Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19259470 | STORAGE MEDIUM, GAME SYSTEM, AND GAME PROCESSING METHOD | July 2025 | February 2026 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 19215307 | Game Scene Management Method and System, Apparatus, and Medium | May 2025 | November 2025 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17867007 | Interactive Instructional Aid | July 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17730263 | System and Methodology Providing Dynamic Instructional Interactivity in Connection with Computer Based Applications | April 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17726196 | PROGRAMMABLE ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT EVALUATION DEVICE FOR EDUCATION | April 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17723602 | CLOUD-BASED AI-POWERED ENTREPRENEURSHIP TRAINING SYSTEM AND METHOD | April 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17719865 | SIMULATOR ARRAY TRAINING SYSTEM | April 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17677880 | PROVIDING TRAINING AND ASSESSMENT OF PHYSIATRICS AND COSMETICS PROCESSES ON A PHYSICAL MODEL HAVING TACTILE SENSORS, USING A VIRTUAL REALITY DEVICE | February 2022 | August 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17665776 | HYBRID VIDEO PRESENTATIONS WITH MULTI-VARIANT PRE-RECORDING AND ALTERNATIVE FLOWS | February 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 44 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17592607 | Interactive Educational Tool | February 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17577628 | UPPER LIMB TRAINING SYSTEM AND METHOD AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | January 2022 | March 2026 | Abandon | 50 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17608330 | SURGICAL OPERATION TRAINING SIMULATOR | November 2021 | November 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17602784 | INVISIBLE OBSERVATION MODE IN THE ONLINE LEARNING PROCESS | October 2021 | July 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17495886 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DISPARATE DATA SOURCES FOR GENERATING PERSONALIZED LEARNING EXPERIENCES | October 2021 | July 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17483084 | SECURE CODING ADAPTIVE TRAINING SYSTEM AND METHOD | September 2021 | July 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17476783 | 3D Physical Replica Of A Cardiac Structure And A Method For Manufacturing The Same | September 2021 | September 2025 | Allow | 48 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17468470 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, APPARATUSES, AND DEVICES FOR CORRECTING PLAYING ACTIONS PERFORMED BY A PLAYER FOR PLAYING A GAME | September 2021 | September 2025 | Abandon | 48 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17468484 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING QUESTIONS FOR LEARNING | September 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 44 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17464666 | PROGRAMMABLE EDUCATION DEVICE | September 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17431970 | Apparatus and Method for Teaching Wound Debridement | August 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 50 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17404435 | Game-Based Lesson Plans and Learning | August 2021 | March 2026 | Abandon | 54 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner POLLOCK, ZACHARY JOSEPH works in Art Unit 3715 and has examined 10 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 30.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 48 months.
Examiner POLLOCK, ZACHARY JOSEPH's allowance rate of 30.0% places them in the 4% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by POLLOCK, ZACHARY JOSEPH receive 1.40 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 22% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by POLLOCK, ZACHARY JOSEPH is 48 months. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +25.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by POLLOCK, ZACHARY JOSEPH. This interview benefit is in the 72% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 42% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 45% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.