USPTO Examiner COLEMAN BRENDA LIBBY - Art Unit 1624

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18820993PYRAZOLOPYRIDINE DERIVATIVE HAVING GLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONIST EFFECTAugust 2024February 2025Allow510NoNo
18832297PROCESS FOR THE RECOVERY OF EPSILON-CAPROLACTAM FROM NYLON 6-CONTAINING MULTI- COMPONENT MATERIALJuly 2024April 2025Allow910NoNo
18832315PROCESS FOR THE RECOVERY OF EPSILON-CAPROLACTAM FROM NYLON 6 COMPRISING FISHING NETSJuly 2024April 2025Allow910NoNo
18645972CRYSTALLINE CHLORO-N-(4-(MORPHOLINOMETHYL)PHENYL)BENZAMIDE AND CRYSTALLINE HYDROCHLORIDE SALTApril 2024July 2024Allow310NoNo
186116858-((4-HYDROXY-3-METHOXYPHENYL)DIAZENYL)NAPHTHALENE-1,3-DISULFONIC ACID AS AN ANTIOXIDANT COMPOUNDMarch 2024September 2024Allow610NoNo
18584672PYRAZOLOPYRIDINE DERIVATIVE HAVING GLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONIST EFFECTFebruary 2024February 2025Allow1210NoNo
18584177PYRAZOLOPYRIDINE DERIVATIVE HAVING GLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONIST EFFECTFebruary 2024March 2025Allow1310NoNo
18391693REDOX ACTIVE MATERIALS, PROCESSES AND USES THEREOFDecember 2023February 2025Allow1410NoNo
18542913CRYSTALLINE L-ARGININE SALT OF (R)-2-(7-(4-CYCLOPENTYL-3-(TRIFLUOROMETHYL)BENZYLOXY)-1,2,3, 4-TETRAHYDROCYCLO-PENTA [B]INDOL-3-YL)ACETIC ACID(COMPOUND1) FOR USE IN SIPI RECEPTOR-ASSOCIATED DISORDERSDecember 2023March 2025Allow1510NoNo
18533894CERTAIN (2S)-N-[(1S)-1-CYANO-2-PHENYLETHYL]-1,4-OXAZEPANE-2-CARBOXAMIDES AS DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE 1 INHIBITORSDecember 2023April 2024Allow420NoNo
18514959INHIBITORS OF LRRK2 KINASENovember 2023June 2025Allow1820NoNo
18513229HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS AS PAD INHIBITORSNovember 2023March 2025Allow1511NoNo
18389574COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF LOWE SYNDROMENovember 2023January 2025Allow1520NoNo
18507013THERAPEUTIC COMPOUNDS AND COMPOSITIONSNovember 2023April 2025Allow1810NoNo
183858088-((4-HYDROXY-3-METHYLPHENYL)DIAZENYL)NAPHTHALENE-1,3-DISULFONIC ACID AS AN ANTIOXIDANT COMPOUNDOctober 2023March 2024Allow510NoNo
183855868-(4-nitroxybenzylideneamino)naphthalene-1,3-disulfonic acid AS AN ANTIOXIDANT COMPOUNDOctober 2023January 2024Allow300NoNo
18495845Oral Formulation of Clonidine and Midazolam for Sedation in Dental ProceduresOctober 2023July 2024Allow900NoNo
18382896METHODS OF PREPARING CELL-BINDING AGENT-DRUG CONJUGATESOctober 2023May 2025Abandon1810NoNo
18486759ANTI-VIRAL COMPOUNDSOctober 2023October 2024Allow1210NoNo
18243771PYRAZOLOPYRIDINE COMPOUNDS AND USES THEREOFSeptember 2023April 2025Allow1910NoNo
18463407NEW SPIRO[3H-INDOLE-3,2'-PYRROLIDIN]-2(1H)-ONE COMPOUNDS AND DERIVATIVES AS MDM2-P53 INHIBITORSSeptember 2023October 2024Allow1410NoNo
18462488METHOD OF TREATING AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSISSeptember 2023January 2025Allow1620NoNo
18448497PYRAZOLOPYRIDINE DERIVATIVE HAVING GLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONIST EFFECTAugust 2023August 2024Allow1310NoNo
18363933TREATMENT OF COGNITIVE AND MOOD SYMPTOMS IN NEURODEGENERATIVE AND NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS WITH ALPHA5-CONTAINING GABAA RECEPTOR AGONISTSAugust 2023September 2024Allow1410NoNo
18225589Cyclopentane-Based Modulators of STING (Stimulator of Interferon Genes)July 2023February 2025Abandon1910NoNo
18328865COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING CNS DISORDERSJune 2023January 2025Allow2010NoNo
18255969SYNTHESIS OF STRUCTURAL ANALOGS OF LARGAZOLE AND ASSOCIATED COMPOUNDSJune 2023October 2024Allow1620NoNo
18323510Heterocyclic Adenosine Receptor AntagonistsMay 2023November 2024Allow1820NoNo
18196459BICYCLIC [4,6,0] HYDROXAMIC ACIDS AS HDAC INHIBITORSMay 2023February 2025Allow2110NoNo
18140348BENZAZEPINE DERIVATIVESApril 2023March 2025Abandon2310NoNo
18307181RIP1K INHIBITORSApril 2023January 2025Allow2120NoNo
18135898ESTER SUBSTITUTED ION CHANNEL BLOCKERS AND METHODS FOR USEApril 2023January 2025Abandon2110NoNo
18135499MEDICAMENT FOR TREATING COUGHApril 2023November 2024Allow1911NoNo
18301742CHLORINATED TETRALIN COMPOUNDS AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONSApril 2023October 2023Allow610NoNo
18300350CERTAIN (2S)-N-[(1S)-1-CYANO-2-PHENYLETHYL]-1,4-OXAZEPANE-2-CARBOXAMIDES AS DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE 1 INHIBITORSApril 2023April 2024Abandon1220NoNo
18128603C-ABL TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITORY COMPOUND EMBODIMENTS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THE SAMEMarch 2023April 2025Allow2421NoNo
18126953COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING RHEUMATOID ARTHRITISMarch 2023October 2024Allow1910NoNo
18180997PROCESS FOR PREPARING LEVOKETOCONAZOLEMarch 2023June 2023Allow310NoNo
18119321METHODS OF TREATMENTMarch 2023August 2024Abandon1820NoNo
18164974Antiviral Pyrazolopiridinone CompoundsFebruary 2023February 2025Allow2410NoNo
18162432PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF DRUG LINKER COMPOUNDSJanuary 2023January 2025Abandon2410NoNo
18095621CRYSTALLINE FORMS OF (S)-5-BENZYL-N-(5-METHYL-4-OXO-2,3,4,5-TETRAHYDROPYRIDO [3,2-B][1,4]OXAZEPIN-3-YL)-4H-1,2,4-TRIAZOLE-3-CARBOXAMIDEJanuary 2023January 2024Allow1320NoNo
18087338CAMPTOTHECINE ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFDecember 2022August 2024Allow2010NoNo
18086076MAYTANSINOID-BASED DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMSDecember 2022June 2025Allow3020NoNo
18078511Charged Ion Channel Blockers and Methods for UseDecember 2022November 2024Abandon2310NoNo
18073897METHODS OF TREATING PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM BRAIN INJURY AND METHODS OF INCREASING THE VALUE OF THE EXTENDED GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE OF PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM BRAIN INJURYDecember 2022August 2024Allow2020YesNo
18059838IDENTIFICATION OF INHIBITORS OF TCPC AND TIR NADase ACTIVITYNovember 2022November 2024Allow2311NoNo
17991899SUBSTITUTED MACROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS AND RELATED METHODS OF TREATMENTNovember 2022April 2024Allow1610NoNo
17992371Antifibrotic Compounds And Related MethodsNovember 2022July 2024Allow2010NoNo
179892375-Membered Heteroaryl Carboxamide Compounds for Treatment of HBVNovember 2022February 2024Allow1500NoNo
17988366Aceclidine Derivatives, Compositions Thereof and Methods of Use ThereofNovember 2022August 2024Allow2130NoNo
17978696COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING EZH2-MEDIATED CANCERNovember 2022December 2024Allow2520NoNo
17977371PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODSOctober 2022May 2024Allow1910NoNo
17975623APPLICATION OF ANLE138B IN DRUG FOR IMPROVING DIET-INDUCED INSULIN RESISTANCEOctober 2022March 2024Abandon1710NoNo
17971865COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING CNS DISORDERSOctober 2022November 2023Allow1200NoNo
17967301CRYSTALLINE FORMS OF A RYANODINE RECEPTOR MODULATOR AND USES THEREOFOctober 2022May 2024Allow1810NoNo
17967308CRYSTALLINE FORMS OF A RYANODINE RECEPTOR MODULATOR AND USES THEREOFOctober 2022May 2024Allow1810YesNo
17918607Synthesis of Vinylic Protected Alcohol IntermediatesOctober 2022June 2025Allow3210NoNo
17937740NON-SURGICAL PREVENTION OF BOAR TAINT AND AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOROctober 2022December 2023Allow2320NoNo
17934069Fixed Dose Oral Testosterone Undecanoate Compositions and Use ThereofSeptember 2022March 2024Allow1810NoNo
17948684CLEAVABLE TETRAZINE USED IN BIO-ORTHOGONAL DRUG ACTIVATIONSeptember 2022May 2024Allow2010NoNo
17946112CERTAIN (2S)-N-[(1S)-1-CYANO-2-PHENYLETHYL]-1,4-OXAZEPANE-2-CARBOXAMIDES AS DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE 1 INHIBITORSSeptember 2022February 2023Allow510NoNo
17946024CERTAIN (2S)-N-[(1S)-1-CYANO-2-PHENYLETHYL]-1,4-OXAZEPANE-2-CARBOXAMIDES AS DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE 1 INHIBITORSSeptember 2022February 2023Allow510NoNo
17942120CERTAIN (2S)-N-[(1S)-1-CYANO-2-PHENYLETHYL]-1,4-OXAZEPANE-2-CARBOXAMIDES AS DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE 1 INHIBITORSSeptember 2022February 2023Allow510NoNo
17942121CERTAIN (2S)-N-[(1S)-1-CYANO-2-PHENYLETHYL]-1,4-OXAZEPANE-2-CARBOXAMIDES AS DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE 1 INHIBITORSSeptember 2022February 2023Allow610NoNo
17942112CERTAIN (2S)-N-[(1S)-1-CYANO-2-PHENYLETHYL]-1,4-OXAZEPANE-2-CARBOXAMIDES AS DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE 1 INHIBITORSSeptember 2022February 2023Allow510NoNo
17942123CERTAIN (2S)-N-[(1S)-1-CYANO-2-PHENYLETHYL]-1,4-OXAZEPANE-2-CARBOXAMIDES AS DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE 1 INHIBITORSSeptember 2022March 2023Allow610NoNo
17942122CERTAIN (2S)-N-[(1S)-1-CYANO-2-PHENYLETHYL]-1,4-OXAZEPANE-2-CARBOXAMIDES AS DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE 1 INHIBITORSSeptember 2022February 2023Allow510NoNo
17942111CERTAIN (2S)-N-[(1S)-1-CYANO-2-PHENYLETHYL]-1,4-OXAZEPANE-2-CARBOXAMIDES AS DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE 1 INHIBITORSSeptember 2022February 2023Allow510NoNo
17942106CERTAIN (2S)-N-[(1S)-1-CYANO-2-PHENYLETHYL]-1,4-OXAZEPANE-2-CARBOXAMIDES AS DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE 1 INHIBITORSSeptember 2022February 2023Allow510NoNo
17930352ANTIPROLIFERATION COMPOUNDS AND USES THEREOFSeptember 2022July 2024Allow2311NoNo
17939020RIP1 INHIBITORY COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING THE SAMESeptember 2022June 2024Allow2120NoNo
17905626L-ERGOTHIONEINE-CONTAINING COMPOSITIONSeptember 2022May 2025Allow3300NoNo
17902085BIASED ADRENERGIC AGONISTSSeptember 2022January 2024Allow1631NoNo
17905327PROCESS FOR THE PURIFICATION OF INDOLE CARBAZOLE ALKALOIDSAugust 2022May 2025Allow3320NoNo
17799680METHODS OF PREPARING CHIRAL BENZODIAZEPINONE DERIVATIVESAugust 2022April 2025Allow3210NoNo
17819178ANTIVIRAL DRUGS TARGETING THE N-TERMINAL DOMAIN (NTD) OF THE CORONAVIRUS SPIKE RECEPTOR BINDING DOMAIN (RBD)August 2022August 2023Allow1210NoNo
17882707CONTROLLED RELEASE FORMULATIONS OF RILUZOLE AND THEIR USESAugust 2022February 2024Allow1810NoNo
17873246Self-Healing Organic CrystalsJuly 2022September 2023Allow1310NoNo
17874122Hydrazinyl-Indole Compounds and Methods for Producing a ConjugateJuly 2022February 2025Abandon3121NoNo
17811201RHEIN AMIDE DERIVATIVE AND PREPARATION METHOD AND USE THEREOF, AND INHIBITOR OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA (HCC) WITH SPECIFIC RECQL4 EXPRESSIONJuly 2022December 2023Abandon1710NoNo
17811008ANTI-VIRAL COMPOUNDSJuly 2022September 2023Allow1520NoNo
178534975 BETA DIHYDROTESTOSTERONE PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATIONS AND RELATED METHODSJune 2022March 2024Allow2020NoNo
17850144BENZODIAZEPINE DERIVATIVES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS FOR TREATING COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENTJune 2022December 2024Allow3030NoNo
17787369METHOD FOR PREPARING LURASIDONE HYDROCHLORIDEJune 2022January 2025Allow3100NoNo
177864701,4-Sulfur-Bridged Polycyclic Compounds Containing Dihydrobenzofuran Structure, Its Preparation Method and Application ThereofJune 2022July 2024Allow2510NoNo
17836070ADENINE ANALOGS, PRODRUGS, DERIVATIVES, COMPOSITIONS AND USES THEREOFJune 2022August 2024Abandon2631YesNo
17833160TRIDENTATE MACROCYCLIC COMPOUNDSJune 2022July 2023Allow1310NoNo
17804979ALBOFUNGIN AND ITS DERIVATIVES SPECIFICALLY RECOGNIZE HIV-1 LTR-III G-QUADRUPLEXJune 2022July 2023Allow1310NoNo
17751613CLOMIPRAMINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASEMay 2022December 2023Allow1820NoNo
17777739METHOD FOR PRODUCING EPSILON-CAPROLACTAMMay 2022March 2025Allow3410NoNo
17744429CRYSTAL MODIFICATIONS OF ODEVIXIBATMay 2022July 2024Allow2620NoNo
17773607SUBSTITUTED HETEROCYCLIC FUSED CYCLIC COMPOUND, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND PHARMACEUTICAL USE THEREOFApril 2022February 2024Allow2220YesNo
17726153NITROGEN-CONTAINING CONDENSED RING COMPOUNDS HAVING DOPAMINE D3 ANTAGONISTIC EFFECTApril 2022November 2023Allow1910YesNo
17724753INHIBITORS OF PLASMA KALLIKREIN AND USES THEREOFApril 2022April 2025Allow3640YesNo
17722947MEDICAMENT FOR PREVENTING AND/OR TREATING DRY EYEApril 2022February 2024Allow2210NoNo
17766496REDOX ACTIVE MATERIALS, PROCESSES AND USES THEREOFApril 2022August 2023Allow1620NoNo
17706225COMPOSITION AND METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF MYOPIAMarch 2022July 2024Allow2820NoNo
17695033COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING CNS DISORDERSMarch 2022October 2022Allow710NoNo
17694896COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING CNS DISORDERSMarch 2022January 2023Abandon1010NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner COLEMAN, BRENDA LIBBY.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
5
Examiner Affirmed
4
(80.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(20.0%)
Reversal Percentile
29.8%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 20.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
73
Allowed After Appeal Filing
27
(37.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
46
(63.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
58.2%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 37.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner COLEMAN, BRENDA LIBBY - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner COLEMAN, BRENDA LIBBY works in Art Unit 1624 and has examined 2,092 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 73.3%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 28 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner COLEMAN, BRENDA LIBBY's allowance rate of 73.3% places them in the 29% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by COLEMAN, BRENDA LIBBY receive 1.58 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 41% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by COLEMAN, BRENDA LIBBY is 28 months. This places the examiner in the 49% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +15.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by COLEMAN, BRENDA LIBBY. This interview benefit is in the 59% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 38.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 84% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 64.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 86% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 68% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 90.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 81% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 85.7% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 54.6% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 69% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 6.7% of allowed cases (in the 92% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 2.1% of allowed cases (in the 66% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.