USPTO Examiner DAVIS JASON GREGORY - Art Unit 3745

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19239893CONTROL METHOD FOR DE-ICING BLADES OF A WIND POWER GENERATORJune 2025October 2025Allow410NoNo
19072473DETERMINING AND UTILIZING A DESIRED FREQUENCY FOR A MECHANICAL SHAKER FOR A SUMP PUMP SYSTEMMarch 2025February 2026Allow1120YesNo
19066111COVER BOARD ATTACHABLE TO CEILING FANFebruary 2025October 2025Allow810YesNo
19058517Centrifugal Air BlowerFebruary 2025October 2025Allow710YesNo
19041155BLOWER SYSTEMJanuary 2025August 2025Allow600YesNo
19034329METHOD FOR REPAIRING A SHEAR WEB OF A WIND TURBINE ROTOR BLADE AND WIND TURBINE ROTOR BLADEJanuary 2025March 2026Allow1320NoNo
19031855MULTIFUNCTIONAL OUTDOOR FANJanuary 2025July 2025Allow610NoNo
18991595HYDRAULIC POSITION CONTROL ARRANGEMENTDecember 2024October 2025Allow1010NoNo
18865354SLIDABLY PLUGGABLE MULTI-FAN MODULE AND SERVER COMPRISING SAMENovember 2024July 2025Allow810NoNo
18865347SPRING-MOUNTED GEARBOX HOUSINGNovember 2024October 2025Allow1110NoNo
18939602BLOWER DEVICENovember 2024February 2026Allow1621YesNo
18937134AXIAL FANNovember 2024August 2025Allow910YesNo
18932779MULTI FAN DEVICEOctober 2024December 2025Abandon1300NoNo
18890091Portable Oscillating FanSeptember 2024October 2025Allow1310NoNo
18887165AXIAL PUMP WITH ADJUSTABLE IMPELLERSeptember 2024October 2025Allow1311YesNo
18828583THRUST-BALANCING CONTRA-ROTATING SYSTEMSeptember 2024January 2026Allow1620YesNo
18770927Guide Vane Body with Vortex Suppression Structure Ring and Axial-Flow Nuclear Reactor Coolant PumpJuly 2024September 2024Allow300YesNo
18727805METHOD AND DEVICE FOR INDIVIDUALLY PITCHING BLADES OF A WIND TURBINEJuly 2024August 2025Allow1410YesNo
18677424METHOD FOR BUNDLING A COLLAPSIBLE ROTOR ASSEMBLYMay 2024August 2024Allow300YesNo
18677505METHOD FOR INSTALLING A ROTOR ASSEMBLYMay 2024February 2025Allow910NoNo
18656379DETERMINING AND UTILIZING A DESIRED FREQUENCY FOR A MECHANICAL SHAKER FOR A SUMP PUMP SYSTEMMay 2024December 2024Allow710NoNo
18654631SEALING SYSTEM FOR A TURBOMACHINEMay 2024July 2025Allow1401YesNo
18646187INDUCED DRAFT FAN AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMApril 2024July 2025Allow1510YesNo
18700953CLOSED-LOOP COOLING FLUID CIRCUIT FOR MAGNETIC BEARINGS OF AN EXPANDER-COMPRESSOR SYSTEMApril 2024November 2025Allow1910YesNo
18699019SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING A WIND TURBINEApril 2024October 2025Allow1910NoNo
18606371OVERALL ENGINE EFFICIENCY RATING FOR TURBOMACHINE ENGINESMarch 2024September 2024Allow600YesNo
18604985OVERALL ENGINE EFFICIENCY RATING FOR TURBOMACHINE ENGINESMarch 2024June 2024Allow300YesNo
18603880Overall Engine Efficiency Rating for Turbomachine EnginesMarch 2024July 2025Allow1600YesNo
18441219SMART VACUUM PRIMING SYSTEMFebruary 2024February 2025Allow1210NoNo
18432359COORDINATING OVERLAP OF LOW PRESSURE ZONES IN ADJACENT TURBINESFebruary 2024February 2025Allow1211NoNo
18424036CONTAINMENT STRUCTUREJanuary 2024June 2025Allow1710NoNo
18419097CIRCULATION PUMP MADE FROM BRITTLE MATERIALJanuary 2024January 2025Allow1211YesNo
18410364WHEELS INCLUDING AN ALUMINUM ALLOY AND METHODS FOR MAKING THE SAMEJanuary 2024July 2025Abandon1811NoNo
18391892FOLDING BLADE WIND TURBINEDecember 2023November 2025Allow2311YesNo
18565156A PITCH SYSTEM FOR A WIND TURBINE BLADENovember 2023February 2025Allow1510NoNo
18564101TWO-STAGE CAVITATION GENERATOR FOR ORGANIC WASTEWATER TREATMENTNovember 2023December 2024Allow1210NoNo
18563220Rotary Machine And Primary Motor-Pump Assembly Provided With This Rotary MachineNovember 2023September 2024Allow1000YesNo
18388603WEAR PAD FOR ROOT OF FAN BLADENovember 2023March 2025Allow1620NoNo
18383397HINGED ROTOR BLADE TO PROVIDE PASSIVE VARIABLE PITCHOctober 2023August 2024Allow1010YesNo
18549379DRIVE ARRANGEMENT WITH VIBRATION DECOUPLINGSeptember 2023November 2024Allow1410NoNo
18548941MANUAL-ADJUSTMENT-TYPE DEVICE FOR ADJUSTING SWING ANGLE OF ELECTRIC FAN ACCORDING TO IDENTIFICATIONSSeptember 2023January 2025Allow1700YesNo
18275367BLADE MEMBER AND STRUCTURAL MEMBERAugust 2023January 2026Allow2931YesNo
18262668SUCTION LINER AND CENTRIFUGAL PUMP COMPRISING THE SAMEJuly 2023February 2026Allow3030YesNo
18347795SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INJECTING DRY GASES INTO GAS COMPRESSORJuly 2023March 2025Allow2000YesNo
18209689OVERALL ENGINE EFFICIENCY RATING FOR TURBOMACHINE ENGINESJune 2023February 2024Allow900YesNo
18328746COLLAPSIBLE ROTOR ASSEMBLY OF A VERTICAL AXIS WIND TURBINEJune 2023June 2025Allow2430YesNo
18205021FAN WHEEL DRIVEN IN ONLY ONE ROTATIONAL DIRECTIONJune 2023September 2024Allow1510NoNo
18327158TURBINE AND TURBOCHARGERJune 2023October 2024Allow1710NoNo
18327149TURBINE AND TURBOCHARGERJune 2023May 2025Allow2330YesNo
18254105TURBINE-GENERATOR ASSEMBLY WITH MAGNETIC COUPLINGMay 2023September 2024Allow1510NoNo
18254142POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM COMPRISING AN IMPROVED OIL RECOVERY CHANNELMay 2023May 2024Allow1200YesNo
18253800HEATING DEVICE AND VACUUM PUMPMay 2023July 2024Allow1400YesNo
18197011Boundary-Layer Pump and Method of UseMay 2023July 2024Allow1410YesNo
18034482ROTODYNAMIC DEGASSING PUMPING UNIT AND ROTOR BEARING DESIGNApril 2023September 2025Abandon2901NoNo
18134615SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN OPERATING CONDITION OF A WIND TURBINEApril 2023August 2024Allow1610YesNo
18295095VERTICAL AXIS WIND TURBINE BLADE-ARM CONNECTION MEMBERApril 2023November 2023Allow710NoNo
18187724GAS TURBINE ENGINE HAVING A TIE RODMarch 2023February 2024Allow1110YesNo
18123797MULTI-AXIAL VARIABLE HEIGHT WIND TURBINEMarch 2023September 2023Allow600YesNo
18186385NACELLE FOR A WIND TURBINEMarch 2023August 2024Allow1721NoNo
18121282SUBMERSIBLE PUMP WITH EXTERNAL SLICERMarch 2023August 2024Allow1710YesNo
18118641DETERMINING AND UTILIZING A DESIRED FREQUENCY FOR A MECHANICAL SHAKER FOR A SUMP PUMP SYSTEMMarch 2023January 2024Allow1010YesNo
18116695IMPELLERMarch 2023October 2024Allow1930YesNo
18024351WIND TURBINE BLADE, WIND TURBINE, METHOD FOR FABRICATION OF A WIND TURBINE COMPONENT AND METHOD FOR FABRICATION OF A WIND TURBINE BLADEMarch 2023October 2025Allow3241YesNo
18115677Grid Decoupled Wind Powered Hydrogen Generation and StorageFebruary 2023January 2024Abandon1010NoNo
18174296WIND TURBINE DRIVE CONTROL DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD OF WIND TURBINE DRIVE DEVICEFebruary 2023January 2025Allow2330NoNo
18042780GUIDE VANE IN GAS TURBINE ENGINEFebruary 2023November 2025Abandon3340NoNo
18113388Coordinating blade orientation to optimize cluster power outputFebruary 2023September 2023Allow710YesNo
18098007METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A PROPELLER FOR A PROPELLER PUMP, AND PROPELLER FOR A PROPELLER PUMPJanuary 2023May 2024Allow1610NoNo
18097953ENERGY-SAVING DEVICE FOR RAPIDLY AND INFINITELY COMPRESSING AIRJanuary 2023January 2024Allow1210YesNo
17928840CENTRIFUGAL FAN AND ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINENovember 2022June 2024Abandon1810NoNo
17993210BLOWER DEVICENovember 2022August 2025Abandon4331YesNo
17925240YAW SYSTEM WITH YAW CONTROL BASED ON CONTROL SIGNALNovember 2022May 2024Allow1810YesNo
17924485HAIRDRYERNovember 2022January 2025Abandon2610NoNo
17977200AXIAL PUMP WITH ADJUSTABLE IMPELLEROctober 2022July 2024Allow2011NoNo
17975643SELF-PRIMING JET PUMPOctober 2022March 2024Allow1720YesNo
17971695METHOD OF RETROFITTING A WIND TURBINE WITH AN ENERGY GENERATING UNITOctober 2022August 2025Allow3440YesNo
17995484COMPRESSOR ROTOR STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR ARRANGING SAID ROTOR STRUCTUREOctober 2022January 2024Allow1510YesNo
17916333INTERMEDIATE CASING FOR A GAS TURBINE ENGINESeptember 2022January 2025Allow2730YesNo
17956573HINGED ROTOR BLADE TO PROVIDE PASSIVE VARIABLE PITCHSeptember 2022August 2023Allow1010YesNo
17907623DEVICE FOR DISTRIBUTING OIL FROM A ROLLING BEARING FOR AN AIRCRAFT TURBINE ENGINESeptember 2022February 2024Allow1610NoNo
17911465METHOD FOR COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED CONTROLLING OF ONE OR MORE WIND TURBINES IN A WIND FARMSeptember 2022August 2025Allow3520YesNo
17911226HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE HAVING AN IMPROVED FAN AND MOTOR ASSEMBLY AND FAN AND MOTOR ASSEMBLY FOR SAMESeptember 2022February 2025Allow2911YesNo
17909365METHOD FOR PROVISIONALLY ENSURING THE FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITY OF A DAMAGED HOUSING, AND HOUSINGSeptember 2022December 2023Allow1510YesNo
17823882INDUCER TUNNEL MAGNETIZATIONAugust 2022August 2023Allow1110NoNo
17801363MAIN LAMINATEAugust 2022April 2024Allow2010NoNo
17796689VACUUM PUMP AND CONTROLLERAugust 2022April 2024Allow2030NoNo
17759749Fan, Synchronous Machine And MethodsJuly 2022December 2023Abandon1701NoNo
17876108SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ESTIMATING FUTURE RISK OF FAILURE OF A WIND TURBINE COMPONENT USING MACHINE LEARNINGJuly 2022July 2025Allow3520NoNo
17813097SEALING SYSTEMJuly 2022March 2023Allow700NoNo
17808073WAVE, WIND AND TIDAL ENERGY GENERATORJune 2022May 2023Allow1100YesNo
17781598IMPELLER RECEPTACLEJune 2022October 2024Allow2830YesNo
17780670TURBINE BLADE FOR A STATIONARY GAS TURBINEMay 2022February 2024Allow2010YesNo
17780537ADJUSTABLE BLADE OF IMPELLER BUILT-IN ELECTRIC PUMPMay 2022August 2023Allow1410NoNo
17780091HIGH EFFICIENCY TURBINE IMPELLERMay 2022September 2023Allow1610YesNo
17776009Nacelle Cover for a Wind TurbineMay 2022February 2024Allow2120YesNo
17734173REVERSIBLE FANMay 2022October 2022Allow600YesNo
17700744MULTI-AXIAL VARIABLE HEIGHT WIND TURBINEMarch 2022January 2023Allow1001YesNo
17642543TURBOMOLECULAR VACUUM PUMPMarch 2022December 2023Abandon2110NoNo
17668820Low Noise High Efficiency Centrifugal BlowerFebruary 2022March 2024Abandon2620NoNo
17634053COOLER FOR A WIND TURBINE HAVING PIVOTABLE COOLING PANELSFebruary 2022August 2023Allow1801YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner DAVIS, JASON GREGORY.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
19
Examiner Affirmed
13
(68.4%)
Examiner Reversed
6
(31.6%)
Reversal Percentile
48.2%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 31.6% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
28
Allowed After Appeal Filing
12
(42.9%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
16
(57.1%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
71.5%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 42.9% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner DAVIS, JASON GREGORY - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner DAVIS, JASON GREGORY works in Art Unit 3745 and has examined 583 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 74.1%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 36 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner DAVIS, JASON GREGORY's allowance rate of 74.1% places them in the 38% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by DAVIS, JASON GREGORY receive 1.77 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 39% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by DAVIS, JASON GREGORY is 36 months. This places the examiner in the 37% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +18.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by DAVIS, JASON GREGORY. This interview benefit is in the 61% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 22.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 45.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 70% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 28.6% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 31% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 44.1% of appeals filed. This is in the 10% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 13.3% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 41.8% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 33% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 43% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 3.2% of allowed cases (in the 75% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

    Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

    • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
    • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
    • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
    • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
    • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
    • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

    Important Disclaimer

    Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

    No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

    Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

    Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.