USPTO Art Unit 4144 Prosecution Statistics

Art Unit Information

Art Unit: 4144
Group: 4140
Tech Center: 4100
Total Cases: 7
Last Active: March 2023

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17096393COMPOSITE MODEL GENERATION METHOD AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUSNovember 2020November 2023Abandon3600NoNo
17046728CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR SINGLE AND MULTI MODE ELECTRIC SECONDARY OR TAG ELECTRIC AXLESOctober 2020July 2021Allow900NoNo
16812713Serially Deposited BiomoleculesMarch 2020June 2024Allow5140YesNo
11810995Audio data processing apparatusJune 2007February 2011Abandon4500NoNo
11419774PASSWORD INPUT DEVICE, PASSWORD INPUT METHOD, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSMay 2006June 2009Abandon3700YesNo
11393724METHOD OF RESERVING NETWORK BANDWIDTH RESOURCES, AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AND NETWORK DEVICE USING THE SAMEMarch 2006January 2009Allow3300NoNo
10473417Demodulator and receiver using sameMarch 2004February 2008Abandon5300NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Art Unit 4144 - Prosecution Statistics Summary

Executive Summary

Art Unit 4144 is part of Group 4140 in Technology Center 4100. This art unit has examined 7 patent applications in our dataset, with an overall allowance rate of 42.9%. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 37 months.

Comparative Analysis

Art Unit 4144's allowance rate of 42.9% places it in the 4% percentile among all USPTO art units. This art unit has a significantly lower allowance rate than most art units at the USPTO.

Prosecution Patterns

Applications in Art Unit 4144 receive an average of 0.57 office actions before reaching final disposition (in the 4% percentile). The median prosecution time is 37 months (in the 22% percentile).

Strategic Considerations

When prosecuting applications in this art unit, consider the following:

  • The art unit's allowance rate suggests a more challenging examination environment compared to the USPTO average.
  • With fewer office actions than average, plan for relatively streamlined prosecution.
  • The median prosecution time is longer than average and should be factored into your continuation and client communication strategies.
  • Review individual examiner statistics within this art unit to identify examiners with particularly favorable or challenging prosecution patterns.

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.