USPTO Examiner SEAMAN D MARGARET M - Art Unit 1625

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19352045BENZO NITROGEN-CONTAINING HETEROAROMATIC RING DERIVATIVE AND USE THEREOF IN MEDICINEOctober 2025December 2025Allow200NoNo
19256050HYDRATE OF VEGFR INHIBITOR, CRYSTAL FORM THEREOF AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFORJune 2025February 2026Allow710NoNo
19004230PARA ACYL SUBSTITUTED DIAZACYCLOHEXENE DERIVATIVESDecember 2024August 2025Abandon710NoNo
18802914CRYSTALLINE FORMS OF (E)-N-HYDROXY-3-(1-(PHENYLSULFONYL)INDOLIN-5-YL)ACRYLAMIDEAugust 2024September 2024Allow200NoNo
18730722RESOLVIN ANALOGS COMPOUNDS, METHODS AND USES THEREOFJuly 2024February 2025Allow700NoNo
18656012ORGANIC COMPOUND (OXIME) TO COMBAT CHEMICAL WARFARE AGENTSMay 2024July 2025Allow1430NoNo
18628594METHODS OF TREATING NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERSApril 2024March 2025Allow1210NoNo
18615563MODULATORS OF MAS-RELATED G-PROTEIN RECEPTOR X2 AND RELATED PRODUCTS AND METHODSMarch 2024March 2025Allow1210NoNo
18443965SELECTIVE REDUCTION OF a,B-UNSATURATED KETONE USING ELECTRONICALLY WEAKLY COUPLED 4,4'-DIVINYLAZOARYLENEBRIDGED DIRUTHENIUM CATALYST BEARING TWO Ru(CO)(3- METHOXYPYRIDIN-2-OLATE)(PiPR3)2 MOIETIESFebruary 2024August 2024Allow610NoNo
18436836PROCESSES FOR PREPARING QUINOLINE COMPOUNDS AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SUCH COMPOUNDSFebruary 2024April 2024Allow320YesNo
18433237ARYL HYDROCARBON RECEPTOR AGONISTS AND USES THEREOFFebruary 2024July 2024Allow610NoNo
18429297COMPOUND FOR USE IN RETINAL DISEASESJanuary 2024August 2025Allow1800NoNo
18411842IRE1 SMALL MOLECULE INHIBITORSJanuary 2024April 2025Allow1520NoNo
18397454COMPOUNDS USEFUL FOR TREATING GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT DISORDERSDecember 2023December 2024Allow1110NoNo
18395388TRIAZOLE DERIVATIVE AND USE THEREOFDecember 2023January 2025Allow1310NoNo
18545056BIS DISELENIDE-BASED SCHIFF BASES AS DEUBIQUITINATION SIGNALING PATHWAY MODULATORSDecember 2023April 2024Allow400NoNo
185368649-(4-NITROBENZYLIDENE)-4-(4-NITROPHENYL)-3-CYANO-2-METHOXY-6,7,8,9-TETRAHYDRO-5H-CYCLOHEPTA[B]PYRIDINE AS AN ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOUNDDecember 2023February 2024Allow200NoNo
18526149SMALL MOLECULE MODULATORS OF IL-17December 2023April 2024Allow410NoNo
18526960METHODS OF TREATING NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERSDecember 2023March 2024Allow300NoNo
18506060PYRIDIN-2(1H)-ONE QUINOLINONE DERIVATIVES AS MUTANT-ISOCITRATE DEHYDROGENASE INHIBITORSNovember 2023December 2024Allow1310NoNo
18387620PARA ACYL SUBSTITUTED DIAZACYCLOHEXENE DERIVATIVESNovember 2023September 2024Allow1010NoNo
18386675PROCESS FOR PREPARING A COT INHIBITOR COMPOUNDNovember 2023March 2025Allow1610NoNo
183836775-(4,5-BIS(4-BROMOPHENYL)-2-(4-CHLOROPHENYL)-1H-IMIDAZOL-1-YL)PENTANOIC ACID AS AN ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOUNDOctober 2023February 2024Allow410NoNo
184934411,3-SUBSTITUTED CYCLOBUTYL DERIVATIVES AND USES THEREOFOctober 2023January 2025Allow1410NoNo
183826974-[(SUBSTITUTED 1H-BENZIMIDAZOL-2-YLSULFANYL)METHYL]-6-SUBSTITUTED-2H-CHROMEN-2-ONES AS LARVICIDAL AGENTSOctober 2023January 2024Allow310NoNo
18379835BENZYLIDENE DERIVATIVES OF FENOBAM AS ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTSOctober 2023December 2023Allow200NoNo
18379715AGONISTS OF PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR-ACTIVATED RECEPTOR ALPHA (PPARa) AND METHODS OF USEOctober 2023February 2025Allow1610NoNo
18484653POLYMORPHS OF (2S,5R)-5-(2-CHLOROPHENYL)-1-(2'-METHOXY-[1,1'-BIPHENYL]-4-CARBONYL)PYRROLIDINE-2-CARBOXYLIC ACID AND PREPARATION PROCESSES THEREOFOctober 2023March 2024Allow510YesNo
18484264METHODS OF MAKING DELMOPINOL AND SALTS THEREOFOctober 2023October 2025Allow2520NoYes
18482912BIFUNCTIONAL CHELATORS AND CONJUGATESOctober 2023January 2024Allow410YesNo
18377741BENZETHERS AND ANILINES OF PYRAZOLYL-AMINO-PYRIMIDINYL DERIVATIVES, AND COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS THEREOFOctober 2023January 2024Allow310NoNo
18481844BIFUNCTIONAL CHELATORS AND CONJUGATESOctober 2023February 2024Allow510YesNo
18480929MACROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS AND USES THEREOFOctober 2023January 2025Abandon1510NoNo
183763861-CYCLOPROPYL-6-FLUORO-4-OXO-7-(4-((5-(QUINOLIN-2-YLMETHYLENEAMINO)-2-THIOXO-1,3,4-THIADIAZOL-3(2H)-YL)METHYL)PIPERAZIN-1-YL)-1,4-DIHYDROQUINOLINE-3-CARBOXYLIC ACID AS AN ANTI-INFLAMMATORY COMPOUNDOctober 2023November 2023Allow100NoNo
18375672OXOIMIDAZOLIDINE DERIVATIVES AS ANTI-TUBERCULAR AGENTSOctober 2023February 2024Allow510NoNo
182844552,4-DIAMINOPYRIMIDINE OXIDE PREPARATION METHODSeptember 2023January 2024Allow300NoNo
18471170CRYSTALLINE FORMS OF A CANNABINOID RECEPTOR TYPE 1 (CB1) MODULATOR AND METHODS OF USE AND PREPARATION THEREOFSeptember 2023October 2024Allow1330NoNo
183691361,2-DIOXO-2,3-DIHYDRO-1H-PYRROLO[2,3-C]QUINOLINE-7-CARBOXYLIC ACID COMPOUNDS AS CK2 INHIBITORSSeptember 2023November 2023Allow200NoNo
18242924PYRIDO[4,3-B]INDOLE-7-CARBOXYLIC ACID COMPOUNDS AS CK2 INHIBITORSSeptember 2023November 2023Allow200NoNo
18242759PYRROLO[3,2-C][2,7]NAPHTHYRIDINE-2-CARBOXYLIC ACID COMPOUNDS AS CK2 INHIBITORSSeptember 2023November 2023Allow210NoNo
18461023COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF TREATING RETINAL DEGENERATIONSeptember 2023November 2024Allow1420NoNo
182395631-CYCLOPROPYL-6-FLUORO-7-(4-(2-HYDROXY-3-(NAPHTHALEN-2-YLOXY)PROPYLPIPERAZIN-1-YL)-4-OXO-1,4-DIHYDROQUINOLINE-3-CARBOXYLIC ACID AS AN ECO-FRIENDLY INSECTICIDAL AGENT AGAINST SPODOPTERA LITTORALIS (BOISD.)August 2023October 2023Allow200NoNo
18234538SUBSTITUTED 1,4-DIHYDROPYRIMIDINES AS ANTITUBERCULAR AGENTSAugust 2023January 2024Allow510NoNo
18264986BENZAZEPINE COMPOUNDS, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND PHARMACEUTICAL USE THEREOFAugust 2023March 2026Allow3110NoNo
18276304SUBSTITUTED ISOXAZOLINE DERIVATIVESAugust 2023December 2025Allow2800NoNo
18366338POLYMORPHS OF PYRIMIDINE CYCLOHEXYL GLUCOCORTICOID RECEPTOR MODULATORSAugust 2023July 2024Allow1110NoNo
18276135A PROCESS FOR PREPARING ABEDITEROL AND INTERMEDIATES THEREOFAugust 2023December 2025Allow2800NoNo
18356977PROCESSES OF MAKING 2-((1-BENZYL-1H-INDAZOL-3-YL)METHOXY)-2-METHYLPROPANOIC ACID AND ITS DERIVATIVESJuly 2023July 2024Allow1210NoNo
18273502N-(BENZOYL)-PHENYLALANINE COMPOUND, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION CONTAINING SAME, AND USE THEREOFJuly 2023March 2026Allow3220NoNo
18272840METHOD FOR PREPARING 2-[2-(2-CHLOROTHIAZOL-5-YL)-2-OXO-ETHYL]SULFANYL-6-HYDROXY-3-METHYL-5-PHENYL-PYRIMIDIN-4-ONEJuly 2023October 2025Allow2700NoNo
18344267CRYSTALLINE SOLID FORMS OF SALTS OF N-{4-[(6,7-DIMETHOXYQUINOLIN-4-YL)OXY]PHENYL}-N'-(4-FLUOROPHENYL) CYCLOPROPANE-1,1-DICARBOXAMIDE, PROCESSES FOR MAKING, AND METHODS OF USEJune 2023October 2024Allow1510NoNo
18214002Highly Purified Batches Of Pharmaceutical Grade Migalastat And Methods Of Producing The SameJune 2023December 2024Allow1710NoNo
18339366SARS-COV-2 INHIBITORS FOR TREATING CORONAVIRUS INFECTIONSJune 2023September 2024Abandon1410NoNo
18259052HISTONE DEACETYLASE INHIBITORSJune 2023January 2026Allow3110NoNo
18268667TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVE AND MEDICINAL USE THEREOFJune 2023January 2026Allow3110YesNo
18267946Prodrugs of 2-(3,5-Dichloro-1-methyl-indazol-4-yl)-1-[(1S,3R)-3-(hydroxymethyl)-5-(1-hydroxy-1-methyl-ethyl)-1-methyl-3,4-dihydro-1H-isoquinolin-2-yl]ethanoneJune 2023February 2026Allow3210NoNo
18336332CRYSTALLINE FORMS OF PITAVASTATIN CALCIUMJune 2023August 2024Abandon1410NoNo
18267551Carboxylic Acid Containing Indanyl Compounds for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative DiseasesJune 2023January 2026Allow3110NoNo
18267331A Substituted Tetrahydroisoquinoline Derivative As A D1 Positive Allosteric ModulatorJune 2023February 2026Allow3210NoNo
18209075ALDH-2 INHIBITOR COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USEJune 2023January 2026Allow3210NoNo
18334325QUINOLINE cGAS ANTAGONIST COMPOUNDSJune 2023May 2024Allow1210NoNo
18266567PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF PYRAZOLE-OXADIAZEPINEJune 2023September 2025Allow2700NoNo
18330623TRICYCLIC TRIAZOLO COMPOUNDS AS DGK INHIBITORSJune 2023March 2026Allow3301NoNo
18039540MANUFACTURING PROCESS FOR PREPARING GADOTERIDOLMay 2023January 2024Allow710NoNo
18255118SALTS OF A HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUND AND CRYSTALLINE FORMS, PROCESSES FOR PREPARING, THERAPEUTIC USES, AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS THEREOFMay 2023March 2026Abandon3310NoNo
18254405ANTICHOLINERGIC AGENTSMay 2023December 2025Allow3110NoNo
18320761BETAHISTINE, OR A PHARMACEUTICALLY ACCEPTABLE SALT THEREOF, AND A MONOAMINE OXIDASE INHIBITOR, FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OR PREVENTION OF ONE OR MORE SYMPTOMS OF VERTIGO IN A SUBJECTMay 2023June 2024Allow1320NoNo
18319828ARYLOXAZOLO SPIRAL RING DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT AND PROPHYLAXIS OF HEPATITIS B VIRUS INFECTIONMay 2023March 2026Abandon3410NoNo
18037665Process For The Preparation Of Prothioconazole And Intermediates ThereofMay 2023March 2026Abandon3410NoNo
18253298SYNTHESIS OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN (PSMA) LIGANDSMay 2023March 2026Allow3410NoNo
18312484COMPOSITIONS OF CXCR4 INHIBITORS AND METHODS OF PREPARATION AND USEMay 2023May 2024Allow1210NoNo
18142432LIQUID AND SOLID STATE LASER FROM 7H-PYRANO[2,3-B:4,5-B']DIQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES USING ENERGY TRANSFER MECHANISMMay 2023February 2024Allow901NoNo
18139653TREATMENT OF HER2 POSITIVE CANCERSApril 2023March 2024Allow1110NoNo
18032842METHODS OF MAKING NICOTINIC ACID DERIVATIVESApril 2023January 2026Allow3310NoNo
18032732Bioactive Benzocycloheptene Analogues From Himachalenes and its ApplicationsApril 2023December 2025Allow3210NoNo
18030723KINASE MODULATORS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFApril 2023January 2026Allow3410NoNo
18130121PPARG INVERSE AGONISTS AND USES THEREOFApril 2023August 2023Allow400NoNo
18129363COMPOUNDMarch 2023February 2026Abandon3410NoNo
18121667SELECTIVE ESTROGEN RECEPTOR DEGRADERSMarch 2023January 2024Allow1010NoNo
18044829NOVEL DIBENZOACRIDINIUM DERIVATIVES, THEIR PROCESS OF PREPARATION AND THEIR USE FOR TREATING VIRAL INFECTIONSMarch 2023January 2026Abandon3410NoNo
18025747COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING MUSCULAR DYSTROPHIESMarch 2023January 2026Allow3511NoNo
18025487SMALL MOLECULE INHIBITORS OF ENPP1March 2023February 2026Abandon3501NoNo
18116920ACRIDIN-9-ONE COMPOUNDS AS ANTIBACTERIAL AGENTSMarch 2023May 2023Allow300NoNo
18023995THERAPEUTIC COMPOUNDSFebruary 2023October 2025Allow3210NoNo
18041944IMIDAZOQUINOLINE OR BENZOINDAZOLONE COMPOUND AND INTERMEDIATE FOR PREPARING SAMEFebruary 2023November 2025Allow3310NoNo
18168711CRYSTALLINE FORM OF LNP023February 2023March 2025Allow2530NoNo
18107127SARS-COV-2 INHIBITORS FOR TREATING CORONAVIRUS INFECTIONSFebruary 2023May 2023Allow410NoNo
18166235CARBOXYLIC ACID OR CARBOXYLIC ACID ESTER COMPOUND HAVING FUSED-RING STRUCTURE, METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME, AND USE OF COMPOUNDFebruary 2023February 2026Allow3620YesNo
18040555NITROXOLINE DERIVATIVE, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND USE THEREOFFebruary 2023October 2025Allow3210NoNo
18040608PYRIMETHAMINE CRYSTAL FORMFebruary 2023January 2026Abandon3510NoNo
18017275A COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR PREPARING N-PHENYLPYRAZOLE-1-CARBOXAMIDESJanuary 2023December 2025Allow3511NoNo
17783816METHOD FOR PRODUCING NITROGEN-CONTAINING HETEROARYLCARBOXAMIDE ACETIC ACID DERIVATIVEDecember 2022December 2025Allow4210NoNo
18085134MACROCYCLIC AZOLOPYRIDINE DERIVATIVES AS EED AND PRC2 MODULATORSDecember 2022April 2024Allow1610NoNo
18002035THYROMIMETICSDecember 2022January 2025Allow2510YesNo
18081395HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS USEFUL AS MODULATORS OF ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORSDecember 2022February 2024Allow1410NoNo
18079019Nemonoxacin malate active pharmaceutical ingredient with low combination impurities, and a preparation method thereofDecember 2022January 2024Allow1320NoNo
18008715PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF FLUOXASTROBIN AND INTERMEDIATES THEREOFDecember 2022October 2025Allow3410NoNo
18062363LPA RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS AND USES THEREOFDecember 2022November 2023Allow1210NoNo
18061745POLYMORPHS OF PYRIMIDINE CYCLOHEXYL GLUCOCORTICOID RECEPTOR MODULATORSDecember 2022May 2023Allow500NoNo
17992399HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS AS IMMUNOMODULATORSNovember 2022October 2023Allow1110NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SEAMAN, D MARGARET M.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
6
Examiner Affirmed
2
(33.3%)
Examiner Reversed
4
(66.7%)
Reversal Percentile
85.5%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 66.7% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
48
Allowed After Appeal Filing
27
(56.2%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
21
(43.8%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
87.1%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 56.2% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner SEAMAN, D MARGARET M - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SEAMAN, D MARGARET M works in Art Unit 1625 and has examined 1,952 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 78.9%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 22 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SEAMAN, D MARGARET M's allowance rate of 78.9% places them in the 48% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SEAMAN, D MARGARET M receive 1.29 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 18% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SEAMAN, D MARGARET M is 22 months. This places the examiner in the 88% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -9.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SEAMAN, D MARGARET M. This interview benefit is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 41.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 81.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 200.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 92% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 87.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 80% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 62.5% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 44.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 37% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 7.7% of allowed cases (in the 90% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 3.1% of allowed cases (in the 74% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.