Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18789097 | AUTOMATED COMPUTER CODE TIMELINE GENERATION | July 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18789084 | COMPUTER CODE EVALUATION USING MACHINE LEARNING ARCHITECTURES | July 2024 | December 2025 | Abandon | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18158931 | AIRCRAFT SIMULATION YOKE, AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS | January 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 36 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17558040 | MAKEUP PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | December 2021 | January 2026 | Abandon | 49 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17617553 | MITRAL VALVE MODEL AND FIXING JIG | December 2021 | January 2026 | Abandon | 50 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17609780 | STUDY MATERIAL FOR NATIVE SPEAKER PRONUNCIATION BY BEGINNERS IN ENGLISH, AND ENGLISH STUDY METHOD USING SAME | November 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17382558 | Machine Learning Based Strength Training System and Apparatus Providing Technique Feedback | July 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17369034 | AGGREGATION OF UNCONSCIOUS AND CONSCIOUS BEHAVIORS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS AND AUTHENTICATION | July 2021 | November 2025 | Abandon | 53 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17366191 | CHANGING BEHAVIOR AFFECTING SLEEP | July 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17363464 | MATH GAME | June 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17358881 | Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) Tactile Display | June 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 51 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17358896 | VIDEO EDUCATION CONTENT PROVIDING METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING USING CHARACTERS | June 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17352368 | SERVER DEVICE, METHOD FOR SERVER DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | June 2021 | September 2025 | Abandon | 51 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17304375 | Medical Training Device and Method to Use it in Teaching Laparoscopic and Robotic Partial Nephrectomy | June 2021 | January 2026 | Allow | 55 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17350456 | Integrated System and Related Methods for Learning, Collaboration, Tournament Hosting, and Business Management | June 2021 | September 2025 | Abandon | 51 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17303988 | TASK TRAINER FOR OPEN CHEST CARDIAC MASSAGE | June 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 52 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17303930 | METHOD, AN APPARATUS AND A COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR PROVIDING A NEXT WORKOUT RECOMMENDATION | June 2021 | January 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17303897 | DIGITAL MICROFLUDICS-BASED BRAILLE ACTUATION IN A STRETCHABLE DISPLAY | June 2021 | November 2025 | Allow | 53 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17332997 | Method, System, and Computer Program Product for Matching Stress-Management Application Software to the Needs of a User | May 2021 | September 2025 | Abandon | 52 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17332524 | Surgical Simulation Object Rectification System | May 2021 | February 2026 | Allow | 57 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner BULTHUIS, ANTHONY JAMES works in Art Unit 3715 and has examined 17 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 29.4%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 51 months.
Examiner BULTHUIS, ANTHONY JAMES's allowance rate of 29.4% places them in the 4% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by BULTHUIS, ANTHONY JAMES receive 1.65 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 33% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BULTHUIS, ANTHONY JAMES is 51 months. This places the examiner in the 5% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +45.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BULTHUIS, ANTHONY JAMES. This interview benefit is in the 91% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 37.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 86% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 41% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 45% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.