Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18679506 | NON-CONTACT RAPID DIAGNOSIS OF ILLNESS BY LASER, INFRA RED, TERAHERTZ AND/OR UV SPECTROSCOPY AND ANALYSIS OF WATER MIXTURE ENVELOPE | May 2024 | March 2025 | Abandon | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18019002 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING INTERNAL LUMEN SHAPE CHANGES TO SCREEN PATIENTS FOR A MEDICAL DISORDER | January 2023 | July 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18015725 | AN INTELLIGENT SINGLE TOOL FOR CLINICIANS | January 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18014691 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CARDIAC STRUCTURE TRACKING | January 2023 | January 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18084832 | DECREASING IEGM HAZARDS IN TIME DIVISION MULTIPLEXED SYSTEM | December 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17929385 | Ultrasound Blanket Device | November 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17980904 | CATHETER WITH ACOUSTIC LENS ARRANGEMENT FOR LOCALIZED ULTRASONIC WAVE TRANSMISSION | November 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17959485 | ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER, ULTRASOUND ENDOSCOPE, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER | October 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17938030 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR QUANTIFICATION OF THE MAPPING OF THE SENSORY AREAS OF THE BRAIN | October 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17888031 | CONSTITUTIVE EQUATION FOR NON-INVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS | August 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 39 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17816069 | BIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT DEVICE, PULSE WAVE SENSOR, SPHYGMOMANOMETER, AND MEETING SUPPORT SYSTEM | July 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 41 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17865194 | Electronic Devices with Body Composition Analysis Circuitry | July 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17861049 | HIGH-ACCURACY TEMPERATURE SCREENING IN DYNAMIC AMBIENT CONDITIONS | July 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17855283 | ASYMMETRIC SENSORS FOR RING WEARABLE | June 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17832915 | ULTRASOUND IMAGING DEVICE AND METHOD OF GENERATING COLOR DOPPLER IMAGE | June 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17740137 | METHODS FOR GENERATING TRAINING DATA FOR USE IN MONITORING BLOOD PRESSURE OF A PERSON THAT UTILIZES VELOCITY AND PULSE WAVE SIGNAL INFORMATION | May 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17726628 | ULTRASONIC DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS AND DIAGNOSIS ASSISTING METHOD | April 2022 | August 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17707016 | METHOD, MEDICAL IMAGING DEVICE AND CONTROL UNIT FOR PERFORMING A MEDICAL WORKFLOW | March 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17677059 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MEASURING BIO-SIGNAL | February 2022 | February 2024 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17630926 | SURGICAL IMAGE-CAPTURING SYSTEM, SIGNAL PROCESSING DEVICE, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD | January 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17550667 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING MULTI-CONTRAST MRI IMAGES | December 2021 | September 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17616442 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM | December 2021 | March 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17613258 | RANGE FINDER FOR OCT LUMINAL CLEARANCE | November 2021 | May 2025 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17455011 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF RELATIVE ONSET FLUORESCENCE DELAY FOR MEDICAL IMAGING | November 2021 | September 2025 | Allow | 46 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17434466 | METHOD FOR EVALUATING SKIN LESIONS USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | August 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 44 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17426417 | Methods for Determining a Blood Pressure Value of a Patient, Blood Pressure Monitors and Dialysis Systems | July 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17378940 | ULTRASOUND IMAGING APPARATUS, OPERATING METHOD OF ULTRASOUND IMAGING APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM | July 2021 | December 2024 | Abandon | 41 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17327754 | ULTRASONIC INSPECTION APPARATUS | May 2021 | August 2024 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17281629 | Dental Tool System | March 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 50 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17210929 | ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM | March 2021 | August 2024 | Abandon | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17273741 | COIL ARRANGMENT FOR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SYSTEM | March 2021 | November 2024 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17032981 | ULTRASOUND BASED THREE-DIMENSIONAL LESION VERIFICATION WITHIN A VASCULATURE | September 2020 | January 2026 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | No | No |
| 17020978 | REAGENT COATED LENSES | September 2020 | August 2024 | Abandon | 47 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner EDUN, DEAN NAWAAB.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 100.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner EDUN, DEAN NAWAAB works in Art Unit 3797 and has examined 13 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 38.5%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 44 months.
Examiner EDUN, DEAN NAWAAB's allowance rate of 38.5% places them in the 7% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by EDUN, DEAN NAWAAB receive 2.77 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 81% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by EDUN, DEAN NAWAAB is 44 months. This places the examiner in the 15% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +52.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by EDUN, DEAN NAWAAB. This interview benefit is in the 94% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 22.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 49% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 51% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.