USPTO Examiner BECCIA CHRISTOPHER J - Art Unit 3775

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19276255ILLUMINATED MEDICAL DEVICESJuly 2025March 2026Allow820YesNo
19276346ILLUMINATED MEDICAL DEVICESJuly 2025March 2026Allow820YesNo
19240331BONE INSERT AUGMENT AND OFFSET METHODJune 2025February 2026Allow810NoNo
19231241PATIENT-SPECIFIC IMPLANT DESIGN, MANUFACTURE AND PLATFORM WITH CLINICAL AND THIRD-PARTY DATA ACQUISITIONJune 2025January 2026Allow710YesNo
19025037Orthopedic Implant In The Form Of A Plate To Be Fixed Between Two Bone PartsJanuary 2025January 2026Allow1220YesNo
19003275MODULAR LENGTH ADJUSTABLE TUBULAR RETRACTOR AND A TUBE BREAKERDecember 2024April 2025Allow410NoNo
18984777SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRONE LATERAL SPINE SURGERYDecember 2024August 2025Allow811NoNo
18820328FRAME-TYPE SURGICAL ROBOT FOR FRACTURE REDUCTIONAugust 2024November 2024Allow200NoNo
18797386SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRONE LATERAL SPINE SURGERYAugust 2024February 2026Allow1800NoNo
18794059DENTAL IMPLANTATION METHOD WITH SURGICAL GUIDEAugust 2024October 2024Allow210NoNo
18766011INTERVERTEBRAL DEVICESJuly 2024February 2026Allow2000NoNo
18754101SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT FIXATIONJune 2024January 2025Allow710YesNo
18745682PATIENT-POSITIONING SYSTEM AND SURGICAL COMPONENTRY, AND SURGICAL METHODS OF USING SAMEJune 2024December 2024Allow600NoNo
18742873VERTEBRAL GROWTH MODULATING DIRECTIONAL HINGED END-TO-END ROD CONNECTORJune 2024July 2025Allow1300NoNo
18737358Surgical Saw for Actuating a Saw Blade with an Oscillating Head, the Saw Having a Coupling Assembly for Releasably Holding the Saw BladeJune 2024November 2025Allow1700NoNo
18716090FUSION CAGES AND METHODS FOR SACRO-ILIAC JOINT STABILIZATIONJune 2024July 2025Allow1300NoNo
18664362LATERAL RETRACTOR SYSTEM FOR MINIMIZING MUSCLE DAMAGE IN SPINAL SURGERYMay 2024March 2026Allow2210NoNo
18660268TOOTH IMPLANT METHODMay 2024July 2024Allow310NoNo
18645596TARSAL-METATARSAL JOINT PROCEDURE UTILIZING FULCRUMApril 2024December 2024Allow710NoNo
18640526ALERT PROCESSOR FOR A BONE FIXATION DEVICEApril 2024February 2026Allow2220NoNo
18632685PATIENT SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTS AND METHODS FOR JOINT PROSTHESISApril 2024March 2026Allow2310NoNo
18627609BONE POSITIONING GUIDEApril 2024July 2024Allow410NoNo
18624286EXPANDABLE VERTEBRAL IMPLANTApril 2024February 2026Allow2310NoNo
18614769KNEE JOINT STRUCTURE FEATURING HYDRAULIC CONTROLMarch 2024June 2025Allow1500NoNo
18586952Stand Alone Interbody Spinal SystemFebruary 2024November 2025Allow2120NoNo
18587921BONE POSITIONING AND PREPARING GUIDE SYSTEMS AND METHODSFebruary 2024September 2024Allow700NoNo
18441566CONSTANT DISTRACTION FORCE DRIVEN SELF ACTUATING GROWING ROD SYSTEMSFebruary 2024June 2025Allow1600NoNo
18436135ACTIVE END EFFECTORS FOR SURGICAL ROBOTSFebruary 2024August 2025Allow1810NoNo
18436159ACTIVE END EFFECTORS FOR SURGICAL ROBOTSFebruary 2024March 2026Allow2510NoNo
18433636SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISTRACTIONFebruary 2024July 2025Allow1710NoNo
18404964IN-SITU ADDITIVE EXPANDABLE IMPLANTSJanuary 2024July 2025Allow1811NoNo
18518673AnchorNovember 2023March 2026Abandon2721NoNo
18515163MODULAR LENGTH ADJUSTABLE TUBULAR RETRACTOR AND A TUBE BREAKERNovember 2023August 2024Allow911NoNo
18387290Intermediate Femoral NailNovember 2023January 2026Allow2720NoNo
18384168Implant With Blade For Displacing Or Cutting Soft Tissue During ExpansionOctober 2023August 2025Allow2200NoNo
18382894STENT SYSTEM FOR MAINTAINING PATENCY OF A BODY LUMENOctober 2023March 2026Allow2800NoNo
18556379EXPANDABLE LAMINOPLASTY IMPLANTOctober 2023March 2026Allow2920NoNo
18488139ROBOT ASSISTED INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS SELECTION AND IMPLANTATION SYSTEMOctober 2023March 2025Allow1700NoNo
18488301MODULAR BODY CAVITY ACCESS SYSTEMOctober 2023May 2025Allow1900NoNo
18555208SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRONE LATERAL SPINE SURGERYOctober 2023March 2024Allow500NoNo
18479058SURGICAL ACCESS PORT STABILIZATIONSeptember 2023February 2026Allow2920YesNo
18479059DEVICES AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING SURGICAL ACCESSSeptember 2023August 2025Allow2310NoNo
18372815SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GUIDING A REVISION PROCEDURESeptember 2023April 2025Allow1801NoNo
18474541METHOD OF USING A SURGICAL TISSUE RETRACTORSeptember 2023July 2025Allow2220NoNo
18283351RETRACTOR AND HOLDERSeptember 2023March 2026Allow3010NoNo
18370055ADJUSTABLE ANGLE BONE FIXATION ASSEMBLYSeptember 2023March 2026Allow2930NoNo
18369228Systems And Methods For Simulating Spine And Skeletal System PathologiesSeptember 2023May 2025Allow1910NoNo
18243397DEVICES AND METHODS FOR VERTEBRAL BONE REALIGNMENTSeptember 2023September 2025Abandon2410NoNo
18461090SPINAL SPACING IMPLANT, SPINAL SPACER ASSEMBLY, EXPANDER AND INSERTION INSTRUMENT, KIT AND METHODS OF ASSEMBLY AND USESeptember 2023September 2025Abandon2410NoNo
18240548EXPANDABLE SPINAL IMPLANT SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USING SAMEAugust 2023April 2025Allow2010NoNo
18238334PATIENT-POSITIONING SYSTEM, COMPUTER-CONTROL AND DATA-INTEGRATION SYSTEM, SURGICAL COMPONENTRY, AND SURGICAL METHODS OF USING SAMEAugust 2023April 2024Allow810NoNo
18238216SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEASURING AND APPLYING A SPINAL COMPRESSION FORCEAugust 2023November 2025Allow2611YesNo
18278854Rotational Tracker Adapter With Biasing MechanismAugust 2023June 2025Allow2200NoNo
18450513EXPANDABLE INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT AND ASSOCIATED METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEAugust 2023August 2025Allow2410NoNo
18361983Retractor Members, And Related Systems And MethodsJuly 2023August 2025Allow2520NoNo
18227412System And Method For Driving An Ultrasonic Handpiece As A Function Of The Mechanical Impedance Of The HandpieceJuly 2023March 2025Allow1900NoNo
18360509ILLUMINATED MEDICAL DEVICESJuly 2023June 2025Allow2310NoNo
18342869METHODS FOR ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE AND NAVIGATION IN SPINAL SURGERY AND RELATED SYSTEMSJune 2023June 2025Allow2410NoNo
18339588SPINAL IMPLANT SYSTEM AND METHODJune 2023May 2025Allow2310YesNo
18268825HEIGHT-ADJUSTABLE IMPLANTJune 2023January 2026Allow3110YesNo
18331886Retractor Systems with Closed Loop ControlJune 2023July 2025Allow2510NoNo
18205670SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SURGICAL NAVIGATIONJune 2023April 2025Allow2310NoNo
18327435APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR REPAIR OF DURAL TEARJune 2023January 2026Allow3211YesNo
18325107System And Method For Monitoring Offset During Navigation-Assisted SurgeryMay 2023March 2025Allow2110NoNo
18323138TARSAL-METATARSAL JOINT PROCEDURE UTILIZING FULCRUMMay 2023March 2026Allow3411NoNo
18320296SECUREMENT PLATE FOR INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANTMay 2023January 2026Allow3211NoNo
18317832IMPLANTS FOR BONE FIXATION OR FUSIONMay 2023June 2025Allow2510NoNo
18196985APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR PATIENT-SPECIFIC METHODS AND INSTRUMENTATIONMay 2023February 2026Allow3311YesNo
18144683Small Joint Fusion Plate and Cutting BlockMay 2023December 2025Abandon3220NoNo
18312780SURGICAL INSTRUMENT AND METHODMay 2023August 2025Allow2720NoNo
18251102VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE FOR MANAGING THE AIRWAY IN AN INDIVIDUAL IN NEED THEREOFApril 2023July 2025Allow2710NoNo
18309307NAVIGATED PELVIC IMPLANT SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED METHOD OF USEApril 2023May 2025Allow2500NoNo
18033253BONE FIXATION SYSTEM FOR HUMAN BONE, METHOD OF DESIGNING AND MANUFACTURING THEREOFApril 2023July 2025Allow2701NoNo
18136284TISSUE ENGAGEMENT DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODSApril 2023January 2025Allow2110NoNo
18136154MICROFRACTURE APPARATUSES AND METHODSApril 2023May 2025Allow2510NoNo
18298978METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DISTRACTION NEUROGENESISApril 2023October 2024Allow1800NoNo
18193807EXPANDABLE INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANTMarch 2023June 2025Allow2710NoNo
18129698SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO REGISTER PATIENT ANATOMY OR TO DETERMINE AND PRESENT MEASUREMENTS RELATIVE TO PATIENT ANATOMYMarch 2023September 2023Allow610NoNo
18129724SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO REGISTER PATIENT ANATOMY OR TO DETERMINE AND PRESENT MEASUREMENTS RELATIVE TO PATIENT ANATOMYMarch 2023September 2023Allow610NoNo
18126253REAMER INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED METHODSMarch 2023February 2025Allow2310YesNo
18125195DISPENSING SYSTEM AND METHODS OF USEMarch 2023November 2025Allow3120NoNo
18183013BONE POSITIONING AND PREPARING GUIDE SYSTEMS AND METHODSMarch 2023October 2023Allow710NoNo
18182995BONE POSITIONING GUIDEMarch 2023January 2024Allow1020YesNo
18024087TUNNEL POSITION DETERMINATION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ANTERIORPOSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTIONMarch 2023October 2025Allow3111YesNo
18174221Partially Resorbable Implants And MethodsFebruary 2023January 2025Allow2310NoNo
18174596DEVICES AND TECHNIQUES FOR TREATING LESSER METATARSALS OF THE FOOTFebruary 2023July 2025Allow2901NoNo
18173115STABILIZATION SYSTEMSFebruary 2023January 2025Allow2310NoNo
18112366DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING AND MONITORING ORTHOPEDIC HARDWAREFebruary 2023June 2025Allow2710NoNo
18107256TECHNOLOGIES FOR DETERMINING SEATING OF AN ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANT DURING AN ORTHOPAEDIC SURGICAL PROCEDUREFebruary 2023September 2024Allow1900NoNo
18164584DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS OF USE FOR DELIVERY OF MATERIALS IN COMBINATION WITH INTRAMEDULLARY DEVICESFebruary 2023December 2025Allow3411YesNo
18160789SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, GUIDES, AND METHODS OF USEJanuary 2023March 2026Allow3810NoNo
18158533EXPANDABLE INTERBODY SPACERJanuary 2023April 2025Allow2720NoNo
18099404Expandable Implant with Deflectable Sequence of SegmentsJanuary 2023February 2025Allow2510NoNo
18155474MINIMALLY INVASIVE INTERBODY FUSIONJanuary 2023September 2024Allow2010NoNo
18096159LATERAL RETRACTOR SYSTEM FOR MINIMIZING MUSCLE DAMAGE IN SPINAL SURGERYJanuary 2023June 2023Allow520YesNo
18151553ROBOTIC SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR BONE PREPARATION FOR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATIONJanuary 2023June 2025Allow2910NoNo
18148008HIP SURGERY SYSTEMS AND METHODSDecember 2022November 2024Allow2310NoNo
18069620APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR BALANCING A JOINTDecember 2022August 2024Allow2000NoNo
18080160Techniques For Patient-Specific Milling Path GenerationDecember 2022October 2024Allow2210NoNo
18009962DEVICE FOR INDICATING AN ACTIVE COMPONENT OF AN ADJUSTABLE MEDICAL APPARATUSDecember 2022May 2025Allow2911NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
12
Examiner Affirmed
5
(41.7%)
Examiner Reversed
7
(58.3%)
Reversal Percentile
82.7%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 58.3% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
89
Allowed After Appeal Filing
28
(31.5%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
61
(68.5%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
48.2%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 31.5% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J works in Art Unit 3775 and has examined 1,430 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 82.0%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 30 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J's allowance rate of 82.0% places them in the 54% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J receive 1.74 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 37% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J is 30 months. This places the examiner in the 62% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +16.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BECCIA, CHRISTOPHER J. This interview benefit is in the 58% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 34.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 59.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 85% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 125.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 84% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 84.8% of appeals filed. This is in the 78% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.7% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 51.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 50% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.7% of allowed cases (in the 64% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 48% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.