Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17132551 | BREATH SENSOR CALIBRATION METHODS AND APPARATUS | December 2020 | March 2024 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17058944 | System for the presentation of acoustic information | November 2020 | June 2024 | Abandon | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17101975 | IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE WITH METAL AND POLYMER HOUSING | November 2020 | January 2024 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17057941 | QUANTIFYING MOTOR FUNCTION USING EEG SIGNALS | November 2020 | March 2024 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17097421 | IN-VIVO MONITORING OF AN INTERNAL VOLUME OF A MAMMAL USING MAGNETIC FIELD GRADIENTS | November 2020 | November 2023 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17086653 | BODY STABILITY MEASUREMENT USING PULSE TRANSIT TIME | November 2020 | April 2024 | Allow | 41 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17086950 | ELECTROCARDIOGRAM GAIN ADJUSTMENT | November 2020 | July 2023 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17069866 | Magnetic Brain Computer interface Surface Membrane | October 2020 | July 2023 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17037985 | CHARACTERIZING STIMULI RESPONSE TO DETECT SLEEP DISORDERS | September 2020 | May 2024 | Allow | 44 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17020740 | BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT APPARATUS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF | September 2020 | November 2023 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17017553 | MEDICAL SYSTEM CONFIGURED TO DISPLAY SUITABLE POSTURES OF A SUBJECT DURING A MEDICAL PROCEDURE | September 2020 | November 2023 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16999412 | METHOD FOR ENHANCING LOCAL EEG SIGNALS AND EEG ELECTRODE DEVICE | August 2020 | October 2023 | Abandon | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16968489 | BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION DISPLAY DEVICE, BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION DISPLAY METHOD AND PROGRAM | August 2020 | July 2024 | Abandon | 48 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16968439 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTERFACING WITH BIOLOGICAL TISSUE | August 2020 | November 2023 | Abandon | 39 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 16945633 | INTERFACE AND ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR CUSTOMIZED SKIN CARE REGIMEN BASED ON SKIN DIAGNOSTICS | July 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16966281 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING SKIN CONDITION BASED ON THERMAL SENSITIVITY IN SKIN | July 2020 | April 2024 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16963909 | METHOD FOR DETECTING BODY MOVEMENTS OF A SLEEPING PERSON | July 2020 | October 2023 | Abandon | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16963825 | DETECTION DEVICE AND DETECTION METHOD FOR FUSION OF TACTILE SENSING AND OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY | July 2020 | April 2024 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16931410 | PULSE�DIAGNOSTIC�DEVICE�AND�SYSTEM�OF�PULSE�DIAGNOSIS | July 2020 | January 2024 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16920557 | DEVICES AND METHODS FOR RESPIRATORY VARIATION MONITORING BY MEASUREMENT OF RESPIRATORY VOLUMES, MOTION AND VARIABILITY | July 2020 | November 2024 | Abandon | 53 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16904555 | DEVICE FOR APNEA DETECTION, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXPEDITING DETECTION OF APNEA EVENTS OF A USER | June 2020 | April 2023 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16889288 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MEASURING PRESSURE WAVES IN DIALYSIS LINES | June 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16882538 | Blood Pressure Measurement Device and Calculation Method Thereof | May 2020 | January 2023 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16857200 | BRAINWAVE ANALYSIS SYSTEM FOR CORRECTION OF SPINE DISLOCATION, DISPLACEMENT, AND SHIFT AND THE METHOD USING THE SAME | April 2020 | August 2023 | Abandon | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16818490 | Magnetic Particle Actuation | March 2020 | September 2023 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16803704 | HEALTH CONDITION DETECTION AND REPAIR SIGNAL PROCESSING SYSTEM | February 2020 | September 2024 | Allow | 55 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16724356 | ENHANCED OCULOMOTOR TESTING DEVICE AND METHOD USING AN ADD-ON STRUCTURE FOR A MOBILE DEVICE | December 2019 | May 2023 | Abandon | 41 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16703937 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING HEMISPHERIC EMOTIONAL VALENCE | December 2019 | May 2023 | Abandon | 41 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16697814 | ASSEMBLY FOR MEDICAL MONITORING DEVICE WITH MULTIPLE PHYSIOLOGICAL SENSORS | November 2019 | December 2023 | Allow | 49 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner OGLES, MATTHEW ERIC works in Art Unit 3791 and has examined 29 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 62.1%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 39 months.
Examiner OGLES, MATTHEW ERIC's allowance rate of 62.1% places them in the 24% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by OGLES, MATTHEW ERIC receive 1.97 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 45% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by OGLES, MATTHEW ERIC is 39 months. This places the examiner in the 28% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +42.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by OGLES, MATTHEW ERIC. This interview benefit is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 36.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 83% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 41.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 64% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 66.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 73% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 47% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 52% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.