USPTO Examiner SIMMONS CHRIS E - Art Unit 1622

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18987568SYNTHESIS OF KEY INTERMEDIATE OF KRAS G12C INHIBITOR COMPOUNDDecember 2024June 2025Allow601YesNo
18968074EMULSIFIABLE NEONICOTINOID PESTICIDE CONCENTRATEDecember 2024February 2025Allow300YesNo
18915221AZAINDOLE ROCK INHIBITORSOctober 2024January 2025Allow300NoNo
18895223METHOD OF TREATING CANCER IN A SUBJECTSeptember 2024March 2025Allow601YesNo
18820199NAPHTHALENE ISOXAZOLINE COMPOUND AND APPLICATION THEREOFAugust 2024December 2024Allow400YesNo
18644728NOVEL LIPIDS AND NANOPARTICLE COMPOSITIONS THEREOFApril 2024January 2025Allow911YesNo
18629056METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING GLUCOCORTICOID EXCESSApril 2024May 2025Allow1320YesNo
18610051AZAINDOLE ROCK INHIBITORSMarch 2024January 2025Allow1010YesNo
18590713POTENT ASGPR-BINDING COMPOUNDS FOR THE DEGRADATION OF IMMUNOGLOBULINS AND OTHER PROTEINSFebruary 2024December 2024Allow1001YesNo
18436569EMULSIFIABLE CONCENTRATE (EC) FORMULATION OF NITENPYRAMFebruary 2024November 2024Allow911YesNo
18547996MITOFUSIN ACTIVATORS HAVING AN ENDOCYCLIC-BONDED CARBONYL GROUP AND METHODS FOR USE THEREOFOctober 2023April 2025Allow2021NoNo
18321266METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING GLUCOCORTICOID EXCESSMay 2023November 2024Abandon1821NoNo
18296752Pharmaceutical Composition Of S-Ketamine HydrochlorideApril 2023February 2025Abandon2320NoYes
17819620METHOD TO TREAT MANGANESE TOXICITY AND MANGANESE-INDUCED PARKINSONISM IN HUMANSAugust 2022June 2025Abandon3440YesNo
17865195INHIBITORS OF GLUCOSYLCERAMIDE SYNTHASEJuly 2022June 2025Allow3500YesNo
17744502METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF SNAKE BITEMay 2022December 2024Allow3130YesNo
17696267ARSINOTHRICIN AND METHODS OF TREATING INFECTIONS USING ARSINOTHRICINMarch 2022February 2025Allow3501YesNo
17571884METHODS OF TREATING MUSCLE CRAMPING AND RELATED COMPOSITIONSJanuary 2022March 2025Abandon3810YesNo
17548030NON-HORMONAL STEROID MODULATORS OF NF-KAPPA BETA FOR TREATMENT OF DISEASEDecember 2021April 2025Abandon4020NoNo
17545301TREATMENT OF MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER AND SUICIDAL IDEATIONS THROUGH STIMULATION OF HIPPOCAMPAL NEUROGENESIS UTILIZING PLANT-BASED APPROACHESDecember 2021January 2025Abandon3710NoNo
17456244Antibiotic CompoundsNovember 2021September 2024Allow3411NoNo
17528729MODULATORS OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS TRANSMEMBRANE CONDUCTANCE REGULATORNovember 2021January 2025Allow3811YesNo
17510326THERAPEUTIC METHODS USING DECANOIC ACID AND AMINO ACIDSOctober 2021August 2024Allow3420NoNo
17605447Inhibition of IL-1 Induced InflammationOctober 2021February 2025Abandon4020YesNo
17493801FORMULATIONS FOR EPIDERMAL REPAIROctober 2021November 2024Allow3711YesNo
17392676METHODS OF DELAYING PAIN PROGRESSION AND TREATING PROSTATE CANCERAugust 2021December 2024Allow4030YesNo
17392247COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS RELATED TO EXCIPIENTS AND CANNABINOID FORMULATIONSAugust 2021March 2025Allow4311NoNo
17361754METHODS FOR TREATING BENZODIAZEPINE MISUSE/USE DISORDERJune 2021October 2024Allow4040YesNo
17351880COMPANION DIAGNOSTIC TOOL FOR MUTANT P53 REACTIVATING COMPOUNDSJune 2021March 2025Allow4541YesNo
172992366-HYDROXY-8-OXATRICYCLO[3.2.1.02,4]OCTANE-2-CARBOXAMIDE DERIVATIVES FOR INDUCING CHONDROGENESIS FOR TREATING JOINT DAMAGEJune 2021March 2025Allow4611NoNo
17335597OPHTHALMIC COMPOSITION OF BRINZOLAMIDE AND BRIMONIDINEJune 2021April 2025Abandon4630YesNo
17297752IMPROVEMENT IN OR RELATING TO ORGANIC COMPOUNDSMay 2021June 2025Abandon4920NoNo
17297038EZH2- FGFR INHIBITION IN CANCERMay 2021October 2024Abandon4001NoNo
17330131MODIFYING THE EXPRESSION LEVEL OF A GENE ENCODING AN CYCLOOXYGENASE ENZYME BY TREATING A HUMAN SUBJECT WITH A NITROXIDEMay 2021November 2024Abandon4251YesNo
17285916PYRIDINYL SULFONAMIDE DERIVATIVES, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND USES THEREOFApril 2021July 2024Allow3920NoNo
17231048COMPOUNDS FOR PROTECTION OF CELLSApril 2021June 2025Abandon5041NoNo
17282344Niraparib SaltsApril 2021May 2024Allow3820NoNo
17277383SELECTIVE SALMONELLA OR E. COLI CULTIVATION METHOD, COMPOSITIONS AND USESMarch 2021April 2025Abandon4911NoNo
17115633METHOD OF TREATMENT OF ACTINIC KERATOSESDecember 2020October 2024Abandon4640NoNo
17071228METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS RELATING TO LUNG FUNCTIONOctober 2020March 2025Allow5382YesYes
16873866SMALL MOLECULE DRUGS AND RELATED METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF DISEASES RELATED TO TDP-43, ALPHA-SYNUCLEIN, HUNTINGTIN'S PROTEIN AND TAU PROTEIN OLIGOMER FORMATIONJuly 2020January 2025Allow5451YesNo
16684874Pharmaceutical Formulations for Subcutaneous AdministrationNovember 2019December 2024Allow6042YesNo
16614335INHIBITORS OF NUCLEOTIDYLTRANSFERASE SUPERFAMILY ENZYMES AS ANTIBIOTICSNovember 2019June 2025Allow6071YesNo
16523230COMPOSITIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSIONJuly 2019December 2022Abandon4131NoNo
16082090PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION FOR TREATING FUNCTIONAL PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERSSeptember 2018April 2025Allow6031YesYes
15875114DELIVERY OF A CHEMOTHERAPY AGENT ACROSS THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIERJanuary 2018February 2020Allow2511NoNo
15649585COMBINATION PRODUCTS FOR THE TREATMENT OF BACTERIAL INFECTIONS AND METHODS OF PRODUCING OR DOSING OF SAMEJuly 2017November 2019Allow2831YesNo
15625151USES OF ETHER PHOSPHOLIPIDS IN TREATING DISEASESJune 2017January 2020Allow3141YesNo
15117340Myogenesis Promotor, Muscle Atrophy Inhibitor, Medical Composition and Taz ActivatorAugust 2016January 2020Allow4241YesNo
14906822IMIDAZOLECARBOXAMIDES AND THEIR USE AS FAAH INHIBITORSJanuary 2016June 2019Allow4130YesNo
14985474GROWTH CONTROL OF ORAL AND SUPERFICIAL ORGANISMS USING GALLIUM COMPOUNDSDecember 2015December 2019Allow4830YesNo
14862072COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING FRIEDREICH'S ATAXIASeptember 2015April 2019Allow4221NoNo
14563613METHODS FOR TREATING NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA WITH 3-(4-AMINO-1-OXO-1,3-DIHYDRO-ISOINDOL-2-YL)-PIPERIDINE-2,6-DIONE IN COMBINATION WITH A SECOND ACTIVE AGENTDecember 2014February 2016Allow1400NoNo
14257755SYNTHETIC SPILANTHOL AND USE THEREOFApril 2014June 2016Allow2610NoNo
14201069METHODS FOR TREATING MULTIPLE MYELOMA USING 4-(AMINO)-2-(2,6-DIOXO(3-PIPERIDYL))-ISOINDOLINE-1,3-DIONE IN COMBINATION WITH ANTIBODIESMarch 2014November 2015Allow2011NoNo
13918692COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TRANSMUCOSAL ABSORPTIONJune 2013July 2016Abandon37161YesYes
13886405HETEROCYCLIC SUBSTITUTED HEXAHYDROPYRANO[3,4-D][1,3]THIAZIN-2-AMINE COMPOUNDSMay 2013February 2014Allow900NoNo
13818337SUBSTITUTED N-PHENETHYLTRIAZOLONEACETAMIDES AND USE THEREOFApril 2013July 2015Allow2821NoNo
13738649CYCLIC AMIDESJanuary 2013November 2015Allow3421NoNo
13222518INSECTICIDAL COMPOUNDAugust 2011November 2012Allow1500NoNo
13011233CRYSTALS OF LAQUINIMOD SODIUM, AND PROCESS FOR THE MANUFACTURE THEREOFJanuary 2011September 2013Allow3212NoNo
13011187CRYSTALS OF LAQUINIMOD SODIUM, AND PROCESS FOR THE MANUFACTURE THEREOFJanuary 2011October 2013Allow3310NoNo
12664062HAIR STYLING COMPOSITIONDecember 2009July 2013Allow4330YesYes
12578932REDUCTION OF INFECTION ASSOCIATED WITH MEDICAL DEVICEOctober 2009December 2012Allow3810NoNo
12574732CONTACT LENS SOLUTION WITH A TERTIARY AMINE OXIDEOctober 2009May 2015Allow6031NoYes
11833530PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION FOR IMPROVING ORAL HYGIENE AND METHODS THEREOFAugust 2007May 2014Allow6021NoNo
11795210METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR DECREASING SALIVA PRODUCTIONJuly 2007October 2015Allow6041NoYes
11633507PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATION CONTAINING PHENYTOIN SODIUM AND MAGNESIUM STEARATEDecember 2006August 2012Allow6061YesNo
11628266THERAPY FOR MULTIPLE SCLEROSISDecember 2006June 2012Allow6060YesNo
11375346ANTIPLAQUE ORAL CARE COMPOSITIONSMarch 2006June 2012Allow6070NoYes
11344725APIGENIN FOR CHEMOPREVENTION, AND CHEMOTHERAPY COMBINED WITH THERAPEUTIC REAGENTSJanuary 2006April 2008Abandon2631YesNo
10762616ASSOCIATION OF FLUCONAZOLE-TINIDAZOLE FOR THE TREATMENT OF VAGINAL INFECTIONS, ITS COMPOSITION, PREPARATION PROCESS AND USAGEJanuary 2004August 2012Allow6091YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SIMMONS, CHRIS E.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
0
(0.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(100.0%)
Reversal Percentile
91.2%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
9
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(11.1%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
8
(88.9%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
11.5%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 11.1% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner SIMMONS, CHRIS E - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SIMMONS, CHRIS E works in Art Unit 1622 and has examined 62 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 72.6%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 40 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SIMMONS, CHRIS E's allowance rate of 72.6% places them in the 28% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SIMMONS, CHRIS E receive 2.87 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 93% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SIMMONS, CHRIS E is 40 months. This places the examiner in the 7% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +6.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SIMMONS, CHRIS E. This interview benefit is in the 33% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 22.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 19% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 34.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 44% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 68% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 85.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 66.7% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 47.1% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 54% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 3.2% of allowed cases (in the 84% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 4.4% of allowed cases (in the 77% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.