USPTO Examiner BAEK JAYMIN JONGWOO - Art Unit 3715

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19111065METHOD, DEVICE, MEDIUM AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR CONTROLLING THE MOVEMENT OF A VIRTUAL BODYJuly 2025October 2025Allow700NoNo
19060687PATHWAY ILLUMINATION AND GUIDANCE FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENTFebruary 2025July 2025Allow510YesNo
17629536AUTOCORRECTING DEVICE SUITABLE FOR LEARNING A RULE OF GRAMMAR IN A ROMANCE LANGUAGEJanuary 2022November 2025Abandon4610NoNo
17548229Textured learning aid with auditory key for the visual impairedDecember 2021June 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17524921REUSABLE CHALKBOARD KITNovember 2021May 2025Abandon4210NoNo
17411669SYSTEM INCLUDING MOBILE DEVICE ACCESSORY FOR DETERMINING STRESS LEVELS AND TREATING THE SAMEAugust 2021November 2025Abandon5120NoNo
17410205SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMMUNICATING WITH VISION AND HEARING IMPAIRED VEHICLE OCCUPANTSAugust 2021September 2025Abandon4920YesNo
17408308TEACHING LITERARY CONCEPTS THROUGH MEDIAAugust 2021May 2025Abandon4510NoNo
17402580DENTAL HYGIENE TOY AND TRAINING KITAugust 2021April 2025Abandon4410NoNo
17388040Instructive Clay Mat Assembly and Method of UseJuly 2021November 2024Abandon4010NoNo
17381609THERAPEUTIC METHOD FOR TREATING DISABILITIESJuly 2021May 2025Abandon4610NoNo
17343485SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CAREER SELECTION AND ADAPTIVE LEARNING TECHNIQUES IN THE FIELD OF CYBERSECURITYJune 2021January 2025Abandon4310YesNo
17339914DEVICES SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO DEVELOP INFANT HAND-EYE COORDINATION AND SPATIAL AWARENESS WHILE INTERACTING WITH A CARETAKERJune 2021April 2025Abandon4710NoNo
17334891BREATHING COACH APPLICATIONMay 2021April 2025Abandon4720NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner BAEK, JAYMIN JONGWOO - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner BAEK, JAYMIN JONGWOO works in Art Unit 3715 and has examined 11 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 0.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 45 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner BAEK, JAYMIN JONGWOO's allowance rate of 0.0% places them in the 1% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by BAEK, JAYMIN JONGWOO receive 1.27 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 17% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BAEK, JAYMIN JONGWOO is 45 months. This places the examiner in the 13% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BAEK, JAYMIN JONGWOO. This interview benefit is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 41% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.