USPTO Examiner FERGUSON JALISA HOLMES - Art Unit 1626

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19247100CONJUGATES, THEIR COMPOSITIONS, AND THEIR RELATED METHODSJune 2025December 2025Allow500YesNo
18714111CONJUGATES, THEIR COMPOSITIONS, AND THEIR RELATED METHODSMay 2024April 2025Allow1100YesNo
18649583METHOD FOR INHIBITING PROLIFERATION OF CANCER CELLSApril 2024April 2025Allow1110NoNo
18649785METHOD FOR INHIBITING PROLIFERATION OF CANCER CELLSApril 2024May 2025Allow1311YesNo
18248325HETEROARYL AMIDE INHIBITORS OF CD38April 2023August 2025Allow2900YesNo
18123102INTERMEDIATES FOR MAKING DERIVATIVES OF SUBSTITUTED MORPHOLINESMarch 2023August 2025Allow2920YesNo
18172722SALTS OF A DIHYDROOROTATE DEHYDROGENASE (DHOD) INHIBITORFebruary 2023March 2026Abandon3720NoNo
17972818GLYCEROL ACETAL SULFATE AND SULFONATE SURFACTANTSOctober 2022June 2025Abandon3210NoNo
17906014MODULATORS OF THE INTEGRATED STRESS RESPONSE PATHWAYSeptember 2022June 2025Allow3300NoNo
17908197Method for Producing Mono-Cross-Coupled Aromatic Compound Having Leaving GroupAugust 2022August 2025Abandon3610NoNo
17798784SPIROCYCLIC INHIBITORS OF HEPATITIS B VIRUSAugust 2022May 2025Allow3300YesNo
17929005PHYSICS-DRIVEN DISCOVERY OF NOVEL SMALL THERAPEUTIC COMPOUNDS FOR USE AS A BCL-2 INHIBITORAugust 2022April 2025Allow3201YesNo
17859724MODIFIED ZINC OXIDE NANOCOMPOSITE, ANTIBIOTIC COMPOSITION COMPRISING THE SAME, AND COMBINATION PREPARATION WITH THE SAMEJuly 2022March 2025Allow3210YesNo
17850289NOVEL UREAS HAVING ANDROGEN RECEPTOR DEGRADATION ACTIVITY AND USES THEREOFJune 2022December 2025Abandon4110NoNo
17788346INDAZOLE COMPOUNDSJune 2022June 2025Allow3510YesNo
17845495METHODS OF PREPARING N6-((2-AZIDOETHOXY)CARBONYL)LYSINEJune 2022July 2025Allow3700YesNo
17840563DOPAMINE D3 RECEPTOR LIGANDS FOR TREATMENT OF DYSKINESIAJune 2022June 2025Abandon3601NoNo
17756413POTENT AND SELECTIVE AZAINDOLE INHIBITORS OF CDK8 AND CDK19May 2022May 2025Allow3600YesNo
17756011CHIRAL SYNTHESIS OF A TERTIARY ALCOHOLMay 2022May 2025Allow3600YesNo
17771083Small Molecule CompoundApril 2022September 2025Allow4110YesNo
17766095COMPOUNDS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH STING ACTIVITYApril 2022September 2025Abandon4211NoNo
17765483LYOPHILIZED COMPOSITION COMPRISING (S)-ISOPROPYL 2-((S)-2-ACETAMIDO-3-(1H-INDOL-3-YL)PROPANAMIDO)-6-DIAZO-5-OXOHEXANOATE FOR INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION AND THE USE THEREOFMarch 2022December 2025Allow4511YesNo
17761829PESTICIDALLY ACTIVE HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES WITH SULFUR AND SULFOXIMINE CONTAINING SUBSTITUENTSMarch 2022August 2025Allow4110YesNo
17760873SUBSTITUTED N-HETEROCYCLIC CARBOXAMIDES AS ACID CERAMIDASE INHIBITORS AND THEIR USE AS MEDICAMENTSMarch 2022September 2025Abandon4201NoNo
17639183PERK INHIBITING IMIDAZOLOPYRAZINE COMPOUNDSFebruary 2022February 2025Allow3500NoNo
17639110QUINAZOLINE COMPOUNDS FOR THE TREATMENT AND PROPHYLAXIS OF HEPATITIS B VIRUS DISEASEFebruary 2022July 2025Abandon4101NoNo
176337892-CYANOACRYLATE COMPOUND AND ADHESIVE COMPOSITIONFebruary 2022September 2025Abandon4310NoNo
17632333KIF18A INHIBITORSFebruary 2022August 2025Allow4311YesNo
17632334KIF18A INHIBITORSFebruary 2022September 2025Allow4311YesNo
17630742ISOQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE FOR THE TREATMENT OF PARASITIC INFECTIONSJanuary 2022May 2025Allow3910NoNo
17628195TRICYCLIC DERIVATIVES AS HYPOXIA INDUCIBLE FACTOR-2(ALPHA) INHIBITORSJanuary 2022June 2025Abandon4101NoNo
17279674NOVEL METHOD FOR PREPARING (-)-CIBENZOLINE SUCCINATEDecember 2021July 2025Allow5111NoNo
17621719METHOD FOR TREATING IDIOPATHIC PULMONARY FIBROSISDecember 2021November 2025Allow4720YesNo
17616436BICYCLIC DERIVATIVES FOR TREATING ENDOPARASITESDecember 2021March 2025Allow3901YesNo
176156705,6-DIHETE LACTONE FOR TREATMENT OF MICROVASCULAR DYSFUNCTIONDecember 2021June 2025Allow4311YesNo
17600535PREPARATION METHOD FOR LEVETIRACETAM INTERMEDIATESeptember 2021October 2024Allow3600NoNo
17434820TOTAL SYNTHESIS OF PIRFENIDONEAugust 2021February 2025Allow4210YesNo
17430794METHOD FOR PREPARING VORICONAZOLE AND INTERMEDIATE THEREOFAugust 2021January 2025Allow4110NoNo
17310380POLYMORPHIC FORMS OF A SUBSTITUTED-QUINOXALINE-TYPE BRIDGED-PIPERIDINE COMPOUNDJuly 2021March 2025Allow4411YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner FERGUSON, JALISA HOLMES - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner FERGUSON, JALISA HOLMES works in Art Unit 1626 and has examined 8 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 43 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner FERGUSON, JALISA HOLMES's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 94% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by FERGUSON, JALISA HOLMES receive 0.88 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 6% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by FERGUSON, JALISA HOLMES is 43 months. This places the examiner in the 15% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by FERGUSON, JALISA HOLMES. This interview benefit is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 1% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 1% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.