USPTO Examiner REILLY SOPHIA JANE - Art Unit 1627

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
193094482-DIARYLMETHYL-4-AMINOTETRAHYDROPYRAN DERIVATIVES AND RELATED COMPOUNDS AS ANTICANCER, ANTIINFLAMMATORY, ANTIFIBROTIC AND NEUROPROTECTIVE AGENTSAugust 2025November 2025Allow200YesNo
18273879TRICYCLIC COMPOUNDS USEFUL IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER, AUTOIMMUNE AND INFLAMMATORY DISORDERSJuly 2023January 2026Allow3000NoNo
18255396SMALL THERAPEUTIC MOLECULES CAPABLE OF INHIBITING THE CATALYTIC ACTIVITY OF THE MAIN PROTEASE ENZYME OF SARS-COV-2June 2023March 2026Allow3410YesNo
18039785TOPICAL FORMULATION COMPRISING SIROLIMUSJune 2023February 2026Allow3210YesNo
18131405ANTIVIRAL HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDSApril 2023March 2025Allow2310NoNo
18028632CLASS OF 1,7-NAPHTHYRIDINE COMPOUNDS AND APPLICATION THEREOFMarch 2023August 2025Abandon2900NoNo
18188541METHODS FOR TREATING HYPERVIRULENT KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE INFECTIONMarch 2023February 2026Allow3531NoNo
18245737NOVEL QUINAZOLINE DERIVATIVE HAVING FLT3 INHIBITORY ACTIVITY, AND USE THEREOFMarch 2023March 2026Allow3620NoNo
18185844RALINEPAG PRODRUGS AND USES THEREOFMarch 2023January 2026Abandon3421NoNo
18181231METHODS OF USING FTO INHIBITORS FOR THE TREATMENT OF PULMONARY HYPERTENSIONMarch 2023February 2026Abandon3521NoNo
18116625INHIBITORS OF THEM1March 2023March 2025Abandon2501NoNo
18018012METHOD FOR PREPARING FORODESINEJanuary 2023January 2026Allow3610NoNo
18015880METHODS FOR SCREENING NOVEL CORONAVIRUS ANTIVIRALS AND METHODS OF USING ANTIVIRALS FOR THE TREATMENT OF CORONAVIRUS INFECTIONSJanuary 2023February 2026Abandon3801NoNo
18013402HPK1 INHIBITORS AND USES THEREOFDecember 2022January 2026Allow3610NoNo
18069622HETEROCYCLIC INHIBITORS OF RHO GTPases FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISEASEDecember 2022March 2026Allow3920YesNo
17999275INHIBITORS OF PORCINE REPRODUCTIVE AND RESPIRATORY SYNDROME VIRUSNovember 2022November 2025Allow3510YesNo
17999254Fused Imidazole Derivatives as AHR AntagonistsNovember 2022November 2025Allow3510NoNo
17999295PYRIDO-PYRAZINYL COMPOUNDS FOR TREATING ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIANovember 2022February 2026Allow3911NoNo
17920478METHOD FOR TREATING VIRAL AND BACTERIAL INFECTION THROUGH INHALATION THERAPYOctober 2022January 2026Abandon3910NoNo
17919204PLEUROMUTILIN IN DERIVATIVES FOR TREATING VIRAL INFECTIONSOctober 2022January 2026Allow3910NoNo
17917435SUBSTITUTED PYRAZINECARBOXAMIDE COMPOUNDS FOR TREATING DISEASES RELATED TO EGFR MUTATIONOctober 2022January 2026Allow3920NoNo
17907238GOLD(III)-BIGUANIDE PRODRUGS, METHODS OF PREPARATION AND USES THEREOFSeptember 2022December 2025Abandon3910NoNo
17909708CRYSTAL OF TRICYCLIC COMPOUND ACTING ON CRBN PROTEIN AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFORSeptember 2022February 2026Abandon4110NoNo
178006096,7-DIMETHOXY-3-(PYRIDIN-2-YL)QUINOLINE COMPOUNDS FOR INHIBITING RETAugust 2022November 2025Allow3910NoNo
17798417METHODS FOR MODULATING CALORIE CONSUMPTIONAugust 2022January 2026Abandon4101NoNo
17759880[1,3]DIAZINO[5,4-d]PYRIMIDINES AS HER2 INHIBITORSAugust 2022February 2026Abandon4210NoNo
17796388RAS INHIBITORS AND METHODS OF USING THE SAMEJuly 2022December 2025Allow4110NoNo
17791364SMALL MOLECULE MODULATORS OF KSR-BOUND MEKJuly 2022February 2026Allow4411NoNo
17788127SUBSTITUTED N-(4-(PYRIMIDIN AND PYRIDIN-4-YL)BENZYLCARBOXAMIDES AND ITS USE FOR TREATING DISORDERS RESPONSIVE TO INHIBITION OF BTKJune 2022October 2025Allow4010NoNo
17779137Novel compounds for treatment of diseases related to DUX4 expressionMay 2022January 2026Abandon4410NoNo
17779055CHEMOTHERAPY FOR GLIOMA THROUGH NEURONAL CONVERSIONMay 2022February 2026Abandon4410NoNo
17767744NEW CARBAZOLE DERIVATIVES SENSITIZING CELLS TO ANTI-CANCER AGENTSApril 2022May 2025Allow3700YesNo
17638106SUBSTITUTED 1,3-PHENYL HETEROARYL DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF DISEASEFebruary 2022November 2025Abandon4510NoNo
17652022HETEROCYCLIC INHIBITORS OF MCT4February 2022July 2025Allow4110YesNo
17637014COMBINATION THERAPY AND BIOMARKER INDICATING EFFICACY THEREOFFebruary 2022November 2025Abandon4410NoNo
17629546ANTIMYCOTIC METHOXYFLAVONE AND FLUCONAZOLE COMBINATION FOR INHIBITING CRYPTOCOCCUSJanuary 2022March 2026Allow5021YesNo
17622267PROCESS FOR PREPARING A COUMARIN-CAGED FORSKOLIN DERIVATIVE, FORSKOLIN DERIVATIVE AND USE OF SAID FORSKOLIN DERIVATIVEDecember 2021October 2025Abandon4610NoNo
17622522QUINAZOLINE AND CINNOLINE DERIVATIVES AS DNA-PK INHIBITORDecember 2021August 2025Abandon4301NoNo
17621555THERAPEUTIC COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING CANCERSDecember 2021September 2025Allow4511NoNo
17621203COMPOUNDS FOR INHIBITING FGFR4December 2021June 2025Abandon4201NoNo
17644742PYRAZOLOPYRIMIDINE ARYL ETHER INHIBITORS OF JAK KINASES AND USES THEREOFDecember 2021September 2025Allow4511YesNo
17618759SSTR-TARGETED CONJUGATES AND FORMULATIONS THEREOFDecember 2021May 2025Abandon4110NoNo
17617321CASEIN KINASE 1 INHIBITORS FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF DISEASES RELATED TO DUX4 EXPRESSION SUCH AS MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY AND CANCERDecember 2021July 2025Abandon4310NoNo
17614854BENZAMIDE-SUBSTITUTED BICYCLIC IMIDAZO- AND PYRAZOLO- FUSED -PYRIDINE, -PYRIMIDE, AND -PYRIDAZINE COMPOUNDS FOR TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATORY DISEASESNovember 2021March 2025Allow4001NoNo
17610192SOLID STATE FORMS OF SAGE-217 AND PROCESSES FOR PREPARATION THEREOFNovember 2021July 2025Abandon4410NoNo
175211533-OXADIAZOLYL SUBSTITUTED PYRAZOLO[1,5,a]PYRIMIDINES FOR ROS1, NTRK, AND ALK MEDIATED DISEASESNovember 2021May 2025Allow4211NoNo
17609105INHIBITING USP19November 2021December 2025Allow4921NoNo
17606543SMALL-MOLECULE FOCAL ADHESION KINASE (FAK) INHIBITORSOctober 2021March 2025Allow4001NoNo
17606243ENTEROVIRUS INHIBITOROctober 2021May 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17604818SUBSTITUTED STRAIGHT CHAIN SPIRO DERIVATIVESOctober 2021March 2025Allow4111NoNo
17604442JAK1 SELECTIVE KINASE INHIBITOROctober 2021December 2025Allow5021YesNo
17604719USE OF FULVESTRANT FOR THE THERAPEUTIC CARE OF CENTRAL CORE DISEASEOctober 2021April 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17604636HETEROBIFUNCTIONAL COMPOUNDS AS DEGRADERS OF HPK1October 2021June 2025Allow4411NoNo
17441642TERPENE BASED THERAPEUTIC DEEP EUTECTIC SYSTEM, METHOD OF OBTAINING AND USES THEREOFSeptember 2021October 2025Abandon4911NoNo
17439085PI4-Kinase Inhibitors and Methods of Using the SameSeptember 2021May 2025Allow4411YesNo
17426932QUINDOLINE COMPOUNDS AND USES THEREOFJuly 2021August 2025Allow4920NoNo
17423444METHODS OF TREATING TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITOR-INDUCED DIARRHEAJuly 2021March 2025Allow4421NoNo
17421411DIHYDROISOQUINOLINE COMPOUNDJuly 2021May 2025Abandon4710NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner REILLY, SOPHIA JANE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner REILLY, SOPHIA JANE works in Art Unit 1627 and has examined 22 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 54.5%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 44 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner REILLY, SOPHIA JANE's allowance rate of 54.5% places them in the 15% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by REILLY, SOPHIA JANE receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by REILLY, SOPHIA JANE is 44 months. This places the examiner in the 14% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +52.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by REILLY, SOPHIA JANE. This interview benefit is in the 94% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 66.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 71% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 1% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 1% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.