USPTO Examiner SCHMIDT IZABELA MARIA - Art Unit 1621

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18782879CRYSTALLINE FORMS OF A KRAS G12C INHIBITORJuly 2024December 2024Allow510YesNo
18670566METHOD OF TREATMENT AND SELECTION OF PATIENTS BENEFITING FROM AGOMELATINE BASED ON EEG MEASUREMENTSMay 2024January 2025Allow820YesNo
18626740COMPOUNDS THAT INTERACT WITH RAS SUPERFAMILY PROTEINS FOR TREATMENT OF CANCERS, INFLAMMATORY DISEASES, RASOPATHIES, AND FIBROTIC DISEASEApril 2024March 2025Allow1111YesNo
18602126UREA COMPOUNDS AND COMPOSITIONS AS SMARCA2/BRM ATPASE INHIBITORSMarch 2024March 2025Allow1200NoNo
18600365DNA POLYMERASE THETA INHIBITOR FOR TREATMENT OF CANCERMarch 2024June 2024Allow300YesNo
18586920Pleiotropic Pathway Modifier Compounds and Method of Treating DiseasesFebruary 2024September 2024Allow711YesNo
18418168PYRAZOLO[1,5-C]PYRIDO[3,4-E]PYRIMIDINES AS CK2 INHIBITORSJanuary 2024September 2024Allow810NoNo
18345461USE OF BROMODOMAIN-CONTAINING PROTEIN 9 INHIBITORS TO TREAT AND/OR PREVENT UTERINE LEIOMYOSARCOMAJune 2023March 2025Allow2130YesNo
18209674SOLID FORMS OF JAK INHIBITOR AND PROCESS OF PREPARING THE SAMEJune 2023October 2024Abandon1711NoNo
18329958COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR WILLIAMS SYNDROME (WS) THERAPYJune 2023June 2025Abandon2420NoNo
18198191COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING PATIENTS WITH AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS (ALS)May 2023April 2025Abandon2321NoNo
18140576POLYMORPHS OF [2-(1H-INDOL-3-YL)-1H-IMIDAZOL-4-YL](3,4,5-TRIMETHOXYPHENYL)METHANONE AND ITS SALTSApril 2023December 2024Allow2011NoNo
18131314CHEMOKINE RECEPTOR MODULATORS AND USES THEREOFApril 2023October 2024Allow1921NoNo
18125940INTRANASAL OLANZAPINE FORMULATIONS AND METHODS OF THEIR USEMarch 2023August 2024Allow1721NoNo
18025817CRYSTALLINE FORMS OF A KRAS G12C INHIBITORMarch 2023January 2025Allow2200YesNo
17822344EIF4E INHIBITORS AND USES THEREOFAugust 2022August 2024Allow2421NoNo
17870476REAGENTS, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVING VIABILITY AND FUNCTION OF CELLS, TISSUES AND ORGANSJuly 2022May 2025Allow3332YesNo
17791755MEK INHIBITORS AND THERAPEUTIC USES THEREOFJuly 2022April 2025Allow3300NoNo
17854801INHIBITORS OF BRUTON'S TYROSINE KINASE AND METHODS OF THEIR USEJune 2022July 2024Abandon2510NoNo
17749958CONJUGATE MONOMETHYL AURISTATIN E TO OBTAIN A COMPOSITION FOR TREATMENT OF PROSTATE CANCERMay 2022June 2025Allow3600NoNo
17655020NOVEL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONSMarch 2022February 2025Abandon3521NoNo
17538919TIME TO RESOLUTION OF AXITINIB-RELATED ADVERSE EVENTSNovember 2021June 2024Abandon3010NoNo
17602426ANTIBACTERIAL COMPOUNDSOctober 2021March 2025Abandon4101NoNo
17437264PESTICIDALLY ACTIVE AZOLE-AMIDE COMPOUNDSSeptember 2021March 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17435803Compounds for Treating Neurodegenerative Diseases and CancersSeptember 2021March 2025Abandon4301NoNo
17435939SYNTHETIC RETINOIDS FOR USE IN RAR ACTIVATIONSeptember 2021February 2025Allow4211YesNo
17435031BENZOTHIOPHENE COMPOUND, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND USE THEREOFAugust 2021January 2025Allow4010NoNo
17412102DUAL MAGL AND FAAH INHIBITORSAugust 2021February 2025Allow4120YesNo
17428734TUFT CELL SPECIFICATION IN INFLAMMATORY ILEITISAugust 2021November 2024Abandon4010NoNo
17305773SPHINGOSINE KINASE INHIBITOR AMIDOXIME PRODRUGSJuly 2021October 2024Allow3910YesNo
17422642INHIBITORS OF HISTONE DEACETYLASE USEFUL FOR THE TREATMENT OR PREVENTION OF HIV INFECTIONJuly 2021March 2025Allow4411YesNo
17422252NLRP3 MODULATORSJuly 2021July 2024Allow3601YesNo
17422434TRANSDERMAL PENETRANT FORMULATIONS CONTAINING CANNABIDIOLJuly 2021November 2024Abandon4010NoNo
17421533PALATABLE FORMULATIONSJuly 2021August 2024Allow3810YesNo
17421567METALLOENZYME INHIBITOR COMPOUNDSJuly 2021March 2025Allow4411YesNo
164997711H-IMIDAZO[4,5-H]QUINAZOLINE COMPOUND AS PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITORJuly 2021May 2025Allow6021YesNo
17366923PYRIDO-PYRIMIDINONE AND PTERIDINONE COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USEJuly 2021February 2025Allow4311NoNo
17419956COMBINATION THERAPY OF PHOSPHATE BINDERS AND VITAMIN KJune 2021October 2024Abandon4010NoNo
17415492AMINOPYRIMIDINE COMPOUND USED FOR INHIBITING ACTIVITY OF PROTEIN KINASEJune 2021January 2025Allow4311YesNo
17309646SALT OF SYK INHIBITOR AND CRYSTALLINE FORM THEREOFJune 2021October 2024Allow4010NoNo
17335202Use of fumaric acid esters and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof in preparing pharmaceuticals for treating ferroptosis-related diseasesJune 2021December 2024Abandon4211NoNo
17293817INHIBITOR OF BRUTON TYROSINE KINASEMay 2021November 2024Abandon4201NoNo
17292891COMPOUNDS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH NLRP ACTIVITYMay 2021April 2025Allow4811NoNo
17292036RHO-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN KINASE INHIBITOR, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING SAME, AND USE THEREOFMay 2021March 2025Allow4611NoNo
17291416FEED ADDITIVE FOR DAIRY CATTLE COMPRISING N-ACETYL-L-TRYPTOPHAN AS ACTIVE INGREDIENTMay 2021April 2025Abandon4720YesNo
17244039Use of Trimetazidine in Preparation of Drugs for Preventing and Treating Liver DiseasesApril 2021October 2024Abandon4110NoNo
17289736PROGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF METASTATIC CANCERApril 2021October 2024Abandon4211NoNo
17289470SMALL MOLECULE DRUGS AND METHODS TO ACCELERATE OSSEOINTEGRATIONApril 2021October 2024Abandon4201NoNo
17289062NOVEL SUBSTITUTED TRICYCLIC COMPOUNDS AS INDOLEAMINE 2,3-DIOXYGENASE INHIBITORSApril 2021April 2024Allow3501YesNo
17239086CONJUGATED CHEMICAL INDUCERS OF DEGRADATION AND METHODS OF USEApril 2021March 2025Allow4711YesNo
17285840PYRIDYLPHENYLAMINOQUINOLINES AND ANALOGUESApril 2021October 2024Abandon4210NoNo
17230009PROCESS FOR PREPARING A COMPOUND OF FORMULA (XIII)April 2021September 2024Abandon4110NoNo
17285214COMPOSITION AND METHOD OF STRENGTHENING SKIN BARRIERApril 2021March 2025Abandon4720NoNo
17224557HIV INHIBITOR COMPOUNDSApril 2021April 2024Allow3610YesNo
17250938NOVEL OXADIAZOLESMarch 2021June 2024Abandon3901NoNo
17281748METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF SCLERODERMAMarch 2021September 2024Abandon4110NoNo
17277954SMALL MOLECULE MENIN INHIBITORSMarch 2021August 2024Abandon4101NoNo
17276821TREATMENT FOR OBESITYMarch 2021April 2025Allow4921YesNo
17271202BTK INHIBITORS, PHARMACEUTICALLY ACCEPTABLE SALTS, POLYMORPHS AND APPLICATION THEREOFFebruary 2021August 2024Abandon4210NoNo
17268512UREA COMPOUNDS AND COMPOSITIONS AS SMARCA2/BRM ATPASE INHIBITORSFebruary 2021December 2023Allow3400YesNo
16646081Process for preparing crystalline Tipiracil HydrochlorideMarch 2020December 2024Abandon5810NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner SCHMIDT, IZABELA MARIA - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SCHMIDT, IZABELA MARIA works in Art Unit 1621 and has examined 54 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 51.9%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 41 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SCHMIDT, IZABELA MARIA's allowance rate of 51.9% places them in the 8% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SCHMIDT, IZABELA MARIA receive 1.06 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 14% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SCHMIDT, IZABELA MARIA is 41 months. This places the examiner in the 5% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +63.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SCHMIDT, IZABELA MARIA. This interview benefit is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 41.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 57% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 0% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 21.4% of allowed cases (in the 93% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.