Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18443144 | NEURAL ELECTRODE FOR MEASURING NEURAL SIGNAL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME | February 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18118168 | DRY ELECTRODES FOR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY MEASUREMENT | March 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18006691 | Garment with Electrode | January 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18146690 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE | December 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18001301 | FASTENING DEVICE FOR TEMPORARILY FASTENING A PORTABLE SENSOR DEVICE TO A HUMAN BODY | December 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17925405 | A GARMENT-TYPE BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION MEASUREMENT DEVICE, AND A MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR THE GARMENT-TYPE BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION MEASUREMENT DEVICE | November 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17917773 | MONITORING OF CARDIAC ACTIVITY | October 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17934905 | ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT APPARATUS | September 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17911528 | GARMENT | September 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17940771 | INTRA-BODY ELECTRODE WITH A POLY(3,4-ETHYLENEDIOXYTHIOPHENE)-BASED COATING | September 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17905366 | AMYLOID FIBERS BASED ELECTRODES | August 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17908469 | BIOLOGICAL ELECTRODE | August 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17800832 | RADIO FREQUENCY SURGICAL INSTRUMENT | August 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17854120 | SURGICAL INSTRUMENT WITH VARIOUS ALIGNMENT FEATURES AND METHOD FOR IMPROVED DISASSEMBLY AND ASSEMBLY | June 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17785645 | PHYSIOLOGICAL SIGNAL MONITORING APPARATUS | June 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17735424 | MOTOR POSITION CONTROL AND METHODS FOR ROBOTIC ASSISTED SEALING INSTRUMENT | May 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17733361 | SUCTION MANIFOLD ASSEMBLY FOR AN ELECTROCARDIOGRAM ELECTRODE APPLICATION SYSTEM | April 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17772118 | DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACQUIRING AND MONITORING OF BIOMETRIC ELECTRICAL SIGNALS | April 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17753743 | BIOPOTENTIAL MEASURING APPARATUS, BIOPOTENTIAL MEASURING SYSTEM, AND BIOPOTENTIAL MEASURING METHOD | March 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17689072 | DRY ELECTRODES FOR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY MEASUREMENTS | March 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17636489 | ELECTRODE FOR ORGANISM | February 2022 | August 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17665845 | ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, BIO-SIGNAL MEASUREMENT SYSTEM AND BIO-SIGNAL COUPLING METHOD | February 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 47 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17584394 | PHYSIOLOGICAL SENSING DEVICE | January 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 44 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17531604 | Connecting Device and Monopolar Cable For Monopolar and Bipolar Operable Surgical Instruments, Surgical Instrument and Surgical System | November 2021 | May 2025 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17525910 | DISPOSABLE HAND-ACTUATED ELECTROSURGICAL INSTRUMENTS | November 2021 | November 2025 | Abandon | 48 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner MOSSBROOK, WILLIAM ERIC works in Art Unit 3794 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 50.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 48 months.
Examiner MOSSBROOK, WILLIAM ERIC's allowance rate of 50.0% places them in the 12% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by MOSSBROOK, WILLIAM ERIC receive 2.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MOSSBROOK, WILLIAM ERIC is 48 months. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +100.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MOSSBROOK, WILLIAM ERIC. This interview benefit is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 48% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 50% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.