Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18417813 | Semiconductor Device and Method of Manufacturing the Same | January 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18564449 | TOP EMISSION TYPE ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR DESIGNING SAME | November 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18489695 | STACKED FOCAL PLANE ARRAY CIRCUIT AND METHOD THEREOF | October 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18487317 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF | October 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18459303 | ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODE AND ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE HAVING THEREOF | August 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18359668 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME AND DISPLAY DEVICE | July 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18346556 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | July 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18322329 | METHOD OF FORMING OPENING IN PASSIVATION LAYER AND STRUCTURES THEREOF | May 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18137291 | CMOS IMAGE SENSOR AND METHOD FOR MAKING THE SAME | April 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17496832 | DISPLAY DEVICE | October 2021 | February 2026 | Abandon | 52 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner ANDUJAR, LEONARDO works in Art Unit 3991 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 0.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 52 months.
Examiner ANDUJAR, LEONARDO's allowance rate of 0.0% places them in the 1% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by ANDUJAR, LEONARDO receive 3.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 87% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ANDUJAR, LEONARDO is 52 months. This places the examiner in the 4% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 0.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 49% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.