Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17121703 | Implantable Bio-Heating System Based on Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers | December 2020 | March 2024 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17085094 | OPTICAL SHUNT REDUCTION USING OPTICALLY ABSORPTIVE MATERIALS IN A MEDICAL SENSOR | October 2020 | September 2024 | Allow | 47 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17016645 | METHOD FOR PERFORMING ANGIOGRAPHY AND ANGIOPLASTY WITHIN LUMEN OF A BLOOD VESSEL | September 2020 | May 2023 | Abandon | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16768849 | INTRALUMINAL ULTRASOUND SCANNER WITH REDUCED DIAMETER | June 2020 | December 2023 | Allow | 43 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 16875438 | ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE AND ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSTIC DEVICE CONTROL METHOD | May 2020 | October 2024 | Abandon | 53 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16857350 | BRAIN SIGNAL TRACKING | April 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16333861 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ULTRAFAST SYNTHETIC TRANSMIT APERTURE ULTRASOUND IMAGING | March 2019 | November 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner DEUTSCH, TAYLOR M works in Art Unit 3798 and has examined 7 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 42.9%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 43 months.
Examiner DEUTSCH, TAYLOR M's allowance rate of 42.9% places them in the 9% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by DEUTSCH, TAYLOR M receive 3.57 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 93% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by DEUTSCH, TAYLOR M is 43 months. This places the examiner in the 18% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +10.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by DEUTSCH, TAYLOR M. This interview benefit is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 22.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 31% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 150.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 48% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 54% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.