USPTO Examiner DVORAK LINDA C - Art Unit 3794

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17041156END EFFECTOR ENABLING GRASPING OF TISSUE AND PLASMA RADIATION TO TISSUE, AND ENDOSCOPIC SYSTEM COMPRISING SAID END EFFECTORSeptember 2020October 2023Abandon3710NoNo
16936657SURGICAL INSTRUMENT INCLUDING A PIEZO-ELEMENT FOR ADJUSTING A POSITION OF A MECHANICAL COMPONENT OF THE SURGICAL INSTRUMENTJuly 2020February 2024Abandon4311NoNo
16900935ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION ABLATION TIPS MADE OF MAGNETIC MATERIALSJune 2020August 2023Abandon3821YesNo
16877737ESOPHAGEAL-TISSUE TEMPERATURE MONITORINGMay 2020November 2023Abandon4220NoNo
16832430Appendage Cooling System for Concussion AssessmentMarch 2020March 2023Abandon3610NoNo
16783626INSTRUMENT FOR ENDOSCOPIC POSTERIOR NASAL NERVE ABLATIONFebruary 2020May 2023Allow4040YesNo
16735341AUTOMATED ABLATION CONTROL SYSTEMSJanuary 2020November 2022Abandon3510NoNo
16675974Electrosurgical Systems and Methods of Configuring the SameNovember 2019August 2022Abandon3410NoNo
16529257CATHETER SYSTEM WITH A HIGH RADIO FREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDAugust 2019June 2022Abandon3410NoNo
16481699ELECTROSURGICAL APPARATUS WITH FLEXIBLE SHAFTJuly 2019August 2022Allow3610NoNo
16450879CATHETER SPINE ASSEMBLY WITH CLOSELY-SPACED BIPOLE MICROELECTRODESJune 2019January 2021Allow1820NoNo
16378458WEARABLE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY AND PHYSIOLOGY MONITORING ENSEMBLEApril 2019October 2020Allow1930YesNo
16299671DELIVERY DEVICE WITH COAXIAL CABLE, APPARATUS COMPRISING SAID DEVICE AND METHODMarch 2019August 2022Allow4130YesNo
16259118SINGLE ACTION TISSUE SEALERJanuary 2019August 2021Abandon3001NoNo
16314453BIPOLAR HIGH-FREQUENCY ELECTRIC KNIFEDecember 2018December 2021Abandon3510NoNo
16117370DUAL MODALITY ENERGY DELIVERY SYSTEMAugust 2018December 2021Abandon4020NoNo
16115240DETECTION OF END EFFECTOR EMERSION IN LIQUIDAugust 2018May 2022Allow4411NoNo
16032550HEATING DEVICE WITH CONTACTLESS TEMPERATURE CONTROLJuly 2018March 2021Abandon3210NoNo
16027057SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SHIELDED AND ADJUSTABLE MEDICAL MONITORING DEVICESJuly 2018November 2021Allow4030NoNo
16065923CONNECTABLE CATHETER SYSTEMJune 2018May 2021Abandon3410NoNo
16008368ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT METHOD AND ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT DEVICEJune 2018June 2021Abandon3621NoNo
15950994Flexible Multi-Arm Catheter with Diametrically Opposed Sensing ElectrodesApril 2018June 2021Abandon3811NoNo
15938876Generator for Supplying a Coagulation Instrument and Control Method for SameMarch 2018November 2024Abandon6060YesNo
15936526LIQUID COOLING SYSTEM FOR NEUTRAL ELECTRODEMarch 2018March 2021Abandon3610NoNo
15918437TREATMENT SYSTEM AND TREATMENT TOOLMarch 2018January 2021Abandon3410NoNo
15913613EUS GUIDED ACCESS DEVICEMarch 2018October 2021Abandon4321YesNo
15909908ESOPHAGEAL RETRACTOR WITH SENSORMarch 2018January 2022Abandon4640NoNo
15907924MAPPING CATHETERFebruary 2018June 2021Abandon4030NoNo
15902398SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ABLATION STATUS MONITORING AND CUSTOM ABLATION SHAPINGFebruary 2018August 2021Abandon4220NoNo
15897287CUTTING SYSTEM AND METHOD OF TISSUE CUTTING FOR MEDICAL TREATMENTFebruary 2018January 2022Abandon4730NoNo
15867238ACCELERATED TRANSITION THERMAL CONTRAST THERAPY DEVICEJanuary 2018October 2021Abandon4520YesNo
15849024COLD COMPRESSION DEVICEDecember 2017April 2021Abandon4020NoNo
15828449DEVICE AND METHOD FOR COOLING LIVING TISSUEDecember 2017December 2020Abandon3730NoNo
15798408SMART CLOTHINGOctober 2017March 2020Abandon2910NoNo
15567514MR COMPATIBLE PUNCTURE CATHETEROctober 2017April 2020Abandon3010NoNo
15666016AMBULATORY HEART MONITOR WITH CONDUCTIVE ADHESIVE CONNECTION TO ELECTRONICS MODULEAugust 2017March 2021Abandon4411NoNo
15651636ASSISTIVE DEVICE FOR REMEDIATING INFLAMMATION, SWELLING AND PAINJuly 2017February 2021Abandon4340NoNo
15626081EQUINE CRYOTHERAPY BOOTJune 2017April 2020Abandon3420YesNo
15611623TEXTILE ELECTRODE DEVICE FOR ACQUISITION OF ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL SIGNALS FROM THE SKIN AND MANUFACTURING PROCESS THEREOFJune 2017July 2021Abandon5010NoNo
15529137DEVICES AND METHODS FOR PULMONARY HYPERTENSION TREATMENTMay 2017December 2019Abandon3111NoNo
15507990AN IRRIGATED ABLATION CATHETER AND PROCESS THEREOFMarch 2017October 2019Abandon3210NoNo
15504522Monitoring ElectrolysisFebruary 2017March 2020Abandon3710NoNo
15422710MIGRAINE HATFebruary 2017July 2019Abandon2910NoNo
15355720COOLING PACK FOR HEAD PROTECTORNovember 2016June 2019Abandon3110NoNo
15310111INTELLIGENT ELECTRODENovember 2016November 2019Abandon3610NoNo
15296531ELBOW HEATING SLEEVEOctober 2016December 2019Abandon3820NoNo
15275441Devices And Methods To Maintain Personal Hygiene While Using The ToiletSeptember 2016July 2019Abandon3410NoNo
15237327APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR SENSING AND PROCESSING PHYSIOLOGICAL SIGNALSAugust 2016June 2021Abandon5810NoNo
15216846TREATMENT APPARATUSJuly 2016September 2019Abandon3820YesNo
15205659SURGICAL INSTRUMENT AND MEDICAL MANIPULATOR SYSTEMJuly 2016August 2019Abandon3720NoNo
15163023NEEDLE PROBE ARRAY AND METHODS REGARDING SAMEMay 2016October 2019Abandon4010NoNo
15162911SENSOR INTERFACE SYSTEMMay 2016November 2020Abandon5410NoNo
15055568END-EFFECTOR ASSEMBLY INCLUDING A PRESSURE-SENSITIVE LAYER DISPOSED ON AN ELECTRODEFebruary 2016June 2019Abandon3920NoNo
15047272BLOOD VESSEL DISSECTING DEVICE, BLOOD VESSEL DISSECTING METHOD AND BLOOD VESSEL HARVESTING METHODFebruary 2016September 2019Abandon4321NoNo
15010754ELECTROSURGICAL DEVICEJanuary 2016February 2019Abandon3720NoNo
14982043Tentacular Electrode Catheter ApparatusDecember 2015January 2021Abandon6020NoNo
14392259WIRELESS CARDIAC EVENT RECORDERDecember 2015February 2021Abandon6030NoNo
14944305Far Infrared Hot Air Type Therapeutic Apparatus with Multiple FunctionsNovember 2015September 2019Abandon4620NoNo
14928756PHYSIOLOGICAL DETECTION STRUCTUREOctober 2015March 2019Abandon4111NoNo
12871875THERAPEUTIC COOLING DEVICESAugust 2010July 2012Allow2221NoNo
12543969VESSEL SEALING INSTRUMENTAugust 2009October 2010Allow1410NoNo
10871790METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR IN SITU TISSUE MARKING AND ORIENTATION STABILIZATIONJune 2004March 2008Allow4421NoNo
10286547METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING CONTRAST-TO-TISSUE RATIO IN ULTRASOUND CONTRAST IMAGING WITH SUBHARMONIC IMAGINGNovember 2002December 2003Allow1310NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner DVORAK, LINDA C - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner DVORAK, LINDA C works in Art Unit 3794 and has examined 63 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 17.5%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 38 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner DVORAK, LINDA C's allowance rate of 17.5% places them in the 2% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by DVORAK, LINDA C receive 1.75 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 35% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by DVORAK, LINDA C is 38 months. This places the examiner in the 31% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +18.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by DVORAK, LINDA C. This interview benefit is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 20.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 26% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 20.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 27% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 92.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 89% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 3.2% of allowed cases (in the 81% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 53% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.