USPTO Examiner WHITE EVERETT - Art Unit 1623

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17057938METHOD FOR PRODUCING CELLULOSE CARBAMATENovember 2020October 2022Allow2320YesNo
17056468CELLULOSE ACETATE, CELLULOSE ACETATE FIBER, CELLULOSE ACETATE COMPOSITION, METHOD FOR PRODUCING CELLULOSE ACETATE, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING CELLULOSE ACETATE COMPOSITIONNovember 2020August 2022Allow2120YesNo
17083617HYDROXYPROPYL METHYL CELLULOSE PHTHALATE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAMEOctober 2020January 2023Allow2730NoNo
17050131SULFONATED PULP FIBERS, DERIVATIVE PULP, SULFONATED FINE CELLULOSE FIBERS, METHOD FOR PRODUCING SULFONATED FINE CELLULOSE FIBERS, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SULFONATED PULP FIBERSOctober 2020August 2023Allow3431NoNo
17020889Novel HydrogelSeptember 2020July 2022Allow2210NoNo
16977754Wheat Straw Pulp, Preparation Method Therefor, Application Thereof and Method for Adjusting Degree of Substitution of CMCSeptember 2020June 2023Abandon3321NoNo
16934475WATER DEGRADABLE FILM CONTAINING HYALURONIC ACID OR SALT THEREOF AND POLYPHENOL COMPOUNDSJuly 2020September 2023Allow3730YesNo
16928186METHOD OF PREPARING DEGRADABLE AND ENVIRONMENT RESPONSIVE COMPOSITE MICROGELSJuly 2020October 2021Allow1500NoNo
16960895METHOD OF SEPARATING HEMICELLULOSE THROUGH EFFICIENT PRETREATMENT OF FIBROUS BIOMASS AND COMPREHENSIVELY UTILIZING THE SAMEJuly 2020June 2023Allow3520NoNo
16923058METHOD FOR PRODUCING CELLULOSE PARTICLES USING POROUS MEMBRANEJuly 2020June 2022Abandon2310NoNo
16923076METHOD FOR PRODUCING CELLULOSE PARTICLES OR CELLULOSE ACETATE PARTICLESJuly 2020March 2023Abandon3310NoNo
16910494METHOD FOR PREPARING STARCH PHOSPHATE USING PHYTATEJune 2020October 2021Allow1610NoNo
16956945OXIDATIVE DEGRADATION OF CELLULOSE ETHERSJune 2020October 2023Allow4050YesNo
16955921FILAMENTS OF MICROFIBRILLATED CELLULOSEJune 2020March 2023Abandon3310NoNo
16895830PROCESS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF ALKYLFLUOROACRYLATEJune 2020August 2022Allow2630NoNo
16770559CARBOXYMETHYLATED CELLULOSE NANOFIBERSJune 2020October 2022Allow2920YesNo
16892288Pulverized Pulp and Method of Producing Cellulose Ether Using the SameJune 2020August 2023Abandon3930NoNo
16769721METHODS FOR PRODUCING A VISCOSE DOPE FROM MICROBIAL CELLULOSEJune 2020November 2022Allow2920NoNo
16769836METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CARBOXYMETHYLATED CELLULOSE NANOFIBERJune 2020April 2023Allow3440NoNo
16768939METHOD FOR PRODUCING CARBOXYMETHYLATED CELLULOSE AND CARBOXYMETHYLATED CELLULOSE NANOFIBERSJune 2020August 2022Allow2620YesNo
16768945CARBOXYMETHYLATED CELLULOSEJune 2020June 2023Allow3740YesNo
16875666MODIFIED CELLULOSE NANOFIBER, SINGLE-LAYER LAMINATE INCLUDING THE SAME, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING MODIFIED CELLULOSE NANOFIBERMay 2020July 2023Abandon3831NoNo
16651159SIMPLIFIED PROCESS FOR MAKING LOW VISCOSITY CELLULOSE ETHERMarch 2020March 2023Abandon3520NoYes
16638636PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES FROM BIOMASSFebruary 2020December 2022Abandon3401NoNo
16786913SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EMULSION BREAKINGFebruary 2020September 2021Allow1910NoNo
16777340METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CONDITIONING OF PARTICULATE CRYSTALLINE MATERIALSJanuary 2020June 2022Allow2810YesNo
16773291DRIED CELLULOSE FIBERS, CELLULOSE FIBER-RESIN COMPOSITE, AND MOLDED ARTICLEJanuary 2020December 2022Allow3421NoNo
16737850HYDROXYPROPYL METHYL CELLULOSE HARD CAPSULES AND PROCESS OF MANUFACTUREJanuary 2020August 2022Abandon3110NoNo
16623308CELLULOSE BASED COMPOSITIONDecember 2019June 2022Allow3020NoNo
16620986CHEMICALLY MODIFIED CELLULOSE FIBER AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAMEDecember 2019May 2022Allow2920YesYes
16706976PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS RELATING TO INHIBITING FIBROUS ADHESIONS OR INFLAMMATORY DISEASE USING LOW SULPHATE FUCANSDecember 2019July 2022Abandon3110NoNo
16619321COATING COMPOSITION, COATING AND ARTICLEDecember 2019March 2023Abandon3901NoNo
16617571CELLULOSE RESIN, MOLDING MATERIAL, MOLDED BODY, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING CELLULOSE RESINNovember 2019October 2022Allow3440NoNo
16689430COMPOSITION AND METHODS FOR PREPARING HEMICELLULOSE-RICH EXTRACT FROM SPEND COFFEE GROUNDNovember 2019September 2022Allow3421NoNo
16613995PREPARATION OF SOLVENT AND POLYMER REDISPERSIBLE FORMULATIONS OF DRIED CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTALS (CNC)November 2019November 2023Allow4810YesNo
16609984FINE CELLULOSE FIBER AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAMEOctober 2019June 2022Allow3250YesNo
16609674METHOD FOR PREPARING ANIONIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUND EXHIBITING IMPROVED WATER SOLUBILITYOctober 2019September 2022Allow3520YesNo
16608892METHOD FOR CONTROLLED PREPARATION OF LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT CELLULOSE ETHEROctober 2019March 2022Allow2920NoYes
16608793NOVEL MODIFIED CELLULOSE, METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAME AND USE THEREOFOctober 2019January 2021Allow1400NoNo
16607571THICKENER, COMPOSITION, AND SHEETOctober 2019January 2023Allow3910NoNo
16606515PREPARATION OF OXIDIZED CELLULOSE, AND APPLICATION OF OXIDIZED CELLULOSE IN WASHING AND DRUG LOADINGOctober 2019September 2021Abandon2320NoNo
16601667Processing method for intelligent hydrogel from nanometer starch particlesOctober 2019April 2022Allow3010NoNo
16493797PROCESS FOR RECOVERING AN ESTERIFIED CELLULOSE ETHER FROM A REACTION PRODUCT MIXTURESeptember 2019February 2022Abandon2920NoNo
16494237METHOD FOR STORING CHEMICALLY MODIFIED CELLULOSE FIBERS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING CHEMICALLY MODIFIED CELLULOSE NANOFIBERSSeptember 2019May 2022Abandon3230NoNo
16492964REGIOSELECTIVELY SUBSTITUTED CELLULOSE ESTERSSeptember 2019June 2021Allow2120NoNo
16492966REGIOSELECTIVELY SUBSTITUTED CELLULOSE ESTERSSeptember 2019December 2022Allow3950NoNo
16492967REGIOSELECTIVELY SUBSTITUTED CELLULOSE ESTERSSeptember 2019September 2022Allow3640YesNo
16492965REGIOSELECTIVELY SUBSTITUTED CELLULOSE ESTERSSeptember 2019January 2022Abandon2820NoNo
16492612REGENERATED CELLULOSIC FIBRES SPUN FROM AN AQUEOUS ALKALINE SPINDOPESeptember 2019January 2022Abandon2820NoNo
16487926HEMICELLULOSE PROCESSING METHODAugust 2019June 2022Allow3440NoNo
16527740THIXOTROPIC OXIDIZED CELLULOSE SOLUTIONS AND MEDICAL APPLICATIONS THEREOFJuly 2019September 2023Allow4930NoYes
16480618CELLULOSE ACETATE AND MOLDED ARTICLEJuly 2019June 2023Allow4750YesNo
16477957SULFATE ESTER MODIFIED CELLULOSE NANOFIBERS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING CELLULOSE NANOFIBERSJuly 2019June 2022Allow3540YesNo
16507768OXIDIZED CELLULOSE-BASED MATERIAL, METHOD FOR OBTAINING SAME AND USE THEREOF AS COMPRESSJuly 2019September 2021Allow2630YesNo
16456433SACCHARIDE FATTY ACID ESTER INORGANIC PARTICLE COMBINATIONSJune 2019August 2022Allow3731NoNo
16471798ACID TYPE CARBOXYLATED CELLULOSE NANOFIBERJune 2019October 2022Allow4010NoNo
16471375ACID-TYPE CARBOXYMETHYLATED CELLULOSE NANOFIBER AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOFJune 2019November 2022Allow4130NoNo
16434072BINDERJune 2019February 2022Allow3321NoNo
16461897METHOD FOR MAKING A FILM COMPRISING MFCMay 2019July 2022Allow3820YesNo
16345994METHOD FOR FORMING A FILM COMPRISING NANOCELLULOSEApril 2019July 2022Allow3930YesNo
16344131SPHERICAL CELLULOSE NANOPARTICLES AND PROCESS FOR PREPARATION THEREOFApril 2019December 2022Abandon4340YesNo
16358948One-Step Processing of Hydrogels for Mechanically Robust and Chemically Desired FeaturesMarch 2019September 2021Allow3030NoNo
16332755CELLULOSE ACETATE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING CELLULOSE ACETATEMarch 2019December 2021Abandon3310NoNo
16273267COMPOSITE MATERIALS CONTAINING HEMP AND NANOCELLULOSEFebruary 2019September 2022Allow4330YesNo
16314855METHOD FOR RAPID GELATION OF SILK FIBROIN SOLUTION UNDER PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITIONSJanuary 2019December 2022Allow4711YesNo
16311725METHOD FOR PREPARING CELLULOSE-CONTAINING PARTICLESDecember 2018December 2022Abandon4731NoNo
16307311COTTON RECYCLINGDecember 2018August 2022Allow4431YesNo
16303165PRODUCTION OF CHEMICALLY DERIVATIZED NANOCELLULOSENovember 2018June 2022Allow4330YesNo
16096857METHODS FOR PRODUCING CHITIN OLIGOMER, N-ACETYLGLUCOSAMINE, AND 1-O-ALKYL-N-ACETYLGLUCOSAMINEOctober 2018November 2022Allow4850YesNo
16159962METHOD FOR PRODUCING CELLULOSE DERIVATIVE, AND CELLULOSE DERIVATIVEOctober 2018June 2021Allow3220NoNo
16076036Sheet for Covering WoundAugust 2018October 2022Abandon5010NoNo
16022788Method of Preparing Single-Phase Modified Sodium Hyaluronate GelJune 2018December 2022Abandon5441YesNo
16005314PROCESS FOR PRODUCING CELLULOSE DERIVATIVE AND CELLULOSE DERIVATIVEJune 2018November 2021Abandon4130NoNo
15769836MODIFIED CELLULOSE FINE FIBERS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAMEApril 2018June 2022Abandon4940NoNo
15768338CELLULOSE ETHERS WITH TEMPORARY CROSS-LINKS, A PROCESS TO MAKE THEM, AND THEIR USEApril 2018November 2019Allow1930NoYes
15948598Hyaluronate CompositionsApril 2018July 2020Abandon2710NoNo
15766116CELLULOSE DERIVATIVE AND USE THEREOFApril 2018December 2020Allow3320YesNo
15761926PROCESS FOR PREPARING AN ESTER OF A CELLULOSE ETHER IN THE PRESENCE OF ACETIC ACID AND A REACTION CATALYSTMarch 2018November 2019Abandon2010NoNo
15919909METHOD FOR PRODUCING CELLULOSE ETHERMarch 2018March 2022Allow4860NoYes
15758503Use of Cellulose Ethers Having 3-Azido-Hydroxyalkyl Groups in Insoluble AdhesivesMarch 2018September 2021Abandon4330NoNo
15756706HYALURONIC ACID COMPOSITION AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFORMarch 2018August 2022Allow5451YesYes
15755625WATER-REDISPERSIBLE POLYMER POWDERFebruary 2018February 2022Abandon4731NoNo
15755266METHOD FOR PREPARING HIGH-WATER-CONTENT EMULSION GEL USING OIL GELLING AGENTFebruary 2018January 2020Abandon2210NoNo
15873779METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CONDITIONING OF PARTICULATE CRYSTALLINE MATERIALSJanuary 2018March 2020Abandon2611NoNo
15856413CELLULOSE FIBER AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING CELLULOSE FIBERDecember 2017September 2020Abandon3211NoNo
15736113Method of Crosslinking of Polysaccharides Using Photoremovable Protecting GroupsDecember 2017June 2020Allow3011NoNo
15577787Molar mass controlled celluloseNovember 2017June 2022Abandon5441YesNo
15571330ANIONIC NANOPARTICLES FOR USE IN THE DELIVERY OF ANIONIC SMALL MOLECULE DRUGSNovember 2017January 2020Abandon2601NoNo
15569210PROCESS FOR PRODUCING ESTERIFIED CELLULOSE ETHERS OF VERY HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT AND LOW VISCOSITYOctober 2017February 2021Abandon4030NoNo
15569197PROCESS OF PREPARING A HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT ESTERIFIED CELLULOSE ETHEROctober 2017March 2021Abandon4030NoNo
15726009METHOD FOR PRODUCING LOW POLYMERIZATION DEGREE CELLULOSE ETHEROctober 2017October 2020Allow3740NoYes
15722636HYDROXYALKYL ALKYL CELLULOSE, METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME, AND SOLID PREPARATIONOctober 2017September 2019Allow2410NoNo
15722448PROCESS FOR THE PURIFICATION OF HEPARAN SULFATE AND USE THEREOF IN COSMETOLOGICAL AND DERMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONSOctober 2017April 2021Abandon4331NoNo
15714150BINDERSeptember 2017August 2019Allow2310NoNo
15553669CELLULOSE ACETATE POWDER AND METHOD OF PRODUCING CELLULOSE ACETATE POWDERAugust 2017October 2020Allow3850YesYes
15683032HYPROMELLOSE PHTHALATE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING HYPROMELLOSE PHTHALATEAugust 2017December 2020Allow3940YesNo
15683222HYPROMELLOSE ACETATE SUCCINATE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING HYPROMELLOSE ACETATE SUCCINATEAugust 2017November 2020Allow3840YesNo
15549858PROCESS FOR FRACTIONATING AN ESTERIFIED CELLULOSE ETHERAugust 2017December 2021Abandon5250NoNo
15644878SOLVENT-BASED PROCESSES FOR PRODUCING NANOCELLULOSE, AND COMPOSITIONS AND PRODUCTS PRODUCED THEREFROMJuly 2017April 2022Abandon5750NoNo
15541642PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A WATER-SOLUBLE CELLULOSE DERIVATIVE HAVING A REDUCED CONTENT OF WATER-INSOLUBLE PARTICLESJuly 2017May 2020Allow3520NoYes

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner WHITE, EVERETT.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
15
Examiner Affirmed
8
(53.3%)
Examiner Reversed
7
(46.7%)
Reversal Percentile
68.7%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 46.7% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
124
Allowed After Appeal Filing
47
(37.9%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
77
(62.1%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
62.8%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 37.9% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner WHITE, EVERETT - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner WHITE, EVERETT works in Art Unit 1623 and has examined 484 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 51.7%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 39 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner WHITE, EVERETT's allowance rate of 51.7% places them in the 15% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by WHITE, EVERETT receive 2.98 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 83% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WHITE, EVERETT is 39 months. This places the examiner in the 25% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +12.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WHITE, EVERETT. This interview benefit is in the 48% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 13.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 10% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 28.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 158.6% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 91% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 84.2% of appeals filed. This is in the 78% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 56.2% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 75.4% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 80% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 6.0% of allowed cases (in the 89% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.8% of allowed cases (in the 61% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.