Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16930621 | FUEL NOZZLE ASSEMBLY AND GAS TURBINE COMBUSTOR INCLUDING THE SAME | July 2020 | May 2021 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16728188 | INJECTOR NOSE FOR TURBOMACHINE INCLUDING A SECONDARY FUEL SWIRLER WITH CHANGING SECTION | December 2019 | July 2021 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16607968 | FUEL INJECTOR AND GAS TURBINE | October 2019 | April 2021 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16565979 | FUEL SPRAY NOZZLE | September 2019 | October 2021 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16551177 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A TURBOPROP ENGINE | August 2019 | June 2025 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16382923 | GAS TURBINE ENGINE | April 2019 | June 2021 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15981559 | GEAR TRAIN FOR GAS GEARED GAS TURBINE ENGINE | May 2018 | September 2021 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner IGUE, ROBERTO TOSHIHARU works in Art Unit 3741 and has examined 7 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 25 months.
Examiner IGUE, ROBERTO TOSHIHARU's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 100% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by IGUE, ROBERTO TOSHIHARU receive 1.57 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 26% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by IGUE, ROBERTO TOSHIHARU is 25 months. This places the examiner in the 80% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by IGUE, ROBERTO TOSHIHARU. This interview benefit is in the 18% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 0.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 77% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 42% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 49% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.