021October 2024Abandon4320NoNo
17276628Hair Follicle Germs, Method for Producing Hair Follicle Germs, and Method for Activating Cells Included in Hair Follicle GermsMarch 2021July 2024Abandon4010NoNo
17187121PRODUCTION METHOD FOR ANIMAL MODELS WITH DISEASE ASSOCIATED PHENOTYPESFebruary 2021August 2024Abandon4210NoNo
17269223STEM CELL DERIVED LINEAGE BARCODINGFebruary 2021January 2025Abandon4711NoNo
17268795METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING SUBJECTS EXPOSED TO VESICANTS AND OTHER CHEMICAL AGENTSFebruary 2021May 2024Abandon3901NoNo
17268437CELL CULTURE DEVICE FORMING A THREE DIMENSIONAL PERFUSION NETWORK FROM A PATTERNED MATERIAL UPON EXPOSURE TO HYDROGELFebruary 2021July 2024Abandon4101NoNo
17172005IGF2-CONTAINING MEDIUM FOR CULTURING MAMMALIAN EMBRYOS IN VITRO AND CULTURE METHODFebruary 2021August 2024Abandon4210NoNo
17167744Microfluidic System Including Cooling DeviceFebruary 2021May 2024Allow4011YesNo
17262243DISSOCIATION OF BIOLOGICAL SAMPLESJanuary 2021May 2025Abandon5221NoNo
17253038FUNCTIONAL CORTICO-SPINAL-MUSCLE ASSEMBLED SPHEROIDSDecember 2020June 2024Allow4220YesNo
17123057CELL CULTURE APPARATUS AND CELL CULTURE METHODDecember 2020April 2025Abandon5231YesNo
16808932SEQUENTIAL INTRAVITREAL ADMINISTRATION OF AAV GENE THERAPY TO CONTRALATERAL EYESMarch 2020January 2025Abandon5841NoNo
16624663METHOD OF HUMAN PERIFERIC SENSORY NEURONS DIFFERENCIATION FROM HUMAN STEM CELLS AND USES THEREOFDecember 2019March 2024Allow5140YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner REGLAS, GILLIAN CHELSEA - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner REGLAS, GILLIAN CHELSEA works in Art Unit 1632 and has examined 33 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 15.2%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 41 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner REGLAS, GILLIAN CHELSEA's allowance rate of 15.2% places them in the 0% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by REGLAS, GILLIAN CHELSEA receive 1.27 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 24% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by REGLAS, GILLIAN CHELSEA is 41 months. This places the examiner in the 5% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +83.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by REGLAS, GILLIAN CHELSEA. This interview benefit is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 16.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 69% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 111.1% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 1% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 1% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.