Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19312047 | SECURE IDENTIFIER INTEGRATION | August 2025 | March 2026 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 19312035 | SECURE IDENTIFIER INTEGRATION | August 2025 | March 2026 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 19201998 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AN AI-DRIVEN BLOCKCHAIN PROTOCOL COORDINATING INCENTIVIZED, RISK-AWARE AUTONOMOUS OPERATIONAL AGENTS FOR DYNAMIC RISK/RETURN MANAGEMENT OF TOKENIZED ASSETS | May 2025 | October 2025 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18813436 | MINTING AND TRANSACTING TOKENIZED DIFFERENTIATED ENERGY ATTRIBUTES USING BLOCKCHAIN | August 2024 | May 2025 | Abandon | 9 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18616159 | SECURE IDENTIFIER INTEGRATION | March 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 16 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18446328 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TOKENIZING CORPORATE ACTIONS | August 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 31 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18199316 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DIRECTING AN EXCHANGE ASSOCIATED WITH AN ANONYMOUSLY HELD TOKEN ON A BLOCKCHAIN | May 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18130821 | NFT Based Secure Authentication and Notification Apparatuses, Processes and Systems | April 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 31 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18118603 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICE ACCESS | March 2023 | August 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 18118644 | WALLET AS A SERVICE | March 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18104177 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINISTIC ERROR DETECTION FUNCTIONS IN LARGE DATA STRUCTURES | January 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18081479 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REMOTE ACCESS | December 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 20 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17958109 | ELECTRONIC ACCOUNT TRANSFERS IN CASINO ENVIRONMENTS | September 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17884522 | SOFTWARE, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS FOR BLOCKCHAIN-RECORDED TRANSACTIONS OF REAL-WORLD ASSETS | August 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17871409 | VIRTUAL ASSET ACCESS CARDS | July 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17865866 | CRAFTING NON-FUNGIBLE TOKENS | July 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17790012 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREVENTING SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS IN DISTRIBUTED LEDGER | June 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17805055 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING AND ELECTRONICALLY DISPLAYING DEGREES OF ASSOCIATION BETWEEN BLOCKCHAIN ADDRESSES | June 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 25 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17830642 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TOUCH SCREEN INTERFACE INTERACTION USING A CARD OVERLAY | June 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17805061 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTELLIGENT NETWORK EXPANSION | June 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 26 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17825470 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTING ABNORMAL TRANSACTION BETWEEN COMPUTING DEVICES IN A COMMUNICATION NETWORK USING VALID TRANSACTION PATTERN | May 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17714052 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING AND RETRIEVING A CUSTOMIZED DIGITAL CONTENT ITEM | April 2022 | October 2024 | Abandon | 30 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17677601 | System and Methods for Creating Non-Fungible Tokens | February 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 32 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17574983 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRANSFER OF NON-FUNGIBLE ASSETS ACROSS MULTIPLE BLOCKCHAIN SYSTEMS | January 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17559760 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USER DATA MANAGEMENT ACROSS MULTIPLE DEVICES | December 2021 | November 2025 | Abandon | 47 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17348233 | MODIFYING A DOCUMENT OBJECT OF A GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE TO PRESENT A TEMPORARY CREDENTIAL | June 2021 | August 2025 | Abandon | 50 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17339096 | INSTANT TOKEN ISSUANCE | June 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 44 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17121103 | CRYPTOGRAPHIC ENCRYPTION PROTOCOL FOR DATA TYPES AND VALUES | December 2020 | January 2025 | Allow | 49 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16901726 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A DIGITAL WALLET APPLYING USAGE RULES ON CRYPTO CURRENCIES AND OTHER CRYPTO ASSETS | June 2020 | November 2024 | Abandon | 54 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16887698 | DCF DECENTRALIZED IDS AND VERIFIABLE CREDENTIALS FOR PRODUCT DELIVERY INTO DATA CONFIDENCE FABRICS | May 2020 | September 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16853462 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BLOCKCHAIN ADMINISTRATION | April 2020 | January 2025 | Allow | 57 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16848811 | BLOCKCHAIN-BASED IMAGE TRANSACTION SYSTEM, METHOD, APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | April 2020 | June 2021 | Allow | 14 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16738055 | METHOD, APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR BLOCKCHAIN TRANSACTIONS | January 2020 | June 2021 | Allow | 17 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16448777 | SECURE REMOTE TRANSACTION FRAMEWORK USING DYNAMIC SECURE CHECKOUT ELEMENT | June 2019 | July 2025 | Allow | 60 | 10 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16448596 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTHENTICATING ONLINE USERS | June 2019 | February 2026 | Allow | 60 | 10 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16442784 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RENDERING VIRTUAL CURRENCY RELATED SERVICES | June 2019 | November 2024 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16271851 | VISUAL ANALYSIS OF TRANSACTIONS | February 2019 | January 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16137481 | Rule-Based Token Service Provider | September 2018 | June 2021 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16007440 | AUTOMATIC TRANSACTION APPARATUS | June 2018 | July 2021 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15629982 | Banking Systems Controlled by Data Bearing Records | June 2017 | May 2021 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15407167 | PROGRESSIVE AUTHORIZATION OF INFORMATION BASED ON CONFIDENCES OF USER IDENTITIES | January 2017 | June 2021 | Allow | 53 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15403796 | GENERATING AND SENDING ENCRYPTED PAYMENT DATA MESSAGES BETWEEN COMPUTING DEVICES TO EFFECT A TRANSFER OF FUNDS | January 2017 | March 2021 | Abandon | 50 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15372274 | COUNTER FRAUD SYSTEMS | December 2016 | April 2021 | Abandon | 52 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15342243 | Automated Payments using a Cryptocurrency Address Embedded in a Passive Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) Device | November 2016 | July 2021 | Abandon | 57 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15299444 | Offline User Identification | October 2016 | March 2021 | Allow | 53 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15295859 | INSTANT TOKEN ISSUANCE | October 2016 | February 2021 | Allow | 52 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15292999 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTHENTICATING A USER USING PRIVATE NETWORK CREDENTIALS | October 2016 | April 2021 | Allow | 54 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15190890 | ENTRY POINT MANAGEMENT | June 2016 | July 2021 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15187631 | TECHNOLOGIES FOR DEVICE COMMISSIONING | June 2016 | June 2021 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 15181917 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TOKEN BASED PAYMENTS | June 2016 | August 2025 | Allow | 60 | 9 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15170650 | DEVICE, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR CREATING VIRTUAL CREDIT CARD | June 2016 | July 2021 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15054808 | PAYMENT MEANS OPERATION SUPPORTING METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR SUPPORTING THE SAME | February 2016 | July 2021 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14879293 | Systems and Methods to Bypass Online Advertisement Blockers | October 2015 | February 2021 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14256622 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING DIGITAL ASSETS | April 2014 | August 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 15 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14149617 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR USER CONTENT VIEW PROTECTION | January 2014 | February 2025 | Allow | 60 | 13 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 13612305 | SECURITY MODULE AND METHOD OF SECURING PAYMENT INFORMATION | September 2012 | June 2018 | Abandon | 60 | 5 | 1 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner CHOI, YUE YIN.
With a 33.3% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 33.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner CHOI, YUE YIN works in Art Unit 3699 and has examined 32 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 65.6%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 57 months.
Examiner CHOI, YUE YIN's allowance rate of 65.6% places them in the 26% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by CHOI, YUE YIN receive 5.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 99% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CHOI, YUE YIN is 57 months. This places the examiner in the 2% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +6.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by CHOI, YUE YIN. This interview benefit is in the 34% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 12.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 8% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 8.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 8% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 62.5% of appeals filed. This is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 60.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 41% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 45% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.