USPTO Examiner KEASEL ERIC S - Art Unit 3753

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18892939QUICK-CLEANING DRAIN FOR QUICK REPLACEMENT OF CLEANING PARTSSeptember 2024February 2025Allow410NoNo
18775721VALVE MEMBER INCLUDING CAVITY, AND RELATED ASSEMBLIES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODSJuly 2024February 2025Allow711NoNo
18644085METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF GAS PIPE WELLS BASED ON SMART GAS INTERNET OF THINGSApril 2024September 2024Allow500NoNo
18696470IMPROVED DOUBLE SAFETY VALVEMarch 2024May 2025Allow1400NoNo
18440771NEGATIVE PRESSURE SWITCHING OF LIQUIDFebruary 2024April 2025Allow1400NoNo
18407087WATER VALVE UTILIZING PUSH-PULL HANDLE TO CONTROL WATER FLOW THERETHROUGHJanuary 2024April 2024Allow310NoNo
18539077QUICK-CLEANING DRAIN FOR QUICK REPLACEMENT OF CLEANING PARTSDecember 2023July 2024Allow710NoNo
18469218VALVE DEVICESeptember 2023March 2025Allow1800NoNo
18272867DRIVE DEVICE, CONTROL VALVE, AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING DRIVE DEVICEJuly 2023October 2024Allow1500NoNo
18351799GAS GOVERNORJuly 2023September 2024Allow1400NoNo
18271398WATER AND SEAFOOD FLOW DISTRIBUTORJuly 2023April 2025Allow2210NoNo
18208569APPARATUS FOR DELIVERY AND RETRACTION OF FLUIDSJune 2023October 2024Allow1600NoNo
18202824ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED REGULATORMay 2023December 2024Allow1910NoNo
18038020CONTROL VALVE AND THERMAL MANAGEMENT ASSEMBLYMay 2023June 2025Allow2510NoNo
18036846FLOW DIVIDER AND FLUID LINE SYSTEM FORMED BY SAMEMay 2023July 2024Allow1500NoNo
18034604VALVE DEVICE FOR FUEL TANKApril 2023July 2024Allow1500NoNo
18250788ELECTRICALLY OPERATED VALVEApril 2023September 2024Allow1701NoNo
18030759DISTRIBUTOR ASSEMBLY, IN PARTICULAR FOR A SEPARATION UNIT OF A MODULAR PROCESS DEVICE ARRANGEMENTApril 2023May 2025Allow2510NoNo
18245312TANK DEVICE FOR STORING A GASEOUS MEDIUM, COMPRISING A VALVE DEVICEMarch 2023May 2024Allow1400NoNo
18181959MODULAR MULTl-DIRECTIONAL GAS MIXING BLOCKMarch 2023January 2025Allow2200NoNo
18111521Valve TrimFebruary 2023September 2024Allow1911NoNo
18164321VALVE CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHODFebruary 2023May 2025Allow2720NoNo
18101632ELECTROMAGNETIC DISTRIBUTOR AND TOILETJanuary 2023December 2024Allow2200NoNo
18062114FLAPPER SERVO VALVEDecember 2022September 2024Allow2201NoNo
18059836THERMAL MANAGEMENT VALVENovember 2022December 2024Allow2511NoNo
18053050HOUSING UNIT FOR A HYDRAULIC VALVE AND HYDRAULIC VALVENovember 2022April 2025Allow2911YesNo
17968683REGULATOR VALVE ASSEMBLY AND COMPONENTS THEREOFOctober 2022November 2024Allow2501NoNo
17940155FUEL TANK ISOLATION VALVE OR VEHICLESeptember 2022October 2023Allow1410NoNo
17821692SYSTEM FOR STORING A RADIOACTIVE SALT SOLUTIONAugust 2022August 2024Allow2400NoNo
17819056DRIVE UNIT FOR GATE VALVEAugust 2022June 2023Allow1000NoNo
17880231SOLENOID VALVEAugust 2022November 2023Allow1620NoNo
17813179GAS VALVE ASSEMBLYJuly 2022November 2024Allow2821NoNo
17860499PNEUMATIC INLET/BLOWDOWN VALVE ASSEMBLYJuly 2022July 2023Allow6000NoNo
17855778ELECTRICALLY OPERATED WATER VALVE AND APPLICATION OF ELECTRICALLY OPERATED WATER VALVE ON ELECTRIC APPLIANCEJune 2022August 2023Allow1310NoNo
17789502VALVE ACTUATORJune 2022January 2023Allow700NoNo
17824948CAVITATION REDUCTION VALVE STRUCTURE USING BYPASS DISPERSION VALVEMay 2022April 2023Allow1100NoNo
17824659VALVE DEVICE AND SYSTEM IN WHICH THE VALVE DEVICE IS MOUNTEDMay 2022September 2024Allow2710YesNo
17751317Solenoid ValveMay 2022June 2024Allow2530YesNo
17732904Magnetic Force Compensator for a Pneumatic PositionerApril 2022April 2025Allow3611NoNo
17730005INTEGRATED CONTROL CIRCUITRY AND COIL ASSEMBLY FOR IRRIGATION CONTROLApril 2022February 2025Allow3420NoNo
17723323INTEGRATED CONTROL CIRCUITRY AND COIL ASSEMBLY FOR IRRIGATION CONTROLApril 2022August 2024Allow2820NoNo
17716584POSITIONING VALVE CONTROL SYSTEMApril 2022May 2024Allow2501NoNo
17706616MULTIPLE STORAGE TANK SYSTEMMarch 2022August 2024Allow2810NoNo
17706571VALVE BODY STRUCTUREMarch 2022October 2023Abandon1910NoNo
17699188ELECTROMAGNETIC VALVEMarch 2022June 2023Allow1510NoNo
17695773Serviceable Temperature Protection System for Faucet and Method of Using SameMarch 2022August 2024Abandon2910NoNo
17694673VALVE TORQUE CONTROL SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOFMarch 2022July 2022Allow410NoNo
17690470VACUUM VALVEMarch 2022May 2024Allow2711NoNo
17674507VALVE UNITFebruary 2022December 2022Allow1000NoNo
17589574Proportional Solenoid ValveJanuary 2022October 2023Allow2010NoNo
17570130VALVE ACTUATORJanuary 2022May 2024Allow2900NoNo
17524816PRESSURE CONTROL VALVE, A FLUID HANDLING STRUCTURE FOR LITHOGRAPHIC APPARATUS AND A LITHOGRAPHIC APPARATUSNovember 2021January 2025Allow3821NoNo
17517995VALVE ARRANGEMENTNovember 2021September 2022Allow1100NoNo
17517996EFFICIENT MECHANICAL GENERATION OF CAVITATION IN LIQUIDSNovember 2021August 2024Allow3310NoNo
17514324ADJUSTABLE VALVE ACTUATOROctober 2021January 2025Allow3811NoNo
17507222INVERSION INHIBITOR FOR FLUID CONTROL VALVE AND METHODS OF FLUID CONTROLOctober 2021December 2024Allow3820YesNo
17507209TOP DRIVE VALVE STOP ASSEMBLYOctober 2021May 2025Abandon4320NoNo
17489748VALVE DEVICESeptember 2021August 2022Allow1100NoNo
17486915ELECTROMAGNETIC VALVESeptember 2021September 2022Allow1210NoNo
17486914ELECTROMAGNETIC VALVESeptember 2021June 2022Allow900NoNo
17482410TWO-STAGE VALVE ASSEMBLYSeptember 2021March 2024Allow3010NoNo
17465644VALVE CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHODSeptember 2021March 2024Allow3101NoNo
17458145PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE WITH AN INTEGRAL VENTURIAugust 2021July 2023Allow2300NoNo
17289925ROTOR DEVICE, VALVE AND METHOD FOR ASSEMBLING A ROTOR DEVICEJuly 2021April 2024Allow3611NoNo
17381547FAUCET HANDLE WITH ANGLED INTERFACEJuly 2021March 2024Allow3211NoNo
17382235MICROCHANNEL VALVE APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHODJuly 2021April 2025Allow4421YesNo
17376265VALVEJuly 2021June 2022Allow1110YesNo
17372610Valve Having a Poppet with a Soft Seal and Features Enhancing Life of the Soft SealJuly 2021June 2022Allow1110YesNo
17372214HVAC ACTUATORJuly 2021March 2024Allow3211NoNo
17369042SMART SOLENOID VALVEJuly 2021May 2023Allow2311NoNo
17340849PREACTION SPRINKLER VALVE ASSEMBLIES, RELATED DRY SPRINKLER DEVICES AND FIRE PROTECTION SPRINKLER SYSTEMSJune 2021September 2022Allow1510NoNo
17326539DETECTING VACUUM PRESURE AND ANOMALOUS CYLCING IN A VACUUM SEWER SYSTEMMay 2021January 2024Abandon3201NoNo
17326519CONTROLLING A VACUUM VALVE IN A SEWAGE PITMay 2021December 2023Abandon3101NoNo
17326318APPARATUS FOR DELIVERY AND RETRACTION OF FLUIDSMay 2021January 2022Allow820NoNo
17324137TWO-DIMENSIONAL MOTOR AND SERVO VALVEMay 2021December 2023Allow3110NoNo
17318057ELECTROMAGNETIC DISTRIBUTOR AND TOILETMay 2021November 2022Allow1811NoNo
17233841Replaceable Seat Pocket AssemblyApril 2021June 2023Abandon2620NoNo
17286332Electromagnetic ValveApril 2021April 2022Allow1200NoNo
17224955VALVE CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHODApril 2021October 2022Allow1920NoNo
17224857VALVE TRIMApril 2021October 2022Allow1811NoNo
17282882VALVE FOR CONTROLLING A PRESSURE DIFFERENTIALApril 2021February 2022Allow1010YesNo
17214913ELECTROMAGNETIC VALVE AND VALVE DEVICEMarch 2021April 2022Allow1310NoNo
17279414FLOW CONTROL VALVEMarch 2021January 2022Allow1000NoNo
17209456ASSEMBLY FOR SENSOR CLEANING WITH SOLENOIDMarch 2021April 2023Allow2500NoNo
17278276ELECTRIC VALVE, HEAT MANAGEMENT ASSEMBLY AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMMarch 2021July 2023Allow2801NoNo
17278288ELECTRIC VALVE AND THERMAL MANAGEMENT ASSEMBLYMarch 2021January 2022Allow1000NoNo
17275323VALVE DEVICE FOR A GASEOUS MEDIUM, AND TANK DEVICE FOR STORING A GASEOUS MEDIUMMarch 2021January 2023Allow2220YesNo
17155160WATER VALVE ASSEMBLYJanuary 2021December 2023Allow3411YesNo
17156358ELECTRONIC EXPANSION VALVE, CONTROL SYSTEM, AND CONTROL METHODJanuary 2021May 2022Allow1610NoNo
17141323ADJUSTABLE VENTURI TUBEJanuary 2021August 2021Allow700NoNo
17130796Proportional Solenoid ValveDecember 2020October 2021Allow900NoNo
17127539VALVE OVERRIDE ASSEMBLY, VALVE, AND METHODDecember 2020March 2022Allow1410NoNo
17127206Expansion ValveDecember 2020September 2023Allow3340NoNo
17127386Apparatus and method for metered dispensing of a microfluidic amount of fluid in the picoliter and microliter range and hand-held device for locally piercing human or animal skinDecember 2020February 2023Allow2600NoNo
17253627PISTON VALVE CORE STRUCTURE WITH RIGID RING SURFACE COMBINED WITH FLEXIBLE BASE SURFACE AND METHOD THEREOFDecember 2020April 2022Allow1500NoNo
17124775EMERGENCY CONTROL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SPRING RETURN VALVE ACTUATORDecember 2020December 2022Allow2400NoNo
15734422ACTUATORDecember 2020July 2022Allow2000NoNo
17059952BLOWOUT PREVENTER APPARATUS AND METHODNovember 2020September 2023Allow3321YesNo
17059180SOLENOID VALVENovember 2020January 2022Allow1310NoNo
17058427ELECTROMAGNETICALLY ACTUATED FLUIDIC VALVES AND SWITCHESNovember 2020June 2022Allow1820NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner KEASEL, ERIC S.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
12
Examiner Affirmed
7
(58.3%)
Examiner Reversed
5
(41.7%)
Reversal Percentile
63.6%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 41.7% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
18
Allowed After Appeal Filing
6
(33.3%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
12
(66.7%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
52.4%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 33.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner KEASEL, ERIC S - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner KEASEL, ERIC S works in Art Unit 3753 and has examined 714 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 81.9%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 26 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner KEASEL, ERIC S's allowance rate of 81.9% places them in the 47% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by KEASEL, ERIC S receive 1.35 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 28% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by KEASEL, ERIC S is 26 months. This places the examiner in the 64% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +10.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by KEASEL, ERIC S. This interview benefit is in the 48% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 30.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 53% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 47.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 67% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 20% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 42.9% of appeals filed. This is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 11.1% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 64.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 81% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.4% of allowed cases (in the 58% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 3.4% of allowed cases (in the 73% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

    Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

    • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
    • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
    • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
    • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
    • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
    • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

    Important Disclaimer

    Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

    No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

    Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

    Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.