Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18618821 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ACCOUNT VERIFICATION | March 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18595860 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REAL-TIME CLASSIFICATION AND VERIFICATION OF DATA USING HIERARCHAL STATE MACHINES | March 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18397831 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SCANNABLE NON-FUNGIBLE TOKEN GENERATION | December 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 26 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18342440 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TOKENIZING INFORMATION FROM A DIGITAL WALLET HOST BY AN ACQUIRER PROCESSOR | June 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 26 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18334839 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SECURED DIGITAL ASSETS | June 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18317493 | ADJUSTING WEIGHTS OF WEIGHTED CONSENSUS ALGORITHMS FOR BLOCKCHAINS | May 2023 | October 2025 | Abandon | 29 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18138114 | Systems And Methods Of Facilitating Merchant Coupon Distribution On A Blockchain Network | April 2023 | September 2025 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18126697 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MASTERCARD AUTHENTICATING NON-FUNGIBLE TOKENS | March 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18124823 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF BLOCKCHAIN TRANSACTIONS | March 2023 | September 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18181240 | Processing data interactions performed by an Internet of Things (IoT) device | March 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18173237 | Digital Access Code | February 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 35 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18164704 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UNIFIED USER EXPERIENCE WITH SINGLE SCREEN USER INTERFACE | February 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18160027 | EMPLOYEE PROFILE FOR CUSTOMER ASSIGNMENT, ANALYTICS AND PAYMENTS | January 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 18093015 | DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM TO ENABLE DYNAMIC, ON-DEMAND SALES FORCE WITH MERCHANT, SELLER AND BUYER NETWORKED | January 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 36 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 18050545 | PROTECTION AGAINST FRONT-RUNNING ATTACKS IN CRYPTOGRAPHIC TOKEN SYSTEM | October 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17781941 | A SYSTEM FOR DIGITAL ASSET EXCHANGE, A DIGITAL WALLET AND AN ARCHITECTURE FOR EXCHANGING DIGITAL ASSETS | October 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17955100 | NETWORK-AGNOSTIC SYSTEM TO FACILITATE PEER-TO-PEER TRANSFERS | September 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17934254 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING A NON-FUNGIBLE TOKEN ASSOCIATED TO AN ITEM | September 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17932460 | Blockchain-Enabled Non-Fungible Token (NFT) Application in Public Transit | September 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17930200 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTITY-PROTECTED DATA ELEMENT DISTRIBUTION NETWORK | September 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 24 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17876658 | CRYPTOCURRENCY CARD WITH CUSTOMIZABLE WALLET ASSIGNMENT | July 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 42 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17876140 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PAYMENT PROCESSING USING DISTRIBUTED DIGITIZED SURROGATES | July 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17814193 | APPARATUS AND METHOD TO FACILITATE TRANSFER OF CONSIDERATION BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS IN A COMMON GEOLOCATION | July 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17867343 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING TRANSFER AND ACCESS RESTRICTIONS ON ELECTRONIC DIGITAL RESOURCES | July 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17751372 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TARGETED ADVERTISING | May 2022 | March 2026 | Abandon | 46 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17739034 | NFT DIGITAL FRAME | May 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17738596 | FRAUD DETECTION FOR PRE-DECLINING CARD TRANSACTIONS | May 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17727957 | DYNAMIC SELECTION OF ADVERTISEMENTS USING DEEP LEARNING MODELS ON CLIENT DEVICES | April 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17659093 | SUPERVISED AND/OR UNSUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR SUPPLEMENTING RECORDS STORED IN A DATABASE FOR RETRIEVAL | April 2022 | March 2026 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17712152 | MULTI-CHAIN CREDENTIAL MANAGEMENT AND RETRIEVAL OF LOST CREDENTIAL | April 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17634945 | AUTHORIZATION DEVICE | February 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17615096 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM | November 2021 | January 2026 | Abandon | 49 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17522398 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING ON-FILE PAYMENT CREDENTIALS | November 2021 | November 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17484506 | CONTROL METHOD, SERVER, AND RECORDING MEDIUM | September 2021 | September 2025 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17439976 | CREDIT ANALYSIS ASSISTANCE METHOD, CREDIT ANALYSIS ASSISTANCE SYSTEM, AND NODE | September 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 44 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17309625 | TWO-DIMENSIONAL CODE TRANSACTION PROCESSING COMMON GATEWAY | June 2021 | December 2025 | Allow | 54 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17294053 | POST-TRANSACTION TIPPING WITH MODIFIED TRANSACTION MESSAGE FIELDS | May 2021 | March 2026 | Abandon | 58 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 17160337 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING AND RECTIFYING ABNORMAL AD SPENDS | January 2021 | September 2025 | Abandon | 55 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17135569 | ESCROW NON-FACE-TO-FACE CRYPTOCURRENCY TRANSACTION DEVICE AND METHOD USING PHONE NUMBER | December 2020 | September 2025 | Abandon | 56 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17001457 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OBFUSCATING TRANSACTIONS | August 2020 | August 2024 | Allow | 48 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16963349 | MANAGING A SMART CONTRACT IN REAL-TIME | July 2020 | February 2026 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 16922804 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND APPARATUS FOR ENHANCING ELECTRONIC COMMERCE USING SOCIAL MEDIA | July 2020 | January 2025 | Abandon | 54 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16847502 | DYNAMICALLY CHANGING DISPLAY ON FOR-HIRE VEHICLES | April 2020 | October 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 5 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16845156 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING A MARKET DATA HUB VIA DISTRIBUTED LEDGER TECHNOLOGY | April 2020 | December 2024 | Allow | 57 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12536874 | ANONYMOUS SEPARATION OF DUTIES WITH CREDENTIALS | August 2009 | November 2013 | Allow | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12473252 | METHOD FOR FINGERPRINTING AND IDENTIFYING INTERNET USERS | May 2009 | December 2011 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12184036 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VERIFYING ELECTION RESULTS | July 2008 | October 2011 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11585734 | LICENSE DISTRIBUTION | October 2006 | May 2009 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11412585 | ENABLING A SOFTWARE SERVICE PROVIDER TO AUTOMATICALLY OBTAIN SOFTWARE SERVICE | April 2006 | January 2011 | Allow | 57 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 11259677 | DIGITAL APPLICATION OPERATING ACCORDING TO AGGREGATION OF PLURALITY OF LICENSES | October 2005 | April 2010 | Allow | 54 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11227027 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR METERING USAGE OF SOFTWARE PRODUCTS WITH AUTOMATIC CATALOG POPULATION | September 2005 | December 2010 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 11216169 | METHOD OF CONTROLLING STORAGE SYSTEM | September 2005 | June 2010 | Allow | 57 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 10982578 | SPECIFIYING SECURITY FOR AN ELEMENT BY ASSIGNING A SCALED VALUE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE RELATIVE SECURITY THEREOF | November 2004 | October 2010 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10971903 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE RENTAL OR SALE, AND SECURE DISTRIBUTION OF DIGITAL CONTENT | October 2004 | June 2008 | Allow | 44 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 10766591 | Arbitration of online game results using an arbitration server and method | January 2004 | April 2009 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10406659 | VERIFYING AUDIO OUTPUT AT A CLIENT DEVICE | April 2003 | June 2010 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10266660 | MULTI-FUNCTION ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION CARD | October 2002 | March 2011 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 10013019 | DIRECT ONLINE MORTGAGE AUCTION NETWORK | November 2001 | July 2008 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 09909587 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTERACTIVE BEEF CATTLE MARKETPLACE | July 2001 | April 2009 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 09884296 | USING A PRIVACY AGREEMENT FRAMEWORK TO IMPROVE HANDLING OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION | June 2001 | June 2009 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner ZELASKIEWICZ, CHRYSTINA E.
With a 75.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 50.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner ZELASKIEWICZ, CHRYSTINA E works in Art Unit 3699 and has examined 29 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 65.5%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 56 months.
Examiner ZELASKIEWICZ, CHRYSTINA E's allowance rate of 65.5% places them in the 26% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by ZELASKIEWICZ, CHRYSTINA E receive 3.72 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 96% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ZELASKIEWICZ, CHRYSTINA E is 56 months. This places the examiner in the 2% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -6.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ZELASKIEWICZ, CHRYSTINA E. This interview benefit is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 12.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 8% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 33.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 50% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 55.6% of appeals filed. This is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 25.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 13% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 20.7% of allowed cases (in the 98% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 10.5% of allowed cases (in the 89% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.