USPTO Examiner BOR HELENE CATHERINE - Art Unit 3797

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19096945REAL-TIME HUMAN POSTURE TRACKING AND CALIBRATION SYSTEM FOR TUMOR RADIOTHERAPYApril 2025November 2025Allow810NoNo
18668462METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ASSISTING A USER IN GUIDING A CATHETER DURING A CARDIAL OPERATIONMay 2024February 2026Allow2110NoNo
18542450IMAGING ABNORMALITIES IN VASCULAR RESPONSEDecember 2023October 2025Allow2230YesNo
18528591DYNAMIC INFANT ORAL-MOTOR ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACKDecember 2023January 2026Allow2620NoNo
18371925SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVING AN OUTSIDE APPEARANCE OF SKIN USING ULTRASOUND AS AN ENERGY SOURCESeptember 2023August 2024Allow1100NoNo
18267848SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING POSITION INFORMATIONJune 2023October 2025Abandon2810NoNo
18161690MRI-COMPATIBLE DEVICESJanuary 2023April 2025Abandon2610NoNo
18017344SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MONITORING RESPIRATION OF AN INDIVIDUALJanuary 2023February 2026Abandon3720NoNo
18015432Heart Rate Monitoring Method and ApparatusJanuary 2023March 2026Allow3810NoNo
17967429INTERLEAVED PHOTON DETECTION ARRAY FOR OPTICALLY MEASURING A PHYSICAL SAMPLEOctober 2022October 2024Abandon2410NoNo
17967636INTERLEAVED PHOTON DETECTION ARRAY FOR OPTICALLY MEASURING A PHYSICAL SAMPLEOctober 2022April 2025Abandon3010NoNo
17916594MEDICAL SENSING SYSTEM AND POSITIONING METHODOctober 2022April 2025Abandon3010NoNo
17949395DETERMINING A RANGE OF MOTION OF AN ARTIFICIAL KNEE JOINTSeptember 2022April 2024Abandon1820YesNo
17941546SWIVEL DEVICE FOR AN ULTRASOUND PROBESeptember 2022July 2025Allow3430YesNo
17874690SURGICAL SYSTEM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODJuly 2022September 2025Abandon3820YesNo
17871465ENCODED PHOTOACOUSTIC TOMOGRAPHYJuly 2022October 2025Allow3920YesNo
17850887BODY-INSERTION DEVICEJune 2022May 2025Allow3420NoNo
17786640UNIT FOR NON-INVASIVE STIMULATION OF THE VISUAL CORTEX CELLS IN SEVERE VISUAL IMPAIRMENTJune 2022October 2025Abandon4010NoNo
17826368OPTIMIZED STRUCTURES FOR OPTICAL MEASUREMENTMay 2022July 2025Abandon3851YesNo
17697580METHOD FOR DETECTING CARPAL TUNNEL USING AN ULTRASONIC DETECTION DEVICEMarch 2022May 2024Allow2620YesNo
17455540Adaptive Pulse Wave Analysis for Blood Pressure MonitoringNovember 2021January 2026Allow5030YesNo
17516109FINGER INSERTS FOR A NAILFOLD IMAGING DEVICENovember 2021February 2025Allow3910YesNo
17493782HYPERSPECTRAL FACIAL ANALYSIS SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PERSONALIZED HEALTH SCORINGOctober 2021September 2023Allow2410NoNo
17449671METHOD, SYSTEM AND APPARATUS FOR TRACKING SURGICAL IMAGING DEVICESOctober 2021February 2024Allow2910NoNo
17471921THORACOSCOPIC METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF BRONCHIAL DISEASESeptember 2021May 2024Abandon3230YesNo
17400443ELECTROMAGNETIC SENSING FOR USE WITH ABLATION TREATMENTAugust 2021October 2025Allow5031NoNo
17395134OPTICAL FUNCTIONAL GUIDEWIRE, DETECTION SYSTEM, AND DETECTION METHODAugust 2021June 2023Abandon2231NoNo
17388312Systems and Methods for Determining Lesion Depth Using Fluorescence ImagingJuly 2021March 2025Allow4330NoNo
17387279INTRACRANIAL DIAGNOSTICS USING OPTICAL IMAGING OF COHERENT LIGHT INTERFERENCEJuly 2021October 2024Abandon3901NoNo
17365336MEDICAL DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MONITORING AND STIMULATING OSTEOGENESISJuly 2021April 2024Abandon3320NoNo
17343364MATERNAL AND FETAL HEART RATE MONITORJune 2021July 2025Allow4940YesNo
17246865ULTRASONIC THERAPY APPLICATOR AND METHOD OF DETERMINING POSITION OF ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCERSMay 2021December 2023Allow3120NoNo
17302041TRANSCRANIAL PHOTOACOUSTIC/THERMOACOUSTIC TOMOGRAPHY BRAIN IMAGING INFORMED BY ADJUNCT IMAGE DATAApril 2021February 2025Allow4631YesNo
17234608MRI-COMPATIBLE DEVICESApril 2021October 2025Allow5430YesNo
17228841SELF-LOCATING, ACTIVE MARKERS FOR NAVIGATED, AUGMENTED REALITY, OR ROBOTIC SURGERYApril 2021May 2025Allow4940YesNo
17207708NEEDLE WITH THIN FILM SENSORSMarch 2021September 2023Allow3020NoNo
17256381METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MRT IMAGING WITH MAGNETIC FIELD MODULATIONDecember 2020September 2024Abandon4420NoNo
17114412TERAHERTZ FIELD EFFECT NON-INVASIVE BIOFEEDBACK DIAGNOSIS SYSTEMDecember 2020October 2024Allow4630NoNo
15734026DETERMINATION OF PARAMETRIZED CHARACTERISTICS OF A TISSUEDecember 2020March 2025Allow5220YesNo
17059622SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING A PHYSIOLOGICAL PROPERTY OF A BIOLOGICAL TISSUE BASED ON ITS MICROWAVE TRANSMISSION PROPERTIESNovember 2020March 2025Allow5221YesNo
17054052APPARATUS AND METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR DETERMINING A BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENTNovember 2020September 2025Allow5930NoNo
17079868BIOSENSOR AND BIOSENSOR ARRAY AND DEVICEOctober 2020February 2024Allow4030YesNo
16947837SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONDUCTING ON-DEVICE SPIROMETRY TESTAugust 2020April 2024Allow4410YesNo
16939345MEDICAL ASSISTANCE DEVICEJuly 2020December 2024Abandon5331YesNo
16959746COMBINING PH AND METABOLIC ACTIVITY IMAGING FOR RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN IMMUNE THERAPYJuly 2020September 2024Allow5020NoNo
16786801SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONDUCTING ON-DEVICE SPIROMETRY TESTFebruary 2020September 2023Allow4320YesNo
16749224MEDICAL GUIDEWIRE ASSEMBLY HAVING IDENTIFICATION DEVICEJanuary 2020March 2026Abandon6060NoNo
16723121ANTIOXIDANT SENSOR AND METHOD OF OBTAINING ANTIOXIDANT SIGNALDecember 2019March 2024Allow5121YesNo
16621711METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SENSING A DENTAL REGIONDecember 2019December 2023Abandon4831NoNo
16575545IMPLANTABLE OR INSERTABLE NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANT IMAGING SYSTEMSeptember 2019August 2024Allow5940YesNo
16552474SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HOME TRANSDERMAL GFR MONITORINGAugust 2019September 2024Abandon6031YesNo
16483008SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR TREATING AND MONITORING A PREGNANT PATIENT HAVING A PREMATURELY OPEN CERVIXAugust 2019November 2023Abandon5230NoYes
16507405APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING SLEEPJuly 2019November 2024Allow6030NoNo
16461859SAFETY LOCKED NEEDLEMay 2019August 2025Abandon6060NoNo
16349570VAGINAL ELECTRODEMay 2019June 2024Abandon6020NoNo
16346833DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING GESTATIONAL AGEMay 2019February 2024Allow5831YesNo
16292931GUIDEWIRE WITH AN INTEGRATED OPTICAL FIBERMarch 2019August 2024Allow6050YesNo
16269520INTERLEAVED PHOTON DETECTION ARRAY FOR OPTICALLY MEASURING A PHYSICAL SAMPLEFebruary 2019June 2024Allow6081YesNo
16254460METHOD AND SYSTEMS FOR COLOR FLOW IMAGING OF ARTERIES AND VEINSJanuary 2019December 2025Allow6070YesYes
16225796METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MEASURING SACCADIC LATENCYDecember 2018September 2025Abandon6050NoYes
16222921MULTI-FIELD MINIATURIZED MICRO-ENDOSCOPEDecember 2018April 2024Allow6031YesNo
16308951Ultrasonic Imaging Device and Operation Method ThereofDecember 2018April 2024Abandon6041NoNo
16093524MEMBRANE-BASED FOOT IMAGING APPARATUS INCLUDING A CAMERA FOR MONITORING FOOT POSITIONINGOctober 2018February 2024Allow6030YesNo
16154002COMPACT ANTENNA ARRANGEMENT OF RADAR SYSTEM FOR DETECTING INTERNAL ORGAN MOTIONOctober 2018January 2025Abandon6091YesNo
16071174USER TERMINAL AND CONTROL METHOD OF THE SAMEJuly 2018November 2024Abandon6041YesNo
16070173APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TAKING A SAMPLE FROM A FLUID-CONDUCTING SYSTEMJuly 2018September 2024Allow6040YesNo
15977091PROBABILITY MAP-BASED ULTRASOUND SCANNINGMay 2018September 2024Allow6061YesNo
15971966Catheter Splines as Location SensorsMay 2018December 2023Allow6041YesYes
15332567IMAGING ABNORMALITIES IN VASCULAR RESPONSEOctober 2016August 2023Allow6052YesNo
14631906MARKING DEVICE WITH RETRACTABLE CANNULAFebruary 2015March 2019Allow4930NoNo
14354679COLOR ULTRASOUND SYSTEM AND METHOD AND DEVICE THEREOF FOR OBTAINING BEAM-FORMING LINE DATAAugust 2014June 2019Allow6020NoNo
12802431VASCULAR ULTRASOUND INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS (IMT) MEASUREMENT SYSTEMJune 2010September 2012Allow2710NoNo
11597325ULTRASONOGRAPHIC DEVICE FOR PERFORMING LUMINANCE CORRECTIONSeptember 2008September 2012Allow6010NoNo
12094195METHOD FOR CREATING A MODEL OF A STRUCTUREMay 2008September 2012Allow5220NoYes
10553770APPARATUS FOR ANGIOGRAPHIC X-RAY PHOTOGRAPHYJune 2006March 2009Allow4120NoYes
10542386DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR DETECTING AND LOCALIZING OBSTRUCTION WITHIN A BLOOD VESSELNovember 2005June 2009Allow4730NoNo
10541624METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR TRACKING A MEDICAL INSTRUMENTJuly 2005January 2010Allow5440NoNo
10907906MARKING DEVICE WITH RETRACTABLE CANNULAApril 2005March 2019Allow60110YesYes
11034194BODY ACTIVITY MEASUREMENT DEVICEJanuary 2005October 2007Allow3410NoNo
11031997RADIATION MODULATOR POSITIONERJanuary 2005December 2007Allow3520NoNo
10519885ULTRASONIC DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS AND ULTRASONIC DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS CONTROL METHODDecember 2004April 2008Allow4020YesNo
10439123LOCAL COIL ARRANGEMENT FOR A MAGNETIC RESONANCE SYSTEMMay 2003July 2008Allow6020YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner BOR, HELENE CATHERINE.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
7
Allowed After Appeal Filing
4
(57.1%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(42.9%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
87.8%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 57.1% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner BOR, HELENE CATHERINE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner BOR, HELENE CATHERINE works in Art Unit 3797 and has examined 62 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 74.2%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 52 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner BOR, HELENE CATHERINE's allowance rate of 74.2% places them in the 39% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by BOR, HELENE CATHERINE receive 3.21 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 90% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BOR, HELENE CATHERINE is 52 months. This places the examiner in the 4% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +19.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BOR, HELENE CATHERINE. This interview benefit is in the 62% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 24.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 37% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 18.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 21% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 90.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 9.7% of allowed cases (in the 93% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 51% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.