Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18634490 | EXERCISE EQUIPMENT WITH DYNAMIC ILLUMINATION OF SIMULATED ENVIRONMENT | April 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 18403908 | Octagonal punching bag arrangement | January 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18569646 | WEIGHT SUPPORT DEVICE AND APPARATUS | December 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18533994 | EXERCISE APPARATUS | December 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18053211 | EXERCISE BAR WITH DYNAMICALLY ROTATING HAND GRIPS | November 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17892904 | TREADMILL | August 2022 | June 2024 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17424764 | BIOPSY TRACT SEALANT APPLICATOR DEVICE AND BIOPSY SYSTEM | July 2021 | September 2025 | Allow | 50 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16237827 | BALANCE TRAINER EXERCISE DEVICE | January 2019 | June 2019 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16113012 | SWINGABLE EXERCISE BIKE | August 2018 | December 2019 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16055435 | BIKE TRAINER GUIDE APPARATUS | August 2018 | May 2019 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16011391 | Barbell Collar | June 2018 | August 2018 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15983521 | MOBILE ATHLETIC TRAINING TABLE | May 2018 | March 2020 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15957626 | FOOT-THERAPY AND TOE-ALIGNING DEVICE | April 2018 | February 2019 | Allow | 10 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15957791 | FOOT-THERAPY AND TOE-ALIGNING DEVICE | April 2018 | July 2019 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15920679 | HAND-FOOT COMPOSITE MOTION EXERCISE MACHINE | March 2018 | October 2019 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15905921 | ARM EXTENSION EXERCISE APPARATUS | February 2018 | July 2019 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15884283 | Jump rope with quick-adjust handle | January 2018 | September 2019 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15837886 | GAIT ASSISTIVE DEVICE | December 2017 | November 2019 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15809331 | PILATES EXERCISE SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE | November 2017 | October 2019 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15802825 | YOGA APPARATUS | November 2017 | April 2019 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15723743 | Wearable Gym | October 2017 | December 2018 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15652248 | JUMPING ROPE WITH WIRELESS SPEAKERS | July 2017 | December 2018 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15542217 | ACTUATOR AND EXERCISE EQUIPMENT USING SAME | July 2017 | August 2019 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15494652 | Height adjustable combat training assembly and method of operation | April 2017 | November 2018 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15493053 | WEIGHT SYSTEMS FOR EXERCISE EQUIPMENT | April 2017 | September 2019 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15492606 | CORE EXERCISE MACHINE | April 2017 | October 2019 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 15475019 | Sports Training System And Method | March 2017 | December 2018 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15389021 | SWIM TRAINING SYSTEM, SWIM DATA COMPUTATION METHOD USING THE SAME, AND SWIM TRAINING METHOD USING THE SAME | December 2016 | April 2019 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15376919 | Physical Therapy System | December 2016 | October 2019 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15347733 | Apparatus and Method for upright drumming and exercising | November 2016 | October 2019 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15330739 | Knee flexion and extension therapy device and method of use | October 2016 | September 2017 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15291532 | MULTI-JOINT EXERCISE MACHINE | October 2016 | May 2019 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15213380 | EXERCISE APPARATUS | July 2016 | October 2018 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15200978 | HIGH PERFORMANCE ROPE EXERCISE HANDLE | July 2016 | April 2019 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15147455 | FREE WEIGHT EXERCISE SHOES | May 2016 | October 2018 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14771992 | FLUID ADAPTER AND FLUID COUPLING | September 2015 | December 2018 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13462763 | MUILTI-FUNCTION EXERCISE BENCH WITH SWIVELABLE SEATBACK AND AT LEAST THREE PAIRS OF SYMMETRICALLY POSITIONED HANDLES | May 2012 | November 2019 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13324577 | BI-FUNCTIONAL INHALING DEVICE | December 2011 | November 2013 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13305197 | MARTIAL ARTS TRAINING DEVICE | November 2011 | April 2014 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13292552 | BARBELL SYSTEM | November 2011 | October 2013 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13199970 | TRAINING ASSEMBLY | September 2011 | December 2013 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 13199148 | DOORFRAME SUSPENSION TYPE PARALLEL-BAR EXERCISING APPARATUS | August 2011 | August 2013 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13180369 | SUPINE CYCLING EXERCISE MACHINE WITH A USER REPOSITIONABLE CRANKARM AND METHOD OF USE | July 2011 | September 2013 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13106297 | Pushup Exercise Device | May 2011 | July 2013 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13068443 | Thigh exerciser | May 2011 | June 2013 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13041710 | Negative Pressure Bandage with Internal Storage Chamber | March 2011 | January 2013 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12762282 | DYNAMIC LOWER LIMB REHABILITATION ROBOTIC APPARATUS AND METHOD OF REHABILITATING HUMAN GAIT | April 2010 | October 2013 | Allow | 42 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12728873 | METHODS FOR WEIGHTING GARMENTS OR ORTHOTICS AND GARMENTS AND ORTHOTICS THEREFOR | March 2010 | October 2019 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner ROBERTSON, JENNIFER MARY DEICHL.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner ROBERTSON, JENNIFER MARY DEICHL works in Art Unit 3791 and has examined 42 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 24 months.
Examiner ROBERTSON, JENNIFER MARY DEICHL's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 100% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by ROBERTSON, JENNIFER MARY DEICHL receive 1.48 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 25% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ROBERTSON, JENNIFER MARY DEICHL is 24 months. This places the examiner in the 85% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ROBERTSON, JENNIFER MARY DEICHL. This interview benefit is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 35.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 81% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 23% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 21% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 48% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 50% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.