USPTO Examiner HAMMOND ELLEN CHRISTINA - Art Unit 3773

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19169790COUPLING DEVICE FOR COUPLING A ROD TO A BONE ANCHORApril 2025October 2025Allow611NoNo
19023889Resorptive Intramedullary Implant Between Two Bones or Two Bone FragmentsJanuary 2025May 2025Allow410YesNo
19023819Resorptive Intramedullary Implant Between Two Bones or Two Bone FragmentsJanuary 2025June 2025Allow520YesNo
18962484BONE ANCHOR BASED RETRACTOR/DISTRACTORNovember 2024March 2026Allow1500YesNo
18943046MULTI-CLAMP APPARATUS FOR EXTERNAL BONE FIXATORNovember 2024March 2026Allow1600NoNo
18943039HINGE APPARATUS FOR EXTERNAL BONE FIXATORNovember 2024January 2026Allow1410NoNo
18827709POLYAXIAL PEDICLE SCREW ASSEMBLY WITH CANNULATED SCREW SHANK HAVING AN INTERNAL DRIVE SOCKET SURROUNDED BY A PLANAR TOP END SURFACESeptember 2024July 2025Allow1011NoNo
18799592INTEGRATED EXPANDABLE INTERBODY SPACER (IEIS)August 2024December 2025Allow1610YesNo
18770767Resorptive Intramedullary Implant Between Two Bones or Two Bone FragmentsJuly 2024October 2025Allow1510YesNo
18745132INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANTS, INSTRUMENTS, AND METHODSJune 2024October 2025Allow1611NoNo
18653281EXPANDABLE INTERVERTEBRAL CAGE IMPLANTMay 2024February 2026Allow2211NoNo
18704209ORTHOPEDIC FIXATION DEVICE WITH LAG SCREW AND COMPRESSION SCREWApril 2024August 2025Allow1610YesNo
18629688MINIMALLY INVASIVE COMPLIANT DEVICES FOR TOTAL LUMBAR DISC REPLACEMENTApril 2024August 2025Allow1600NoNo
18696965SPINAL FIXATION TOOL, SYSTEM AND METHODMarch 2024October 2024Allow700NoNo
18692522IMPROVED BONE ANCHOR AND BONE ANCHOR INSERTION TOOLMarch 2024December 2025Abandon2101NoNo
18444119INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT AND TOOL ASSEMBLYFebruary 2024October 2025Allow2011YesNo
18438270BONE ANCHOR ASSEMBLIES WITH INTERCHANGEABLE AND DIFFERENT LOCKING THREADED CLOSURESFebruary 2024June 2025Allow1600NoNo
18407714Intubation deviceJanuary 2024October 2025Allow2110NoNo
18406445PEDICLE SCREW STABILIZATION SYSTEMS AND INSTRUMENTSJanuary 2024December 2025Allow2411NoNo
18397857METHODS FOR IMPROVING SPINAL ALIGNMENT AND MOTIONDecember 2023July 2025Allow1811NoNo
18527164SPINAL IMPLANT AND DELIVERY SYSTEMDecember 2023July 2025Allow1901NoNo
18504077SHIELD FOR SPINAL DEFECTNovember 2023August 2024Allow1021YesNo
18495753BIO-FLEXIBLE SPINAL IMPLANT HAVING DETACHABLE HEAD MODULE AND ASSEMBLY THEREOFOctober 2023August 2025Allow2210NoNo
18556413SURGICAL INSERTION GUIDEOctober 2023October 2025Allow2410NoNo
18371426METHODS FOR RESTORING BILATERAL SPINAL ALIGNMENT AND/OR RANGE OF MOTIONSeptember 2023January 2026Allow2810NoNo
18464949DRIVE INSTRUMENTS WITH RETENTION MECHANISMS, MEDICAL IMPLANTS, AND RELATED TECHNOLOGIESSeptember 2023October 2025Allow2501NoNo
18464451ADJUSTABLE TETHER IMPLANTSeptember 2023August 2025Allow2401NoNo
18462275PIVOTABLE BONE ANCHOR ASSEMBLY WITH INDEPENDENT PROVISIONAL LOCKING BY INSERT COMPRESSING MEMBERSeptember 2023February 2025Allow1711YesNo
18458318SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TISSUE REMOVALAugust 2023April 2025Allow2000NoNo
18236924METHODS AND DEVICES FOR ALTERING SPINAL LORDOSIS AND/OR KYPHOSIS DURING SPINAL FUSIONAugust 2023April 2025Allow2000NoNo
18232557TOTAL SPINAL JOINT SYSTEMS WITH DISSIMILAR BEARING MATERIALSAugust 2023November 2025Abandon2710NoNo
18232103DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO ALTER SPINAL ALIGNMENTAugust 2023October 2025Abandon2710NoNo
18229149DEVICES AND METHODS FOR ALTERING SPINAL LATERAL CURVATUREAugust 2023March 2025Allow2000NoNo
18350069METHOD OF ASSEMBLING A PIVOTAL BONE ANCHOR ASSEMBLY WITH SNAP-IN-PLACE BUSHINGJuly 2023January 2024Allow610NoNo
18332665BONE ANCHOR ASSEMBLIES WITH INTERCHANGEABLE AND DIFFERENT LOCKING THREADED CLOSURESJune 2023November 2023Allow501NoNo
18317676PIVOTAL BONE ANCHOR ASSEMBLY HAVING THREADED RECEIVER LOWER OPENING AND SHANK HEADMay 2023November 2025Abandon3001NoNo
18128724Tissue Retraction And Vertebral Displacement Devices, Systems, And Methods For Posterior Spinal FusionMarch 2023October 2025Allow3111YesNo
18124908Medical Device Employing a Coaxial Screw Gear Sleeve MechanismMarch 2023August 2025Allow2910YesNo
18182828POSTERIOR STABILIZATION SYSTEMS AND METHODSMarch 2023October 2025Abandon3110NoNo
18120042UNIVERSAL CLAMP APPARATUS FOR BONE FIXATION DEVICEMarch 2023June 2025Allow2711NoNo
18108625Implant for BoneFebruary 2023October 2025Allow3211YesNo
18106737EXPANDABLE IMPLANT ASSEMBLYFebruary 2023June 2025Allow2810YesNo
18162647PIVOTAL BONE ANCHOR ASSEMBLY HAVING TWIST-IN-PLACE INSERT AND RECEIVER WITH PRE-FORMED AXIAL ROTATION INSERT STOPSJanuary 2023May 2024Allow1500NoNo
18018512Specimen Retrieval DeviceJanuary 2023September 2025Allow3210NoNo
18099736SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE SHAPE OF SPINAL RODS AND SPINAL INTERBODY DEVICES FOR USE WITH AUGMENTED REALITY DISPLAYS, NAVIGATION SYSTEMS AND ROBOTS IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINE PROCEDURESJanuary 2023June 2025Allow2901NoNo
18098642Two-Piece Spine Implant Installation Instrument For Use With An Endoscope And Method Of UseJanuary 2023August 2025Allow3111YesNo
18071600Capped Distraction/Compression Rod SystemNovember 2022October 2025Abandon3510NoNo
17968622SPINAL CORRECTION TENSIONING SYSTEMOctober 2022March 2026Allow4121NoNo
17996308IMPROVED LINEAR FIBULAR NAILOctober 2022October 2025Abandon3611NoNo
18045899TISSUE RETRACTOR AND METHOD OF USEOctober 2022November 2024Allow2500NoNo
17961809Expandable Spinal Implant Apparatus And Method Of UseOctober 2022July 2025Allow3411YesNo
17935241UNI-PLANER BONE FIXATION ASSEMBLYSeptember 2022July 2025Allow3311NoNo
17933430PIVOTAL BONE ANCHOR ASSEMBLY WITH POLYAXIAL SCREW HAVING FRUSTO-CONICAL UPPER SURFACESeptember 2022December 2022Allow300YesNo
17931989CAGE FOR MINIMAL INVASIVE SURGERYSeptember 2022April 2025Abandon3110NoNo
17930113LAMINA PLATE ASSEMBLYSeptember 2022October 2025Abandon3821NoNo
17897882RETRACTOR FOR SPINAL SURGERYAugust 2022November 2025Allow3911NoNo
17822147Lumbar vertebrae fusion device with internal extension mechanismAugust 2022December 2024Allow2710NoNo
17821939SCREW TOWER AND ROD REDUCTION TOOLAugust 2022January 2025Allow2901NoNo
17881573FIXATED INTERVERTEBRAL MESH IMPLANT AND METHODAugust 2022October 2025Allow3821NoNo
17881298PERCUTANEOUS ACCESS PATHWAY SYSTEMAugust 2022February 2025Allow3010NoNo
17877021Retractor Tool Apparatus and Method of ManipulationJuly 2022December 2025Allow4131YesNo
17815698EXPANDABLE VERTEBRAL PROSTHESISJuly 2022September 2024Allow2600NoNo
17871864HEIGHT-EXPANDABLE SPINAL CAGEJuly 2022February 2025Allow3111NoNo
17813856INTRAMEDULLARY FIXATION DEVICE WITH SHAPE LOCKING INTERFACEJuly 2022March 2026Allow4421YesNo
17861164RETRACTORSJuly 2022August 2025Allow3711NoNo
17809350MINIMALLY INVASIVE INSTRUMENT SET, DEVICES, AND RELATED METHODSJune 2022June 2025Allow3621NoNo
17849053IRIS EXPANDERJune 2022March 2025Allow3311NoNo
17848435INTERNAL FIXATION SYSTEM FOR ANATOMICAL REDUCTION OF FRACTURED VERTEBRAL BODY OF SPINE AND INTRAVERTEBRAL BONE GRAFTINGJune 2022April 2025Allow3420NoNo
17843034BOTTOM LOADED PEDICLE SCREWJune 2022January 2025Allow3110YesNo
17840746SPINAL FIXATION SYSTEM AND METHODJune 2022October 2025Allow4011NoNo
17834781PIVOTAL BONE ANCHOR ASSEMBLY WITH SNAP-IN-PLACE PRE-LOCK FRICTION FIT BUSHINGJune 2022July 2023Allow1311NoNo
17732063ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT AUGMENTSApril 2022November 2024Allow3110YesNo
17729234SPINAL ANCHORING SYSTEMApril 2022December 2024Allow3220YesNo
17659931TISSUE RETRACTOR DEVICEApril 2022November 2024Abandon3121YesNo
17754918IMPLANT WITH INTRAMEDULLARY PORTION AND VARIABLE ANGLE EXTRAMEDULLARY PORTIONApril 2022February 2025Allow3411NoNo
17718893ENDOSCOPIC IMAGING SYSTEMApril 2022January 2023Abandon911YesNo
17754684VARIABLE VERTEBRAL CAGEApril 2022June 2025Allow3830YesNo
17706873INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT AND TOOL ASSEMBLYMarch 2022December 2023Allow2141YesNo
17655156SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LAPIDUS REPAIR OF BUNIONSMarch 2022March 2025Allow3620NoNo
17653560TETHERED RESTRAINT OF VERTEBRAL BODIESMarch 2022January 2025Allow3401NoNo
17665146POLYAXIAL PEDICLE SCREWFebruary 2022May 2023Allow1610NoNo
17665311PIVOTAL BONE ANCHOR ASSEMBLY HAVING A THREADED SHANK HEAD AND A THREADED RECEIVER LOWER OPENINGFebruary 2022February 2023Allow1210NoNo
17569832COUPLING DEVICE FOR COUPLING A ROD TO A BONE ANCHORJanuary 2022January 2025Allow3621YesNo
17557419INTERBODY CAGE AND METHOD OF INSERTIONDecember 2021December 2024Abandon3611NoNo
17553136DISTRIBUTING GRAFT MATERIAL FROM AN EXPANDABLE CAGEDecember 2021May 2025Allow4111NoNo
17616265ANCHORING DEVICE FOR USE IN SPINAL DEFORMITY CORRECTION SURGERYDecember 2021March 2025Allow4011NoNo
17504239INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANTS, INSTRUMENTS, AND METHODSOctober 2021December 2024Allow3811YesNo
17492353Bone anchor based retractor/distractorOctober 2021June 2024Abandon3310NoNo
17488395INTRA-CORPORAL TELESCOPIC OSTEODISTRACTION DEVICE, AN EXTRA CORPORAL FORCE PRODUCING DEVICE, A METHOD FOR BONE LENGTHENING AND A BONE LENGTHENING ARRANGEMENTSeptember 2021April 2024Allow3100NoNo
17442074IMPLANTABLE EXPANDABLE BONE SUPPORT DEVICESeptember 2021February 2025Allow4121NoNo
17480193Lateral Spondylolisthesis Reduction CageSeptember 2021January 2025Allow4011NoNo
17439850Set Screw and Set Screw Driving Tool for Improved Rod AlignmentSeptember 2021November 2024Allow3811NoNo
17473060PIVOTAL BONE ANCHOR ASSEMBLY WITH RECEIVER HAVING VERTICAL TOOL ENGAGEMENT GROOVESeptember 2021April 2022Allow710NoNo
17464769Rod Inserter And Rod With Reduced Diameter EndSeptember 2021August 2024Allow3620YesNo
17446335IMPLANTS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS OF USEAugust 2021September 2024Allow3621NoNo
17446391INTERSPINOUS PROCESS FUSION DEVICE AND METHOD OF USEAugust 2021July 2024Allow3510NoNo
17391158DUAL EXPANDING SPINAL IMPLANT, SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF USEAugust 2021December 2021Allow400YesNo
17443388MATRIX IMPLANTJuly 2021July 2024Allow3620NoNo
17382782Screw Tower and Rod Reduction ToolJuly 2021May 2022Allow1010NoNo
17380897EXPANDABLE FUSION DEVICE WITH INDEPENDENT EXPANSION SYSTEMSJuly 2021February 2025Allow4331NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner HAMMOND, ELLEN CHRISTINA.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
1
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
79.2%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
12
Allowed After Appeal Filing
4
(33.3%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
8
(66.7%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
55.4%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 33.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner HAMMOND, ELLEN CHRISTINA - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner HAMMOND, ELLEN CHRISTINA works in Art Unit 3773 and has examined 346 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 83.2%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 31 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner HAMMOND, ELLEN CHRISTINA's allowance rate of 83.2% places them in the 57% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by HAMMOND, ELLEN CHRISTINA receive 1.83 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 42% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HAMMOND, ELLEN CHRISTINA is 31 months. This places the examiner in the 58% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +12.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by HAMMOND, ELLEN CHRISTINA. This interview benefit is in the 48% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 28.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 53% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 62.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 87% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 22% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 80.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 73% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 25.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 57.1% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 2.3% of allowed cases (in the 76% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 2.8% of allowed cases (in the 73% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.