USPTO Examiner MEHL PATRICK M - Art Unit 3798

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18808815CONCENTRIC ARCHITECTURE FOR OPTICAL SENSINGAugust 2024January 2025Allow510YesNo
18796264SYSTEM FOR PRECISELY LOCATING ABNORMAL AREA OF BRAIN FIBER BUNDLEAugust 2024February 2025Allow610NoNo
18739199TARGETING CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION BASED ON MYOCARDIAL VIABILITYJune 2024November 2024Allow510YesNo
18600308UNIFIED ANISOTROPIC VOLUME AND SURFACE MESH STORAGEMarch 2024May 2025Allow1510YesNo
18444367SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR NON-INVASIVE IMAGE-BASED PLAQUE ANALYSIS AND RISK DETERMINATIONFebruary 2024October 2024Allow810YesNo
18444339SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR NON-INVASIVE IMAGE-BASED PLAQUE ANALYSIS AND RISK DETERMINATIONFebruary 2024April 2025Allow1420YesNo
18579311IMPLEMENTING A PERIODIC DEOXYHEMOGLOBIN SIGNALJanuary 2024May 2025Allow1600YesNo
18391515SYSTEM, DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SAFEGUARDING THE WELLBEING OF PATIENTS FOR FLUID INJECTIONDecember 2023December 2024Allow1200NoNo
18350177ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS AND OPERATION METHOD OF ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUSJuly 2023March 2025Allow2010NoNo
18350104SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ABLATION VISUALIZATIONJuly 2023September 2024Allow1500NoNo
18193800REGISTRATION OF 3D and 2D IMAGES FOR SURGICAL NAVIGATION AND ROBOTIC GUIDANCE WITHOUT USING RADIOPAQUE FIDUCIALS IN THE IMAGESMarch 2023October 2024Allow1800NoNo
18183877CONNECTED BODY SURFACE CARE MODULEMarch 2023January 2025Allow2240YesNo
18183639SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED TRANSFORM BY MANIFOLD APPROXIMATIONMarch 2023December 2024Allow2110NoNo
18102243ACOUSTIC SHOCK WAVE OR PRESSURE PULSE TREATMENT FOR PROPTOSIS OR EXOPHTHALMOSJanuary 2023May 2025Allow2701YesNo
18098032APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTINUOUS NONINVASIVE MEASUREMENT OF LUNG FLUID RESPIRATORY FUNCTION AND EVENTSJanuary 2023October 2024Allow2110NoNo
18085443NEEDLE AND TINE DEPLOYMENT MECHANISMDecember 2022January 2024Allow1300NoNo
18062829METHOD FOR PREDICTING CARDIOVASCULAR RISKDecember 2022December 2023Allow1200YesNo
18053560SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TOUCHLESS DETECTION OF HEART RATE VARIABILITYNovember 2022January 2025Allow2620NoNo
17921245SYSTEM, DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SAFEGUARDING THE WELLBEING OF PATIENTS FOR FLUID INJECTIONOctober 2022October 2023Allow1110NoNo
17967302ULTRASOUND SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USER INTERFACE ON IMAGE TOUCHSCREEN CONTROL OF FOCAL ZONE ADJUSTMENTSOctober 2022March 2025Allow2920YesNo
17964657OPTICAL CAMERA POSITIONING TOOLOctober 2022November 2024Allow2510NoNo
17881932TREATMENT INSTRUMENTAugust 2022May 2024Allow2200NoNo
17878564Multimodal Imaging Systems Probes And MethodsAugust 2022January 2024Allow1700NoNo
17814435System And Methods For Assessing Presence Of Large Vessel Occlusion To Aid In Transfer Decision-Making For Endovascular Treatment In Patients With Acute Ischemic StrokeJuly 2022March 2024Allow2010NoNo
17805533SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTIVE HEART VALVE SIMULATIONJune 2022September 2024Allow2710NoNo
17831993Method and System for In-Bed Contact Pressure Estimation Via Contactless ImagingJune 2022October 2024Allow2810NoNo
17751352LOCALIZATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AN INGESTIBLE DEVICEMay 2022November 2023Allow1700NoNo
17770431METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIA FOR UTILIZING A THERAPEUTIC ULTRASOUND DEVICE TO PERFORM MITRAL VALVE DECALCIFICATIONApril 2022November 2024Allow3110NoNo
17765471IMAGING-BASED REFLEX MEASUREMENTS FOR SEDATION DEPTH MONITORINGMarch 2022May 2025Allow3821YesNo
17657177COMBINING MULTIPLE ERGONOMIC RISK FACTORS IN A SINGLE PREDICTIVE FINITE ELEMENT MODELMarch 2022July 2025Allow3910YesNo
17765177OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF NEUROLOGICAL MOVEMENT DISORDERS FROM MEDICAL IMAGINGMarch 2022November 2024Allow3211YesNo
17696116BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION MEASUREMENT SYSTEM AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUMMarch 2022June 2024Abandon2710NoNo
17690890SCANNING BASED THz NEARFIELD IMAGING DEVICEMarch 2022October 2024Abandon3110NoNo
17682839Methods Useful in Optimizing the Treatment of Neuropathies and Targeting Tissues with Cosmetic Botulinum InjectionsFebruary 2022February 2025Abandon3620NoNo
17651846INFRARED THERMOGRAPHY PLATFORM FOR DETERMINING VASCULAR HEALTH OF INDIVIDUALSFebruary 2022April 2024Allow2620YesNo
17579624THORACIC GARMENT OF POSITIONING ELECTROMAGNETIC (EM) TRANSDUCERS AND METHODS OF USING SUCH THORACIC GARMENTJanuary 2022June 2024Allow2910NoNo
17571273MULTI-TARGET TREATMENT PLANNING AND DELIVERY AND VIRTUAL LOCALIZATION FOR RADIATION THERAPYJanuary 2022May 2024Allow2801YesNo
17454540METHOD OF ASSESSING THE LEVEL OF VASCULAR INFLAMMATIONNovember 2021September 2023Allow2210YesNo
17504301ULTRASOUND THERAPY CATHETER WITH MULTI-CHAMBERED BALLOONS FOR TRANSLUMINAL LONGITUDINAL POSITIONINGOctober 2021November 2023Allow2510YesNo
17462622HEART RATE DETECTING DEVICE CAPABLE OF ALLEVIATING MOTION INTERFERENCEAugust 2021January 2025Allow4110NoNo
17432909MEASUREMENT DEVICE USING EIT ELECTRODEAugust 2021February 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17428011METHODS FOR ACCURATE NEEDLE-FREE ASSESSMENT OF MYOCARDIAL OXYGENATIONAugust 2021June 2024Abandon3520NoNo
17393157Personal Health Data CollectionAugust 2021November 2022Allow1620YesNo
17383327SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING THROMBOSIS FOR HEART VALVE REPLACEMENTSJuly 2021April 2025Allow4420NoNo
17311524Pulse Sensor for Detecting the Pulse of a Living OrganismJune 2021February 2025Allow4401NoNo
17315691METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC SOURCE IMAGING USING DEEP NEURAL NETWORKSMay 2021February 2024Allow3310NoNo
17160910TRAINING IMAGE GENERATION DEVICE, TRAINING IMAGE GENERATION METHOD, TRAINING IMAGE GENERATION PROGRAM, LEARNING DEVICE, LEARNING METHOD, LEARNING PROGRAM, DISCRIMINATOR, RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE PROCESSING PROGRAMJanuary 2021February 2024Allow3721YesNo
17256024SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF MEDICAL IMAGESDecember 2020March 2024Allow3910NoNo
17247637TRANSILLUMINATION OF IRIS MUSCLES TO INFER STROMA DEFORMATIONDecember 2020November 2024Allow4720NoNo
17010497METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ADAPTIVE TIMING OF A SECOND CONTRAST BOLUSSeptember 2020April 2024Allow4310NoNo
17006973INJECTION SETUP KITS AND METHODSAugust 2020January 2024Allow4010YesNo
16966262SKINCARE DEVICEJuly 2020November 2024Abandon5120NoNo
16772644ENDOSCOPIC IMAGING USING NANOSCALE METASURFACESJune 2020June 2025Allow6030YesNo
16867509OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY SENSOR AND RELATED APPARATUS AND METHODSMay 2020February 2025Abandon5840YesNo
16627171UNIFIED ANISOTROPIC VOLUME AND SURFACE MESH STORAGEDecember 2019January 2024Allow4840YesNo
16681325CARDIAC IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHODNovember 2019April 2024Abandon5331YesNo
16500109SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PLANNING PERIPHERAL ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES WITH MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGINGOctober 2019August 2024Abandon5840NoYes
16492643CARDIAC MOTION SIGNAL DERIVED FROM OPTICAL IMAGESSeptember 2019March 2024Allow5450NoNo
16488087METHOD AND DEVICE FOR NON-INVASIVELY CLASSIFYING A TUMOROUS MODIFICATION OF A TISSUEAugust 2019June 2024Abandon5850NoNo
16534725DYNAMIC AGENT INJECTION FOR CARDIOVASCULAR CHARACTERIZATIONAugust 2019January 2024Allow5431YesNo
16410130Systems and Methods for Imaging of Neurovascular-CouplingMay 2019December 2024Allow6041YesNo
16388218Use of HP Xenon-129 MRI to Measure Xenon Signal Changes in the Brain Tissue Over a Period to Quantitatively Evaluate the Condition of CBF in an IndividualApril 2019February 2025Abandon6060NoNo
16336603ANATOMICAL MODEL FOR POSITION PLANNING AND TOOL GUIDANCE OF A MEDICAL TOOLMarch 2019September 2024Abandon6060YesNo
16261994ULTRASOUND PRODUCTION SOURCE WITH AN OUTSIDE THREADJanuary 2019March 2024Allow6060YesNo
16306951SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LIGHTING IN RENDERED IMAGESDecember 2018September 2024Abandon6080NoNo
16195424Cardiac and Respiratory Self-Gated Motion-Corrected Free-Breathing Spiral Cine ImagingNovember 2018September 2024Abandon6060NoNo
16174585MEDICAL IMAGING APPARATUS TO AUTOMATICALLY DETERMINE PRESENCE OF AN ABNORMALITY INCLUDING A DETERMINATION TO TRANSMIT AN ASSISTANCE IMAGE AND A CLASSIFIED ABNORMALITY STAGEOctober 2018February 2024Allow6051YesNo
16077041SYSTEM TO DIFFERENTIATE AND IDENTIFY TYPES OF TISSUE WITHIN A REGION PROXIMATE TO A WORKING END OF A SURGICAL INSTRUMENTAugust 2018January 2024Allow6040NoNo
15332979APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTINUOUS NONINVASIVE MEASUREMENT OF RESPIRATORY FUNCTION AND EVENTSOctober 2016April 2018Abandon18120NoNo
13922860INTRACORPOREAL MARKER AND MARKER DELIVERY DEVICEJune 2013September 2018Allow6020NoYes
13635501HOLDER AND LIGHT MEASURING DEVICE USING SAMENovember 2012February 2019Allow6060NoYes

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MEHL, PATRICK M.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
1
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
20.2%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
3
Allowed After Appeal Filing
0
(0.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(100.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
9.3%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner MEHL, PATRICK M - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MEHL, PATRICK M works in Art Unit 3798 and has examined 64 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 76.6%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 35 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MEHL, PATRICK M's allowance rate of 76.6% places them in the 35% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MEHL, PATRICK M receive 2.25 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 77% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MEHL, PATRICK M is 35 months. This places the examiner in the 22% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +16.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MEHL, PATRICK M. This interview benefit is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 14.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 19.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 47% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 66.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 85% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 45% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 44% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.