Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16995955 | LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF | August 2020 | January 2022 | Abandon | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16793925 | Nasal Implant Introduced Through a Non-Surgical Injection Technique | February 2020 | June 2024 | Allow | 52 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16752756 | FABRIC WITH BARBS COATED WITH A WATER-SOLUBLE MATERIAL | January 2020 | May 2024 | Allow | 52 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16617707 | AN IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE | November 2019 | June 2024 | Allow | 54 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16053844 | ROTOR ASSEMBLY AND MOTOR INCLUDING THE SAME | August 2018 | October 2020 | Abandon | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13115409 | THIN-FILM SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE FOR DISPLAY APPARATUS AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF | May 2011 | September 2012 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 12986996 | CONFIGURABLE AND PORTABLE SYSTEM FOR GENERATING NARRATIVES | January 2011 | May 2012 | Abandon | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12986972 | CONFIGURABLE AND PORTABLE METHOD FOR GENERATING NARRATIVES | January 2011 | May 2012 | Abandon | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12365278 | MAPPING DEFINITION CREATION SYSTEM AND MAPPING DEFINITION CREATION PROGRAM | February 2009 | February 2011 | Abandon | 25 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12363529 | UPDATING SEARCH ENGINE DOCUMENT INDEX BASED ON CALCULATED AGE OF CHANGED PORTIONS IN A DOCUMENT | January 2009 | April 2011 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 11372951 | Method for ensuring QoS for isochronous data in residential ethernet system including legacy ethernet device | March 2006 | September 2008 | Abandon | 30 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 11025545 | Method of designing a desirable customer experience | December 2004 | April 2008 | Abandon | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10972507 | Controlling access to content based on certificates and access predicates | October 2004 | April 2008 | Abandon | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10605477 | A METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DESIGN, MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION OF COMPLEX INITIATIVES | October 2003 | April 2008 | Abandon | 55 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Art Unit 4143 is part of Group 4140 in Technology Center 4100. This art unit has examined 14 patent applications in our dataset, with an overall allowance rate of 35.7%. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 30 months.
Art Unit 4143's allowance rate of 35.7% places it in the 1% percentile among all USPTO art units. This art unit has a significantly lower allowance rate than most art units at the USPTO.
Applications in Art Unit 4143 receive an average of 0.64 office actions before reaching final disposition (in the 4% percentile). The median prosecution time is 30 months (in the 56% percentile).
When prosecuting applications in this art unit, consider the following:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.