USPTO Examiner SIPP AMY R - Art Unit 3775

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18440809SURGICAL GUIDE WIRE ENGAGEMENT DEVICEFebruary 2024October 2024Allow821YesNo
18453784METHODS AND DEVICES FOR SYNDESMOSIS TENSIONINGAugust 2023June 2025Allow2210NoNo
18069792Expandable Support Device and Method of UseDecember 2022April 2025Allow2820YesNo
17982612EXPANDABLE REAMERNovember 2022January 2025Allow2710NoNo
17947926INTERVERTEBRAL CAGE WITH NON-PARALLEL UNDERCUTSSeptember 2022January 2025Abandon2821NoNo
17858123TIBIAL PLATEAU LEVELING OSTEOTOMY PLATEJuly 2022February 2025Allow3220NoNo
17784794INJECTION DEVICE SUITABLE FOR INJECTING PARTICLES INTO A BONE CAVITYJune 2022June 2025Abandon3610NoNo
17734002VARIABLE ANGLE LOCKING IMPLANTApril 2022June 2025Allow3730NoNo
17731899Expandable Spinal ImplantsApril 2022November 2024Allow3110YesNo
17711418SURGICAL ALIGNMENT GUIDE ASSEMBLY FOR TOTAL ANKLE REPLACEMENT AND METHOD OF USING THE SAMEApril 2022July 2023Allow1620NoNo
17672873TIBIAL PLATEAU LEVELING OSTEOTOMY PLATEFebruary 2022May 2022Allow310NoNo
17582476Articulating Rotary Cutting ToolJanuary 2022September 2023Allow1940YesNo
17541456BACKLIT SURGICAL INSTRUMENT SUPPORT ASSEMBLYDecember 2021July 2024Allow3210NoNo
17536540INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANTS AND RELATED METHODS OF USENovember 2021September 2024Allow3310NoNo
17612786THIN-BLADE CHISEL SYSTEMNovember 2021May 2025Allow4131NoNo
17526921BONE ANCHORSNovember 2021August 2024Allow3320YesNo
17519272ACTUATED POSITIONING DEVICE FOR ARTHROPLASTY AND METHODS OF USENovember 2021March 2025Abandon4011NoNo
17514048TIBIAL PLATEAU LEVELING OSTEOTOMY PLATEOctober 2021March 2022Allow520NoNo
17607222SURGICAL ROTATIONAL TOOL DRIVER AND METHODOctober 2021August 2024Allow3410NoNo
17488034EXPANDABLE AND ADJUSTABLE LORDOSIS INTERBODY FUSION SYSTEMSeptember 2021October 2024Allow3620NoNo
17447093ELECTROSURGICAL ILLUMINATING INSTRUMENTSeptember 2021February 2025Allow4130YesNo
17463971BONE SHORTENING OSTEOTOMY APPARATUSSeptember 2021August 2022Allow1120YesNo
17446529SURGICAL IMPLANT FOR CORRECTION OF HALLUX VALGUS OR TAILOR'S BUNIONAugust 2021October 2022Abandon1311NoNo
17407416SPINAL IMPLANTS AND INSTRUMENTSAugust 2021March 2025Allow4220NoNo
17400849Surgical Tool System With Interchangeable Battery and Control ModulesAugust 2021February 2024Allow3110YesNo
17425771FIXING DEVICE FOR A TIBIA ALIGNMENT SYSTEMJuly 2021February 2025Abandon4330YesNo
17384859PRESHEARING METHOD FOR THE CONTROL OF THE RHEOLOGY AND THE INJECTABILITY OF AQUEOUS INORGANIC CEMENTSJuly 2021March 2024Allow3110YesNo
17378621ERGONOMICALLY DESIGNED VAGINAL SPECULUMJuly 2021July 2024Abandon3601NoNo
17363471SURGICAL ALIGNMENT GUIDE ASSEMBLY FOR TOTAL ANKLE REPLACEMENT AND METHOD OF USING THE SAMEJune 2021December 2021Allow610NoNo
17352841SURGICAL IMPACT TOOLJune 2021July 2024Abandon3701NoNo
17348899TIBIAL PLATEAU LEVELING OSTEOTOMY PLATEJune 2021November 2021Allow510NoNo
17348888TIBIAL PLATEAU LEVELING OSTEOTOMY PLATEJune 2021February 2022Allow820YesNo
17346988EXPANDABLE INTERBODY IMPLANTJune 2021December 2023Allow3010NoNo
17330283ACTIVE TENSION BONE AND JOINT STABILIZATION METHODSMay 2021July 2024Abandon3710NoNo
17316923Expandable, Angularly Adjustable Intervertebral CagesMay 2021April 2025Allow4821YesNo
17315694EXPANDABLE INTER-BODY FUSION DEVICES AND METHODSMay 2021August 2024Abandon3920NoNo
17302451SUPPORT DEVICE AND METHOD FOR USEMay 2021June 2024Abandon3701NoNo
17232736KNEE SIZING AND BALANCING INSTRUMENTApril 2021January 2024Allow3341YesNo
17301832ACCESS DEVICE HAVING AN ANCHORING FEATURE AND METHODS OF USING THE SAMEApril 2021November 2024Allow4330NoNo
17219262Methods and Tools for Hip Replacement with Superscapsular Percutaneously Assisted Total Hip ApproachMarch 2021January 2022Allow1020YesNo
17204385IMPLANT EXTRACTORMarch 2021April 2025Allow4941YesNo
17201735BONE REAMER AND METHODS OF USEMarch 2021July 2025Allow5231NoNo
17175649SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR JOINING BONEY STRUCTURESFebruary 2021June 2021Allow411NoNo
17175074GEARED CAM EXPANDABLE INTERBODY IMPLANT AND METHOD OF IMPLANTING SAMEFebruary 2021April 2023Allow2611NoNo
17158499Expandable Interbody Implant with Lordosis CorrectionJanuary 2021June 2023Allow2911NoNo
17150255CERCLAGE CABLE SYSTEM AND APPARATUSJanuary 2021December 2024Abandon4741NoNo
17149342SURGICAL EXTRACTORJanuary 2021June 2024Allow4130YesNo
17148933SURGICAL EXTRACTORJanuary 2021July 2024Allow4240YesNo
17146759Methods and Tools for Hip Replacement with Superscapsular Percutaneously Assisted Total Hip ApproachJanuary 2021July 2021Allow620YesNo
17145701TOOL AND METHOD FOR SEPARATING A FEMORAL CUP FROM AN ACETABULAR BALL IN AN IMPLANTED HIP PROSTHESISJanuary 2021December 2023Allow3521YesNo
17143591Methods and Tools for Hip Replacement with Superscapsular Percutaneously Assisted Total Hip ApproachJanuary 2021March 2022Allow1440YesNo
17128271ARTICULATING EXPANDABLE INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANTDecember 2020May 2023Allow2811YesNo
17126608REUSABLE SURGICAL GUIDE FOR OSTEOSYNTHESIS SURGERY IN PARTICULAR OF THE HALLUX VALGUSDecember 2020August 2024Allow4431YesNo
17118887SPINAL SURGERY KIT COMPRISING A PLURALITY OF MODULAR INSERTER TIPSDecember 2020July 2023Allow3120NoNo
17118849DEPTH STOP INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN SPINAL SURGERYDecember 2020July 2023Allow3120NoNo
17114566SCREW CADDYDecember 2020December 2023Allow3620YesNo
17113883LATERAL SPINE PLATE WITH SET SCREW LOCKING OF BONE SCREWSDecember 2020April 2024Allow4040YesNo
17112845FLEXIBLE BONE FIXATION DEVICEDecember 2020July 2024Abandon4330YesNo
17110960SEAL FOR APPLICATION OF BONE CEMENTDecember 2020May 2023Abandon2910NoNo
17101314DISPOSABLE BURR ATTACHMENTNovember 2020July 2024Allow4440YesNo
16953407CUSTOMIZED PATIENT-SPECIFIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS AND METHODNovember 2020January 2024Allow3821NoYes
17094306VERTEBRAL IMPLANTS AND RELATED METHODS OF USENovember 2020May 2025Allow5461NoNo
17089128Surgical Instrument For Tightening A Bone Fixation Member Around BoneNovember 2020April 2023Allow2920YesNo
17068900APPARATUS FOR STABILIZATION OF A BONE FRACTURE SITEOctober 2020January 2024Allow3930YesNo
17045653Curable Material Dispensing System And Methods Of Operating And Packaging The SameOctober 2020November 2022Allow2510YesNo
17062702Hinged anterior cervical plate systemOctober 2020May 2023Abandon3211NoNo
17006098CANNULATED LOCKING AND FIXATION SET FOR ORTHOPEDIC SURGERYAugust 2020March 2023Abandon3111NoNo
16975828SYNDESMOSIS FIXATION AND RECONSTRUCTION SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USING THE SAMEAugust 2020March 2024Allow4341YesNo
16998992STAPLE AND PLATE HARD TISSUE FIXATIONAugust 2020September 2021Allow1320YesNo
16969332ACETABULAR REAMER HANDLE AND METHOD OF REAMING AN ACETABULUMAugust 2020November 2023Allow3930NoNo
16989442LARYNGOSCOPE WITH BLADE POSITION ADJUSTMENTAugust 2020February 2025Allow5450YesNo
16984563ARTICULATING EXPANDABLE INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANTAugust 2020March 2023Allow3111NoNo
16936235INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT DEVICE WITH INDEPENDENT DISTAL-PROXIMAL EXPANSIONJuly 2020October 2023Abandon3920NoNo
16932511Expandable and Adjustable Lordosis Interbody Fusion SystemJuly 2020July 2021Allow1211YesNo
16961654Orthopedic Implanted ScrewJuly 2020August 2023Abandon3720NoNo
16921731Expandable Support Device and Method of UseJuly 2020August 2022Allow2610NoNo
16916192PLATE BENDER FOR MANDIBULAR IMPLANTS AND BENDING PROCESSJune 2020January 2023Allow3011YesNo
16956250CUTTING GUIDE FOR PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY AND KIT FOR PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMYJune 2020December 2022Allow3020YesNo
16898696EXPANDABLE VERTEBRAL IMPLANTJune 2020August 2024Abandon5041NoNo
16771610GUIDE FOR POSITIONING A RESURFACING HEAD IMPLANTJune 2020August 2022Allow2610YesNo
16892208IMPLANT FILLING DEVICEJune 2020October 2022Abandon2910NoNo
16882595STAPLE AND PLATE HARD TISSUE FIXATIONMay 2020January 2023Allow3221YesNo
16877655STERNAL CLOSURE STRAP DEVICEMay 2020October 2023Abandon4141NoNo
16877956TENSIONER FOR A STERNAL CLOSURE STRAP DEVICEMay 2020August 2022Allow2711NoNo
16877528Delivery tool and method for forming a structure having a layer of hardened paste and particles under the layerMay 2020September 2022Allow2820YesNo
15930007SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SURGICAL RETRACTIONMay 2020May 2022Allow2420YesNo
16872306TOOL FOR CUTTING OR CRIMPING CABLE IN A MEDICAL PROCEDUREMay 2020October 2022Allow2921YesNo
16869272DRILL GUIDES AND INSERTERS FOR BONE PLATES HAVING HOOK MEMBERSMay 2020September 2022Allow2810NoNo
16609077DEVICE FOR LIGHTING THE INTRAOCULAR CAVITYMay 2020December 2023Abandon5021YesNo
16859582SURGICAL ACCESS SYSTEMS AND METHODSApril 2020October 2023Allow4220YesNo
16855959BONE RESECTION GUIDE AND METHODApril 2020October 2022Allow3021YesNo
16851076HEADLESS SCREW REMOVAL TOOLApril 2020May 2024Abandon4941NoYes
16837693CONTOURABLE PLATEApril 2020January 2022Allow2131NoNo
16834531IMPLANT EXTRACTOR ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF IMPLANT EXTRACTIONMarch 2020January 2023Allow3431YesNo
16828588HOOK PLATE AND HOOK PLATE SYSTEMMarch 2020May 2022Allow2510NoNo
16646485MEDICAL FIXATION DEVICE FOR POLYMER CABLESMarch 2020October 2023Abandon4311NoNo
16811350BONE IMPLANT AND METHOD FOR TREATING LONG BONE ANGULAR DEFORMITIESMarch 2020October 2022Allow3121YesNo
16802713SCREW CADDYFebruary 2020May 2023Abandon3820NoNo
16785860High Tibial Osteotomy GuideFebruary 2020November 2022Abandon3410NoNo
16775560PATIENT-SPECIFIC PROSTHESIS ALIGNMENTJanuary 2020January 2025Abandon6041NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SIPP, AMY R..

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
14
Examiner Affirmed
4
(28.6%)
Examiner Reversed
10
(71.4%)
Reversal Percentile
88.6%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 71.4% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
32
Allowed After Appeal Filing
15
(46.9%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
17
(53.1%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
73.8%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 46.9% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner SIPP, AMY R. - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SIPP, AMY R. works in Art Unit 3775 and has examined 499 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 68.9%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 36 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SIPP, AMY R.'s allowance rate of 68.9% places them in the 23% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SIPP, AMY R. receive 2.72 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 90% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SIPP, AMY R. is 36 months. This places the examiner in the 18% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +28.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SIPP, AMY R.. This interview benefit is in the 79% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 20.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 13% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 42.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 57% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 20% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 58.8% of appeals filed. This is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 15.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 34.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.2% of allowed cases (in the 50% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 1.2% of allowed cases (in the 58% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.