Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19268638 | NASAL ADMINISTRATION | July 2025 | November 2025 | Abandon | 4 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16557402 | DEVICE TO PREVENT HYPOTHERMIA AND INCREASE COLD-WEATHER SURVIVAL, UTILIZING THE USER'S EXHALED AIR | August 2019 | February 2020 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16511108 | SCENTED PLEATED FACE MASK | July 2019 | September 2019 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16428344 | Blind intubation device and related methodologies for endotracheal intubation | May 2019 | September 2019 | Allow | 3 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16422652 | INTERNAL NEBULIZER SEAL AND METHOD OF USE | May 2019 | December 2019 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15404770 | SANITARY NAPKINS CAPABLE OF TAKING COMPLEX THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPE IN USE | January 2017 | October 2019 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15344357 | DEVICES AND METHODS FOR SKIN TREATMENT | November 2016 | September 2019 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15307932 | ABSORBENT ARTICLE WITH SELECTIVELY POSITIONED WAIST CONTAINMENT MEMBER HAVING AN IMPROVED WAIST SEAL | October 2016 | August 2019 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15128040 | COMPOSITE ANESTHESIA DEVICE FOR MEDICAL USE | September 2016 | November 2019 | Abandon | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15218107 | DISPOSABLE ABSORBENT REFASTENABLE ARTICLES AND METHODS FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME | July 2016 | October 2019 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15137041 | ABSORBENT ARTICLES HAVING A BELT PORTION WITH A TEXTURE ZONE HAVING A TEXTURE RATIO | April 2016 | October 2019 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15088207 | ABSORBENT ARTICLES HAVING TEXTURED ZONES | April 2016 | October 2019 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15063678 | ADJUSTMENT FOR HYDROCEPHALUS SHUNT VALVE | March 2016 | August 2019 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15055084 | FLUID COMMUNICATION PATH | February 2016 | May 2019 | Allow | 38 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14893268 | Absorbent Core | November 2015 | July 2019 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14934520 | MENSTRUAL PANT | November 2015 | October 2019 | Abandon | 48 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14867046 | EXTRUSION BONDED LAMINATES FOR ABSORBENT ARTICLES | September 2015 | June 2019 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14832138 | ABSORBENT ARTICLE WITH GRAPHICS | August 2015 | January 2020 | Abandon | 53 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14801053 | ABSORBENT ARTICLES HAVING A PULPLESS ABSORBENT CORE WITH IMPROVED PERFORMANCE | July 2015 | November 2019 | Abandon | 52 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14723246 | CLOSURE SYSTEM FOR A DRAINABLE POUCH | May 2015 | November 2019 | Allow | 53 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14715387 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CLASSIFICATION OF PHOTO-PLETHYSMOGRAPHICALLY DETECTED RESPIRATORY EFFORT | May 2015 | September 2019 | Allow | 52 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14617774 | GAS FLOW REVERSING ELEMENT | February 2015 | July 2019 | Allow | 53 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14533472 | ABSORBENT ARTICLE WITH WAISTBAND | November 2014 | April 2019 | Allow | 54 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14304448 | TUB FOR HUMIDIFIER | June 2014 | July 2019 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13893452 | ABSORBENT ARTICLES WITH UNIFORM GRAPHICS | May 2013 | December 2019 | Abandon | 60 | 8 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13491642 | Absorbent Structure For Absorbent Articles | June 2012 | October 2019 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12986812 | DELIVERY SYSTEM | January 2011 | August 2019 | Allow | 60 | 9 | 1 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner PHILIPS, BRADLEY H works in Art Unit 3785 and has examined 26 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 80.8%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 43 months.
Examiner PHILIPS, BRADLEY H's allowance rate of 80.8% places them in the 51% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by PHILIPS, BRADLEY H receive 2.23 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 62% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PHILIPS, BRADLEY H is 43 months. This places the examiner in the 17% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +26.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by PHILIPS, BRADLEY H. This interview benefit is in the 73% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 33% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 25.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 34% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 20.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 10% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 47% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 49% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.