USPTO Examiner CROSBY JR RICHARD D - Art Unit 3724

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17132236FOLDING KNIFEDecember 2020June 2023Allow3020YesNo
17247712RAZOR CARTRIDGESDecember 2020June 2023Abandon3030NoNo
17252880HAIR CUTTING DEVICEDecember 2020March 2024Allow3940YesNo
17058255METHOD AND SYSTEM TO CONTROL, AUTOMATE, MONITOR, AND SHUT DOWN A DELI SLICERNovember 2020April 2023Abandon2910NoNo
17102550SAWMILL WITH A ROCKING CARRIAGENovember 2020March 2023Abandon2820NoNo
17099923TABLE SAW WITH A RIP FENCE LOCKING DEVICENovember 2020April 2022Allow1710NoNo
17098351UTILITY INSTRUMENT AND A METHOD OF USING SAMENovember 2020December 2021Allow1310YesNo
17095787METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ADJUSTING AND MAINTAINING A POSITION OF A CUTTING SURFACE OF A PERFORATING APPARATUSNovember 2020October 2022Allow2430NoNo
17090873PARTIALLY-SERRATED DISPOSABLE PIZZA CUTTERNovember 2020December 2022Abandon2520YesNo
17084025ADHESIVE TAPE DISPENSER HEADOctober 2020July 2023Allow3311NoNo
17050613A HAIR CUTTING SYSTEMOctober 2020June 2024Allow4460YesYes
17077183STRING TRIMMER HAVING A CURVED SHAFT SECTION FOR VARIABLE LENGTH AND OPERATOR HEIGHTOctober 2020September 2023Allow3510NoNo
17077884COLLECTING SAWDUST AND OTHER DEBRIS FROM POWER SAWSOctober 2020September 2024Allow4640YesNo
17077356IMPELLERS FOR CUTTING MACHINES AND CUTTING MACHINES EQUIPPED THEREWITHOctober 2020October 2023Allow3530NoNo
17074534Chain SawOctober 2020April 2022Allow1810NoNo
17072515SUCTION ATTACHMENTS FOR SURGICAL HAIR CLIPPERS AND METHODS OF USING SUCH SUCTION ATTACHMENTSOctober 2020March 2024Allow4141NoNo
17048009METHOD FOR OPERATING A WORKING DEVICE OR RESCUE DEVICE, AND WORKING DEVICE OR RESCUE DEVICEOctober 2020June 2023Allow3211NoNo
17070102Lottery Ticket Dispensing Unit with a Shuttle Separator DeviceOctober 2020July 2024Allow4541NoNo
17046791CUTTING BLADEOctober 2020April 2025Allow5420NoNo
17067517RAZOROctober 2020August 2022Allow2220NoNo
17065550PUNCH SET FOR ELECTRICAL BOXOctober 2020April 2024Allow4221YesNo
17064038HEDGE TRIMMEROctober 2020August 2023Allow3430YesNo
17063029PROCESSING APPARATUSOctober 2020September 2023Allow3600NoNo
17062328MACHINE TOOLOctober 2020March 2024Abandon4201NoNo
17061584GRASS TRIMMEROctober 2020April 2022Allow1910NoNo
17043992BRUSH CUTTERSeptember 2020July 2023Allow3440YesNo
17023494STOP FOR A WORK PLATFORM TOOLSeptember 2020September 2023Allow3650YesNo
17022818Surgical Hair Clippers And Vacuum Apparatuses Including Sensing And Feedback DevicesSeptember 2020February 2023Allow2911NoNo
17017811LONGITUDINAL CUTTING OF A BAND OF A SOFT FOOD MASSSeptember 2020April 2022Allow1910NoNo
17018236TABLE SAWSeptember 2020August 2024Allow4730NoYes
17016089FADE COMB FOR AN ELECTRIC HAIR TRIMMERSeptember 2020October 2023Abandon3740YesNo
16970640Knife assembly and cutting system equipped with sameAugust 2020June 2023Allow3440NoNo
16969580COMB FOR A HAIR CLIPPERAugust 2020September 2021Allow1400NoNo
16969577A COMB FOR A HAIR CUTTING APPLIANCEAugust 2020April 2024Allow4470NoYes
16943146PACKAGING MACHINE HAVING CUTTING STATIONJuly 2020September 2023Abandon3811NoNo
16928761NOTCHING MACHINEJuly 2020August 2023Allow3721NoNo
16925328METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING HIGH-TORQUE HEXAGONAL DRILL SHANKJuly 2020September 2023Allow3800NoNo
16920288SENSOR-BASED SHAVING SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF ANALYZING A USER'S SHAVE EVENT FOR DETERMINING A UNIQUE THRESHOLD VALUE OF THE USERJuly 2020March 2023Allow3301YesNo
16770588BIDIRECTIONAL SHEET METAL CUTTING TOOLJune 2020June 2024Allow4841NoNo
16880758JUICING DEVICES WITH A REMOVABLE GRINDER ASSEMBLYMay 2020July 2023Allow3811YesNo
16862452Pipe CutterApril 2020October 2021Allow1710NoNo
16860128SHEET HOLDERApril 2020December 2022Abandon3220NoNo
16857246Knife assembly for corrugated knife blade and cutting system equipped with sameApril 2020June 2021Abandon1410NoNo
16854706Handheld Work ApparatusApril 2020March 2023Allow3520NoNo
16850209BLADE HOLDER WITH ADJUSTING SLIDEApril 2020June 2021Allow1410NoNo
16755783IMPROVEMENTS RELATING TO TOOL HANDLESApril 2020March 2023Abandon3520NoNo
16827769TRACK SQUARE WITH ADJUSTABLE MECHANISMMarch 2020March 2023Allow3531NoNo
16827073METHODS OF MANUFACTURING KNIFE HOLDERS OF CUTTING WHEELSMarch 2020November 2022Allow3230NoNo
16820654KITCHEN UTENSIL FOR REMOVING EGG CHALAZA OR EGGSHELL PIECES, AND RELATED METHODSMarch 2020December 2022Abandon3321NoNo
16805177Tomato Dicing Assembly And Method Of UseFebruary 2020April 2020Allow200NoNo
16801679BAND SAWFebruary 2020April 2024Allow5071YesNo
16793512ROPE SEVERING DEVICEFebruary 2020September 2022Allow3121YesNo
16778460Display or Storage Assembly for Handheld Power ToolJanuary 2020September 2022Allow3120NoNo
16747285TABLE MITER SAWJanuary 2020October 2021Allow2010NoNo
16740788ROTARY KNIFE PROVIDING MATERIAL REMOVAL VIA SUCTIONJanuary 2020March 2023Allow3820YesNo
16629493METHOD FOR PRINTING AND AUTOMATICALLY CUTTING A TEXTILE SHEETJanuary 2020September 2023Abandon4430NoNo
16737300Polymeric Cutting Edge Structures And Method of Manufacturing Polymeric Cutting Edge StructuresJanuary 2020March 2025Allow6060YesYes
16629502APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CUTTING ELECTRODE SHEETJanuary 2020January 2023Allow3630YesNo
16729156WOODWORKING MACHINERY FLIP STOP SYSTEMS AND METHODSDecember 2019February 2023Abandon3710NoNo
16623894SHAVER AND METHODS FOR DETECTING SHAVING CHARACTERISTICSDecember 2019September 2022Allow3320NoNo
16710850CUTTING APPARATUSDecember 2019October 2022Allow3400NoNo
16619967Transverse cutting system suitable for being used in a machine for the production of plastic filmDecember 2019June 2022Allow3110NoNo
16682238ROTATING CUTTING ASSEMBLY AND CUTTING TOOTH FOR A ROTATING CUTTING ASSEMBLYNovember 2019January 2023Abandon3920NoNo
16678597Tile Cutting Hand ToolNovember 2019January 2023Abandon3910NoNo
16611911METHOD OF CUTTING DESIGNS WITH INNER GEOMETRIES IN CNC WIRE CUTTINGNovember 2019January 2024Abandon5040YesNo
16665247MULTIFUNCTIONAL CUTTEROctober 2019December 2021Abandon2530NoNo
16604645METHOD OF CUTTING ACCURATE DESIGNS IN CNC MACHINE USING HOT-WIRE/EDM METHODSOctober 2019March 2023Abandon4120NoNo
16590535GRASS TRIMMER, OPERATING METHOD THEREOF AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOFOctober 2019May 2021Allow1910NoNo
16577063Grass TrimmerSeptember 2019June 2023Allow4430YesNo
16567808SLICERSeptember 2019August 2021Allow2421NoNo
16488446COMPOSITE FERRULES FOR EXTENSION POLESAugust 2019June 2023Allow4521YesNo
16544773SHAVING BLADE CARTRIDGEAugust 2019October 2020Allow1400NoNo
16542115Pivot Posts & Trimmer Heads Utilizing The SameAugust 2019June 2022Allow3401NoNo
16524299Tomato Dicing Assembly And Method Of UseJuly 2019December 2019Allow501NoNo
16513728WATERMELON CUTTERJuly 2019April 2020Allow900NoNo
16512868REPLACEABLE RAZOR CARTRIDGE COMPONENTJuly 2019May 2021Abandon2210NoNo
16505787SHEET BODY CUTTING METHOD AND SHEET BODY CUTTING DEVICEJuly 2019October 2021Allow2811YesNo
16502303Concentric Abrasive Disc PunchJuly 2019September 2021Abandon2611NoNo
16417640INTEGRATED FLATTENING, CUTTING, AND COLLECTING ASSEMBLY CAPABLE OF INTEGRITY MAINTENANCEMay 2019November 2021Allow3010NoNo
16414639ROLLED MATERIAL DISPENSERMay 2019November 2021Allow3010NoNo
16413672PROTECTIVE APPARATUS FOR A MACHINE TOOLMay 2019June 2021Allow2511NoNo
16349666HAIR CUTTING APPARATUS COMPRISING A CURRENT DETECTORMay 2019March 2021Allow2301NoNo
16408991Grass Trimmer and Cord Delivering Method of Grass TrimmerMay 2019November 2020Allow1800YesNo
16347324AN ENGINE-DRIVEN TOOL WITH A GENERATOR CONNECTED TO A FAN MOTORMay 2019September 2022Allow4030NoNo
16396383PIPE RAMMING SYSTEM WITH HYDRAULIC CROWDApril 2019May 2020Allow1300NoNo
16392350AUTOMATIC DISPENSER FOR BALANCING WEIGHTSApril 2019November 2019Allow710NoNo
16096897CUTTING MACHINE AS WELL AS METHOD FOR CUTTING ELASTIC STRINGS, IN PARTICULAR MEAT STRINGSMarch 2019July 2020Allow2101NoNo
16367353SHAVING RAZOR HANDLEMarch 2019June 2020Allow1410YesNo
16367402RAZOR HANDLE WITH A PIVOTING PORTIONMarch 2019December 2022Allow4440NoNo
16367418SHAVING RAZOR CARTRIDGEMarch 2019June 2020Allow1510NoNo
16367412RAZOR HANDLE WITH A PIVOTING PORTIONMarch 2019June 2023Allow5051NoNo
16367401SHAVING RAZOR CARTRIDGEMarch 2019February 2020Allow1000NoNo
16366288RAZOR HANDLE WITH A PIVOTING PORTIONMarch 2019April 2023Allow4841NoNo
16366246RAZOR HANDLE WITH A PIVOTING PORTIONMarch 2019June 2023Abandon5160NoYes
16363609GRASS TRIMMERMarch 2019July 2020Allow1610NoNo
16352280ELEVATED UTENSILMarch 2019August 2020Abandon1710NoNo
16268302SHAVING BLADE CARTRIDGEFebruary 2019May 2020Allow1510NoNo
16229817CABLE PROCESSING MACHINE WITH IMPROVED PRECISION MECHANISM FOR CABLE PROCESSINGDecember 2018October 2019Allow1000NoNo
16309949RAZOR SYSTEMDecember 2018August 2021Allow3221YesNo
16309683RECONFIGURABLE SHAVING RAZORS WITH ARTICULATING HEADDecember 2018November 2020Allow2310NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner CROSBY JR, RICHARD D.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
6
Examiner Affirmed
3
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
3
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
78.4%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
38
Allowed After Appeal Filing
14
(36.8%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
24
(63.2%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
61.0%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 36.8% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner CROSBY JR, RICHARD D - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner CROSBY JR, RICHARD D works in Art Unit 3724 and has examined 422 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 68.0%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 33 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner CROSBY JR, RICHARD D's allowance rate of 68.0% places them in the 31% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by CROSBY JR, RICHARD D receive 2.05 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 50% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CROSBY JR, RICHARD D is 33 months. This places the examiner in the 49% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +15.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by CROSBY JR, RICHARD D. This interview benefit is in the 55% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 44% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 22.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 31% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 50.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 46% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 79.3% of appeals filed. This is in the 71% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 34.8% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 41.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.9% of allowed cases (in the 66% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 3.5% of allowed cases (in the 78% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

    Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

    • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
    • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
    • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
    • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
    • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
    • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

    Important Disclaimer

    Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

    No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

    Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

    Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.