USPTO Examiner LAWSON MATTHEW JAMES - Art Unit 3775

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17130543System for Connecting a Connecting Device, in Particular a Distractor, to a BoneDecember 2020May 2023Allow2920NoNo
17130809METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DIRECTING AN ELONGATE FLEXIBLE COMPONENT THROUGH A PART OF A HUMAN BODYDecember 2020September 2022Allow2121YesNo
17122121FEMORAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLING SAMEDecember 2020November 2022Allow2300NoNo
17117545BONE CLOSURE ASSEMBLYDecember 2020July 2022Allow1911NoNo
17115777FLEXIBLE ELONGATED CHAIN IMPLANT AND METHOD OF SUPPORTING BODY TISSUE WITH SAMEDecember 2020March 2023Allow2710YesNo
17111357METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS INSERTIONDecember 2020August 2023Allow3320YesNo
17096707EXPANDABLE VERTEBRAL DEVICE WITH TRIANGULAR CONNECTION BEAMNovember 2020May 2022Abandon1810NoNo
17090515OPERATING INSTRUMENT AND METHOD FOR SPINAL IMPLANTNovember 2020April 2022Allow1711NoNo
17077603Pressure Loaded Drive Control for Bone ResectionOctober 2020May 2023Abandon3121NoNo
17048511BONE MATTER COLLECTION APPARATUSESOctober 2020August 2022Allow2220YesNo
17068119ARTHROSCOPIC RESECTION DEVICEOctober 2020July 2023Allow3311NoNo
17035272Constant-Torque Intraosseous Access Devices and Methods ThereofSeptember 2020July 2023Allow3311NoNo
17033636FIXATION MEMBER INSERTER INSTRUMENTSeptember 2020July 2023Allow3410NoNo
17031389ROTATABLE SURGICAL INSTRUMENT WITH BEARINGSeptember 2020October 2022Allow2521YesNo
17014546EXPANDABLE IMPLANT WITH PIVOTING CONTROL ASSEMBLYSeptember 2020May 2022Allow2010YesNo
17002372SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FASTENING OF TWO OR MORE INTERACTING ELEMENTSAugust 2020October 2023Allow3830YesNo
16996981ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT, METHOD, AND KITAugust 2020January 2023Allow2921NoNo
16996978Apparatus and Method for Retracting Brain Tissue During Brain SurgeryAugust 2020January 2023Allow2910NoNo
16994456ORTHOPEDIC LEG ALIGNMENT SYSTEM AND METHODAugust 2020February 2023Allow3010NoNo
16991109BONE SCREW WITH CUTTING TIPAugust 2020December 2022Allow2810YesNo
16968393Interbody With Extendible MembersAugust 2020January 2022Allow1720YesNo
16947435TIBIAL PLATEAU LEVELING OSTEOTOMY PLATEJuly 2020April 2021Allow820NoNo
16947354CAGE AND POSITIONING INSTRUMENT FOR A CAGE POSITIONING SYSTEMJuly 2020July 2022Allow2420NoNo
16939844INSTRUMENT LEADING EDGE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM AND METHODJuly 2020August 2022Allow2500NoNo
16936730TIBIAL PLATEAU LEVELING OSTEOTOMY SYSTEMS AND METHODSJuly 2020October 2022Allow2711YesNo
16931668ENGINEJuly 2020April 2022Allow2110YesNo
16927548INTERBODY TOOL, SYSTEMS, AND METHODSJuly 2020December 2022Abandon2921NoNo
16873765AMPUTATION SYSTEM FOR FIELD USEJune 2020September 2021Allow1410YesNo
16912463EXPANDABLE INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANTJune 2020December 2022Allow2930YesNo
16908368IMPLANT INSERTION INSTRUMENTJune 2020October 2022Allow2810NoNo
16906026Femur PlateJune 2020December 2022Allow3021YesNo
15733275MINIMALLY INVASIVE HIP ARTHROPLASTY TECHNIQUES AND APPARATUSJune 2020March 2023Allow3311YesNo
16905231HANDHELD SURGICAL DEVICE HAVING RETRACTABLE PORTIONJune 2020May 2023Abandon3511NoNo
16902921EXPANDING INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANTSJune 2020December 2021Allow1811NoNo
16640766PROSTHETIC DEVICE FOR RECONSTRUCTING STERNA, RIBS AND COLLARBONESJune 2020February 2023Allow3630YesNo
16901730DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NATURAL FEATURE TRACKING OF SURGICAL TOOLS AND OTHER OBJECTSJune 2020September 2022Allow2710NoNo
16892882BONE MATERIAL DISPENSING APPARATUS AND METHODSJune 2020September 2022Allow2810NoNo
16887282ARTHROSCOPIC ANTERIOR GLENOID GUIDEMay 2020May 2022Allow2421YesNo
16882496BONY SCREW WITH MOVABLE BRACKET ARMMay 2020October 2020Allow500YesNo
16877559STERNUM REPLACEMENT PLATE MADE IN ONE PIECEMay 2020September 2022Allow2830YesNo
16875465STEERABLE IMPLANT ASSEMBLYMay 2020January 2022Allow2021NoNo
15931170DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MOTOR AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MOTORMay 2020June 2023Allow3711NoNo
16872221PERCUTANEOUS METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND DEVICES FOR POSITIONING A GUIDE WIRE IN A BONEMay 2020November 2022Allow3011NoNo
16761824OFFSET REAMER DRIVER WITH REMOTE RELEASE MECHANISMMay 2020June 2023Allow3840YesNo
16858070SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CREATING GRAFT TUNNELS IN BONEApril 2020February 2022Allow2201YesNo
16850795EXPANDABLE IMPLANT ASSEMBLYApril 2020December 2022Allow3240YesNo
16850195Spinal ImplantApril 2020December 2022Allow3220YesNo
16846969MEDICAL DEVICES FOR AIRWAY MANAGEMENT AND METHODS OF PLACEMENTApril 2020December 2022Allow3221NoNo
16755442DEVICE FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF HEMORRHOIDSApril 2020February 2023Allow3411YesNo
16649418Device and method for cutting into a cancellous boneMarch 2020October 2022Allow3110YesNo
16822852Internal Bone Fixation DeviceMarch 2020June 2022Abandon2710YesNo
16645824ADJUSTABLE BONE IMPLANTSMarch 2020August 2023Abandon4120NoNo
16804544BONE FRACTURE FIXATION CLAMPFebruary 2020July 2021Allow1620NoNo
16801968DRILL BIT WITH DELIVERY DEVICE FITTING AND METHOD OF USE THEREOFFebruary 2020November 2022Allow3241YesNo
16800106FEMORAL SYSTEM HANDLE SURGICAL INSTRUMENT AND METHOD OF ASSEMBLING SAMEFebruary 2020March 2023Abandon3720NoNo
16784425CERVICAL PLATE WITH A FEEDBACK DEVICE FOR SELECTIVE ASSOCIATION WITH BONE SCREW BLOCKING MECHANISMFebruary 2020July 2022Allow2920YesNo
16778469ORTHOPEDIC STABILIZATION DEVICES AND METHODS FOR INSTALLATION THEREOFJanuary 2020November 2021Allow2200NoNo
16775961Surgical Instrument And Methods Of Use ThereofJanuary 2020August 2022Allow3010YesNo
16774109ORTHOPAEDIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT ASSEMBLY FOR REAMING A PATIENT'S ACETABULUMJanuary 2020June 2022Allow2920NoNo
16738479IMPLANT EXTRACTORJanuary 2020March 2023Allow3850NoNo
16732554ABRASIVE CUTTING SURGICAL INSTRUMENTJanuary 2020February 2022Allow2610NoNo
16719234INTEROPERATIVE AIMING ARMDecember 2019May 2023Allow4121YesNo
16697726Implant HolderNovember 2019May 2021Allow1810NoNo
16693733EXTENDED TAB REINFORCEMENT SLEEVENovember 2019September 2022Allow3320NoNo
16691310IMPLANT AND COVERING METHODS AND APPARATUSNovember 2019April 2023Abandon4120NoNo
16689587ADJUSTABLE RIB AND STERNAL IMPLANTNovember 2019February 2022Allow2710YesNo
16689763Device with an Open Cell ElementNovember 2019September 2022Allow3430YesNo
16685788Implant With Protected Fusion ZonesNovember 2019May 2022Allow3010YesNo
16681812SURGICALLY IMPLANTABLE JOINT SPACERNovember 2019May 2021Allow1800NoNo
16671799BONE PLATE HAVING A CONNECTOR AND A CONNECTOR FOR A SURGICAL LOOPNovember 2019April 2022Allow2920YesNo
16668877BONE PLATEOctober 2019June 2022Abandon3110NoNo
16669124Method and Apparatus for Joint ReconstructionOctober 2019May 2022Allow3020NoNo
16668824METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INSERTING A BONE PLATEOctober 2019May 2021Allow1910NoNo
16659031Spinal Fusion ImplantOctober 2019April 2022Allow2910YesNo
16655345DEVICE FOR PROVIDING BONE CEMENTOctober 2019July 2022Allow3311YesNo
16655298SURGICAL FIXATION SYSTEMS AND METHODSOctober 2019May 2022Allow3120NoNo
16654691SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FASTENING OF TWO OR MORE INTERACTING ELEMENTSOctober 2019May 2022Allow3120YesNo
16596321MULTI-BARREL DRILL GUIDE AND ANCHOR DEPLOYMENT ASSEMBLYOctober 2019April 2022Allow3020YesNo
16573030FEMORAL ORTHOPAEDIC INSTRUMENT ASSEMBLY FOR SETTING OFFSETSeptember 2019May 2022Allow3220NoNo
16565003Spinal Fusion ImplantSeptember 2019April 2023Allow4330YesNo
16563084EXPANDABLE MOTION PRESERVATION SPACERSeptember 2019October 2021Allow2621NoNo
16559870BONE MARROW ACCESS APPARATUSSeptember 2019August 2023Allow4740NoNo
16559306Prosthetic Intervertebral DiscsSeptember 2019February 2022Allow3010YesNo
16552027CUTTING BLOCK APPARATUS AND METHOD OF TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTYAugust 2019August 2022Allow3521YesNo
16549932Method and Apparatus for Treating Cranial Cruciate Ligament Disease in CaninesAugust 2019December 2021Abandon2731YesNo
16483239STEP STAPLE FOR FRACTURE FIXATIONAugust 2019November 2021Allow2711NoNo
16481285SYSTEMS FOR ADVANCING A PIN WIRE WITH A DRIVER DEVICEJuly 2019February 2023Allow4221YesNo
16518110Self-Holding Screw HeadJuly 2019March 2022Allow3211YesNo
16515859PATELLA CUTTING GUIDEJuly 2019March 2022Allow3221YesNo
16477500ANNULAR ASSISTANCE DEVICEJuly 2019February 2022Allow3111YesNo
16502954INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT FOR QUADRUPEDSJuly 2019November 2022Allow4030NoNo
16447292SUPRACONDYLAR BULLET SLEEVEJune 2019December 2021Allow2911NoNo
16443307BONE CEMENT APPLICATOR WITH RETRACTABLE MIXING ROD AND METHOD FOR PRODUCTION OF A BONE CEMENTJune 2019July 2021Allow2511NoNo
16443158BONE CEMENT APPLICATOR WITH RETRACTABLE MIXING ROD AND METHOD FOR PRODUCTION OF A BONE CEMENTJune 2019June 2021Allow2401NoNo
16431879IMPLANT REMOVAL TOOLJune 2019September 2021Allow2820YesNo
16430833IMPLANT INSERTION TOOL FOR IMPLANTING AN ACETABULAR COMPONENT AND ASSOCIATED SURGICAL METHODJune 2019June 2022Allow3721NoNo
16430841INSTRUMENTS AND METHOD FOR USE IN DISASSEMBLING IMPLANTSJune 2019February 2022Allow3210YesNo
16465805Orthopedic Locking ScrewMay 2019October 2021Allow2921YesNo
16420565BONE FRACTURE REPAIR APPARATUS AND METHODSMay 2019February 2022Abandon3310NoNo
16419348SLANTED DRIVE AXIS ROTARY SURGICAL CUTTING TOOLS AND POWERED HANDPIECESMay 2019June 2021Allow2500NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
20
Examiner Affirmed
12
(60.0%)
Examiner Reversed
8
(40.0%)
Reversal Percentile
63.5%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 40.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
60
Allowed After Appeal Filing
22
(36.7%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
38
(63.3%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
60.5%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 36.7% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES works in Art Unit 3775 and has examined 826 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 67.7%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 37 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES's allowance rate of 67.7% places them in the 30% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES receive 2.56 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 71% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES is 37 months. This places the examiner in the 34% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +33.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES. This interview benefit is in the 80% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 34% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 43.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 67% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 66.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 59% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 64.9% of appeals filed. This is in the 45% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 37.8% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 57.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 59% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.5% of allowed cases (in the 59% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 51% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.