Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19040516 | TRANSACTION AND SETTLEMENT VALIDATION SERVICE | January 2025 | May 2025 | Allow | 4 | 0 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18616184 | TRANSACTION AND SETTLEMENT VALIDATION SERVICE | March 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 9 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18617527 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMIC ALLOCATION OF TRANSACTION-BOUND ATTRIBUTES USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS | March 2024 | May 2024 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18439701 | ACCESS CONTROL INTERFACE FOR MANAGING ENTITIES AND PERMISSIONS | February 2024 | September 2024 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18433257 | ACCESS CONTROL INTERFACE FOR MANAGING ENTITIES AND PERMISSIONS | February 2024 | September 2024 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18475081 | INTERACTIVE DIGITAL RECEIPT | September 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18228558 | ACCESS CONTROL TOWER | July 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18221775 | ACCESS CONTROL TOWER | July 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18342532 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING CONTRIBUTIONS TO CREATION OF ELEMENT OF PROTOTYPE | June 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 14 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18196205 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING A SEAMLESS VEHICLE CARE AT A VEHICLE CARE SITE | May 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18126773 | ACCESS CONTROL TOWER | March 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17900536 | EXPEDITED E-COMMERCE TOKENIZATION | August 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17876822 | DETECTION OF USE OF A REMOTE ACCESS TOOL FOR SECURE TRANSACTIONS | July 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17876199 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO ADJUST IN-VEHICLE CONTENT BASED ON DIGITAL ASSETS | July 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17843672 | SYSTEM FOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND MONITORING | June 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17833760 | ENCAPSULATION OF PAYMENT INFORMATION | June 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17756350 | Method and System for Reducing a Time to Authenticate a User | May 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17732153 | DEPLOYING A CLOUD-BASED SYSTEM USING A DISTRIBUTED LEDGER | April 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17659758 | METHOD AND SYSTEM OF NFT VALIDATION IN A BROKER MARKETPLACE | April 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17769314 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVED ELECTRONIC TRANSFER OF RESOURCES VIA A BLOCKCHAIN | April 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17658436 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BLOCKCHAIN COMMUNITY GOVERNANCE, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | April 2022 | October 2024 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17654751 | Interface for Constructing Smart Protocols for Execution on Blockchain Platforms | March 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17585852 | BLOCKCHAIN-BASED LICENSE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK | January 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17489648 | TICKET AUTHENTICATION AND AUDIT SERVICE | September 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17458079 | COMPUTING SYSTEM FOR DISTRIBUTING CRYPTOCURRENCY | August 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17393099 | ACCESS CONTROL INTERFACE FOR MANAGING ENTITIES AND PERMISSIONS | August 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17363237 | TOKENIZATION PLATFORM FOR FACILITATING A TOKEN-BASED DIGITAL MARKETPLACE | June 2021 | April 2023 | Allow | 22 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17040234 | Banking Processing Method And Computer-Readable Storage Medium Having Application For Banking Processing Stored Therein | September 2020 | December 2024 | Allow | 50 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16934439 | SECURE OFFLINE APPROVAL OF INITIATED DATA EXCHANGES | July 2020 | March 2025 | Allow | 56 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16154064 | TERMINAL DATA ENCRYPTION | October 2018 | March 2021 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15723078 | ACCESS CONTROL TOWER | October 2017 | January 2021 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15660385 | DECENTRALIZED IDENTITIES FOR ACCESS TO MULTIPLE COMPUTING RESOURCE SYSTEMS | July 2017 | February 2021 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15645118 | System, Method, and Computer Program Product for Performing Analysis of Transaction Data | July 2017 | January 2021 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15486170 | CRYPTOCONOMY SOLUTION FOR ADMINISTRATION AND GOVERNANCE IN A DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM | April 2017 | January 2021 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15485736 | ELECTRONIC CAR KEY AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | April 2017 | June 2021 | Allow | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15460485 | PAYMENT TRANSACTION METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREFOR | March 2017 | November 2020 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15261368 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATICALLY SECURING AND VALIDATING MULTI-SERVER ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS OVER A PLURALITY OF NETWORKS | September 2016 | February 2021 | Allow | 53 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15215587 | ACCOUNTING FOR ONLINE SYSTEM USER ACTIONS OCCURRING GREATER THAN A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME AFTER PRESENTING CONTENT TO THE USERS WHEN SELECTING CONTENT FOR USERS | July 2016 | September 2019 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14094602 | Individualized Digital Media Delivery Systems | December 2013 | May 2019 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12120666 | SYSTEMS, METHODS AND COMPUTER PRODUCTS FOR PROVIDING TAPE LIBRARY DYNAMIC PRICE PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT FEATURE | May 2008 | September 2008 | Allow | 4 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 10518686 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTING PROMOTION MESSAGES TO A COMMUNICATION TERMINAL | December 2004 | March 2019 | Allow | 60 | 10 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner KUCAB, JAMIE R.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 50.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner KUCAB, JAMIE R works in Art Unit 3699 and has examined 36 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 91.7%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 34 months.
Examiner KUCAB, JAMIE R's allowance rate of 91.7% places them in the 76% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by KUCAB, JAMIE R receive 2.08 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 69% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by KUCAB, JAMIE R is 34 months. This places the examiner in the 25% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +25.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by KUCAB, JAMIE R. This interview benefit is in the 75% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 36.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 79% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 10.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 37% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 38% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.