Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18602968 | INTERSPINOUS SPACER WITH A RANGE OF DEPLOYMENT POSITIONS AND METHODS AND SYSTEMS | March 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18103949 | FLEXIBLE INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION CAGE WITH OPENING | January 2023 | January 2025 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18095409 | METHOD OF CONTROLLING SYMPTOMS RELATING TO COVID-19 | January 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17957733 | TREATMENT OF SPINAL INJURY WITH MULTIFOCAL POLYMER | September 2022 | June 2024 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17865736 | ADJUSTABLE SPINAL IMPLANTS, ASSOCIATED INSTRUMENTS AND METHODS | July 2022 | September 2023 | Abandon | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17808538 | SPINAL SURGICAL APPROACH METHOD | June 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17839460 | Modular Bone Anchor Assembly | June 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17752330 | Intervertebral spinal implant systems | May 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17773873 | EXTERNAL CORRECTIVE APPLIANCE | May 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17695296 | DISC PROSTHESIS FOR CONTROLLED FUSION | March 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17542378 | EXPANDABLE INTERBODY IMPLANT DEVICE | December 2021 | January 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17539756 | CONNECTION DEVICE FOR USE WITH EXTENSION MEMBERS OF A BONE ANCHOR | December 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17484304 | ILIAC CREST DISPLACEMENT DEVICE AND METHOD | September 2021 | June 2023 | Abandon | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17398928 | METATARSAL ALIGNMENT APPARATUS | August 2021 | June 2023 | Abandon | 22 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17367892 | DIAGNOSTIC CERVICAL SCANNING AND TREATMENT DEVICE | July 2021 | January 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17414032 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TREATING PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES | June 2021 | January 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17213600 | SPINAL DISC REPLACEMENTS AND METHODS OF MAKING THEREOF | March 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17190438 | MAGNETIC PROSTHETIC NAIL AND METHOD OF IMPLANTATION OF THE SAME | March 2021 | January 2023 | Abandon | 22 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17145081 | EXPANDABLE RETRACTOR BLADE ASSEMBLY | January 2021 | September 2022 | Abandon | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16950795 | Retractor Systems with Sensors | November 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17083677 | ORGAN RETRACTOR | October 2020 | July 2022 | Abandon | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17084158 | EXTERNAL FIXATION DEVICE | October 2020 | February 2023 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17042282 | INSERTION ANGLE-ADJUSTABLE IMPLANT CAGE FOR OBLIQUE LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION SURGERY | September 2020 | February 2023 | Abandon | 29 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16981759 | BONE FIXATION IMPLANT AND METHOD OF IMPLANTATION | September 2020 | February 2023 | Abandon | 29 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16978836 | Ankle (Tibio-Talar) Fusion Nail | September 2020 | August 2022 | Abandon | 23 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16958398 | SPINAL FUSION SYSTEM | June 2020 | September 2022 | Abandon | 27 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16882187 | Bone Implant Having Tether Band | May 2020 | May 2022 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16880810 | POSTERIOR SPINAL FIXATION SCREWS | May 2020 | August 2022 | Abandon | 27 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16818240 | EXTERNAL FIXATION DEVICE | March 2020 | January 2023 | Abandon | 34 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16802695 | SEGMENTED ALIGNMENT ROD ASSEMBLY | February 2020 | March 2022 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16748081 | MULTI-CAP REMOVING-AND-HOLDING INSTRUMENT FOR SPINAL SURGERIES | January 2020 | November 2022 | Abandon | 34 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16734454 | DISPENSING FASTENERS | January 2020 | July 2022 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16723456 | BONE INTRAMEDULLARY FIXATION SCAFFOLD | December 2019 | February 2022 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16680696 | METHOD FOR IMPLANTING A ROD IMPLANT ALONG A SPINE OF A PATIENT | November 2019 | March 2022 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16552184 | SURGICAL PORT ASSEMBLIES AND METHODS | August 2019 | August 2021 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16537399 | PERCUTANEOUS ACCESS DEVICES AND BONE ANCHOR ASSEMBLIES | August 2019 | November 2019 | Abandon | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16485037 | SURGICAL IMPLANT SYSTEM FOR TREATING FIFTH METATARSAL JONES FRACTURES | August 2019 | June 2022 | Abandon | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16480559 | AXIALLY PRECISE SCREWDRIVER | July 2019 | February 2023 | Abandon | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16441951 | Biomaterial Delivery Device, And Related Systems And Methods | June 2019 | November 2021 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16238160 | PIVOTAL BONE ANCHOR ASSEMBLY WITH SNAP-IN-PLACE BIASING BUSHING FOR PRE-LOCK FRICTION FIT | January 2019 | April 2019 | Abandon | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16093034 | SPINAL INSTRUMENTATION TO ENHANCE OSTEOGENESIS AND FUSION | October 2018 | September 2022 | Abandon | 48 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 16135754 | DYNAMIC STABILIZATION SYSTEM | September 2018 | October 2020 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15665567 | CONFORMING BONE STABILIZATION RECEIVER | August 2017 | April 2018 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15618499 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING VERTEBRAL REDUCTION USING A SLEEVE | June 2017 | May 2018 | Allow | 11 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15357053 | SPINAL ROD REDUCTION SYSTEM | November 2016 | October 2018 | Abandon | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14918198 | BONE FIXATION TENSIONING TOOL AND METHOD | October 2015 | December 2018 | Abandon | 37 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14586487 | Fixation System, An Intramedullary Fixation Assembly and Method of Use | December 2014 | October 2018 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13625694 | JOINT ARTHROPLASTY DEVICES AND SURGICAL TOOLS | September 2012 | June 2013 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13405797 | JOINT ARTHROPLASTY DEVICES AND SURGICAL TOOLS | February 2012 | August 2015 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12777809 | METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR ARTICULAR REPAIR | May 2010 | September 2014 | Allow | 52 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12135603 | PATIENT SELECTABLE JOINT ARTHROPLASTY DEVICES AND SURGICAL TOOLS | June 2008 | May 2011 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10675864 | INTRAMEDULLARY IMPLANT FOR FRACTURE FIXATION | September 2003 | January 2006 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner ROBERT, EDUARDO C works in Art Unit 3773 and has examined 51 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 29.4%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 28 months.
Examiner ROBERT, EDUARDO C's allowance rate of 29.4% places them in the 2% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by ROBERT, EDUARDO C receive 1.71 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 49% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ROBERT, EDUARDO C is 28 months. This places the examiner in the 54% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +31.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ROBERT, EDUARDO C. This interview benefit is in the 83% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 17.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 8% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 25.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 26% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 66.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 85% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 2.0% of allowed cases (in the 77% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 41% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.