Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17128822 | VEHICLE CONTROL DATA GENERATION METHOD, VEHICLE CONTROLLER, VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEM, VEHICLE LEARNING DEVICE, VEHICLE CONTROL DATA GENERATION DEVICE, AND MEMORY MEDIUM | December 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15797746 | INTAKE MANIFOLD | October 2017 | November 2018 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15696456 | Vehicle Control Device | September 2017 | May 2018 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15259781 | FUEL SUPPLY APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE | September 2016 | September 2017 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15248924 | ENGINE DEVICE | August 2016 | June 2018 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15105527 | EXHAUST GAS RECIRCULATION APPARATUS AND ENGINE SYSTEM INCLUDING SUCH EXHAUST GAS RECIRCULATION APPARATUS | June 2016 | April 2018 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15071845 | FUEL SUPPLY DEVICE OF MOTORCYCLE | March 2016 | November 2018 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15066921 | ENGINE SYSTEM HAVING UNKNOWN-FUEL STARTUP STRATEGY | March 2016 | November 2017 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14669954 | AUTO STOP ENGINE CONTROL FOR VEHICLES | March 2015 | October 2016 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14402001 | INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES | November 2014 | November 2016 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14539340 | AUXILIARY CHAMBER TYPE INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE | November 2014 | July 2017 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14525028 | DETERMINATION OF THE EFFECTIVE FUEL-AIR RATIO OF A SUPERCHARGED INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE WITH SCAVENGING AIR COMPONENT | October 2014 | February 2017 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14381745 | Method for Operating a Fuel Injection System and Fuel Injection System Comprising Fuel Injection Valves with a Piezo Direct-Drive | August 2014 | September 2016 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14373114 | CONTROL APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE | July 2014 | December 2016 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14233067 | PLASMA GENERATING DEVICE, AND INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE | April 2014 | October 2017 | Allow | 45 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14061959 | COMBINED FUELING STRATEGY FOR GASEOUS FUEL | October 2013 | April 2016 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14006056 | INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE | October 2013 | February 2017 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14112594 | INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE | October 2013 | June 2016 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13982674 | PLASMA GENERATION DEVICE | October 2013 | January 2016 | Allow | 30 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14046574 | METHOD FOR OPERATING A FUEL INJECTION SYSTEM | October 2013 | May 2016 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13982662 | INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE | October 2013 | December 2015 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14004208 | VEHICLE, AND METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE | September 2013 | April 2016 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14019191 | ENGINE CONTROL FOR A LIQUID PETROLEUM GAS FUELED ENGINE | September 2013 | April 2016 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13885116 | METHOD FOR OPERATING AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE | July 2013 | September 2015 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13787636 | FUEL INJECTION METHOD AND COMBUSTION ENGINE WITH EARLY PRE-INJECTION | March 2013 | April 2015 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13703907 | FLUID VALVE | February 2013 | January 2016 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13731467 | FUEL CONTROL SYSTEM AND FUEL CONTROL METHOD OF A GASOLINE DIRECT INJECTION ENGINE | December 2012 | February 2015 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13670059 | CONTROL APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE | November 2012 | January 2015 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13557512 | Low Temperature Dual Fuel Combustion Utilizing Diesel and Methanol Fuels | July 2012 | January 2015 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner JIN, GEORGE C. works in Art Unit 3799 and has examined 29 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 28 months.
Examiner JIN, GEORGE C.'s allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 100% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by JIN, GEORGE C. receive 0.97 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 6% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by JIN, GEORGE C. is 28 months. This places the examiner in the 69% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by JIN, GEORGE C.. This interview benefit is in the 18% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 20.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 24% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 62.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 50.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 47% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 48% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 54% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.