USPTO Examiner RAMOS NICOLE N - Art Unit 3722

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
16971802CUTTING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CHAMFERING FILM STACK USING THE SAMENovember 2021April 2025Abandon5530YesNo
17134766ROTARY CUTTING TOOLDecember 2020June 2023Allow2930YesNo
17125565DRILLING TOOLDecember 2020July 2023Allow3130YesNo
17112483Rotary cutting toolDecember 2020December 2022Allow2410NoNo
17109988CUTTING INSERT, CUTTING EDGE-REPLACEABLE ROTARY CUTTING TOOL AND ROTARY CUTTING METHODDecember 2020July 2023Allow3121NoNo
15734274GUIDING TOOL FOR A SURFACE TRIMMING DEVICE AND TRIMMING ARRANGEMENTDecember 2020June 2025Allow5421YesNo
17108248SQUARE-SHAPED INSERT FOR BAR-PEELING AND INSERT-HOLDER TOOL FOR SAMEDecember 2020October 2023Allow3530NoNo
17057908TOOL AND CUTTING INSERT FOR INTERNAL COOLING, AND METHOS OF MANUFACTURING THEREOFNovember 2020December 2023Abandon3741NoNo
17094786TWIST DRILLNovember 2020March 2021Allow411YesNo
17053378CUTTING INSERT, CUTTING TOOL, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING MACHINED PRODUCTNovember 2020May 2022Allow1800NoNo
17053044Helical Milling Tool with Forward-Backward FeedingNovember 2020April 2023Abandon3020NoNo
17080116CUTTING INSERTOctober 2020June 2022Allow2010NoNo
17050680TOOL BODY AND A MILLING TOOLOctober 2020May 2024Allow4241NoNo
17074226COMPRESSED GAS-OPERATED APPARATUS AND COMPRESSED GAS MACHINING SYSTEMOctober 2020March 2024Allow4110NoNo
17065804Cutting ToolOctober 2020July 2023Allow3440YesNo
17043123SPINDLE DEVICE OF MACHINE TOOLSeptember 2020October 2024Abandon4820NoNo
17032230MACHINE TOOLSeptember 2020April 2022Allow1920NoNo
17029571SUCTION DEVICE HAVING BLADES, AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOFSeptember 2020February 2024Abandon4130YesNo
17027314MILLING CUTTER WITH BRACESSeptember 2020November 2021Allow1410NoNo
17025494END MILLSeptember 2020August 2022Allow2320YesNo
16981825END MILLSeptember 2020January 2023Abandon2810NoNo
16981817INSERT AND CUTTING TOOL ASSEMBLY COMPRISING SAMESeptember 2020May 2023Allow3221YesNo
17022510MILLING TOOLSeptember 2020November 2022Allow2620YesNo
17020015Dental Milling Machine MethodSeptember 2020March 2022Allow1810YesNo
17019355TOOL HOLDER FOR CUTTING INSERTSeptember 2020January 2022Abandon1601NoNo
17017032CUTTING INSERTSeptember 2020May 2022Allow2010NoNo
16978818TURNING METHOD FOR A CNC-LATHE AND A TURNING TOOLSeptember 2020August 2024Allow4811NoNo
16975430CUTTING INSERT AND TOOL BODY FOR A MILLING TOOLAugust 2020June 2024Allow4540NoNo
16975592METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING PROCESSED ARTICLE, TOOL PATH CALCULATION METHOD, PROCESSED ARTICLE, AND IMPELLERAugust 2020August 2021Allow1220YesNo
16969230CUTTING TOOL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING MACHINED PRODUCTAugust 2020February 2024Allow4240NoNo
16969413CUTTING INSERT, CUTTING TOOL, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING MACHINED PRODUCTAugust 2020July 2023Allow3510NoNo
16968658RADIUS ENDMILL AND MACHINE TOOL USING THE SAME, AND DESIGNING METHOD AND MACHINING METHOD OF RADIUS ENDMILLAugust 2020May 2024Allow4651YesNo
16967826RING-SAW ASSEMBLIES AND PROCESSESAugust 2020March 2023Allow3121NoNo
16985034CUTTING INSERTAugust 2020June 2023Allow3440YesNo
16965699END MILL AND MACHINING METHODJuly 2020June 2022Allow2310NoNo
16939506POWER TURRET DEVICEJuly 2020February 2022Abandon1910NoNo
16934645ON-WING TOOL FOR IN-SITU CUTTING ON WING-TO-FUSELAGE ATTACHMENT OF AIRCRAFTJuly 2020February 2021Allow711NoNo
16962041CUTTING INSERT AND CUTTING TOOL ON WHICH SAME IS MOUNTEDJuly 2020October 2021Allow1510YesNo
16922617ROTARY CUTTING HEAD HAVING CUTTING EDGES EXTENDING PAST KEY ACTUATING PORTIONJuly 2020May 2022Allow2310NoNo
16915084DOUBLE-SIDED, POLYGONAL CUTTING INSERT WITH ALTERNATING CONCAVE AND CONVEX CUTTING EDGESJune 2020January 2022Allow1810YesNo
16957902CUTTING INSERT AND BORING TOOLJune 2020February 2021Allow810YesNo
16879275Unloader/Pusher Tube Debris Removal SystemMay 2020October 2023Abandon4111YesNo
16764501CUTTING TOOL WHICH IS ASSEMBLED AND READY FOR DELIVERYMay 2020March 2024Abandon4631YesNo
16875227FIRMLY ASSEMBLED CUTTER HOLDING ASSEMBLYMay 2020February 2022Allow2100NoNo
16875916CUTTING INSERTMay 2020October 2021Allow1710NoNo
16865446PROCESS FOR OPERATING A VIRTUAL SENSOR FOR DETERMINING THE CONDITION OF A TOOL HOLDER ON A TOOL MACHINE; VIRTUAL SENSOR FOR DETERMINING THE CONDITION OF A TOOL HOLDER AND TOOL MACHINEMay 2020November 2022Allow3110NoNo
15733049SLOT MILLING SEQUENCEApril 2020March 2022Allow2310YesNo
16856149BROACH FOR A BROACHING MACHINEApril 2020June 2023Abandon3820NoNo
16855275KEY DUPLICATION MACHINE HAVING PIVOTING CLAMPApril 2020March 2023Allow3420NoNo
16847943END MILL AND DRILLING METHODApril 2020April 2023Allow3640YesNo
16840681RAPIDLY RETRACTABLE TOOL SUPPORT FOR A PIPE MACHINING APPARATUSApril 2020October 2020Allow700NoNo
16651664ROTARY CUTTING TOOL FOR CHIP CONTROLMarch 2020January 2022Abandon2210NoNo
16828320END MILLMarch 2020April 2022Allow2511NoNo
16822648MACHINE TOOL AND DRAG FRAME CONVEYOR FOR FEEDING/REMOVING WORKPIECESMarch 2020March 2024Abandon4821NoNo
16821542CUTTING INSERT AND CUTTING TOOLMarch 2020July 2021Allow1620YesNo
16818753MACHINE TOOL WITH OPTIMIZED ORIENTATION OF VIBRATION DAMPERSMarch 2020January 2022Allow2210NoNo
16647010CUTTING TOOL PART ASSEMBLYMarch 2020July 2022Allow2810NoNo
16642709MILLING INSERT AND A SIDE AND FACE MILLING TOOLFebruary 2020December 2022Allow3430NoYes
16799340TOOL CARRIER AND TOOL HOLDERFebruary 2020July 2023Abandon4011NoNo
16640376INSERTFebruary 2020January 2022Allow2310NoNo
16785649IMPELLER MANUFACTURING APPARATUS AND MANUFACTURING METHOD USING THE SAMEFebruary 2020July 2022Abandon2921NoNo
16783354END MILL WITH INDEPENDENT RAKE SURFACESFebruary 2020October 2021Allow2020NoNo
16778195DRILLING AID SYSTEMJanuary 2020January 2021Allow1210YesNo
16635837DUST COLLECTOR FOR POWER TOOLJanuary 2020January 2023Allow3511YesNo
16634197CUTTING INSERT, CUTTING TOOL, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING MACHINED PRODUCTJanuary 2020January 2021Allow1210NoNo
16633591CUTTING INSERT, CUTTING TOOL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING MACHINED PRODUCTJanuary 2020September 2021Allow1910NoNo
16749638INDEXABLE MILLING CUTTER WITH PRECISE COOLANT STREAMSJanuary 2020June 2022Allow2831YesNo
16747872PRECISION MACHINE TOOLJanuary 2020January 2023Allow3620YesNo
16632558CUTTING INSERT FOR DRILLINGJanuary 2020July 2023Allow4230YesNo
16629581CUTTING INSERT, CUTTIING TOOL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING MACHINED PRODUCTJanuary 2020October 2021Allow2110NoNo
16629767TOOL-CHANGING DEVICE, MACHINE TOOL HAVING SUCH A TOOL-CHANGING DEVICE, AND ASSOCIATED METHODJanuary 2020January 2022Allow2410NoNo
16629821ROTARY CUTTING INSERT AND TOOL HAVING DECLINED AXIAL SUPPORT SURFACESJanuary 2020April 2022Allow2740YesNo
16627634CUTTING INSERT AND A METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A CUTTING INSERTDecember 2019June 2023Allow4230NoNo
16624915COATED TOOL, CUTTING TOOL, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING MACHINED PRODUCTDecember 2019July 2023Allow4321YesNo
16700296MACHINE TOOL HAVING A TOOL SPINDLE AND A LOADING PORTALDecember 2019March 2021Allow1510NoNo
16618166DRILL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING MACHINED PRODUCTNovember 2019January 2022Abandon2540YesNo
16618168END MILL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING MACHINED PRODUCTNovember 2019March 2022Allow2810YesNo
16699089TWIST DRILLNovember 2019March 2021Allow1610YesNo
16694554MILLING TOOL HAVING A REPLACEABLE CUTTING RINGNovember 2019June 2024Allow5460YesNo
16615507CUTTING TOOLNovember 2019July 2021Allow2020YesNo
16689053DEVICE FOR REMOVING AN INSTALLED FASTENER IN AN OPENINGNovember 2019September 2022Abandon3401NoNo
16613451THREADING DEVICE AND THREADING METHODNovember 2019November 2022Allow3611NoNo
16682826TOOTH FORMATIONS AND ARRANGEMENT FOR A SAW BLADENovember 2019September 2021Allow2210NoNo
16612062DRILL BODY AND DRILLNovember 2019September 2021Allow2220NoNo
16674068Quill StopNovember 2019January 2021Allow1410NoNo
16672447CUTTING INSERT AND CUTTING SYSTEM COMPRISING CUTTING INSERTNovember 2019August 2021Allow2120YesNo
16666761Reciprocating Filing ToolOctober 2019November 2021Abandon2501NoNo
16609210ENDMILL SPECIFICATION DESIGN METHOD, CUTTING CONDITION DETECTING METHOD, AND PROCESSING METHODOctober 2019May 2023Abandon4221NoNo
16666482SPINDLE DEVICEOctober 2019December 2020Allow1410YesNo
16666180ROTARY TOOL FOR LOWER RECEIVER MANUFACTURINGOctober 2019December 2021Allow2511YesNo
16608231ROTARY TOOL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CUT PRODUCTOctober 2019January 2023Allow3830YesNo
16608315CUTTING TOOL FOR MACHINING DIFFERENTIAL CASE, MACHINING APPARATUS FOR DIFFERENTIAL CASE AND MACHINING METHOD FOR DIFFERENTIAL CASEOctober 2019December 2021Allow2520YesNo
16661109SPINDLE DEVICEOctober 2019February 2021Allow1610NoNo
16656011END MILL INCLUDING FLAT RELIEF HAVING REINFORCED RIGIDITYOctober 2019March 2022Abandon2920NoNo
16601977CUTTING INSERT AND TOOL FOR MACHINING A WORKPIECEOctober 2019December 2021Allow2610NoNo
16597073METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MONITORING A BAR BLADE CHUCKING AND/OR A BLADE SLOT OF A BAR BLADE CUTTER HEAD FOR BEVEL GEAR PRODUCTIONOctober 2019February 2023Abandon4021NoNo
16596018MACHINE TOOLOctober 2019January 2022Allow2720YesNo
16594622DRILL BITOctober 2019December 2021Allow2631YesNo
16595284GEAR MANUFACTURING MACHINEOctober 2019December 2021Allow2611NoNo
16593424Shale Shaker Motor Mounting Plate Milling MachineOctober 2019July 2021Allow2110NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner RAMOS, NICOLE N.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
3
Examiner Affirmed
2
(66.7%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(33.3%)
Reversal Percentile
55.7%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 33.3% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
11
Allowed After Appeal Filing
4
(36.4%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
7
(63.6%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
60.3%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 36.4% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner RAMOS, NICOLE N - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner RAMOS, NICOLE N works in Art Unit 3722 and has examined 698 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 82.7%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 26 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner RAMOS, NICOLE N's allowance rate of 82.7% places them in the 57% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by RAMOS, NICOLE N receive 1.51 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 24% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by RAMOS, NICOLE N is 26 months. This places the examiner in the 76% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +9.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by RAMOS, NICOLE N. This interview benefit is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 33.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 75% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 56.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 83% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 77% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 72.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 61% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 62.5% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 37.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 25% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 41% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 4.5% of allowed cases (in the 81% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.