USPTO Examiner SOROUSH LAYLA - Art Unit 1622

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18974530Preparation Method and Application of Micelle Preparation Containing Thymol and Derivative ThereofDecember 2024March 2025Allow300YesNo
18794128AMLODIPINE FORMULATIONSAugust 2024April 2025Allow811NoNo
18600419NON-SEDATING DEXMEDETOMIDINE TREATMENT REGIMENSMarch 2024April 2025Allow1310NoNo
18600431NON-SEDATING DEXMEDETOMIDINE TREATMENT REGIMENSMarch 2024August 2024Allow610NoNo
18590910ANALGESIC AND ANTIPRURITIC PHARMACERTICAL COMPOSITION AND APPLICATION THEREOFFebruary 2024February 2025Allow1100YesNo
18588626TOPICAL FORMULATION FOR A JAK INHIBITORFebruary 2024December 2024Allow1010YesNo
18441397STABLE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS OF CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDEFebruary 2024January 2025Abandon1110NoNo
18528684STABLE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS OF SUCCINYLCHOLINE CHLORIDEDecember 2023August 2024Allow920YesNo
18526030METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE SENSORIAL PROPERTIES OF OIL-IN-WATER EMULSIONS, TO REDUCE THE ADHESIVE EFFECT OF SUCH GLYCERIN-BASED OIL-IN-WATER EMULSIONSDecember 2023February 2025Allow1410YesNo
18487671SUSTAINED RELEASE AMINOPYRIDINE COMPOSITIONOctober 2023April 2025Abandon1811NoNo
18478029AR+BREAST CANCER TREATMENT METHODSSeptember 2023February 2025Allow1610YesNo
18455242TOPICAL DETOMIDINE FORMULATIONSAugust 2023March 2025Abandon1910NoNo
18334084USE OF TOPICAL BRAF INHIBITOR COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATMENT OF EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR DOWNSTREAM EFFECTORS - INDUCED CUTANEOUS REACTIONSJune 2023May 2025Abandon2431NoNo
18022886Nano-Emulsion Based Compositions, Methods for Their Preparation and Their Use in Delivery of Active IngredientsFebruary 2023January 2025Allow2321YesNo
18077296COMPOSITIONS OF BILE ACIDS AND PHENYLBUTYRATE COMPOUNDSDecember 2022December 2024Allow2410NoNo
17942505PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION CONTAINING B-LAPACHONE AS ACTIVE INGREDIENT FOR PREVENTION OR TREATMENT OF CHOLESTATIC LIVER DISEASESeptember 2022May 2024Allow2030YesNo
17820783METHODS OF ADMINISTERING INTRAVENOUS MELOXICAM IN A BOLUS DOSEAugust 2022April 2025Abandon3210NoNo
17840502VAPORIZABLE PSYCHOACTIVE ALKALOID COMPOSITION AND PREPARATION THEREOFJune 2022November 2024Abandon2941NoNo
17804342TOPICAL TREATMENT FOR ANORECTAL DISORDERS WITH AND WITHOUT SEAT CUSHIONMay 2022June 2025Abandon3741YesNo
17738422Dosing Regimens Associated With Extended Release Paliperidone Injectable FormulationsMay 2022September 2023Allow1610YesNo
17713082TOPICAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION BASED ON SEMIFLUORINATED ALKANESApril 2022March 2025Abandon3531NoNo
17703543TREATMENT OF SKIN CONDITIONS USING HIGH KRAFFT TEMPERATURE ANIONIC SURFACTANTSMarch 2022July 2023Allow1661YesNo
176421361,4-DIHYDROBENZO[D]PYRAZOLO[3,4-F][1,3]DIAZEPINE DERIVATIVES AND RELATED COMPOUNDS AS LRRK2, NUAK1 AND/OR TYK2 KINASE MODULATORS FOR THE TREATMENT OF E.G. AUTOIMMUNE DISEASEMarch 2022April 2025Allow3700YesNo
17673518USING FATTY ACID SYNTHASE INHIBITORS TO TREAT FIBROSISFebruary 2022November 2024Allow3321YesYes
17591223METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO PREVENT AND TREAT DISORDERS ASSOCIATED WITH MUTATIONS IN THE ODC1 GENEFebruary 2022August 2024Allow3021YesNo
17554316TOPICAL ACYCLOVIR FORMULATIONS AND USES THEREOFDecember 2021March 2025Abandon3921NoNo
17496460METHODS OF MODULATING TETRABENAZINE METABOLITES PLASMA LEVELS USING BUPROPIONOctober 2021May 2025Abandon4350YesYes
17449785METHODS FOR ENHANCING THE BIOAVAILABILITY AND EXPOSURE OF A VOLTAGE-GATED POTASSIUM CHANNEL OPENEROctober 2021March 2025Abandon4121NoNo
17292027NITROGEN-CONTAINING FUSED HETEROCYCLIC SHP2 INHIBITOR COMPOUND, PREPARATION METHOD, AND USEMay 2021January 2025Allow4421YesNo
17165652METHODS OF TREATING EPITHELIOID CELL TUMORSFebruary 2021September 2024Allow4311NoNo
17153611TOPICAL DETOMIDINE FORMULATIONSJanuary 2021April 2025Abandon5151YesNo
17052775CANCER TREATMENTS TARGETING CANCER STEM CELLSNovember 2020September 2024Allow4740YesNo
17087365METHODS OF INDUCING ANESTHESIANovember 2020March 2025Abandon5321YesYes
16971472IMIDAZOPYRIMIDINES AS EED INHIBITORS AND THE USE THEREOFAugust 2020June 2024Allow4611YesNo
16932352TREATMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF AUGMENTATION IN RESTLESS LEGS SYNDROMEJuly 2020September 2024Allow5041YesNo
16766019RHEOLOGY ADDITIVES BASED ON DI-OR TRI-AMIDES AND MIXTURES THEREOFMay 2020February 2024Allow4541YesNo
16809662PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATIONS COMPRISING NITROCATECHOL DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF MAKING THEREOFMarch 2020November 2024Abandon5641YesNo
16470350METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE SENSORIAL PROPERTIES OF OIL-IN-WATER EMULSIONS, TO REDUCE THE ADHESIVE EFFECT OF SUCH GLYCERIN-BASED OIL-IN-WATER EMULSIONSJune 2019February 2025Allow6061YesNo
16365364USE OF TIOTROPIUM BROMIDE TO PREVENT PULMONARY OXYGEN TOXICITYMarch 2019February 2025Abandon6041NoYes
16246320COMBINATION OF A SELECTIVE HISTONE DEACETYLASE 3 (HDAC3) INHIBITOR AND AN IMMUNOTHERAPY AGENT FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCERJanuary 2019June 2024Allow6051YesNo
15528882TREATMENT OF SKIN ATROPHY WITH A COMBINATION OF TRIIODOTHYROACETIC ACID (TRIAC) AND DEHYDROEPIANDROSTERONE (DHEA)May 2017December 2018Allow1911YesNo
15229116Therapeutic Calcium Phosphate Particles in Use for Aesthetic or Cosmetic Medicine, and Methods of Manufacture and UseAugust 2016February 2020Allow4231YesNo
15226415Formulations that Provide Support During Vaccinations and Adaptive Immune System ResponseAugust 2016December 2018Allow2821YesNo
15220617(HETERO)ARYL IMIDAZOLES/PYRAZOLES FOR TREATMENT OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERSJuly 2016April 2019Allow3321YesYes
14971230AQUEOUS GEL FORMULATIONS CONTAINING IMMUNE RESPONSE MODIFIERSDecember 2015April 2018Allow2821NoNo
14704375PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING NEBIVOLOL OR A NEBIVOLOL ANALOGUEMay 2015June 2018Allow3841YesNo
14612143TREATING INFLAMMATION AND INFLAMMATORY PAIN IN MUCOSA USING MUCOSAL PROLONGED RELEASE BIOADHESIVE THERAPEUTIC CARRIERSFebruary 2015August 2015Allow711YesNo
14499457COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING BRAIN FUNCTIONSeptember 2014February 2016Allow1700YesNo
14453861COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING BRAIN FUNCTIONAugust 2014February 2016Allow1801YesNo
14301757Polyol and Polyether Iron Oxide Complexes as Pharmacological and/or MRI Contrast AgentsJune 2014September 2014Allow300YesNo
14288686PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONMay 2014May 2020Allow6081YesNo
14020363N-QUINOLIN-BENZENSULFONAMIDES AND RELATED COMPOUNDS FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER, AUTOIMMUNE DISORDERS AND INFLAMMATIONSeptember 2013September 2017Allow4841YesNo
13937923Polyol and Polyether Iron Oxide Complexes as Pharmacological and/or MRI Contrast AgentsJuly 2013November 2016Allow4011NoNo
13834281TOPICAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATMENT OF SKIN DAMAGEMarch 2013January 2020Allow6041NoYes
13799682FORMULATION FOR THE PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASEMarch 2013March 2019Allow6041NoYes
13816265ANTI-DANDRUFF SHAMPOOMarch 2013September 2015Allow3121YesYes
13734339Polyol and Polyether Iron Oxide Complexes as Pharmacological and/or MRI Contrast AgentsJanuary 2013July 2013Allow601YesNo
13706828COMBINATION OF 4-{3-[CIS-HEXAHYDROCYCLOPENTA[C]PYRROL-2(1H)-YL]PROPOXY}BENZAMIDE AND A NMDA RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING THE SAMEDecember 2012August 2014Allow2111YesNo
13676326TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITORS AS ANTI-KINETOPLASTID AGENTSNovember 2012September 2016Allow4652NoNo
13610113COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIONSeptember 2012October 2015Allow3721YesYes
13595215ANTIWRINKLE AGENT, LIPOLYSIS PROMOTER, EXTERNAL COMPOSITION FOR SKIN AND FOOD AND BEVERAGE COMPOSITIONAugust 2012January 2013Allow500NoNo
13541325INTRANASAL SPRAY DEVICE CONTAINING PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONJuly 2012March 2015Allow3220YesNo
13541314METHOD OF MANAGING OR TREATING PAINJuly 2012February 2013Allow711YesNo
13539989PESTICIDE COMPOSITION COMPRISING PROPAMOCARB-FOSETYLATE AND AN INSECTICIDALLY ACTIVE SUBSTANCEJuly 2012November 2014Allow2821YesYes
13461063ASSOCIATION BETWEEN 4-{3-[CIS-HEXAHYDROCYCLOPENTA[C]PYRROL-2(1H)-YL]PROPOXY}BENZAMIDE AND AN ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE INHIBITOR, AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING ITMay 2012August 2014Allow2821YesYes
13378405NOVEL PHENYLIMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVE AS PDE10A ENZYME INHIBITORApril 2012July 2014Allow3121YesNo
13298766Treatment or Prevention of Fungal Infections with PDK1 InhibitorsNovember 2011July 2014Allow3211YesNo
13137659NOVEL COSMETIC COMPOSITIONSSeptember 2011September 2012Allow1301NoNo
13214130ANTI-FUNGAL FORMULATIONAugust 2011September 2012Allow1301NoNo
13098844PHOTOSENSITIZER COMPOSITION FOR TREATING SKIN DISORDERSMay 2011September 2015Allow5341YesNo
13119736USE OF AZAPERONE FOR REDUCING ANTIBIOTIC USAGEMarch 2011February 2014Allow3520NoYes
13055005THERAPEUTIC AGENT FOR MIGRAINEMarch 2011November 2015Allow5841NoNo
13055206SPHINGOSINE 1 PHOSPHATE RECEPTOR MODULATORS AND THEIR USE TO TREAT MUSCLE INFLAMMATIONJanuary 2011May 2015Allow5231NoYes
13004837TREATING PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS USING MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR M1 ANTAGONISTSJanuary 2011July 2012Allow1901NoNo
12963308POLYOL AND POLYETHER IRON OXIDE COMPLEXES AS PHARMACOLOGICAL AND/OR MRI CONTRAST AGENTSDecember 2010August 2012Allow2911YesNo
12954497PROCESS FOR PREPARATION OF RASAGILINE AND SALTS THEREOFNovember 2010January 2014Allow3711NoNo
12918696USES OF PENTAMIDINE AND RELATED COMPOUNDSAugust 2010December 2012Allow2801YesNo
12863513COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ALLEVIATING DEPRESSION OR IMPROVING COGNITIONJuly 2010March 2014Allow4431YesNo
12833208COSMETIC COMPOSITIONS AND CONTAINER THEREFORJuly 2010February 2013Allow3111YesNo
12774376PYRAZINE KINASE INHIBITORSMay 2010March 2011Allow1101NoNo
12446567COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR SUPPRESSING ENDOMETRIAL PROLIFERATIONApril 2010December 2015Allow6051NoNo
12750563ANTI-FUNGAL FORMULATIONMarch 2010March 2012Allow2410YesNo
12705555ANTI-FUNGAL FORMULATIONFebruary 2010April 2012Allow2610YesNo
12689044CITRATE SALT OF RASAGILINEJanuary 2010October 2010Allow920YesNo
12590996PERFLUOROCARBON GEL FORMULATIONSNovember 2009August 2012Allow3301NoNo
12573322USE OF 4-CYCLOPROPYLMETHOXY-N-(3,5-DICHLORO-1-OXIDO-4-PYRIDIN-4-YL)-5-(METHOXY)PYRIDINE-2-CARBOXAMIDE IN THE TREATMENT OF CRANIAL TRAUMASOctober 2009March 2016Allow6060YesYes
12450118SOLID PREPARATION COMPRISING 2-[[6-[(3R)-3-AMINO-1-PIPERIDINYL]-3,4-DIHYDRO-3-METHYL-2,4-DIOXO-1(2H)-PYRIMIDINYL]METHYL]-4-FLUOROBENZONITRILESeptember 2009March 2011Allow1810NoNo
12446286TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITORS AS ANTI-KINETOPLASTID AGENTSJuly 2009August 2012Allow4021YesNo
12520808PESTICIDE COMPOSITION COMPRISING PROPAMOCARB-FOSETYLATE AND AN INSECTICIDALLY ACTIVE SUBSTANCEJune 2009May 2012Allow3521NoNo
12455976DELAYED RELEASE RASAGILINE CITRATE FORMULATIONJune 2009August 2011Allow2610NoNo
12447065AQUEOUS PHARMACEUTICAL SUSPENSIONS CONTAINING REBAMIPIDE AND MANUFACTURING PROCESS THEREOFApril 2009February 2014Allow5830YesYes
12384872LOW-MELTING BIOCIDAL FORMULATIONApril 2009June 2012Allow3820NoYes
12293877GALLIUM COMPOSITIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF LIVER CANCER AND METHODS OF USEMarch 2009October 2011Allow3721YesYes
12378323Process for the treatment and prevention of diseases caused by fungiFebruary 2009December 2012Allow4611YesNo
12348849DIHYDROXYPHENYL COMPOUNDS AND GLUCOSIDE COMPOUNDS THEREOFJanuary 2009September 2010Allow2010NoNo
12206290INHIBITORS OF MELANOCYTE TYROSINASE AS TOPICAL SKIN LIGHTENERSSeptember 2008August 2010Allow2311NoNo
12206334INHIBITORS OF MELANOCYTE TYROSINASE AS TOPICAL SKIN LIGHTENERSSeptember 2008March 2010Allow1901NoNo
12194674SELF-TANNING EFFECTSAugust 2008April 2012Allow4311NoNo
12189040AGENT FOR TREATMENT OF ALLERGIC EYE DISEASEAugust 2008March 2010Allow2000NoNo
12164137SUNSCREEN COMPOSITE PARTICLES AND POROUS PARTICLES IN COSMETIC COMPOSITIONSJune 2008March 2012Allow4540NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SOROUSH, LAYLA.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
6
Examiner Affirmed
2
(33.3%)
Examiner Reversed
4
(66.7%)
Reversal Percentile
85.2%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 66.7% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
32
Allowed After Appeal Filing
18
(56.2%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
14
(43.8%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
86.0%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 56.2% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner SOROUSH, LAYLA - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SOROUSH, LAYLA works in Art Unit 1622 and has examined 115 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 87.8%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 37 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SOROUSH, LAYLA's allowance rate of 87.8% places them in the 64% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SOROUSH, LAYLA receive 2.67 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 89% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SOROUSH, LAYLA is 37 months. This places the examiner in the 13% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +13.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SOROUSH, LAYLA. This interview benefit is in the 55% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 18.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 10% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 54.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 68% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 80.6% of appeals filed. This is in the 70% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 52.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 52.8% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 66% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 13.0% of allowed cases (in the 97% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 1% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.