USPTO Examiner REITZ MICHAEL K - Art Unit 3745

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17137536COOLING CIRCUIT HAVING A BYPASS CONDUIT FOR A TURBOMACHINE COMPONENTDecember 2020July 2024Allow4361YesNo
17247485E-ASSIST TURBOCHARGER WITH BLEED FLUID SYSTEM CONNECTING COMPRESSOR SECTION TO WEB RING OF TURBINE SECTION FOR THRUST LOAD SUPPRESSIONDecember 2020November 2023Allow3521YesNo
17252244AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEM FOR AN AIRCRAFT CABIN, COMPRISING A TURBOMACHINE PROVIDED WITH A RADIAL TURBINE DISTRIBUTORDecember 2020July 2022Allow1920NoNo
17089458DIRECTIONAL AIRFLOW DEVICE AND AIR CLEANER WITH SAMENovember 2020November 2023Abandon3610NoNo
17051017CONNECTING ELEMENT FOR A LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM OF WIND TURBINE BLADEOctober 2020August 2023Allow3440YesNo
17067192TURBINE BUCKET WITH DUAL PART SPAN SHROUDS AND AERODYNAMIC FEATURESOctober 2020June 2023Allow3330YesNo
17046266WIND TURBINE, WIND POWER PLANT AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A WIND TURBINE AND A WIND POWER PLANTOctober 2020November 2022Abandon2520YesNo
17063266Containment Case Active Clearance Control StructureOctober 2020April 2022Allow1910YesNo
17038352FLUID DRAIN SYSTEM FOR AN AIRCRAFT PROPULSION SYSTEMSeptember 2020October 2022Allow2521NoNo
17040303WICKET GATE FOR A HYDRAULIC TURBINE OR PUMPSeptember 2020August 2022Allow2320NoNo
17015128BEARING ARRANGEMENT FOR A WIND TURBINE AND WIND TURBINESeptember 2020October 2023Allow3831YesNo
16976175VERTICAL AXIS TURBINEAugust 2020December 2022Allow2711NoNo
17003438WOUND RETAINING WIREAugust 2020March 2024Abandon4341NoNo
16969398METHOD FOR PRODUCING A SPLIT ROTOR BLADE, AND ROTOR BLADEAugust 2020July 2023Allow3521YesNo
16940818DELIVERY DEVICE COMPRISING A SIDE CHANNEL BLOWER OR PERIPHERAL BLOWERJuly 2020July 2023Abandon3502NoNo
16918168AXIAL FLOW IMPELLER AND AIR CONDITIONERJuly 2020January 2022Allow1910NoNo
16610455METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING ENGINES OR MOTORS CONTAINED IN A CYLINDRICAL CASINGJune 2020July 2022Abandon3310NoNo
16896353CENTRIFUGAL FANJune 2020October 2022Allow2821YesNo
16877672ROTOR FOR A WIND TURBINE AND WIND TURBINEMay 2020July 2022Allow2611NoNo
15931812SEALING STRUCTURE BETWEEN TURBINE ROTOR DISK AND INTERSTAGE DISKMay 2020July 2021Allow1401NoNo
16859569ROTOR ASSEMBLYApril 2020May 2022Allow2421YesNo
16851752COMPONENTS FOR GAS TURBINE ENGINESApril 2020April 2022Abandon2420NoNo
16851832SEAL ELEMENT FOR SEALING A JOINT BETWEEN A ROTOR BLADE AND A ROTOR DISKApril 2020February 2022Allow2220NoNo
16851720COMPONENTS FOR GAS TURBINE ENGINESApril 2020March 2022Allow2320YesYes
16850651SNUBBER SHROUD CONFIGURATIONSApril 2020December 2024Abandon5640YesYes
16849467Non-Sealed Vacuum Pump With Supersonically Rotatable Bladeless Gas Impingement SurfaceApril 2020August 2022Allow2841NoYes
16841277SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING AND MITIGATING GAS TURBINE COMPONENT MISALIGNMENT USING VIRTUAL SIMULATIONApril 2020January 2023Allow3320NoNo
16835492TURBOMACHINE AIRFOIL HAVING A VARIABLE THICKNESS THERMAL BARRIER COATINGMarch 2020January 2023Allow3421YesNo
16651559TURBINE BLADE AND GAS TURBINEMarch 2020March 2023Allow3541YesNo
16648940SIROCCO FAN, BLOWING DEVICE, AND AIR CONDITIONERMarch 2020March 2022Abandon2410NoNo
16819692LIGHTNING PROTECTION FOR A DIRECT DRIVE WIND TURBINEMarch 2020August 2023Allow4130YesNo
16640924WIND TURBINE SAFETY BRAKE CONTROL STRATEGYFebruary 2020October 2021Allow2010YesNo
16494754DEVICE FOR PRODUCING HYDRO-ELECTRIC POWERFebruary 2020September 2022Abandon3610NoNo
16783249SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING WAKE MANAGEMENT IN WIND FARMSFebruary 2020February 2024Abandon4850NoNo
16780094VANED DIFFUSER AND CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSORFebruary 2020October 2021Allow2111NoNo
16628643WIND TURBINEJanuary 2020March 2023Abandon3830NoNo
16726992STACKING OF ROTOR BLADE AEROFOIL SECTIONS TO ADJUST RESONANT FREQUENCIESDecember 2019February 2024Allow5050YesNo
16717631CEILING FAN MOUNTING ASSEMBLYDecember 2019October 2022Allow3430NoNo
16715046BLADE DE-ICINGDecember 2019November 2023Abandon4741NoNo
16697242COOLING ASSEMBLY FOR A TURBINE ASSEMBLYNovember 2019March 2023Allow4031YesNo
16694919BRUSH SEAL COMPRISING AT LEAST TWO GROUPS OF BRISTLESNovember 2019April 2023Allow4021YesNo
16614928TURBINE BLADE AND GAS TURBINENovember 2019April 2022Allow2920YesNo
16685147Return Channels For A Multi-Stage TurbocompressorNovember 2019August 2022Allow3330YesNo
16575329INSERT FOR A BLADE OF A ROTARY-WING AIRCRAFT AND A BLADE OF ROTARY-WING AIRCRAFTSeptember 2019May 2025Abandon6081YesNo
16566023DUAL ACTUATOR HYDRAULIC PITCH-LOCK PROPELLER SYSTEMSeptember 2019April 2021Allow1900NoNo
16491405SHROUDED BLADES WITH IMPROVED FLUTTER RESISTANCESeptember 2019November 2021Allow2730NoNo
16491259SNUBBERED BLADES WITH IMPROVED FLUTTER RESISTANCESeptember 2019March 2022Abandon3020NoNo
16542185CENTRIFUGAL BLOWERAugust 2019October 2021Allow2620YesNo
16485247RETURN STAGEAugust 2019January 2021Allow1800NoNo
16533966TURBINE BLADE AND METHODAugust 2019April 2022Allow3230YesNo
16527650Inter-Blade Profiles for Hydraulic Turbines with Removable Cover PartJuly 2019March 2022Abandon3220NoNo
16482326WIND TURBINE WITH A TUBULAR SUPPORT STRUCTURE AND A BEARING ASSEMBLYJuly 2019December 2024Abandon6090YesNo
16527615Pre-Formed Plug with Inter-Blade Profiles for Hydraulic TurbinesJuly 2019May 2022Allow3430NoNo
16526508TURBINE-TIP CLEARANCE CONTROL SYSTEM OFFTAKEJuly 2019February 2022Abandon3020YesNo
16447421LOW-DRAG ROTOR BLADE EXTENSIONJune 2019June 2022Abandon3640YesNo
16470397A NACELLE FOR A WIND TURBINE AND A WIND TURBINEJune 2019November 2020Allow1700NoNo
16440213DIFFUSER PIPE WITH AXIALLY-DIRECTED EXITJune 2019May 2022Allow3540NoNo
16438134TURBOCHARGER TURBINE WHEELJune 2019October 2022Allow4031NoNo
16436293MITIGATION OF ADVERSE FLOW CONDITIONS IN A NACELLE INLETJune 2019June 2021Abandon2510NoNo
16467210BACKSIDE SEAL FOR STEAM TURBINE GLAND SYSTEMJune 2019October 2023Abandon5260YesNo
16400345TURBO BLOWER WITH IMPELLER UNIT-COOLING FAN FOR FUEL CELLMay 2019June 2022Abandon3840NoNo
16342443STEAM TURBINE AND STEAM TURBINE CONTROL METHODApril 2019March 2021Allow2320YesNo
16381226PUMPApril 2019October 2020Allow1800NoNo
16379179RETENTION CLIP FOR VARIABLE VANE ARMApril 2019August 2020Allow1600NoNo
16376925FAN BLADE MOUNTING STRUCTURES AND ARRANGEMENTSApril 2019January 2022Abandon3330YesNo
16367703Mainframe for Wind TurbinesMarch 2019July 2022Allow3940NoNo
16364279ACCESSORY GEARBOXMarch 2019April 2021Abandon2410NoNo
16361282STRUT DAMPENING ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF MAKING SAMEMarch 2019February 2021Allow2320YesNo
16334754WIND TURBINE WITH A VERTICAL ROTATION AXISMarch 2019August 2021Abandon2920NoNo
16270071METHOD FOR REPLACING METAL AIRFOIL WITH CERAMIC AIRFOIL, AND RELATED TURBOMACHINE BLADEFebruary 2019September 2020Allow2010NoNo
16267799FEATHER SEALS WITH LEAKAGE METERINGFebruary 2019May 2021Allow2720NoNo
16267972AERODERIVATIVE GAS TURBINE WITH IMPROVED THERMAL MANAGEMENTFebruary 2019November 2023Allow5751YesNo
16266472FAN ASSEMBLIESFebruary 2019March 2021Abandon2510NoNo
16261745GAS TURBINE ENGINE COMPONENTS HAVING INTERLACED TRIP STRIP ARRAYSJanuary 2019October 2021Abandon3221YesNo
16254880CENTRIFUGAL FANJanuary 2019January 2021Allow2420NoNo
16251219FAN BLADES WITH RECESSED SURFACESJanuary 2019April 2022Abandon3940YesNo
16249079SHROUD SEGMENT FOR DISPOSITION ON A BLADE OF A TURBOMACHINE, AND BLADEJanuary 2019October 2020Allow2110NoNo
16245636FAN BLADE STRUCTUREJanuary 2019January 2021Abandon2410NoNo
16243154CMC LAYERING WITH PLIES WITH INNER PORTION DEFINED WITH OPENING(S), AND NOZZLE ENDWALLJanuary 2019August 2021Abandon3220YesNo
16239524GAS TURBINEJanuary 2019February 2021Allow2530NoNo
16313302TURBINE HOUSING, EXHAUST TURBINE, AND TURBOCHARGERDecember 2018October 2020Allow2210NoNo
16225075AIRCRAFT SURFACE COOLER ASSEMBLYDecember 2018October 2021Abandon3430YesNo
16220213NON-INTRUSIVE MEASUREMENT OF THE PITCH OF A BLADEDecember 2018September 2020Allow2110NoNo
16207918CMC HONEYCOMB BASE FOR ABRADABLE COATING ON CMC BOASDecember 2018August 2021Allow3320NoYes
16204732FAN ASSEMBLYNovember 2018February 2021Abandon2610NoNo
16204726FAN ASSEMBLYNovember 2018August 2020Allow2010NoNo
16202631BLEED EJECTORNovember 2018April 2021Allow2930YesNo
16304575PADDLE ASSEMBLY COMPRISING A PADDLE AND A REMOVABLE BLADENovember 2018July 2020Allow2010NoNo
16198656TURBINE CASING AND TURBINE HAVING SUCH A TURBINE CASINGNovember 2018November 2020Allow2411NoNo
16157256AIRCRAFT GAS TURBINE ENGINE BLADE PITCH CHANGE MECHANISMOctober 2018October 2020Allow2410NoNo
16153054BELL CRANK AND BAR ASSEMBLYOctober 2018February 2020Allow1700NoNo
16144622AIRFOIL SHAPE FOR FIRST STAGE COMPRESSOR ROTOR BLADESeptember 2018September 2022Abandon4731YesYes
16142455TurbomachineSeptember 2018February 2021Allow2930YesNo
16139645Containment Case Active Clearance Control StructureSeptember 2018June 2020Allow2110YesNo
16086817AIRCRAFT PROPELLER COMPRISING COLLAPSIBLE VARIABLE PITCH BLADESSeptember 2018February 2020Allow1700NoNo
16086226TURBINE AIRFOIL WITH TRAILING EDGE FRAMING FEATURESSeptember 2018August 2021Allow3520YesNo
16132885Wind Turbine Rotor Blade Assembly for Reduced NoiseSeptember 2018October 2021Abandon3740YesNo
16085176FILM COOLING HOLE IN GAS TURBINE COMPONENTSSeptember 2018June 2021Abandon3330YesNo
16081139IMPELLER AND AXIAL FLOW FANAugust 2018August 2020Allow2320YesNo
16112975CENTRIFUGAL FANAugust 2018April 2020Allow2010NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner REITZ, MICHAEL K..

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
7
Examiner Affirmed
3
(42.9%)
Examiner Reversed
4
(57.1%)
Reversal Percentile
82.4%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 57.1% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
13
Allowed After Appeal Filing
5
(38.5%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
8
(61.5%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
63.8%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 38.5% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner REITZ, MICHAEL K. - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner REITZ, MICHAEL K. works in Art Unit 3745 and has examined 151 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 68.2%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 28 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner REITZ, MICHAEL K.'s allowance rate of 68.2% places them in the 31% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by REITZ, MICHAEL K. receive 2.35 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 63% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by REITZ, MICHAEL K. is 28 months. This places the examiner in the 69% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +2.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by REITZ, MICHAEL K.. This interview benefit is in the 24% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 22.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 30.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 45% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 22% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 22% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 14.3% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 40.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 43% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 49% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

    Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

    • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
    • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
    • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
    • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
    • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
    • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

    Important Disclaimer

    Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

    No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

    Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

    Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.