USPTO Examiner JOHANAS JACQUELINE T - Art Unit 3773

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19274513INTRAMEDULLARY BONE FIXATION DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODSJuly 2025November 2025Allow400YesNo
19272751RECEIVING PART OF A BONE ANCHORING DEVICE AND SYSTEM INCLUDING THE RECEIVING PART AND AT LEAST ONE INSTRUMENTJuly 2025March 2026Allow810NoNo
19265048Systems And Methods For Spinal FixationJuly 2025September 2025Allow300NoNo
18963672AUGMENTED REALITY (AR)-ASSISTED ENHANCED FRACTURE REDUCTION FIXATORNovember 2024February 2026Allow1510NoNo
18920849EXPANDABLE CORPECTOMY MODULAR ENDPLATE CONNECTIONOctober 2024March 2026Allow1710NoNo
18882825INTERBODY FUSION SYSTEMSeptember 2024March 2026Allow1810NoNo
18651109DISTRACTING AND ANGLING EXPANDABLE INTERBODY DEVICEApril 2024September 2025Allow1700NoNo
18639345Micro RetractorApril 2024January 2026Allow2110NoNo
18701015FRICTION-FIT IMPLANTABLE DEVICES AND ASSEMBLIESApril 2024November 2025Allow1910YesNo
18612547Universal Fixator ClampMarch 2024January 2026Allow2210NoNo
18612626SURGICAL RETRACTOR ASSEMBLYMarch 2024September 2025Allow1810NoNo
18611032COUPLING DEVICE FOR COUPLING A ROD TO A BONE ANCHOR AND SYSTEM OF SUCH A COUPLING DEVICE AND AT LEAST TWO BONE ANCHORSMarch 2024September 2025Allow1800YesNo
18690731A POLYAXIAL SPINAL SCREWMarch 2024October 2025Allow1910NoNo
18597447VERTEBRAL IMPLANT FOR DYNAMIC STABILIZATIONMarch 2024February 2026Allow2410YesNo
18597360PECTUS BAR AND STABILIZER DEVICES AND METHODSMarch 2024November 2025Allow2110NoNo
18594351RETRACTOR DEVICEMarch 2024January 2026Abandon2310NoNo
18590184INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL WITH AUTOMATIC DYNAMIZATION AND CONTINUOUS COMPRESSIONFebruary 2024January 2026Allow2310NoNo
18581887COMPRESSION FASTENER, INSTRUMENTS AND METHODSFebruary 2024January 2026Abandon2310NoNo
18539915SURGICAL RETRACTORDecember 2023September 2025Allow2110NoNo
18569442SELF-COUNTERSINKING BONE FASTENER AND METHOD FOR COUNTERSINKING A BONE FASTENER USED IN CONNECTION WITH AN ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTDecember 2023August 2025Allow2010YesNo
16110246MULTIPLE SPINAL SURGICAL PATHWAYS SYSTEMS AND METHODSAugust 2018January 2020Allow1710NoNo
16100539INSERTER FOR EXPANDING BODY TISSUEAugust 2018February 2020Allow1810NoNo
16050820DILATION SYSTEMJuly 2018October 2019Allow1510NoNo
16020119DEVICES AND METHODS FOR INSERTING A VERTEBRAL FIXATION MEMBERJune 2018October 2019Allow1510YesNo
16018368ELASTIC MEMBER CLAMPSJune 2018October 2019Allow1610NoNo
16010626CLAMP IMPLANT FOR POSTERIOR ARCH OF THE ATLASJune 2018December 2019Allow1810YesNo
16010405Porous Spinal Fusion ImplantJune 2018February 2020Allow2010NoNo
15933036SURGICAL TISSUE PROTECTION SHEATHMarch 2018September 2019Allow1810YesNo
15787019TRANS-ILIAC CONNECTOROctober 2017January 2020Allow2721NoNo
15729964SPINAL CORRECTION SYSTEM ACTUATORSOctober 2017January 2020Allow2811NoNo
15723229EXPANDABLE VERTEBRAL IMPLANTOctober 2017August 2019Allow2210NoNo
15722440ORTHOPEDIC CLAMP AND EXTENSION RODOctober 2017November 2019Allow2520YesNo
15704360Expandable Interspinous Process Spacer ImplantSeptember 2017February 2019Allow1700YesNo
15677981SPINAL FUSION IMPLANT AND RELATED METHODSAugust 2017February 2019Allow1800YesNo
15672786INTERSPINOUS IMPLANTS WITH DEPLOYABLE WINGAugust 2017October 2019Allow2620NoNo
15662995DEVICES AND METHODS FOR INSERTING A VERTEBRAL FIXATION MEMBERJuly 2017June 2019Allow2321YesNo
15650336IMPLANT FOR IMMOBILIZING CERVICAL VERTEBRAEJuly 2017August 2018Allow1310YesNo
15540558INTERVERTEBRAL DISTRACTORJune 2017August 2018Allow1310YesNo
15620206SPINAL STABILIZATION SYSTEMJune 2017December 2019Allow3050YesNo
15604199SPINAL DISTRACTION SYSTEMMay 2017November 2019Allow3731YesNo
15604322Bone Anchor with Deployable Purchase ElementMay 2017August 2019Allow2720YesNo
15529023ELECTRONIC LARYNGOSCOPEMay 2017May 2019Allow2410YesNo
15601713SPINAL IMPLANT SYSTEM AND METHODMay 2017December 2019Allow3140YesNo
15599789Interphalangeal arthrodesis implantMay 2017August 2019Allow2730YesNo
15600691Bone Anchor DeviceMay 2017April 2019Allow2310YesNo
15595292SUBCUTANEOUS IMPLANTABLE DEVICE FOR GRADUALLY ALIGNING A SPINEMay 2017October 2018Allow1711YesNo
15526764INTRAMEDULLARY NAILMay 2017April 2019Allow2320NoNo
15594586MULTIPLE DIAMETER SPINAL ROD CLAMPING MECHANISMMay 2017January 2019Abandon2011NoNo
15525975SECURE GUIDE DEVICEMay 2017February 2019Abandon2120NoNo
15483846DEFORMABLE DEVICE FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE FIXATIONApril 2017April 2019Allow2411YesNo
15481408SURGICAL SKULL CLAMPApril 2017March 2019Abandon2311NoNo
15463128BONE FIXING SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USEMarch 2017November 2018Abandon2010NoNo
15453153OCCIPITAL FIXATION ASSEMBLY, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ATTACHING THE SAMEMarch 2017March 2019Allow2420YesNo
15432631Magnetically Actuateable Rod Insertion for Minimally Invasive SurgeryFebruary 2017June 2019Allow2821NoNo
15432647Post-Operatively Adjustable Spinal Fixation DevicesFebruary 2017May 2019Abandon2711YesNo
15418130Combined Intramedullary - Extramedullary Bone Stabilization and Alignment SystemJanuary 2017August 2019Allow3121YesNo
15402903INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT DEVICES AND METHODS FOR INSERTION THEREOFJanuary 2017September 2018Allow2021YesNo
15394156Method and Apparatus for Performing Spinal SurgeryDecember 2016August 2018Allow2010NoNo
15359365Systems and Methods for Correcting Spinal DeformitiesNovember 2016June 2019Allow3020YesNo
15354609Trocar SupportNovember 2016May 2019Allow3011YesNo
15333012FIXATION SCREW ASSEMBLYOctober 2016May 2019Allow3110YesNo
15296429SPINAL IMPLANT WITH ATTACHMENT SYSTEMOctober 2016July 2018Allow2130YesNo
15283728INTERVERTEBRAL PROSTHETIC DISC WITH SHOCK ABSORPTION COREOctober 2016September 2019Abandon3520NoNo
15274570EXPANDABLE VERTEBRAL IMPLANTSeptember 2016March 2019Allow3021NoNo
15263604EXPANDABLE INTERBODY IMPLANT AND METHODS OF USESeptember 2016September 2018Allow2421YesNo
15245664METHOD OF PLACING AN IMPLANT BETWEEN BONE PORTIONSAugust 2016September 2018Allow2510YesNo
15243218GROWING ROD FOR TREATING SPINAL DEFORMITIES AND METHOD FOR USING SAMEAugust 2016October 2018Allow2620NoNo
15232537SPINAL IMPLANT SYSTEM AND METHODAugust 2016May 2019Allow3321YesNo
15117318BONE SCREW ASSEMBLYAugust 2016May 2019Allow3430NoNo
15230993INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANTAugust 2016September 2019Allow3741YesNo
15116789CERVICAL MINIMAL ACCESS FUSION SYSTEMAugust 2016May 2019Allow3430YesNo
15228019REVISION CONNECTORS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS THEREOFAugust 2016April 2019Allow3221NoNo
15226011MIS CROSS-CONNECTORAugust 2016April 2019Allow3211NoNo
15225537ARCUATE FIXATION MEMBERAugust 2016June 2018Allow2231YesNo
15222042LAMINA PLATE ASSEMBLYJuly 2016January 2020Allow4250YesNo
15220014SPINAL IMPLANTSJuly 2016December 2018Allow4120YesNo
15217584PRE-PACKED CORPECTOMY DEVICE TO IMPROVE FUSIONJuly 2016October 2018Allow2630YesNo
15212373PLASTICALLY DEFORMABLE INTER-OSSEOUS DEVICEJuly 2016July 2018Allow2410NoNo
15200459ADJUSTABLE SPINE DISTRACTION IMPLANTJuly 2016September 2019Allow3930YesNo
15174814PEDICLE SCREW WITH TULIPJune 2016August 2019Allow3930NoNo
15147328Surgery ManipulatorMay 2016April 2019Allow3650NoNo
15138722DYNAMIC EXTERNAL FIXATOR AND METHODS FOR USEApril 2016August 2018Allow2810YesNo
15068836NON-FUSION SCOLIOSIS EXPANDABLE SPINAL RODMarch 2016September 2019Allow4321YesNo
15067884INTERBODY BONE IMPLANT DEVICEMarch 2016July 2019Allow4031YesNo
15058186EXPANDABLE VERTEBRAL IMPLANTMarch 2016July 2018Allow2830NoNo
15053726METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TREATING A BONE FRACTUREFebruary 2016August 2018Allow2901YesNo
14997014Intervertebral Implant with Fixation GeometryJanuary 2016August 2019Allow4360YesNo
14997038DISTRACTION TUBE WITH WIRE CLAMPJanuary 2016September 2019Allow4450YesNo
14994697SPINAL IMPLANT WITH FLUID DELIVERY CAPABILITIESJanuary 2016November 2019Allow4641YesNo
14993888POLYAXIAL SCREW AND ROD SYSTEMJanuary 2016August 2018Allow3120YesNo
14978685SPINAL IMPLANT SYSTEM AND METHODDecember 2015June 2018Allow3010NoNo
14925571DEVICES AND METHODS FOR MONOAXIAL SCREW CONVERSIONOctober 2015May 2019Allow4310YesNo
14785017TELESCOPING RETRACTOR HOLDEROctober 2015September 2019Allow4840YesNo
14881507VERTEBRAL IMPLANTS AND METHODS FOR INSTALLATION THEREOFOctober 2015March 2019Allow4140NoNo
14783882REVISION ASSEMBLY FOR AN ITEM OF VERTEBRAL OSTEOSYNTHESIS EQUIPMENTOctober 2015January 2019Abandon4030YesNo
14861649SPINAL IMPLANT SYSTEM AND METHODSeptember 2015July 2018Allow3321YesNo
14829040APPARATUS AND DEVICES FOR PERCUTANEOUSLY EXTENDING AN EXISTING SPINAL CONSTRUCTAugust 2015June 2019Allow4630YesNo
14823606SUPRAPATELLAR INSERTION SYSTEM, KIT AND METHODAugust 2015June 2018Allow3511YesNo
14819380ILLUMINATING SURGICAL DEVICEAugust 2015January 2019Allow4121NoNo
14796302Stand Alone Intervertebral Fusion DeviceJuly 2015March 2020Abandon5661YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
8
Examiner Affirmed
5
(62.5%)
Examiner Reversed
3
(37.5%)
Reversal Percentile
59.5%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 37.5% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
8
Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(37.5%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
5
(62.5%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
62.3%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 37.5% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T works in Art Unit 3773 and has examined 112 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 89.3%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 32 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T's allowance rate of 89.3% places them in the 71% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T receive 2.83 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 82% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T is 32 months. This places the examiner in the 53% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +8.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by JOHANAS, JACQUELINE T. This interview benefit is in the 38% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 28.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 22% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 46.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 92.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 89% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.9% of allowed cases (in the 66% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 2.0% of allowed cases (in the 68% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.