Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18428514 | Transepidermal Water Loss Measurement Device | January 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18076185 | Method and Device for Diagnosing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Susceptibility | December 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17795235 | METHOD FOR SEPARATING MULTIPLE SLICES OF WORKPIECES BY MEANS OF A WIRE SAW DURING A SEQUENCE OF SEPARATION PROCESSES | July 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17434547 | MEASUREMENT UNIT AND MONITORING SYSTEM FOR MONITORING INDICATOR OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE IN PERSON | August 2021 | December 2025 | Allow | 51 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15841358 | USER CONDITION EVALUATION SYSTEM THROUGH TOUCH SCREEN DEVICE USAGE PATTERN CHANGE | December 2017 | February 2019 | Abandon | 14 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15708322 | USER CONDITION EVALUATION SYSTEM THROUGH TOUCH SCREEN DEVICE USAGE PATTERN CHANGE | September 2017 | January 2019 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15389516 | VISION AND COGNITION TESTING AND/OR TRAINING UNDER STRESS CONDITIONS | December 2016 | August 2018 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15357054 | STRAIN MONITORING SYSTEM AND APPARATUS | November 2016 | May 2019 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15345245 | OPTICAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENT | November 2016 | August 2018 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15338747 | CPR CHEST COMPRESSION MONITOR WITH REFERENCE SENSOR | October 2016 | August 2018 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15299808 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONSCIOUS SENSORY FEEDBACK | October 2016 | October 2018 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15262974 | DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR RESHAPING A HEART VALVE ANNULUS, INCLUDING THE USE OF MAGNETIC TOOLS | September 2016 | August 2018 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15240555 | MONITORING SYSTEM | August 2016 | January 2019 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15195847 | Tissue Retractor Oximeter | June 2016 | August 2018 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15151909 | CORE BODY TEMPERATURE SYSTEM | May 2016 | June 2019 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 15015941 | DEFORMITY CORRECTION USING NEURAL INTEGRITY MONITORING | February 2016 | February 2019 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14860370 | Implantable Pressure Sensors for Telemetric Measurements through Bodily Tissues | September 2015 | October 2018 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14772884 | BIOIMPEDANCE CIRCUMFERENCE MEASUREMENT | September 2015 | November 2017 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14840488 | METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE RELATIVE SPATIAL CHANGE IN SUBSURFACE RESISTIVITIES ACROSS FREQUENCIES IN TISSUE | August 2015 | February 2019 | Abandon | 41 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14835723 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTING PAIN OF USERS | August 2015 | February 2019 | Abandon | 42 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 14766374 | BELT FOR GUIDING THE ACTIVATION OF THE CORE MUSCLES | August 2015 | December 2018 | Abandon | 40 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 14813171 | CATHETER APPARATUS WITH TELESCOPING LUMEN CATHETERS AND ITS USE IN METHODS FOR TREATING VASCULATURES | July 2015 | July 2018 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14813173 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PLACING A CATHETER WITHIN A VASCULATURE | July 2015 | July 2018 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14788852 | MYOELECTRIC POTENTIAL MEASUREMENT DEVICE AND MYOELECTRIC POTENTIAL MEASUREMENT METHOD | July 2015 | March 2019 | Allow | 44 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 14712431 | FLUID DIVERSION MECHANISM FOR BODILY-FLUID SAMPLING | May 2015 | December 2018 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 14711610 | FLOWOMETRY IN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY FOR ANALYTE LEVEL ESTIMATION | May 2015 | March 2019 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14662676 | FLUID DIVERSION MECHANISM FOR BODILY-FLUID SAMPLING | March 2015 | January 2019 | Allow | 46 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 14622600 | SURGICAL ACCESS | February 2015 | September 2018 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 14614506 | METHOD AND SYSTEM TO DETERMINE AN OPTIMAL TISSUE COMPRESSION TIME TO IMPLANT A SURGICAL ELEMENT | February 2015 | April 2019 | Allow | 50 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14525270 | IMPLANTABLE BIO-PRESSURE TRANSPONDER | October 2014 | November 2018 | Allow | 48 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14498102 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PARENTERALLY PROCURING BODILY-FLUID SAMPLES WITH REDUCED CONTAMINATION | September 2014 | January 2019 | Allow | 51 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 14284634 | SYSTEM FOR IMPROVED TISSUE HANDLING AND IN LINE ANALYSIS OF THE TISSUE | May 2014 | May 2019 | Abandon | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14285547 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING OXYGEN SATURATION | May 2014 | December 2018 | Allow | 54 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14284915 | ELECTRODE LAYOUT FOR BLOOD TEST SENSOR STRIP | May 2014 | November 2018 | Allow | 54 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14261331 | AUDIOLOGIC TEST APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND RELATED METHOD | April 2014 | June 2018 | Allow | 50 | 4 | 1 | No | No |
| 14197837 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTION OF CANCER IN WOMEN | March 2014 | March 2019 | Abandon | 60 | 2 | 1 | No | Yes |
| 14038839 | GRID AND ROTATABLE CUBE GUIDE LOCALIZATION FIXTURE FOR BIOPSY DEVICE | September 2013 | August 2018 | Allow | 58 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13867632 | MONITORING SYSTEM | April 2013 | April 2019 | Abandon | 60 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 13743016 | ORAL DEVICE | January 2013 | February 2019 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13691195 | BODY FAT MEASUREMENT DEVICE | November 2012 | December 2018 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13535620 | Anastomosis Leak Testing Apparatus | June 2012 | September 2018 | Allow | 60 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 13486333 | DEVICE FOR DETECTING ELECTRICAL POTENTIALS OF THE FOREHEAD REGION OF A PATIENT | June 2012 | November 2018 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 13420490 | Ophthalmic Refractor and Method of Ophthalmic Refractor Signal Analysis | March 2012 | October 2018 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 1 | No | No |
| 13342677 | Integrated Sensor for Analyzing Biological Samples | January 2012 | October 2013 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13105726 | CATHETER | May 2011 | June 2019 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 13086453 | Sample capture in one step for test strips | April 2011 | February 2019 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 12901774 | Systems For and Methods Of Assessing Urinary Flow Rate Via Sound Analysis | October 2010 | March 2013 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12761585 | ELASTIC HYSTERETIC PALPATORY TRAINING APPARATUS | April 2010 | March 2012 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12718006 | ELASTIC HYSTERETIC PALPATORY TRAINING METHOD | March 2010 | February 2012 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12675994 | BLOOD ANALYSIS DEVICE AND BLOOD ANALYSIS SYSTEM USING THE SAME | March 2010 | July 2013 | Allow | 40 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12302914 | IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENTS | November 2009 | February 2014 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 12383261 | POSTURAL INFORMATION SYSTEM AND METHOD INCLUDING CENTRAL DETERMINING OF SUBJECT ADVISORY INFORMATION BASED ON SUBJECT STATUS INFORMATION AND POSTURAL INFLUENCER STATUS INFORMATION | March 2009 | October 2018 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 1 | No | No |
| 12337872 | MULTI-ORIENTATION TARGETING SET FOR MRI BIOPSY DEVICE | December 2008 | April 2013 | Allow | 52 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 12214947 | Marker or filler forming fluid | June 2008 | January 2019 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 1 | No | Yes |
| 12123145 | SYSTEMS FOR AND METHODS OF ASSESSING LOWER URINARY TRACT FUNCTION VIA SOUND ANALYSIS | May 2008 | March 2010 | Allow | 22 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 11826766 | METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A GUIDEWIRE WITH AN EXTRUSION JACKET | July 2007 | May 2013 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 10577428 | BONE-MARROW EXTRACTION AND/OR INJECTION DEVICE AND A SYSTEM INCLUDING SUCH A DEVICE | August 2006 | November 2010 | Allow | 55 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11495510 | PLACENTAL BLOOD EXTRACTOR | July 2006 | December 2009 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 11378850 | ELASTIC HYSTERETIC PALPATORY TRAINING APPARATUS AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF | March 2006 | March 2010 | Allow | 48 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 11322278 | APPARATUS FOR COLLECTING NANOPARTICLES | January 2006 | December 2008 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11299394 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OBTAINING ALIQUOT FROM LIQUID-BASED CYTOLOGICAL SAMPLE | December 2005 | January 2010 | Allow | 49 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 10632961 | BIOELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE MEASURING APPARATUS | August 2003 | September 2008 | Allow | 60 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner EISEMAN, ADAM JARED.
With a 25.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 12.5% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner EISEMAN, ADAM JARED works in Art Unit 3791 and has examined 59 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 78.0%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 44 months.
Examiner EISEMAN, ADAM JARED's allowance rate of 78.0% places them in the 45% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by EISEMAN, ADAM JARED receive 2.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by EISEMAN, ADAM JARED is 44 months. This places the examiner in the 15% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +20.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by EISEMAN, ADAM JARED. This interview benefit is in the 64% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 32.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 69% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 42.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 65% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 66.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 58% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 33.3% of appeals filed. This is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 33.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 21% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 5.1% of allowed cases (in the 86% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 50% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.