USPTO Examiner BAYS PAMELA M - Art Unit 3796

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18433300IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR AFFECTING CARDIAC FUNCTION THROUGH DIAPHRAGM STIMULATION, AND FOR MONITORING DIAPHRAGMATIC HEALTHFebruary 2024March 2025Allow1411NoNo
18418747SOMATIC, AUDITORY AND COCHLEAR COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND METHODJanuary 2024April 2025Abandon1510NoNo
18530157Minimally Invasive Heart Pump with Modular Adjustable Construct InsertionDecember 2023June 2025Allow1821NoYes
18526768VAGAL NERVE STIMULATION FOR TREATING CENTRAL NERVOUS SYTEM DISORDERSDecember 2023September 2024Abandon1010NoNo
18465435NEUROSTIMULATION TREATMENT FOR ABNORMAL CONNECTIVITY WITH A CINGULATE REGIONSeptember 2023September 2024Allow1221YesNo
18226223SURGICAL DEVICE TIP WITH DEFLECTABLE JOINTJuly 2023May 2025Allow2220NoNo
18357532NEUROSTIMULATION SYSTEM WITH LINKED PROGRAMMING ADJUSTMENTJuly 2023March 2025Allow1921YesNo
18150746Material Characteristics Ideal for Providing Either Partial or Total Mechanical Support to the Failing or Arrested Heart and Method for Developing Ideal Characteristics for Underlying Cardiac DisordersJanuary 2023November 2024Allow2321NoNo
18057863SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING POWER BASED ON IMPEDANCE DETECTION, SUCH AS CONTROLLING POWER TO TISSUE TREATMENT DEVICESNovember 2022June 2025Allow3121YesNo
17939445WIRELESS NEUROSTIMULATORSSeptember 2022April 2025Allow3111YesNo
17812594NONINVASIVE IMAGING AND TREATMENT SYSTEM FOR CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIASJuly 2022June 2025Allow3530NoNo
17858668MULTIPLE-LEAD IMPLANTABLE SYSTEMS FOR STIMULATION OF CRANIAL NERVESJuly 2022August 2024Allow2531YesNo
17657581SOMATIC, AUDITORY AND COCHLEAR COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND METHODMarch 2022September 2023Allow1710NoNo
17646880SINGLE CHANNEL AND DUAL CHANNEL NOISE DETECTION SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUESJanuary 2022September 2023Allow2120YesNo
17618097Implantable Electrode Lead with Conductors Connected to Form a BraidDecember 2021September 2024Abandon3410NoNo
17541531STIMULATION LEAD AND METHOD INCLUDING A MULTI-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRODE ARRAYDecember 2021August 2023Allow2110YesNo
17495595METHODS FOR ASSESSING EFFICACY OF RENAL NEUROMODULATION AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND DEVICESOctober 2021November 2024Allow3840YesNo
17486072WIRELESS NEUROSTIMULATORSSeptember 2021April 2024Allow3151YesYes
17481510VAGAL NERVE STIMULATION FOR TREATING CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISORDERSSeptember 2021November 2023Allow2651NoNo
17446730IMPLANT DEVICE WITH MEMS (MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEM) ACTUATED MEMBRANESeptember 2021June 2025Allow4631NoNo
17461909VAGAL NERVE STIMULATION FOR TREATING POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDERAugust 2021August 2023Allow2451YesNo
17434749ALTERNATING CHARGE TO INHIBIT SORPTION TO SURFACES EXPOSED TO BIOLOGICAL MATERIALSAugust 2021June 2025Allow4521YesNo
17346265VAGAL NERVE STIMULATION FOR TREATING OR PREVENTING STROKE OR TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACKJune 2021May 2024Abandon3571NoNo
17315895Electrically Conductive Coating Applied To An Oxidizable Surface Of An AIMD Ferrule Or Housing To Provide An Oxide-Resistant Connection To An EMI Filter Capacitor, An EMI Filter Circuit Or AIMD Electronic Circuits And ComponentsMay 2021April 2024Allow3541YesNo
17246782SEWING RING WITH QUICK CONNECT TO INFLOWMay 2021June 2024Allow3811YesNo
17193548ALGORITHM FOR DETECTING AND PRESENTING SUCTION IN DOWN-SAMPLED MCS LOG FILESMarch 2021June 2024Allow3921YesNo
17179506VEIN OCCLUSION ASSESSMENT USING TEMPERATUREFebruary 2021June 2024Allow4021YesNo
17135108ELECTRICAL STIMULATION DEVICE AND METHODDecember 2020November 2024Allow4611NoNo
17251002MICROELECTRODE, PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF AND NEURAL PROSTHESISDecember 2020February 2025Allow5121YesNo
17247056NEURO-CARDIAC GUIDED MAGNETIC STIMULATION THERAPYNovember 2020April 2024Allow4120YesNo
17103035MICRO LEAD FOR DIRECTIONAL STIMULATIONNovember 2020September 2024Allow4641YesNo
17046687MIDFIELD POWER SOURCE FOR WIRELESS IMPLANTED DEVICESOctober 2020January 2025Allow5131NoYes
17029832IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR AFFECTING CARDIAC FUNCTION THROUGH DIAPHRAGM STIMULATION, AND FOR MONITORING DIAPHRAGMATIC HEALTHSeptember 2020November 2023Allow3831NoNo
17013480COGNITIVE SCREENS, MONITOR AND COGNITIVE TREATMENTS TARGETING IMMUNE-MEDIATED AND NEURO-DEGENERATIVE DISORDERSSeptember 2020March 2025Allow5521NoNo
17008058IMPLANTABLE STIMULATION LEAD INCLUDING A COILED LEAD BODY AND METHODS FOR FORMING THE SAMEAugust 2020October 2023Allow3731NoNo
16941911Biomarker Sampling in the Context of Neuromodulation Devices, Systems, and MethodsJuly 2020June 2024Allow4730YesNo
16920876IMPLANTABLE LEADLESS PACEMAKERSJuly 2020December 2023Allow4121YesNo
16855080SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REGULATING ORGAN AND/OR TUMOR GROWTH RATES, FUNCTION, AND/OR DEVELOPMENTApril 2020May 2025Allow6041NoNo
16855010Sheath Device for Inserting a CatheterApril 2020June 2024Allow5041YesNo
16796970MEDICAL THERAPY ARRANGEMENT FOR APPLYING AN ELECTRICAL STIMULATION TO A HUMAN OR ANIMAL SUBJECTFebruary 2020May 2025Allow6051NoNo
16782141IMPLANTABLE ELECTRODE WITH A STUB LINEFebruary 2020September 2023Allow4340YesNo
16712501PERCUTANEOUS ACCESS FOR SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF TREATING SLEEP-RELATED DISORDERED BREATHINGDecember 2019August 2024Allow5621NoNo
16703603WIRELESS ELECTRICAL STIMULATION SYSTEMDecember 2019June 2024Allow5461YesNo
16693088VAGAL NERVE STIMULATION TO REDUCE INFLAMMATION ASSOCIATED WITH AN ANEURYSMNovember 2019September 2024Abandon5850NoNo
16682570Optically Excited Biopotential PhantomNovember 2019April 2024Abandon5321YesNo
16525060Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation SystemJuly 2019August 2024Allow6041YesNo
16335047OUTPUT CONTROL DEVICE, OUTPUT CONTROL METHOD, AND PROGRAMMarch 2019August 2024Allow6060YesNo
16292144NERVE CUFF WITH POCKET FOR LEADLESS STIMULATORMarch 2019November 2024Allow6061NoYes
16273098CATHETER ADAPTED FOR DIRECT TISSUE CONTACTFebruary 2019August 2023Allow5441NoNo
16300361THREAD BIDIRECTIONAL INTERLOCKING OF ELECTRODE LEADNovember 2018February 2024Allow6041NoNo
16057605SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR APPLYING ANTI-TACHYCARDIA PACING USING SUBCUTANEOUS IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORSAugust 2018November 2023Allow6060YesYes
15805662LEADLESS PACEMAKER SYSTEMNovember 2017June 2024Abandon6071YesYes
15634842ELECTRODE ARRAY ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF MAKING SAMEJune 2017November 2023Allow6050YesYes
15425577APPARATUS WITH FILTER TO TREAT MACULAR DEGENERATION AND METHOD OF TREATING MACULAR DEGENERATIONFebruary 2017September 2023Allow6061YesNo
15412480IMPLANTABLE HEART TREATMENT SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODSJanuary 2017September 2018Allow2010NoNo
14396767DEVICE FOR CUTTING HAIROctober 2014January 2019Allow5021YesNo
14483914SYSTEM AND METHOD TO SELECT SIGNAL SEGMENTS FOR ANALYSIS OF A BIOLOGICAL RHYTHM DISORDERSeptember 2014February 2019Allow5321NoNo
13479979ESTIMATING ACUTE RESPONSE TO CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPYMay 2012November 2013Allow1821YesNo
13123402METHOD OF FIXATING A HEART HELP DEVICEApril 2011April 2016Abandon60131NoNo
12769970SCG POINT PICK PROCESS FOR USE WITH MULTIAXIS ACCELEROMETERSApril 2010March 2013Allow3520YesNo
12448503SIGHT REGENERATION ASSISTING DEVICEMarch 2010May 2012Allow3520YesNo
12705262SILICONE MOLDED CO-POLYMER COMPOSITE LEAD BODY FOR PACING AND DEFIBRILLATION LEADSFebruary 2010June 2012Allow2810NoNo
11782537IMPLANTABLE DEVICE SYSTEM TO COLLECT PARAMETER DATA FOR SERVICE CENTERJuly 2007October 2009Allow2710NoNo
11733862SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSISTED PARTITIONING OF BODY CONDUITSApril 2007September 2012Allow6041NoNo
11632866PHYSIOLOGICAL SENSOR SYSTEM FOR USE IN A MAGNETIC RESONANCE DEVICEJanuary 2007November 2009Allow3410NoNo
11563296HEART STIMULATOR USING A BEZIER FUNCTION TO DEFINE AV-DELAY VALUESNovember 2006August 2009Allow3310NoNo
11560141SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USING REGRESSION MODELS TO ESTIMATE VULNERABLE PERIODS FOR HEART STIMULATION PARAMETERSNovember 2006August 2009Allow3310NoNo
11599179SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF REDUCING ARTIFACT IN NEUROLOGICAL STIMULATION SYSTEMSNovember 2006June 2012Allow6060YesNo
11408773CARDIAC PACEMAKER HAVING A SEALED OBLONG HOUSINGApril 2006June 2011Allow6030NoNo
11378677SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING CLOSELY-FOLLOWED CARDIAC THERAPY MANAGEMENT THROUGH AUTOMATED PATIENT CAREMarch 2006March 2011Allow6030YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner BAYS, PAMELA M.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
0
(0.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(100.0%)
Reversal Percentile
99.7%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
7
Allowed After Appeal Filing
5
(71.4%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(28.6%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
93.1%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 71.4% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner BAYS, PAMELA M - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner BAYS, PAMELA M works in Art Unit 3796 and has examined 68 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 89.7%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 41 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner BAYS, PAMELA M's allowance rate of 89.7% places them in the 69% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by BAYS, PAMELA M receive 3.16 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 97% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BAYS, PAMELA M is 41 months. This places the examiner in the 7% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +10.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BAYS, PAMELA M. This interview benefit is in the 46% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 24.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 26% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 27.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 133.3% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 86% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 87.5% of appeals filed. This is in the 79% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 42.9% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 30.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 22% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 5.9% of allowed cases (in the 91% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 9.8% of allowed cases (in the 88% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.